Get PJ Media on your Apple

Dems Who Do Campaign Time Get Prime State Department Spots

Latest is a longtime Democratic operative tasked with battling anti-Semitism who's spent years battling the Republican Jewish Coalition.

by
Bridget Johnson

Bio

May 20, 2013 - 5:05 pm
<- Prev  Page 2 of 2   View as Single Page

When asked Friday what the U.S. position is on Iran refusing to let women run for office, Psaki gave a characteristically weak policy answer.

“We don’t take positions on any candidates, as you know, and we hope that the upcoming presidential elections will be free, fair and transparent and will represent the will of the Iranian people. So we wouldn’t weigh into decisions made by the government,” she said.

“If you’re being fair it would seem, to exclude 50 percent of the population from an election, would already mean that it is not a fair election,” a reporter responded.

“It seems astounding that this department — I mean, what if — what if they decided to exclude as this country once did not merely women but black people; would that be acceptable to you? That’s just their choice? They do it any way they want, and you’re not going to stand up for democratic rights?” a reporter continued.

Psaki said there are “a lot of ways to, of course, define” free and fair, “but again, we don’t select or play a role in selecting who the candidates are.”

“We can take a look through the process. I’m happy to comment once it’s completed,” she added.

Over at the United Nations, Ambassador Susan Rice worked two Democratic presidential campaigns — as a foreign policy adviser to Kerry in 2004 and to Obama in 2008 — before moving into her role at Turtle Bay. Here she became the loyal talking-points delivery person days after the Benghazi terror attack, and even though she withdrew her name for secretary of State she’s still high in the running to become Obama’s national security adviser in his second term — a post that requires no Senate confirmation.

But also in a high position on the U.S. team at the UN is a former Democratic political player with no State Department experience.

In 2010, Obama picked Joe Torsella as U.S. Representative to the United Nations for Management and Reform, a position carrying the title ambassador. Torsella, former deputy mayor for policy and planning in Philadelphia, unsuccessfully ran for the House in 2004 and bucked for the 2010 Senate nomination before Arlen Specter switched parties. When pulling out of the race, he said it was for the good of the Democratic Party.

Torsella was CEO of the National Constitution Center when Obama gave a key 2008 campaign speech on race relations there. The center also hosted a Democratic primary debate between Obama and Hillary Clinton.

On Nov. 1, Torsella gave $2,000 to Obama’s campaign.

When Torsella was the one on the campaign trail, Rice gave $2,000 to his House bid and $2,400 to his Senate effort.

The buzz in diplomatic circles has been that Torsella’s inexperience has been evident on the job, particularly with the weighty task of reforming the UN. In March, he scolded other countries for tipping the booze during UN budget negotiation meetings.

When Clinton became secretary of State, she moved her trusted political team into Foggy Bottom with her — and that team, with its political management approach to an unfolding terror attack, appears to be the source of many of her Benghazi troubles.

One of those is Cheryl Mills, her right-hand woman who was also President Clinton’s deputy White House counsel.

At the most recent Benghazi hearing, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee heard from whistleblower Gregory Hicks, the No. 2 diplomat in Libya at the time of the attack, who was angrily reprimanded by Mills for talking to Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) during a congressional  investigatory trip to Tripoli.

“She demanded a report on the visit,” Hicks testified. “She was upset.”

<- Prev  Page 2 of 2   View as Single Page
Bridget Johnson is a career journalist whose news articles and opinion columns have run in dozens of news outlets across the globe. Bridget first came to Washington to be online editor at The Hill, where she wrote The World from The Hill column on foreign policy. Previously she was an opinion writer and editorial board member at the Rocky Mountain News and nation/world news columnist at the Los Angeles Daily News. She has contributed to USA Today, The Wall Street Journal, National Review Online, Politico and more, and has myriad television and radio credits as a commentator. Bridget is Washington Editor for PJ Media.

Comments are closed.

Top Rated Comments   
oops...wiki has their 2012 budget at 57.533 billion. we have quintupled a government agency spends most of its money outside of the US-with no practical usefulness.

not sure if I feel we are getting five times the output of the bush admin.

12
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
If Obama's so pro-Israel, then why is his IRS targeting pro-Israel groups for harassement? The Tea Parties and pro-life organizations are explicitly opposed to him. So what is it about supporting a policy he supposedly agrees with that puts them on the enemies list?
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Well, there were Cantor's much discussed remarks, guarded as they were, on the anti-Semitism in the GOP House caucus.

Was he wrong? Maybe, maybe not. But we can say this with certainty, Eric Cantor has a number of associates he thinks are anti-Semitic.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
All Comments   (12)
All Comments   (12)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
Geesh! In the world of reality, EVERY president no matter their political party brings to their administrations their party and campaign loyalist. Am I missing something in the article that is supposed to be revealing something outside the norm?

"....the State Department is expressly a nonpartisan agency."

WOW! Last I checked, State is headed by a political party appointee who in turn staffs with yet more political party appointees whom are not career status employees. Even career status is populated with a broad diversity to include political among other things.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Many Republicans don't agree with the social policies of the Republican party. Personally, I see no reason why anyone not an actual church (group that sings hymns and prays) should receive tax free status. Some churches are mega and
have pools, bowling alleys etc. Those should be taxed. There are a lot of empty suits in all federal agencies. Did Hillary give any justification for the enormous increase in the State Department budget
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Empty Suits, and there seem to be quite a few of them at the senior - and most Senior - levels of this Administration, surround themselves with hacks so as not to detract from their aura - as dim as it is.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
bush's last request for funding of state dept came in at 11.456 billion, for 2009.
hillary requested 47 billion for 2012.

at this point, after quadrupling the state department budget, there is probably a job for every democrat.

1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Yet, they didn't have funds to protect the Ambassador to Libya.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
oops...wiki has their 2012 budget at 57.533 billion. we have quintupled a government agency spends most of its money outside of the US-with no practical usefulness.

not sure if I feel we are getting five times the output of the bush admin.

12
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Obama's cronies should realize he has very few high profile 'plum jobs' left to offer. Certainly no State Department ones that could earn them nice shiny merit badges and world press coverage; all while letting experienced career bureaucrats handle any real work. The traditional high profile 'plums' now seem to carry very high and unique risk of Bus Accidents under the Obama administration.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Sort of wonder what the Arabic content of the imams' prayers will be.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
If Obama's so pro-Israel, then why is his IRS targeting pro-Israel groups for harassement? The Tea Parties and pro-life organizations are explicitly opposed to him. So what is it about supporting a policy he supposedly agrees with that puts them on the enemies list?
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
“It is not difficult for opposition research to comb through these associations and come up with someone who is less than ‘kosher’ on almost any issue– it is like shooting ducks in a barrel.”

Translation: "Well everyone has such slimy friends." This may not be a lie. He might actually believe this crap, because he only knows sleazy people, and they all have bad associations. Birds of a feather and all that.

However, let's see if that applies to the Right? Let's pick someone. I choose Eric Cantor, the House Majority Leader. After all, he's high-ranking... and Jewish. Does anyone honestly think he has anti-Semitic associations? Bueller? Anyone?

It is so easy to prove the falsehood of such a statement.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Well, there were Cantor's much discussed remarks, guarded as they were, on the anti-Semitism in the GOP House caucus.

Was he wrong? Maybe, maybe not. But we can say this with certainty, Eric Cantor has a number of associates he thinks are anti-Semitic.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Good point, but one cannot choose your co-workers. :)
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
View All