When this is allowed to go on unreported by the MSM and un challenged by voters such as yourself then you can fully expect it to happen to you at another time. No more complaining about what Bush did in Florida. No more concerns about voting. Just watch the MSM and see who they are pushing for you to vote for and go with that candidate from now on because all other voters are invalidated. Dr. Long is a well respected academic.

You prove nothing with your vicariously pulled so called “quote” It does not invalidate her math. The caucuses were gamed. ACORN was paid over eight hundred thousand dollars by the Obama campaign for work they did in the primaries. I.E. pulling their usual tactics. Have you ever read their handbook for such things? I have. It’s exactly what we saw happen in every caucus. The primary WAS indeed stolen. It’s a fact. If you don’t like that then perhaps having an open mind and questioning the tactics of your candidate are in order.

If not then please don’t be surprised when your voting process is nothing more than thuggery with little rights involved in the next elections.

Regarding the disproportion of delegates…why do you think the caucuses were gamed to begin with. Axelrod and Obama are part of the Chicago machine and these sorts of things are common practice there.

“A young potent male was victorious over an older women. It was a symbolic victory on many deep psychological levels. I am afraid last night was just the beginning and that there will be more crimes against women.”

She faces a man beating a woman at a restuarant and declares the above.The event is attributed to Obama’s win over CLinton.Such a victim queen would always use statistics to morph to her advantage.

She moderates comments on her site and allows only the favourable ones, akin to feminista’s at feministing.com.

Obama’s election and Hillary’s defeat is more a result of her arrogance and mis-management.

Regarding the shift of Black female vote, that is a natural human psyche.Let me give an example.I identify myself with a candidate A or Candidate B. Let me assume that I have a slight tilt towards candidate A. If A has no chance of winning I support B. But if A suddenly has picked up, my support would shift to A at expense of B.

And regarding the disproportionate number of delegates from Obama’s regions: This advantage is his lady luck. He did not insist to change rules to suit his campaign. His racial profile made him an ideal candidate to exploit those “rules”.

http://wewillnotbesilenced2008.com/video/index.htm

Based on the postings here…isn’t “nlcatter” a candidate for banning?