Cuban Filmmaker Stonewalled in Trying to Tell the True Story of ‘Che’
Among Ernesto “Che” Guevara’s final requests before he was executed by Bolivian forces in 1967 was that a message of hope be sent back to Fidel Castro: the revolution would come to America.
Che immediately became the martyr for the radical left, with his image seized by American protestors of the 1960s. Since then another, cultural, revolution has taken place. Wikipedia catalogs references to him worldwide from restaurant names, to advertising campaigns, to music, to pop culture. His image adorned an Obama Texas campaign office in 2008. Che’s image is now displayed by average college students and even toddlers. No one blinks an eye when a student garbed in clothing bearing his iconic upward gaze takes a seat in my classroom. Students get their fashion cues from music, movie, and sports stars, and follow professors who display Che on office doors and websites, and teach courses about him. Students can find online guides to writing papers about the 2003 New York Times bestselling translation of Che’s Motorcycle Diaries, which was made into the 2004 box office hit.
Those who document the reality of the Castro regime, however, do not find themselves well received in the academy. For example, Juan J. Lopez once taught at the University of Illinois at Chicago but was denied tenure in spite of a teaching award and a well-received book published by The Johns Hopkins University Press titled Democracy Delayed: The Case of Castro’s Cuba. Lopez had escaped Cuba with his parents and moved to the United States in 1967.
Agustin Blazquez who wrote about Lopez’s predicament in 2002 also is a Cuban exile frustrated by the artistic/academic community that, while ostensibly worshiping all that is “Latino,” shuns those who expose the communist Castro regime. In Cuba, Blazquez had been apprehended twice on bogus charges, and saw the inside of El Castillo del Principe prison that he calls a “dungeon.”
In 1965, at the age of 21, he used the offer of an acting school scholarship in Canada to request an exit permit and managed with some finagling of the communist bureaucracy to leave. After living in Spain and Canada, Blazquez arrived in the U.S. in 1967. He was greeted with warmth by Americans — except those in the art world.
He learned that grants and prizes for documentaries in his series “Covering Cuba” would not be forthcoming. The latest, and seventh, titled Che: The Other Side of an Icon, was produced on a budget of $14,000. Only about $4,000 of that was from a non-profit that he had started himself. He had submitted a more typical budget of $494,000 to CPB-PBS (Corporation for Public Broadcasting, Public Broadcasting System). Blazquez had no success with the publicly supported organization, nor did he with the taxpayer-supported American Film Institute in his other projects. In fact, he could not even get an airing on POV (Point of View), the program created by PBS specifically for the purpose of airing “controversial” films.
Still, Blazquez, by changing his approach and scaling back, and doing his own editing on his own equipment, has managed to produce a compelling film that demolishes the radical heartthrob’s reputation as a brave guerrilla fighting on behalf of the oppressed.
Testimony comes from survivors, relatives of victims, and scholars. For example, Jaime Suchliki, history professor and director of the University of Miami’s Institute for Cuban and Cuban-American Studies, presents U.S. concerns about “many Vietnams” in the region. Antonio Jorge, chief economist of the Ministry of Treasury, from 1959 to 1960, who received Guevara’s requests for government funds in person, testifies to Che’s looting of the government as National Bank president.
The Argentinean-born Che’s contemptuous attitudes towards Cubans, blacks, and peasants are revealed by those who knew him and are backed up in his own writings. Wheelchair-bound Margot Menendez, whose brother was executed, describes the treatment she and other women received as they waited futilely to visit relatives in prison. Strip searches and arbitrary cancellations are recalled. So are the beatings by guards when the women rushed “Che’s” car as it entered the prison yard. Blanca Rojas recalls learning of her father’s execution by seeing it on television the same night she gave birth to her son. The dramatic footage is shown of Col. Cornelio Rojas — made an “example” — who stands tall and defiant up to the point when the gun shots in the head bring him down.
Journalist Humberto Fontova recounts Che’s 1962 terrorist bomb plot that would have likely exceeded the devastation of 9/11. It was planned to explode in New York City’s shopping district on the day after Thanksgiving, the busiest shopping day of the year. The plan was foiled by the FBI.
Fontova exposes “Che” not only as a sadistic killer but as an incompetent revolutionary. Che, who had inherited his father’s social and ethnic pretensions as an Argentinean of mixed European heritage, as well as his mentally unstable mother’s radical tendencies, had severely bungled his work as the head of banking and as minister of industries in collectivizing farms. It was then that Castro sent him to what he knew would be his death in Bolivia, for Che could not even “put compass to map.”
Nevertheless, the narrative put out in a press release by the AFI for the 2008 film by Steven Soderbergh simply titled Che, describes Che “galvanizing poor peasants into a military force that can take on trained professionals.” The same AFI turned down Blazquez’s third film on Elian Gonzalez, the young Cuban refugee who was forcibly sent back to Cuba under President Clinton after his mother had drowned during their escape.
Contrary to AFI’s depiction, Che’s delight was in shooting 240 defenseless victims, some as young as 15. Political prisoners say the real number is much higher. Che also delighted in having people and their children rounded up off the street and forced to watch executions.
Such facts and testimonies presented in a straightforward manner show the real “Che.” One sees the horror melded over the decades into a resigned sadness in the faces of family members of his victims. Such understated testimony should make any Che-t-shirt-clad student pause.
But to get an airing on a college campus is no easy task. The dissenting intellectual on today’s campus, if he gets past the gatekeepers, is met with stonewalling. Dead silence is what mostly greeted Blazquez when he contacted over 100 campuses for the screening of his first film. Subtle impediments in the form of last-minute room changes and announcements torn off walls were placed in his path at the two campuses where he did manage to get permission to air his documentary.
Nor could he make headway with PBS that has a division for “educational media.” The late Reed Irvine in 1996 recounted Blazquez writing directly to 65 public television stations after getting nowhere with PBS, but getting only four responses — all rejections.
Blazquez then testified at a hearing before a House of Representatives appropriations committee about PBS. Still, the censorship and bias continue. In 2007, Blazquez charged PBS with airing the documentaries of Castro-collaborator Estela Bravo, a native New Yorker, who has lived in Cuba since 1983 as a member of the pro-Castro privileged elite. He documented instances of PBS airing other documentaries that showed individuals maligning the Cuban exile community as “the right-wing fringe” and the “Miami mafia.”
Despite the hostility, Blazquez is working on his eighth documentary. It’s about an exiled Cuban-American ballad singer who has similarly found American TV and show business doors closed to her.
The DVDs in his “Covering Cuba” series are sold at www.CubaCollectibles.com or here.






He ought to contact Michael Moore. I’m sure that, considering Moore’s campaigns to root out the truth in spite of obstacles set up by the entrenched elites, coupled with Moore’s wealth gleaned from respected, unbiased documentaries, that Blazquez would find support from a fellow filmmaker.
Mr. Moore has tremendous respect for Castro and for what he apparently thinks Castro, Che & the rest of his team have achieved. Problem is, what they achieved is to turn a productive country into a country on the edge of starvation, bringing their own linens to the hospital, oh, and no freedom.
Coward, murderer and a phony. That’s all one needs to know about this cretin. It’s loads of fun confronting the Che lovers with the facts. Especially the “twentysomethings”, who think they have it all figured out.
… In most cases, if you want to know how heroic someone is, first gage how much the right-wing hates them. The greater they hate him/her, the more heroic he/she must be. Che Guevara, (one of the most heroic individuals of the 20th century) invites a large amount of hatred, vitriol, and misinformation from the right-wing fringe for two reasons:
(1) He represents many of the noble attributes that their bankrupt philosophy abhors, namely self-sacrifice, helping the poor, restoring justice when it comes to great inequality, and overthrowing the oligarch puppets of plantation capitalism.
(2) Che represents everything that the right-wingers secretly wish they were – brave, determined, dashing, charismatic, intelligent, poetic, and unshakable against impenetrable odds – while they took deferments from Vietnam, Che battled armies on 2 continents usually outnumbered 20 or 50 to 1.
El Che Vive
“Che represents everything that the right-wingers secretly wish they were”
You actually believe right-wingers secretly want to be executioners of 15-year-old boys and men? You’d be dead wrong about that.
“There are none so blind as those who will not see…”
My four uncles fought with Ernesto “Che” Guevara in the Segundo Frente del Escambray — I’ll not go into detail about what this was, since the information is readily available for those who will open their eyes and do some research. One of them, actually a part of Che’s elite cadre, told me this story late in his life, after he had been released from prison. (He was branded a “contra-revolucionaro”, and spent over ten years in various prisons, most notably in Isla de Pinos. He was released in time to come over on the Mariel boat lift.)
Late in the war, Che’s command took over a village that was ‘protected’ by a ‘troop’ of young cadets from a military school — mostly in their late teens and post-teens. Che spoke eloquently to the townspeople, explaining how these would-be soldiers would be taken into the mountains, so they could see how the revolutionaries lived and fought for the fatherland. Hopefully, they would then choose to join the forces for the liberation of Cuba. Otherwise, they’d be held, mostly for their own safety, so they would not run back and join the oppressing army.
On the walk back to their camp, Che ordered my uncle to take the cadets off-path and shoot them, because he would not be burdened with feeding or caring for “the sons of the criminal bourgeoise,” even if they were almost children. My uncle said he argued with ‘El Comandante,’ to no avail, because the more he argued the more rabid the dog became.
My uncle eventually gave the order to shoot the cadets, but said he could not stay to watch the brutal act committed. He told me this was something he’d utterly regret, and feel remorse for, until his death.
So I’m guessing you also idolize Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Ceausescu, Mao, and the rest of the 20th Century’s rogue’s gallery of statist mass murderers, because the “right wing” hates them?
Viva the thugs and killers, you noble heroic enablers of genocide. Lucky for the rest of us your ilk are too cowardly to act on your bloody fantasies, leaving you the pallid alternative of vicarious mass murder. Sure, you’ll wear the dude’s tee shirt, but actually put a bullet in the head of a 15 year old political prisoner? No, no, keep your lily white hands clean.
Che Guevara: The man who believed in mankind……….http://szrzlj3.blogspot.nl/2012/06/blog-post.html
I’d be interested in where you got your view of Che. You obviously have not seen this documentary of testimonies of those who knew him. Their information is from personal experience and academic research. Apparently your only evidence is that Che is not admired by the right? That strikes me as the subjective, presumptive evidence of one who has no facts.
“In most cases, if you want to know how heroic someone is, first gage how much the right-wing hates them”.
In this case, you can tell how much a ‘hero’ hates America by how much the left loves them.
“In an interview with che a few weeks after the crisis, Sam Russell, a British correspondent for the socialist Daily Worker, found Guevara still fuming over the Soviet betrayal. Alternately puffing a cigar and taking blasts on his asthma inhaler, Guevara told Russell that if the missiles had been under Cuban control, they would have fired them off. Russell came away with mixed feelings about che, calling him “a warm character whom I took to immediately…clearly a man of great intelligence, though I thought he was crackers from the way he went on about the missiles”.
Anderson – che; A Revolutionary Life, pg. 545.
Che was a mass murderer and megalomaniac as well as a Communist. We should be cleaning toilets with shirts that have his image on it. And for the college kids today to treat this evil killer as some sort of hero is insulting. Why don’t they just cut to the chase and wear a T-shirt with a picture of Stalin on it? Che was just another Stalin but on a much smaller scale. A pox on the house of any, ANY, college professor who tries to sell the idea to college kids that Che was a “great” man. He was a Communist thug and a murderer. Period.
“At the risk of seeming ridiculous, let me say that the true revolutionary is guided by a great feeling of love. It is impossible to think of a genuine revolutionary lacking this quality… We must strive every day so that this love of living humanity will be transformed into actual deeds, into acts that serve as examples, as a moving force.”
— CHE GUEVARA
Was it ‘love’ that made Guevera to execute up to 600 unarmed men and boys?
Che philosophizing on the rule of law: “To send men to the firing squad, judicial proof is unnecessary. These procedures are an archaic bourgeois detail. This is a revolution! And a revolutionary must become a cold killing machine motivated by pure hate.”
If further proof was needed that all of OUR MONEY to fund PBS should be cut off now, this is the last straw. Think about it. Those who want to see this man’s work paid to have it NOT BE SHOWN. We are being taxed to support a political view/speech we do not agree with and are being held hostage to do so. Separation of Church and State? What a laugh. Try separation of SPEECH and STATE. We are living in a soft bellied fascist tyranny and it just gets worse with every passing year. Those who refuse to show the other side of Che don’t want anyone to think differently. Yeah the ones who use that cliche about thinking outside the box. Well we are boxed in by political correctness and it is OUR MONEY (property) which has been used to constructed out jail. With the new congress, there still might be a chance that the entire “public” broadcasting propaganda outlet might finally bite the dust. Not going down without a vicious fight tainted with lies and smears, the left is bringing Big Bird to the defense. If the right has any savvy and sense of political theater, they might introduce the real Big Bird of PBS – the Australian cassowarie, large and deadly, which can kill a grown man with just one kick. The world has been recently introduced to this horror because it lost its habitat due to a recent cyclone. It’s a perfect metaphor for “public broadcasting”.
How frustrating. Keep fighting the good fight is what I say, and purchase was just made for the DVD on http://www.CubaCollectibles.com. It’s about time we had opportunity to see how the people who lost their lives or the lives of their loved ones saw what was going on con ‘ la revoluccion’. Thank you for posting this!
Despicable silencing by our very own mini-Ministry of Truth aka CPB, In the absence of a public explanation for not airing these documentaries what other conclusion can be drawn but that CPB and fellow travelers don’t want their Potemkin narrative questioned.
Mr. Blazquez is doing a great work exposing the dictators in control of Cuba. Che was a coward and a military fool. The fact that the left has elevated this piece of filth to the status of a cultural icon is pathetic.
Ché was a sociopathic psychopath who continues to resonate with the generations of American youth produced since the 60s. The fault is NOT in ourselves, Horatio, it IS in our Stars — media stars.
Where is Armando Balladares and the rest when Blasquez needs notoriety?
A few weeks ago I was I was shopping on the main street of town in Rockland County NY. In the window of a shop frquented by “BoBo’s” was set of matching toddler size “Che” sweat shirts. I thought to myself “What kind of sick parent would outfit a two or three year old with that?” A film may expose the truth about Che, but it does not matter to people who see this psycotic idiot as an icon. They all already know the truth and the truth doesn’t matter!
His mockumentary doesn’t get shown because it is right-wing revisionist crap! Cheaply made films that the earth is flat or that lizard people run the world aren’t popular either.
THE REAL CHE GUEVARA:
- Worked in a Leper colony and treated lepers
- Was instrumental in teaching over 900,000 Cubans to read
- Tended to thousands of sick campesinos
- Helped construct dozens of schools throughout Cuba
- Removed the Mafia and dictatorship of Batista from Cuba which had killed 20,000 Cubans and tortured thousands more
- Desegregated the schools in Cuba before they were in the Southern US
- Called out South Africa’s Apartheid in 1964, 30 years before the West!
- Denounced the racism and KKK in America
- Warned of the dangers of the IMF, 3 decades before most of the developing world realized they had been scammed into debt slavery
- Left a bourgeoisie comfortable life of the upper class, a potential well compensated career as a medical doctor, and a high regarded governmental position, each time to slog through the jungle and fight guerrilla wars against impenetrable odds! … In fact, near the end it took 1,800 rangers to bring down his 25 men.
THE REAL Che’s “CRIMES” were:
~ Stopping American companies from owning 70 % of the arable land in Cuba
~ Teaching peasants to read, by bringing the Cuban literacy rate from 60 to 97 %
~ Having the 200 or so War Criminals who killed 20,000 Cubans for Batista shot against a wall
~ Fighting white mercenaries in the African Congo with an all black army
~ Speaking out against US and eventually USSR Imperialism while demanding that the poor of the world be allowed to live a life of dignity
… For most real Latinos like myself he is a heroic figure (think George Washington minus the slaves) who tried to stand up to US corporate domination of Latin America.
Ah, Rosa, that’s a hilarious and spot-on parody of what passes for “thought” on the Left! I laughed so hard I made coffee come out my nose!
(Wait, what? She was serious?! That’s even funnier, unless she’s reproduced of course)
I’m sorry, but at best your description of Che sounds more like a hagiography cooked up by the Ministry of Propaganda. At worst, it sounds like abject hero-worship. Anything but a real account of the man’s activities. I’m surprised you didn’t mention the fact that he developed a cure for cancer, transmuted lead into gold, and had the ability to levitate.
And what is a “real Latino,” anyway? Somebody who thinks exactly like you?
Normally I would go through all your points to debunk them, but honestly with as much as you expressed there is only thing to say… you are delusional. Not to mention extremely ignorant of history.
Rosa, you left out the part where he ordered a man named “Felix” to strangle a puppy in his presence. It’s in Che’s own diary.
who tried to stand up to US corporate domination of Latin America
He couldn’t stand up to a single American sailor in Havana harbor. He was a punk who liked to watch puppies die. The Castro brothers wanted him dead, which is why they sent him to Bolivia.
Wow, you have described everything that Hugo Chavez has accomplished.
Che reincarnated.
Rosa, thye Che fought for this http://www.therealcuba.com/Page10.htm and for
http://www.therealcuba.com/Page7.htm. For a Cuba where the numbe of Blacks and mixed blood would drop to an all time low most proper of American Deep South pre-Civic war. For a Cuba who while the All-White Nomenkatura lives like kings, where thousands of underage boys and girls have to seel their bodies to liberal paedophiles in order to survive. Perhaps that is the reasn some people are so much in love with Che and Cuba he provided them fresh flesh.
CUBA UNDER the U.S.-BACKED DICTATOR BATISTA:
- Americans owned 70 % of the arable land
- 1% of the population controlled 46 % of the wealth
- Batista’s goons and secret police killed 20,000 Cubans (tortured even more)
- 40 % of the population were illiterate
- 50 % of the population lived in Bohio shacks
- Dissidents were hung and left to dangle in the streets as a warning sign
- The Mafia (Meyer Lansky & Co) ran Havana and used Cuba as a whorehouse for rich gringos from the U.S.
= These are the conditions that allowed Fidel and Che to rise to power.
Blah, Blah, Blah, don’t patronize us Rosa. A whole lot of us know all about Battista. I am old enough to remember being happy when he was overthrown. But, true to every “revolution” from the French one on, the Cuban one was stolen by the Castro brothers and their Communist followers.
Rosa,
What about the cold-blooded executions? Those were pretty cool, huh?
“Fulgencio Batista murdered 20,000 Cubans in seven years … and he turned Democratic Cuba into a complete police state – destroying every individual liberty. Yet our aid to his regime, and the ineptness of our policies, enabled Batista to invoke the name of the United States in support of his reign of terror. Administration spokesmen publicly praised Batista – hailed him as a staunch ally and a good friend – at a time when Batista was murdering thousands, destroying the last vestiges of freedom, and stealing hundreds of millions of dollars from the Cuban people, and we failed to press for free elections.”
— U.S. Senator John F. Kennedy, October 6, 1960
Strangelyu I cannot find any half credible source (eg NYT archives). Stange for someone who was on teh verge of becoming a Presiden,t. The only ones I find are from hard left sites (the kuind of peole who supported the Khmer rouge).
Por cierto, Rosa, cuanto te pagan?
Right compare a butcher and a thug to George Washington, kind of making Blazquez’s point for them, Instead Cabrera Infante’s portrayal of Che’
in the Lost City, produced and directed by Andy Garcia, could scarcely
find a distributor.
Ah yes, “Rosa,” Latin America has never had its own industrialists and millionaires and bankers — it is all the Americans’ fault.
You are only as credible as your name, you know. And when you choose to send anonymous missives that read curiously like a page from the Cliff Notes of a certain fasco-leftist’s thin little pocketbook, I say to myself: “Rosa,” hmmm. Lets get the real name, and some citations for what you list here, and then we can talk. OK?
I think it’s the T shirt companies that are preventing this movie from being distributed. After all, they don’t want to hurt their sales of Che’ T shirts!
The right-wing fears Che and his example – which is why they constantly try to slander his memory. Luckily most educated people just ignore their lies (hell 50 % of the GOP thinks Obams is muslim) and continue to honor Che as the freedom fighter he was.
“There was no person more feared by the company (CIA) than Che Guevara because he had the capacity and charisma necessary to direct the struggle against the political repression of the traditional hierarchies in power in the countries of Latin America.” — Philip Agee, CIA Agent
Che was fighting against:
- American Oligarchy (United Fruit, Texaco, U.S. Sugar)
- The US based Mafia (1959 Havana)
- The Monroe Doctrine rationale for Latin American Imperialism (Bay of Pigs)
- The idea of Banana Republics (Arbenz 1953 coup)
Che’s radicalism was spawned from living in Guatemala during the 1953 overthrow of Jacobo Arbenz by the CIA at the behest of the United Fruit Company (those lovely capitalists who liked to kill brown Central Americans so Americans could have cheap bananas).
Hasta la Victoria Siempre!
Guess what, comrade. The world has turned. Che’s dead. The Revolution’s over. Nobody’s following his example anymore. He’s nothing but a f-ing t-shirt.
Guess what Che? The commie revolution failed as a society and as a govt system.But America is still here.You know why the commies failed in America?Because its a republic comrade.Each state reserves the right to choose a republican form of govt if the federal govt over steps its bounds,(like becoming a communist govt).Its the ultimate safeguard against commies or fascists.
Depending on the poll 37-50% of Democrats think 9-11 was an inside job.
http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/2009/08/14/truther-denial/
Camillo,
Latin America is still poor. It is still lousy with revolutionaries. It still basically sucks. The only two countries worth half a sh@t are Chile and Colombia. And Che did fantasize about strangling puppies. In America we call that “batsh@t crazy” but hey, who am I to judge?
FYI, the final score is CIA 1 Che 0.
CHE’s LAST WORDS to his children in a farewell letter:
“Above all, always be capable of feeling most deeply any injustice committed against anyone in the world. That is the most beautiful quality in a revolutionary.”
Right-wing teabaggers hate Che because he’s 1,000 times the man they will ever be.
You forgot to mention the strangled puppy. Clue: it’s in Che’s own diary — he boasted about it.
I was born, raised and educated in the USSR – and I kindly ask you to stop this communist propaganda. Seriously!
Naw, the most beautiful thing about a revolutionary is the moment the .45 cal slug enters their brain-pan. CIA 1 Che 0. I couldn’t be the man Che was because I actually work for a living, I care for my family, I don’t take that which I do not earn; and above all, I never choke puppies.
Damn it, George82, get off your stolen iPhone and get those dishes washed!
And yet, Hollywood Stoner Roger L Simon recently chastised Conservatives for shuning Hollywood.
Perhaps all the Libertarian Cowards working and making money in Hollywood could do something about Hollywood’s Blacklisters?
Of course, to end the Blacklisting it would require Hollywood’s Cowards to stop sucking Tom Hank’s butt-hole.
sounds like a conservative sponsor needs to step up. As for NPR, this story should be presented to the congress currently debating public funding of NPR. There is a supportive conservative educational structure in the country that would welcome academia exposure.
Rosa,
Try saying that to my friend Candido who had to flee Cuba in 1979.
By the way, you omitted the fact that your ‘hero’ executed a bunch of LATINO CHILDREN and LOVED IT!!!!!
” Left a bourgeoisie comfortable life of the upper class”
So did Dictator worshippers Bill Ayres, Bernadette Dorn, Howard Dean. So what-big deal.
I actually saw this flick at the Tower Theater in Little Havana, Miami. I have never ever seen such a biased piece of propaganda in my life.
I find it funny that this director can’t figure out why this “documentary” isn’t being shown widely. Here’s a possible answer: If the subject of your documentary is described repeatedly as a “psychopath”, with no interviews with those who knew the subject closely, and the subject’s picture is repeatedly shown juxtaposed with a skull in front of a pool of blood, then…
your flick aint gonna be shown anywhere. Only in Little Havana.
So, if Che was so “great,” why did Fidel and Raul want him dead?
They sent him to Bolivia so that would happen, and they got their wish.
And then there’s the matter of the strangled puppy.
Paul, You knew him better than those in the documentary? I don’t recall Che mentioning you in his writings, diaries or in any of the photos of him with others. Please step forward with your evidence!
I see the trolls don’t actually refute any of Che’s actual policies or words
CAMILO MIA(moron in action)#14 Let’s look at Che’s example, jackass: military incompetence,mass murder, megalomania, and the utter destruction of the cuban economy through stalinist collectivism. What a great example to follow!Are you sure you haven’t had intimate contact with ROJA? Your stalinist ravings indicate a mind ravaged by tertiary syphillis.VIVA CUBA LIBRE!
CHE GUEVARA = Hero, leader, icon, father, son, husband, rebel, soldier, writer, intellectual, doctor, politician, dentist, poet, statesman, military theorist, economist, guerrilla, teacher, diplomat, general, warrior, inspirational legend, and current “Saint” in Bolivia.
And killer of puppies, by his own account.
Guevara’s formation of death squads, sent to exterminate deserters and dissenters, go unremarked upon. The forced labor camps that housed gays, intellectuals, poets and, eventually, people with AIDS, ditto. Of course, Che’s defenders here don’t want to mention that. Not part of the official script, huh guys?
Amazing, the number of Che supporters/trolls coming out of the woodwork. Almost as many as showed up when Breitbart commenters dissed Michael Jackson! Cults of personality – gotta love them.
Castro “Rose” and the bunch of groupie Che fans that continue faithfully kow towing to the memory of this sicko murderer remind me of the imbecillic children led to the abyss by the fabled pied piper of Hamellin. Here’s a WELL DONE to Agustín Blazquez and his excellent documentary on the guy who’s well-known last words upon surrendering to his Bolivian captors were: “Don’t shoot… I’m worth more to you alive than dead…”
They should have siced a hungry puppy on him.
Part of Che’s emnity towards America stems from him having his ass kicked by an American sailor in Havana harbor. It must have been hilarious to watch, because after the sailor knocked Che to the ground, he just held him down in a submission hold while Che flailed away and cursed.
Maybe that’s why Che took it out on a cute, defenseless puppy. Che’s description of the puppy’s death throes are ghastly, excruciating reading. I’d sooner sit down to dinner with Jeffrey Dahmer than read that passage again.
Maybe the artisan/academic community and moonbats like Rosa, Camilio MIA, and Jorge82 can, in their own feeble minds, ignore or explain away Che’s pathological hated and systematic killing of gays. But the judgement of history is neither so forgetful nor forgiving of this and the many other obvious manifestations of Che’s homicidal sociopathy.
the pr!ck didn’t even bathe.
defund PBS
DEFUND PBS !
Ernesto Che Guevara was a murderer, there are a lot of evidence that he killed and ordered subordinates to kill a lot of Cubans the mayority of them were young people, this took place when he was in charge on The Cabaña prison in La Havana, Cuba. The prisoners were all for political reason and against Fidel and Comunism. He was a killer machine.
“I have yet to find a single credible source pointing to a case where Che executed ‘an innocent’. Those persons executed by Guevara or on his orders were condemned for the usual crimes punishable by death at times of war or in its aftermath: desertion, treason or crimes such as rape, torture or murder. I should add that my research spanned five years, and included anti-Castro Cubans among the Cuban-American exile community in Miami and elsewhere.”
— Jon Lee Anderson, author of the 800 pg ‘Che Guevara: A Revolutionary Life’, PBS forum
It is in his own writings.
“I have yet to find a single credible source pointing to a case where Che executed ‘an innocent’.”
Christ, what stupidity.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YO6aH4EiQ_Q
What war? There was a war?
To publicize please put clips on YOUTUBE.Thta is the only way to people informed about fraud CHE.
DAVID 1984 (and the other Stalinist sympathizers of CHE the MASS MURDERER:John Lee Anderson,is a Castroite stooge, and therefore an invalid source for proving Che’s innocence.Totalitarian regimes define crimes such as desertion,treason,broadly enough to justify terror(criticizing the government is treason in Cuba while merely free speech in the USA,and other free nations. Here is what the BLACK BOOK OF COMMUNISM:CRIMES TERROR REPRESSION(1999 Harvard University Press), A history of communism put together by former leftist/communist scholars, has to say about Cuba and CHE:”Interminable Totalitarianism in the Tropics” (p.647).About Che it says:”‘He worked in the Cabana prison, WHERE A GREAT NUMBER OF PEOPLE WERE EXECUTED,INCLUDING SOME OF HIS COMRADES-IN- ARMS WHO REFUSED TO ABANDON THEIR DEMOCRATIC BELIEFS. CHE observed, “I can’t be the friend of those who don’t share my ideas”(p.652).According to the leftist, Regis Debray, it was he and not Castro who invented Cuba’s forced labor camps.Che wrote in his will of:”the extremely useful hatred that turns men into effective,violent,merciless, and cold killing machines. Ibid,p.652. Not content with murder, CHE was appointed economics minister, and ended up ruining Cuba’s national bank while living luxuriously in a mansion that had been seized from a member of the Cuban elite(Ibid,p.652) . This is the hypocritical,power- hungry, mass-murdering thug, That DAVID,ROSA,CAMILLO,and the other useful idiots defend. as a hero and an idealist.They cannot tolerate their pathetic little existences without the drug of a totalitarian utopian fantasy,due to their inability to face life.They are weak,contemptible people, who need lies such as the legend of CHE ,the way a heroin addict needs his fix.VIVA CUBA LIBRE!
THE ABOVE POST IS FROM ME,DEGUELLO VIVA CUBA LIBRE!DEFUND PBS!
Che is a hero.
Nothing will ever change that.
Certainly not lies from cowards in Miami.
A hero who allowed himself to be taken, alive and who welcomed his captors with “Don’t kill me I am of more value for you alive than dead”. He was a hero only for shooting unarmed people.
“Shoot coward, you are only going to kill a man” — Che’s Last Words
I don’t find this too heroic;
“In an interview with che a few weeks after the crisis, Sam Russell, a British correspondent for the socialist Daily Worker, found Guevara still fuming over the Soviet betrayal. Alternately puffing a cigar and taking blasts on his asthma inhaler, Guevara told Russell that if the missiles had been under Cuban control, they would have fired them off. Russell came away with mixed feelings about che, calling him “a warm character whom I took to immediately…clearly a man of great intelligence, though I thought he was crackers from the way he went on about the missiles”.
Anderson – che; A Revolutionary Life, pg. 545.
It’s especially confusing to hear from so many che supporters here in the US. Are they aware that if your hero got his way, you and/or their loved ones would have been wiped out in a nuclear blast?
CALLE OCHO : CHE was a mass-murdering thug , and you are useful idiot with an IQ of OCHO (8).