Dag Solstad’s Big Socialist Payday
One of the things the Norwegian socialist system has nearly perfected is the punishment of certain beliefs, behaviors, and lifestyles by taxing them to death and the rewarding of others with taxpayer-funded largesse.
For example, if you choose to socialize regularly with your friends at a bar, where you enjoy a couple of beers while talking over your problems, you’ll be severely penalized for it by Norway’s sky-high alcohol taxes, as a result of which the average beer costs around ten dollars. If, by contrast, you choose to meet your friends at a Muslim community center, where you discuss the virtues of hijab, honor killing, forced marriage, and female genital mutilation and the evils of democracy, sexual equality, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and gay rights over a cup of coffee, you’ll be just fine, because these centers enjoy generous government support. It’s all quite simple — bars bad, Muslim community centers good.
The same calculus applies to all sorts of other things. The Norwegian system is suspicious of entrepreneurs — seen through socialist eyes, they are troublemakers, introducing an element of chaos, anarchy, and unpredictability into what otherwise would be a smoothly functioning machine under constant government oversight. Among the entrepreneurs who are regarded with suspicion are freelance writers. The system does its best to discourage people from entering this line of work by (among other things) forcing them to charge their customers value-added tax, file paperwork about this every two months, and fill out additional tax forms every year. In addition, the Norwegian system offers a range of benefits and perks to ordinary employees that freelancers finance with their taxes but are barred from enjoying themselves. To be a freelance writer in Norway, in short, is to condemn oneself to the life of a second-class citizen.
But this is not, note well, the case for all freelance writers. A number of authors and poets receive an annual government stipend amounting to a figure which, in American dollars, is somewhere in the low five figures. What to make of this? On the one hand, it is not unreasonable to argue that a democratic nation should find ways to promote cultural achievement. On the other hand, it is not unreasonable to ask why authors upon whom the government does not look fondly should pay steep taxes to support authors who, for whatever reason, have won the government’s favor. This question is especially critical when the taxpaying author is struggling to make ends meet and the tax-money-receiving author is wealthy.
It is an especially critical question when the author at the receiving end of government largesse is someone like Dag Solstad. And we’re not talking about any token sum. No, the Norwegian minister of culture, Anniken Huitfeldt, has just announced that Solstad will be only the fourth cultural figure in Norwegian history to receive what is known as a “honorary salary” at the expense of Norwegian taxpayers. How much? Solstad will be paid 200,000 kroner a year, tax-free, for the rest of his life. Given Norwegian tax rates, that is equivalent to an income of around $60,000 or $70,000 annually — every kroner of it taken from the taxes paid by, among others, Solstad’s fellow Norwegian writers (most of whom, needless to say, are a hell of a lot less well off than he is).
The three previous recipients of this honor, all of them now deceased, were the nationally famous and beloved actors Per Aabel and Wenche Foss and the sculptor Fritz Røed. None were visibly needy. Foss, for one, could regularly be spotted at one of the priciest eateries in town, Theatercaféen. As for Røed –well, not to put him down, but why give him this honor and not, say, Odd Nerdrum, who is perhaps the greatest painter of our time, and certainly the greatest living artist in Norway? Well, if you want the answer to that question you’d better ask the Norwegian art establishment, whose leading lights have long made it clear that they resent Nerdrum’s creative genius, technical facility, and genuine maverick status — his rejection of the insipidities of contemporary art and insistence on following in the footsteps of Rembrandt and not Warhol. The Norwegian art scene’s movers and shakers recognize in Nerdrum’s go-it-alone greatness a harsh rebuke to their own witless, mediocre conventionality, their piety toward today’s art-establishment norms. Such is the nature of this kind of honor: the establishment always calls the shots, and the artist or writer who ends up receiving the honor will invariably be someone whose work and public statements affirm the establishment’s core values and beliefs.
Which brings us back to Solstad. What qualifies Solstad for this exceptional treatment by the Norwegian state? Well, let’s take a quick look at his career. He has written seventeen novels. (The seventeenth, published two years ago, is adorably entitled Seventeenth Novel.) Many of his novels have surprised even left-leaning Norwegians with their shrill Marxism. Perhaps the most famous of these books, Gymnaslærer Pedersens beretning om den store politiske vekkelse som har hjemsøkt vårt land (Gymnasium Teacher Pedersen’s Account of the Great Political Awakening that Has Haunted Our Country), is an affectionate look at a Maoist secondary-school instructor and his students. It was made into a hit movie in 2006.
The background to this literary record is that Solstad, as I recounted a while back here at PJM, for many years belonged to a hard-Maoist political party called the AKP (m-l). In 2008, having been equivocal for some years about his political orientation, he proudly declared that he was “a Communist once more.” That same year, in response to the debate over free speech inspired in large part by the Danish cartoon crisis, he bragged that “I take a completely indifferent posture toward freedom of expression….I cannot envision a future in which a situation will arise in which I will be denied the right to express myself.” Indeed, instead of defending free speech, Solstad — in a clear reference to critics of Islam — railed against those who, he said, use it “as a weapon directed against everything I stand for.” He made it plain that in his view, some speech should be silenced. This argument was breathtaking to read –though it was unclear whether what was breathtaking about it was the result of incredible ignorance about the lessons of history or a repulsive willingness to lie coldbloodedly about those lessons.
To sum up Solstad’s contribution to Norwegian society and culture: few of his countrymen in the postwar era have done more than he has to normalize, mainstream, and render acceptable extreme leftism, including the monstrous ideology of Mao Zedong, the greatest mass murderer in human history. Alas, it is in the nature of the current socialist regime in Norway that such an achievement is not held in contempt but is rather honored as a contribution to the nation. To put it bluntly: in the eyes of Norway’s socialist leaders, Solstad has quite clearly done the right thing with his life. To hand this successful man 200,000 kroner a year, to be sure, is hardly the kind of redistribution of income that Karl Marx had in mind — but it’s precisely the kind that the Norwegian government routinely practices: quite simply, it rewards those who engage in behavior it approves of and punishes those who don’t.






It’s the same in the Netherlands. Mediocre artist and critics who detest skilled artists. It’s just envy I guess. Do the test: http://reverent.org/an_artist_or_an_ape.html or read http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/4109664.stm
Don’t make the mistake that this is about socialism. It’s about power. These people use a couple of mantras that are difficult to defend against:
Distributed wealth
So wealth for everyone: the more people rely on social welfare, the more votes the “socialists” will get – that’s why the left wingers encourage immigration of uneducated people that will be able to vote, but will rely on social welfare. Guess who they will be voting for. It does sounds fair doesn’t it? e.g. Amsterdam will most likely never have a Liberal or right wing local government anymore. More than half of the inhabitants of Amsterdam are immigrants and probably has the most social housing projects in the world. Sounds to good to be true? … it is.
A green environment
Yes, we liberals want our kids to grow up in a barren, polluted environment and hope that they will die a painful death, preferably at a young age. That’s typical Liberal.
Civilization
Left wingers seem to have the monopoly on civilization; slowly, but surely all government funded intellectuals have been turned into propaganda machines and can hardly be considered to be free intellectuals anymore. However, they are smart enough to understand that they will drop to the bottom of the food chain when the system breaks.
No discrimination
Personally I think one of the most terrible methods used by the left wingers for decades; if you criticize people with a different cultural background, then you’re a racist, a fascist or a bigot. Remember: a lot of those left wingers work for government funded cultural organizations, so it’s their – well payed – salary we’re talking about. A dutch candidate for PM of The Netherlands (Pim Fortuyn) was demonized by journalists, socialists, left wing politicians, even some liberals(!), just because he shook the system on its foundation. It showed the left wingers that things could change in a heartbeat and it scared the shit out of them. The current Dutch Liberal government is trying hard to disband this system by reducing government funds to all these left wing organizations. It will take time.
Support for developing countries
You don’t want to know how much Western tax payers money was turned into weapons in Africa. You really don’t. But it happens. But then again; we’re helping these poor people, so what kind of person are you if you want to stop that?! Again, a lot of left wingers earn their salary in this “industry”.
I can go on for ages, but I won’t now. Perhaps later.
So Bruce – if Norway is this screwed up (and I believe you when you say it is), and if it is so difficult to be a freelance writer, and if the Islamic threat is so real (and I believe you on that, too) – when are you coming home?
He’s not coming back because Norway is richer than the US (on a per capita basis), real income after tax is higher, and public services are generally of better quality.
styx
“Per capita”.
And what of Mr Bawer specifically? He very well not be “richer” in Norway than the U.S. as a free lance writer. I suspect there is other things that keep Mr Bawer in Norway.
he he. Move, sir. Go away.
Small countries that are overwhelmingly populated and controlled by a single ethnic group are considerably more tractable and easier to govern than large multi-ethnic countries that share the rights and responsibilities of government with all. Europe’s struggles with its immigrants are not entirely related to the fact that Islam is more inimical to Western civilization than the United States is to its Spanish-speaking visitors. Plenty of it derives from the fact that European countries are intrinsically more xenophobic.
This is true. The blinders on their eyes with many muslim immigrants may come off in Norway when it is shown that many muslims there do not contribute, but only take, whilst demanding accomadation, or simply subverting the culture.
Thank you so much for another super article, Mr. Bawer, I appreciate it enormously that you as a foreigner in Norway point to the facts of the situation in Norway. Norway has been brainwashed by the Progressives since after WWII. From the 60′s our system got more and more Socialistic as did the rest of the politics from our Labour Party who with small breaks has had the power for decades. They have followed their agenda systematically.They are not interested in free speech unless it is on their premises and they are not interested in leaving people able to govern their own life.They want to controll everything. People end up expecting their life being taken care of from birth to grave. The personal freedom vanish on the way. You are not responsible for yourself and that degenerate a country in the end, I think.
There was a time when a pack of cigarettes cost twenty-five cents and I had a general idea of what socialism stood for in all its various forms. This is no longer possible I’m no kind of pathologist.
Too much honor to call the novelist the intellectual.Socialism cultivate art as cultural base because the emotional thinking is preferable for stultifying a society.Main Soviet ideologists where the writers like famous Sholokhov.This writers had immence privilegies in USSR.The idea that elite`s inclination to leftism is based on the whishes of elitists to rule the masses under the socialist slogans is illustrated by the privilegies of “intellectuals”(artists) in socialist society.
Very interesting piece that provides some insight into the political soul of Norway. The disconect between the people of Norway that is exhibited by their acceptance of Solstad as some sort of national treasure when he is in fact a disciple of Mao is remarkable. In America Bill Ayers is recognized as a gifted writer, but he is better known for his radical terrorism and he is reviled for it.
Ah, but we have plenty of nonsensical hero worship here too. The lionization of Teddy Kennedy is a perfect example. He is treated as the great socialist hero of the Senate when in fact he duplicitously was encouraging the Soviets to stand up to Ronald Reagan. International socialist ideals were more important to Kennedy than the fate of his own country. Let’s just sweep that little fact under the old rug, shall we?
“The Norwegian system is suspicious of entrepreneurs — seen through socialist eyes, they are troublemakers, introducing an element of chaos, anarchy, and unpredictability into what otherwise would be a smoothly functioning machine under constant government oversight.”
Well, if you get rid of the entrepreneurs, you get rid of business and private enterprise. And if you do that, who’s going to make money to support the giant European welfare state? Oh, that’s right, no one. It eventually runs out of money because a central government is really lousy at making money. Does anybody look at what’s happening in Greece today? That’s what’s in store for the rest of Europe as well, and it’s also happening in places like Portugal, Spain, Italy, Ireland, and France. At this rate, it will be happening in Norway soon, too. Couldn’t happen to a “nicer” bunch of people.
+1 for libertyship
the homogeneity of norway, the lone example propped up by marxists as the example for all countries to follow, only briefly lessens/blunts/blurs the onslaught of collectivism but we all know where the inevitable road to central planning eventually leads
Norway’s welfare state is propped up by $60 billion/year in oil and gas revenue. They could go a long time before reality sets in.
“it is not unreasonable to ask why authors upon whom the government does not look fondly should pay steep taxes to support authors who, for whatever reason, have won the government’s favor.”
Yes, it is. The King’s, Fuhrer’s, General Secretary’s, Duce’s, Emperor’s favorites get the bucks; the others get… whatever punishment the current government can inflict. EUrope, same as it ever was. The wish nobility, priesthood, socialist bureaucrat has guided EUrope to its current triumphal heights of prosperous economies and satisfied subjects. It’s unreasonable to question success on this grand a scale. Has it been matched or exceed anywhere else (can’t compare the EU success to the racist, sexist, classist Amerikkka).
EUrope is a model for world government, which everyone outside the United States deserves. Stop trying to make EUrope in a free state. It won’t happen. It’s culturally impossible. Let EUrope be EUrope.
Norway has about 4.7 million people, or less than a quarter of the NYC metro area. They are the 2nd largest natural gas exporters in the world and the 9th largest oil exporter in the world. Their sovereign fund is the second largest in the world at about 500 billion. Every man, woman and child has over $100,000 stake in that fund. I would say with these kinds of stats there’s room for a lot of wacky clueless economic policies. That said, there is no shortage of off-the-wall crazies in any country!
This is a terminal, culturally suicidal,collectivity of socialist herd animals.When the muslims take over,they’ll at least liquidate officially sanctioned scum like Solstad,join OPEC and institute Sharia.Considering what Norway is now, it can only be an improvement.
Taxation is Theft
http://godfatherpolitics.com/118/taxation-is-thef…
“It will be found an unjust and unwise jealousy to deprive a man of his natural liberty upon the supposition he may abuse it.” George Washington
“Gymnasium Teacher Pedersen’s Account of the Great Political Awakening that Has Haunted Our Country”
Sounds like something straight out of a Soviet re-education camp.
I don’t know if any of you maroons know this, but the author of this piece is a gay man. A gay man that left America for Europe. He openly admits this in he literary disaster “While Europe Slept.” You maroons celebrate the opinions of a gay man who left his country. What do you crazy “swamp people” neocons have to say for yourselves now? I want to hear from the Evangelical christians who love Mr. Bawer’s screeds.
Dude you need help. I would love to reply more but I’m not an Evangelical swamp person.
I don’t know if he’s gay or not and can’t be bothered to look it up because I don’t care. What difference does it make? What is your point?
The point is “Rocker” that all you neocons are so crazy about your “conservative” values, that it’s laughable that Bruce Bawer is such a hero to all of you. He’s a proud gay man who left the continent to reside in enlightened Europe! What say you about gay marriage, gays in the military, or gay transgender bi-sexuals who like to read Soldier of Fortune magazine and want to fight along side our brave Marines over there in the Middle East? “No way” you’ll say, “can’t have no tote bag sportin’ trany with a fanny packin’ an M-16 in a foxhole!”. But Bruce Bawer? “Ahhh shucks..he’s just awesome…he tells it like it is…I’m drinking my Pabst Blue Ribbon, readin’ about how screwed up socialist Europe is, and lovin’ every sentence this Bawer guy types!…Oh, he’s gay?” And by the way, what kind of moniker is “Rocker”? Please tell me you’re not one of those 80′s hair metal leftovers who can’t get enough Guns and Roses. Hello! It’s 2001…try some Kanye West for a bit of enlightenment.
I know you’re a troll so I shouldn’t respond but you’re such a lame one I can’t resist. Since I really deplore the sort of invective that usually appears on left-wing sites and only very occasionally here (have you noticed…and when it does, more often than not a left-troll doing it), won’t use any nasty words tempting as it is to call into question your intellectual capacity. Suffice it to say though that there isn’t one word in all of your blather that addresses the substance of the article…not even tangentially.
“Troll”? Is that all you have? Troll? What YOU have failed to address is the consistent use of a very lame moniker: “Rocker”. oh!…you must be a cool “rocker” from the 80′s! Wow! By your own indirect admission you likely now have a song playing on the 8-track from one of the following bands:
1. Warrant,
2. Nelson,
3. Faster Pussycat,
4. Iron Maiden.
If you actually had any sophistication, you’d call yourself “Mr. Progressive” and you’d presently be listening to an enlightened track from the Black Eyed Peas, Kanye West, Lady Gaga, or Justin Bieber. So there, Mr. “Tangentially”. I win again……….
Hey LovelyEarth, it’s 2011 not 2001. Lost ten years along the way, did we? That’s alright; just try harder next time.
Thank you, “jomo2009″, for pointing out that I incorrectly referred to the year “2001″ when we are clearly in the year “2011″. I hit the “0″ key once too often when I should have hit the “1″ key. Silly me.
But I see why you’re so anal about being accurate with the years being referenced in a post, being that you have incorporated the year “2009″ into your moniker. 2009 is it? Big year for you? So big that everyone who reads your on-line name gets the impression that 2009 is a big thing for you? That the point? Well, 2009 was a big year, you know why? Because President Obama was in office and that criminal Bush was finally out! Ever think of that? You and “Rocker” should join mullets and start an 80′s band, or perform hit songs from 2009.
I think we can only refer LovelyEarth back to CanadaCorner’s comment…you’re clearly deranged. Literally raving. Probably foaming at the mouth too. It’s like a button is pushed and every left wing trope imaginable comes spewing forth. I’m not one of those who says things like “being a progressive is by definition crazy” But people like you give pause. Lovely, you can’t really compete in this little tiff because you know nothing about me other than the fact that I indicated that I thought the original poster’s sexual proclivities were not relevant to the discussion. We, on the other hand, know quite a bit about you from your brink-of-insanity drivel. Not a fair fight. ‘Nuff said.
ooops.
Looks like the DailyKos idiot wandered away from his village.
Note my reply to riverstyx above. I read Mr Bawers book, and knew he is gay, but did not want to put words in his mouth as to why exactly he left NY and resides in Europe.
I enjoy Mr Bawers input, it is a refreshing change from a so many other gay “stupidly progressive just because I’m gay” writers.
You got em to bite again. Are you realated to ErisGuy?
This is actually a reply to my confused friend “Rocker”. Here’s the point of my post:
1. conservatives = anti-gay, and
2. conservatives can’t stand “socialist” Europe, yet
3. conservatives love Bruce Bawer, which is strange because,
4. Bruce Bawer = gay, and
5. Bruce Bawer left the US a long time ago to live in Socialist Europe.
See the hypocrisy? It’s a conservative trait. It runs deep. Just like people who call themselves things like “Rocker” typically set the snooze alarm to Queen’s “We Are the Champions” and sport a mid-80′s mullet. And drink Pabst. I think you know that guy. Oh, one more thing…I win again.
Oh, the irony. The supposed ‘open-minded’ ‘liberal’ ‘progressive’ hates a group of people because he lacks the ability to think critically and can’t accept that not everyone is engages in homogeneous group-think.
Oh, actually, I don’t think Marx would have lost any sleep over this. Its not like he made a great living hanging out in the British Museum of Natural History while his capitalist side kick, Engels, kept him in tea and crumpets in jolly old London. It was expensive living in the imperial belly of the beast while writing those best sellers, The German Ideology and Das Kapital.
Very interesting. But what makes the Norwegians such reflexive anti-Semites?
Marx would have loved it, he was always begging money.
I thought Dag was in the movies. Isn’t that the mad professer from Back to the Future…………………………
Here, the Norwegian government has given extraordinary support to a Maoist, even after Mao’s horrific history is better-understood than in the past. The committee that choses the winner of the Nobel Peace Prize is chosen by the Norwegian parliament. Perhaps the mind-set displayed by the award to Solstad helps explain the prizes awarded to Obama, Arafat and a some other recipients.
Dag Solstad is a muddled thinker but a great writer – surely that’s not so unusual? Bruce Bawer is a fine writer too, and its a shame that he insists on imbuing everything he writes with a visceral contempt for the Norwegian secular welfare state and the way of life in his adopted country. In this he resembles Muslims such as Mullah Krekar, who reject nearly all aspects of Norwegian life (except the generosity of its government) yet insist on making their homes here. Thank God they don’t possess Bruce’s zeal and talent for writing – that would be truly unbearable.