Drunkblogging Obama’s Libya Speech
4:14PM Reporters reportedly chuckled when they were told that the White House wouldn’t make war decisions based on “consistency or precedent.”
Me, I started drinking.
Actually, that’s not true — I waited nearly minutes after taking of Number One Son’s carpool.
4:18PM Shep Smith on Fox just finished savaging the Administration. That’s like having your Border Collie turn on you. This isn’t going to be pretty.
4:21PM “I’m not afraid of planes!” Gaddafi is shouting from the rooftops. Good thing, too — since he’ll probably need to board one for Monaco if he wants to live.
4:24PM Still on Fox. Reagan — what a cowboy. Talking to Congress before launching a war against a tiny country where we have no vital interests. Such nerve.
4:25PM Just switched to CNN. John King is a welcome relief from all that bombast on Fox. And also from charisma.
4:29PM David Gergen is telling us we’re going to be involved for a long time no matter what happens.
Thanks goodness we’re having this debate now, more than a week after initiating hostilities.
4:32PM I’m confused, and it isn’t just the very large vodka-rocks I’m enjoying seconds of.
It’s a major address, but it’s not in primetime for most of the nation. It’s a war, but the President isn’t addressing Congress. It looks like a press conference, where Obama might announce a worthwhile American initiative. What’s the context here?
4:32PM Gravitas is lacking. This is a war speech, but his speech is fast and his voice is lacking its usual resonance. Message: This is not all that important.
4:33PM OK, so a general war update. Great troops — I love this stuff.
4:33PM We have a unique role! Which we’re turning over to a Canadian general!
4:34PM “Libya sits directly between Tunisia and Egypt.” It is also quite flat. And often hot.
4:35PM “Last month, Gaddafi’s grip of fear seemed to weaken — but I did nothing for a couple weeks. But it’s vital now, I promise you.”
I might have done some paraphrasing.
4:35PM “Gaddafi had lost confidence and legitimacy.” And he had them… when?
4:36PM Now we’re at the laundry list of Gaddafi atrocities — and they are atrocities. You can’t make light of that.
4:37PM Also, Obama has found his groove. But still, this is the kind of thing presidents usually say from behind the Resolute desk or in front of Congress. It’s just jarring in its wrongness.
4:38PM We faced a choice: I was going to quote something here, but I still haven’t heard the choice.
4:39PM Benghazi, a city the size of Charlotte. Props to my homies in the SC! That was just a weird line.
4:40PM “We have stopped Gaddafi’s deadly advance.” Actually, the rebels have made nice advances today, all thanks to our No Fly Zone, and direct attacks on ground targets. To mention that would be bragging?
4:41PM In just one month we’ve done everything but get permission and money from your elected representatives.
Obama bragging about diplomatic and military speed. Dare we call it… a rush to war?
4:42PM NATO has taken command. And who has effective command of NATO? This is like a naked Ron Jeremy grabbing a pine needle and calling it a fig leaf.
4:43PM “We have done what we said we will do.” But we still don’t know what that is! No strategy has been announced, no end game, no exit strategy.
By the way, I despise “exit strategies.” That’s just another phrase for “bugging out.” But I do expect to hear one articulated by this President.
4:44PM “Some Americans continue to have questions.” Well, tonight is the first time we’ve had answers from on high, so, well — yeah.
4:45PM “A false choice.” “On the one hand!” My eyes just glazed over as Obama reaches for his oldest, cheapest, most obvious rhetorical trick.
4:46PM We must measure our interests against the need for action? Don’t our interests determine our need for action? I’m very confused.
4:47PM If not helping Libya is a “betrayal of who we are,” then why not Syria and Burma and Timbuktu?
4:48PM Ahh — we’re setting an example for other nasty dictators. Well, Libya’s nasty dictator has been very nicely boxed in by the example set by Operation Iraqi Freedom in 2003. Now then — what example might have convinced Gaddafi he was out of his box? Hmmm…?
4:50PM OK, so the people of Libya asked us for help. This will encourage others to rise up and do likewise. So either our responsibility to protect is unlimited, or we’re encouraging people to rise up and get slaughtered.
That’s not a strategy.
4:50PM I’m pretty well loaded by now, but I seem to have given all this more thought than the administration.
Of course, that’s been true for most of the last three administrations.
4:51PM “Let me close… ”
Let you? Dude, I’ll give you money.
4:52PM “That’s why we’re going after al Qaeda!” And giving them missiles in Libya!
The shallowness of this speech shows a real audacity of hope in the ignorance of the American people.
4:53PM I’m getting paged to appear on PJTV. Click on over for live video drunk remarks!
Because this speech is pretty much over.
(And don’t miss the “Ten missing elements from Obama’s speech.”)






Haven’t heard anything so far.
Oh great, a geography lesson.
I lived in Charlotte, N.C. It is nothing like a Middle Eastern village.
Benghazi, a city the size of Charlotte. Props to my homies in the SC!
Just a half-hour into the drunk-blog. Looks like someone was mixing their vodka with a a single (small) ice cube
blah blah blah, empty suit idiot.
It’s a not quite prime time speech because Obama’s not quite ready for prime time.
I cant wait for Senator Obama to offer a rebuttal.
Threadwinner! lol
Best comment of the evening!
Wasn’t he the guy that was against it before he was fore it?
Oh, ow!
Still haven’t heard anything new.
There’s not enough booze in the world to make me listen to the O-bomber speak tonight. Thanks for doing the work I refuse to do.
” One Lybian said….”
bipartisan support from congress??? lolwut?
I know Ron Jeremy and Obama is no Ron Jeremy.
at least ron jeremy is honest about screwing people over for money.
“THAT, . . . WAS UN-C-A-A-A-L-L-LED FOR!”
Where was this concern of his during the Iranian uprising and now during Syria’s?
Iran, for some reason, is off-limits (to ex-Pres. Bush too). Syria isn’t an oil producer.
Syria is hard, they’re tucked away behind Israel, Iran is hard, there’s hills, and valleys, and stuff. Libya is flat, and right on the coast. He gave Iran a pass before, and taking on Syria would likely require taking on Iran, as well.
Why not just come out and say it’s payback time for Gadhafi? Best way to get him out is through military means. Bomb the murderer.
I’ve had half a glass of wine. Not nearly enough to ‘understand’ Dear President.
But what he says isn’t much important anyway. The cadence of his speeches always seems to be the same, though. I think it’s how he won so much of the kids’ vote and women’s. Valleytalk as interpreted by a modern politician, so appealing.
“blah blah blah?
blah blah blah?
blah blah Blah!”
Truly, listen for it. Two uptalk questions, then a definitive statement.
That is funny.. and so true.
Kristi, bite your tongue woman! How dare you speak of Dear Reader this way?
What will your Boulder neighbors think?
\sarcasm
Every reason he used for going into Libya were the same reasons for going into Iraq but only one tenth as serious.
This guy is so full of crap.
I’m sure glad he is going to keep good care of the $33 billion dollars that the “Libyan people” own. I’m sure they will get most of it minus a small 15% service fee.
Now Dear Liar is sounding more neo-conservative than W.
Oh no he ditt’nt….
Did he actually say preventing genocide was a reason for war….?
I mean no disrespect, but if we were to place a set of Commando Solo aircraft in orbit over Libya and play this speech on all radiowaves, Im pretty certain the UN and the ICC would have this country up on war crimes. It doesnt just fail to inspire, it manages to suck any ambient inspiration out of the air.
Listening to this speech is like drinking Nyquil with an everclear chaser.
He looks sad and depressed.
He is not even convincing HIMSELF.
Is reality starting to penetrate?
Wrapping it up – “…swiftly and decisively…” When has this President done anything having to do with the military in a swift and decisive manner?
Well for sure I would have skipped Professor Obama’s lecture if I could have, but my wife insisted, wrongly, that we watch. I would have flunked his class, since frankly I had no idea what he was trying to say.
Speaking of geography, isn’t Charlotte in the NC?
Charlotte is indeed the Northern of the two Carolinas. Although it is only 20 miles from the border with SC.
Hey, at least it’s in one of the 57 states.
Next up from Rice and Powers— a no fly zone over Gaza and the West Bank?
the UN would mandate it, is this going to be a NATO/Arab League mission?
Its a scary possibility.
What is Hebrew for L.O.L.?
Oy vey!!!!
הָמוֹן צְחוֹק
I think NATO will think twice (If not trice) before they take on the IAF.
The Israelis don’t fly migs and their planes are flown by real pilots.
Charlotte is in NC.
Uh, Charlotte is in North Carolina. Must have been the vodka talking.
so a million dead by axe in Darfur… did not even make the world blush
It is all setting the stage for “legitimate” action against Israel when it finally acts to stop the daily increasing missile attacks.
Oh Thank God I ate some English Toffee from Trader Joes at about 4PM and fell promptly into a sugar coma. Thanks for taking one for the team, Vodkapundit. I won’t even read your blow by blow cuz I know you got it covered.
I can’t stop chuckling, you people are hilarious. Nice to find a site where the comments are funny and intelligent.
Would have been simpler to say the Europeans want this war but not having the military assets to execute it they need ours.
Did not tell well.
Did he ask for our votes?
That was worse than listening to the droning teacher voice from a Charlie Brown special.
That’s it, exactly! The president’s speech voice reminds me of Charlie Brown’s teacher (blah, blah, blah, blah…”It’s going to be a looong school year, Charlie Brown”)!
No, it’s not the vodka talking. Charlotte’s always being mistaken for being in S.C. It’s a cross we have to bear, sort of like Dallas and JFK.
Apparently the ‘New Black Panthers’ are psstd off at Obama. It seems they have a affection for Kadaffy. I suppose Kadaffy is some kind of ‘inspiration’ to them or they just got their Kadaffy ‘funding’ cut off (I think it’s the Kadaffy Bank that has just rolled.) I read somewhere Kadaffy was funding the Black Panthers and Farrakhan. So, I can see why they are a tad angry at Obama right now…
Malik Zulu Shabazz says Obama whatever he is doin’ he is representing the ‘White Man’ he has the ideology of ‘the White Man’ the ‘Policies of the White Man’, CIA set up sabotage lie on an African Leader, Bomb ‘that’ man like he was President Bush. He represents the ‘White Man’… and on and on
Now, to ‘them’ Obama is the Ultimate Uncle Tom.
Quite Frankly, Obama as the President of the United States is suppose to represent ALL THE PEOPLE. Apparently, these ‘resentful’ black men have different ideas…
So, you see, when the issue surfaces about race and racism, and that ‘it hasn’t died’, well we now know where it continues to live…
Let me paraphrase the President. The reason we went to war here was the killing of civilians and the blowing up of mosques. If you don’t believe me, listen to the speech again.
The nerve of Qaddafi, blowing up mosques!
Darn it, Andy, you tipped the scales. I’d just about convinced myself I could skip watching the speech in reruns and go straight to the drinking portion of the program.
I knew I forgot something. Ma, get me the bottle.
Charlotte is being set up as the power base from which to start breaking down the right-to-work states. The Dem nominating convention is set for there, and little union info shops are setting up around town. Home state of ‘the Democrat’s bank’ –as Bank of America is called. Do a search on your ‘images’ tab for [ bank of america lobby charlotte ] and take a look at the artwork.
Obama is so lame.
As you state Buddy, Charlotte just so happens to be the site of the 2012 Democratic National Convention. He couldn’t have picked Memphis, El Paso, Detroit or – on the high end – Fort Worth, to compare the population of Benghazi to now could he? Nope, he just had to get that little advertisement in.
Obama is an ever-campaigning, slimy, opportunist fool. (Dear Lord spare us another four years.)
I would have liked to hear a rebuttal from good ole Joe “Hoof in Mouth” Bidum, you know, the one where he says that any President who goes to war without Congressional approval or oversight should be impeached, and he would be leading the charge. Would have made for some interesting facial expression from both “The Won” and Shelly.
Nice to see comments from Frank Martin here. For many years, he’s had a blog called Varifrank.
It’s still up, but sadly has had no new postings in over a year.
I first got hooked on blogs when a link (on MSNBC’s webpage, of all places) pointed me to Today, I was “Unprofessional”…, about the tsunami that hit Indonesia on Christmas Day, 2004.
I’ve even linked that one in the sidebar of my own blog as the first of “Really Fine Posts by Others…”.
He now only puts things up on twitter. It’s his life, after all, and he’s probably decided that there should be more to it than blogging.
I do miss his posts, though.
-
Foxnews pundits have been disappointing: sowing confusion and ignorance.
No one bothered to review Libya (and Cirenaica) history, European and
US colonialism there post-wW II etc.
Americans should demand a much better class of journalism, RT (Russian
Television) which we get her in New Zealand did a much better job,
they had American experts on who actually knew what they were talking about.
So, any examples? Or is this another “Americans, and especially FOX News, are stupid” attack that is supposed to sound so reasonable, without any facts. How can anyone take you seriously?
As you said, this was all wrong on so many levels. I want my money back. How can he say so many things to make those of us who support using force in Libya so upset?
I know what I’m feeling. I often will spend days, even weeks trying to get my children to try doing something. But I find myself all in a knot when they finally try. I want them to do it, but not like that. They were supposed to do it the way I showed them.
Obama is like my children. After weeks of being yelled at to do something, he finally does, but even though I support action, I’m cringing at every word and action he takes. He’s doing it, but he’s doing it all wrong.
http://samschaos.blogspot.com/2011/03/obama-doctrine-examined.html
“4:46PM: I’m very confused.” — Oh, no, you’re not; sober or otherwise, you know very well who is attempting to confuse whom, through preposterous positioning and confounding of immiscible elements, . . .
And, . . . you do understand—do you not—that, we’re not there for regime change—right? At least, last week that’s how it was, . . .
I think that Obama forgot to include how he plans to get rid of Quaddafi: send him donuts. Hopefully he will eat too many donuts, and have a heart attack.
Wait you say, that can’t be a strategy! Waiting for Quaddafi to die of natural causes? Well, at least it is more strategy than anything that the President laid out in his speech.
OBAMA TAKES CREDIT FOR REGIME CHANGE IN IRAQ
Last year Joe Biden on Larry King took credit on behalf of the administration for stablizing Iraq and moving it toward a representative government. But last night in his speech on Libya Obama exceeded Biden’s lies by actually taking credit for regime change in Iraq.
Click my name and read my piece: Barack Obama’s Claim Game, or Taking Credit for Regime Change in Iraq.
While mourning the loss of Frank Martin’s wonderful posts (referred to above), may I present (for your consideration as a worthy successor), Bill Whittle and his latest THE END OF THE BEGINNING
Please, check him out.
While mourning the loss of Frank Martin’s wonderful posts (referred to above), may I present (for your consideration as a worthy successor), Bill Whittle and his latest THE END OF THE BEGINNING
Please, check him out.
-
To all:
I apologized to the moderator for the double posting above.
The automatic updates for my anti-virus program kicked in, almost freezing the system and making me think the first attempt had failed.
I have no issue with him if he decides to delete one of them (and this explanatory post), to clean things up.
I’m probably making too much of this; but what can I say?
I’m a compulsive picture straightener.
-
I couldn’t help notice parallels to George W. Bush’s reasons for going to war in Iraq, and the arguments, accusations and insults directed at him.
Lately, I’ve been hearing people like Bob Beckel and E. J. Dionne claim that they withheld harsh criticism of Bush out of respect for his position. For the first several months of that war, this was true, right up until Democrats noticed Howard Dean’s success in raising money for his campaign by vitriolic attacks on the war. That was when the meme began that Bush had lied about Saddam having WMD and that this was the only reason for going to war.
I hope that the situation in Libya doesn’t suck us in to a protracted war in Libya and that we can pull out as Obama seems to think, but I can’t help worrying about the suction these sorts of things seem to have.
Another thing that I don’t get is why the President thinks Libya is in such a strategic position, between Tunisia and Egypt. Egypt I can see, because it controls the Suez canal and the Sinai bordering Israel, but in that case why didn’t we intervene there to prevent the Muslim Brotherhood and other radical elements from seizing power. Libya doesn’t seem nearly as important strategically as Egypt.
I don’t think Libya IS that important, but part of the rationale for this half-assed action is that it takes away the chance for the “Obama is soft folks” to go completely wild. If we had refrained from taking any action, you can be sure that a fairly high percentage of the people here would be shredding Obama for letting Daffy slaughter the brave rebels, blah, blah, blah. It’s kind of a cut your losses action. It pleases no one, therefore it probably makes some sense, but I don’t want to get sucked into any huge commitment there, either.
I really enjoyed the comments. I just don’t know if I can add anything but I have a really hard time saying the word “President” in front of Obama. I made myself watch his “new hypocritical campaign speech”. Isn’t that what that was? Or was it a cry for sympathy and money from “Ignorant Masses”? He did not disappoint. He did not let me down with his running onto the stage and smiling his “SMILE”. I really loved his pregnant pauses while he waited for all the military officers in the crowd to applaud him and it just was not there. Where did he think he was, a Union Rally? We have to get him out of here. Two more years may be more than I can stand. Four more years might make me start a colony on the Moon or Mars, whichever. Anyone with me??????
DID ANYONE NOTICE WHEN OBAMA SPOKE LAST NIGHT, TO ME HIS EYES LOOKED SMALL, YOU SEEN A LOT OF WHITE, SMOKING SOMETHING??
Dear Mr. Green,
You seem to be talking the talk (writing the write?) of a man addicted to alcohol. None of the stuff going on in the world has anything to do with how many drinks you have, and your drinking is a poor context within which to try to understand it. I hope I am wrong, but perhaps you should be careful to consider what is important to you and why it is so.
Paul – very nice of you to say. I do appreciate it.
I would really love to play poker with the “o”. He is so-oooo predictable.