Cowardice: Norway Ejects Danish Cartoonist, Welcomes Jihadist
If you’ve seen the now-iconic image of Muhammed with a bomb in his turban, then you’ve experienced the work of Kurt Westergaard, the most famous of the Danish cartoonists whose 2005 drawings of the Muslim prophet for the newspaper Jyllands-Posten led to worldwide mayhem.
That one drawing changed Westergaard’s life. After Danish police arrested three Muslims in 2008 for plotting to kill him in retaliation for the cartoon, he was put under surveillance and a panic room was installed in his house. That room saved his life on New Year’s Day 2010, when another Muslim broke into his home wielding an axe and screaming about revenge.
Fast forward to September 9, 2011. Westergaard and his wife traveled to Oslo, where four days later he was to take part in a press conference at a cultural center called Litteraturhuset. The occasion: the publication of a new children’s book for which Westergaard had done the illustrations. But on September 12, the day before the event, Westergaard flew home.
The reason given to Litteraturhuset — and to the press — was that Westergaard, 76, had taken ill. But almost immediately it was reported that he had left the country at the behest of the Norwegian Police Security Service (PST).
PST communications director Trond Hugubakken refused to address this report directly, saying only that “Westergaard lives with a death threat hanging over him and is a vulnerable person.”
As soon as Westergaard was back in Denmark, however, he confirmed in an interview with the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation (NRK) that he had indeed been told by Norwegian officials to go back to Denmark. The PST, he explained, had made the decision in concert with the Danish Security and Intelligence Service:
I was informed that we were to return home at once. … The official explanation is that I had heart problems. You must decide for yourself whether you believe that or not.
Curiously enough, Westergaard’s Danish publisher, John Lykkegaard, stuck to the cover story:
He didn’t feel well. That was why he went home.
Meanwhile, Westergaard’s collaborator on the children’s book, Geirr Lystrup, offered his own rather odd comment:
I think these are strange times we’re living in. I think that this can’t be serious. But then it is serious, and maybe I didn’t entirely understand that when I made contact with Kurt Westergaard to ask him to do the drawings for the book.
Huh?
It goes without saying that Kurt Westergaard should not have to take part in an event at which he might take the risk of being killed. But that decision should have been his to make, not the PST’s. On the contrary, it is the job of the PST to make it possible for a man like Westergaard, whose work has antagonized a substantial, and vocal, portion of the population of Oslo, to continue to speak in public without putting his life at risk. By shipping Westergaard back to Denmark, the PST was taking the easy route, shirking its responsibility, and sending out a signal that it really does not care very much about protecting freedom of expression.
This is the same PST, by the way, that did absolutely nothing when it was informed by Interpol Norwegian Customs earlier this year that a young man named Breivik — who would later be arrested for the atrocities in Oslo and Utøya — had purchased suspicious chemicals abroad.
What a disgusting comment.
Why are all other nations on Earth allowed to determine their own cultural identity?
Why must the USA and European nations be the only ones forced to submit to Islamic/Jewish multiculturalism and diversity?
Let’s see: Could it be that the USA and European nations do not “submit” to multiculturalism re Jews and that Jews have contributed significantly to each and every nation in all aspects of culture in which they have resided. Of course, you, “WhiteHistory”, are just repeating what Hitler wrote and said about Jews. That’s a very “classy” affiliation, isn’t it?
islam and Judaism are not the same..
You should look into the baha’i.. the messianic muslim progressive revelation allah worshipers who targeted America to spread tolerance for islam around the world..
some key terms..
Abdul Baha
Unity in diversity
baha’i new world order
baha’i interfaith dialogue
It’s been over 100 years of baha’i infiltration in America..
Oh please. There are about 11 Baha’i in the USA. They are horribly persecuted in Iran. I’ve met several, and they are possibly the least dangerous people I’ve ever seen.
You should have told him that the Baha’i have their world centre in Haifa Israel, with the most beautiful landscaped gardens leading down the hill from their temple, where they have complete freedom and so far have not bothered anyone else.
Zoroastrians also persecuted in Iran are free in Israel.
The same with Druze,Latter Day Saints,Copts……..
Norway is known for it’s antisemitic cartoons and anti American hostility.
The funny thing is they violate their own society by ignoring muslim rapes,violence and spreading hatred.They allowed a muslim gang that brutally raped a 14 yr old so violently she committed suicide, to go free.They ignored their citizens crying out in frustration,victimization and need, to the point they created Breivik.
Did they stop,listen and discuss the countries complaints and correct the problems that led to Breivik’s explosion of rage? No,they blamed others,demonstrated more antisemitism,superior ideals and embraced a terrorist ,just like Breivik,of a different religion.
They are suicidal,nazi,hate monger supporting the annihilation of their own culture.
A bit sick and CREEPY.
Referring to comments by Whiskey.
Referring to Whiskey.
Let me put it another way: who do you think has more to give to the military as a warrior-leader-Meyer, or guys like this: http://atwar.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/16/wheres-my-generator-spy/ (warning, nausea alert)? Now, who do you think is more likely to stay for 20? More likely to be alienated by penny-ante stupidity? Less likely to get in trouble over bullshit? More likely to be elevated to senior leadership and a position to influence doctrine and training?
That ought to tell you something about our military’s trajectory as an organization.
The problem was not water or a generator. The problem is that this lieutenant has been taught, along with his peers, that the proper way to interact with Afghans is by being a suplicating little bitch. They treat the Afghans not like people, but like some sort of magical unicorn-like creatures whom you must avoid offending at all costs (when they’re not going to the other extreme and treating them like a bunch of terrorist subhumans.) Not demanding respect, they get none, and rightly get played like the tools they are. Worse yet, they think that this is OK-the LT doesn’t seem to be embarassed over being punked, nor even aware that this is not normal. He’s too busy being ecstatic about his magical yogic abilities to emphathize with the Afghans, as fellow Brown People! And he’s probably in the top tenth as far as US officers interacting with their counterparts-I mean, he sort of speaks a language they understand, and is at least trying.
Personally, I’ve NEVER been treated with such disrespect and discourtesy by the Afghans. And I’ve never seen them treat each other like that, unless there was some serious social status disparity (tribal leader vs. subordinate,) or a tribal conflict going on (watching grown dudes with beards bitchslapping each other is hilarious.) I’ve never even had IRAQIS act like that towards me, and those are the most arrogant and entitled people I’ve ever met. But I’ve seen more than one US military officer acting this way (kissing ass while being patronizing-I don’t know how they do it, but they do,) and be treated like a prison bitch for his troubles. I think they like it-maybe it’s a result of having the FRG force Three Cups of Tea down their throats.
Excuse me, but what has this got to do with the above article?
The Norwegians are sounding very much like the Brits. The Brits wouldn’t let Michael Savage in the country (because he’s such a h8ter, evidently) and couldn’t stand the thought of Geert Wilders in their nation, but they allow known jihadi supporters free reign.
Europe is toast. They deserve it. I hope they don’t expect the US to help them out of this mess or anything like a Marshal Plan to fix Europe back up after it has broken itself … yet once again … because it ain’t coming! Europe is on their own. They are a pack of dying nations that will drag down anyone stupid enough to get too close them. Europe was saved from itself twice in the 20th century. Enough, already. All we got out of saving them was ingratitude, nastiness, back-stabbing and general obnoxiousness. I’ve had more than enough of Europe. The only saving grace is that Europe has been too inept and incompetent to carry out their deeply held wish to destroy Israel. I laugh at the European “anti-semitic speech laws”. Speaking illl of Jews is worth prison in Europe, but killing them is what Euro-policy has been about for a long, long, long time.
Europe has the morality of a slug. A dirty, back-stabbing slug, at that.
This is true. Europe today is a retirement-home rec-room populated with toothless barbarians-of-old waiting for their pudding cups to arrive. Nothing left but the fine architecture (which the muzzies will soon be blowing to smithereens).
I’m starting to miss the Vikings.
It’s getting harder every day to believe that these people ever were Vikings.
Another lesson in real-life, get-down Mohammedanism. Raze every mosque; burn every Koran; disappear every imam. Or live under sharia.
Indeed. I am ashamed my brothers in Norway have turned into a bunch of pathetic sycophantic pussies.
Not for nothing is the word “Quisling” of Norweigian origin.
WhiteHistory – Jews are not forcing multiculturalism on anyone. There are just not enough of us to do that. There are, though, plenty of atheists as well as other groups (think La Raza and Muslim groups) that are doing that.
Ah yes, it’s all about the atheists isn’t it. Strange that while all kinds of religious groups think up reasons to destroy each other and the planet, they turn and blame atheists, who don’t want to hurt anyone at all. Anyone with even a smidgen of sense can see that atheists have nothing to do with all this religious bullshit. Stop blaming atheists for something that is the fault of superstitious clap-trap that is designed for controling and dividing people.
“It goes without saying that Kurt Westergaard should not have to take part in an event at which he might take the risk of being killed.”
I am sure the possibility of others being hurt along with Kurt was taken into consideration. As I understand it, Norwegian security is pathetically weak. I am not making excuses for them, that weakness is of their own making.
There is no excuse for sheltering Mohyeldeen Mohammad.
You are correct Mr. Bawer, this is a spectacular display of cowardice and lack of moral responsibility.
I want to like them, I really do, but as Boogeyman above says “I am starting to miss the Vikings.”
Ask yourself who benefits the most from this? The supplication, the submission, the groveling (of native Norwegian men?) It is certainly NOT “the Jews” who don’t really exist and never have in Scandinavia. Nor is it Gays, who are too small a group demographically to have real power.
Yes politicians buy or rent votes, but they can see the long term threat, they and their families will be ousted by real Muslims. From George Galloway to Anjem Choudary is one generation.
I’ve done a “case study” on Sweden, and while I do not think it is the ONLY reason, I think the main reason is women’s full social equality to their native male peers. Whom they then despise (because women crave men with greater social status). Making women social equals made instantly their native men profoundly unsexy. Thus the entire culture “worthless” because it produces un-sexy men. Thus a constant driving female push for as much dominance, and groveling by native men, as possible. Anyone who went through High School and watched the various dominance displays and how well they worked understands this.
Over and over again, significant majorities of voters don’t like Multiculturalism, or PC, which amounts to importing massive amounts of non-Westerners (Mexicans in the US, Muslims in Europe) and groveling before them, giving them money from those who generate wealth (White Middle class men). BUT … because modern democracy gives great weight to voting blocs, women who consistently support PC and Multiculturalism in very LARGE margins, get their way. Only direct democracies like Switzerland are able to by plebiscite get their majority way. Parliamentary and Representative Democracies (Republics) are hideously vulnerable to bloc vote gaming.
Think, what Norwegian man WANTS to grovel and apologize, in front of some alien man, and his four wives, much less pay out his tax money for them so that there is nothing for HIM? But what woman would not find the groveling by the native social-equal male peer and the dominance by the “hard” Muslim not arousing? Sexy. Attractive. This is a broad social trend brought about by the great weakness in Western society: Western women don’t find their men sexy or worthwhile, thus they reject their culture. In favor of dominant sexy men.
Few native Western men want to die for the Colors of Benetton, but women find it great. THEY don’t pay a huge penalty (or so they think). Sexy men a plenty, dominance they find sexy, and so on. See brainless (and therefore somewhat indicative) Jane Fonda’s biggest regret: she did not sleep with Che Guevara.
PC/Multiculturalism is a huge problem in all countries, with differing amounts in different nations. Unless you ascribe diabolical and super-effective mind control only broad social changes like those brought on by industrialization can account for it.
And they say men think with their sex organs.
“they welcome back home an outspoken champion of violence and a sworn enemy of liberty who has just been deported by one of the world’s most oppressive nations.”
What a coincidence!!! NOT!!!
September 12th is significant. Hello Muslim happy day across America; also September 12th. Hello Ottomans being pushed back from the Gates of Vienna (September 12th).
Anyone begin to see a little pattern cropping up here? I don’t think Mohyeldeen Mohammed was “deported” – he was purposely sent out in honor of September 12th so that Islam could once again mock the West and continue their conquest of the world and use one of their own in a strategic position to get it done.
Norway are simply Dhimmies and they’re afraid. That’s what they’ve chosen to be.
Moyeldeen Mohammed is not deported for his actions? He celebrated the deaths of Norwegian soldiers in Afghanistan and no one has the stones to act against him. Why does this make me ill and I am not even a Norwegian. He came with his parents to Norway at age three. Did he learn from them or a mosque or madrassa funded by Saudi oil money? We have these Wahabi mosques all over the U.S.A.; is that OK with all of you?
i dont mind the mosques. it is the muslims i object to. they can have a mosque on every streetcorner, as far as i am concerned, if only we would send every treacherous, genocidal, pedophilic, misogynistic, robbing one of them, both the imported world-criminals, as well as the ones we have raised ourselves. send them to a place they love, and that aint here.
Political correctness: destroying civilization for the benefit of barbarians and the enjoyment of left/liberals.
Europe is hell-bent on suicide. It’s that simple.
I don’t disagree one jot with the sentiments expressed about raving, idiotic primitives and theocrats like Mohyeldeen Mohammad and the danger they pose to our, let’s say it clearly, civilized, peaceful and decent western societies. But your premise – Westergaard kicked out, Mohyeldeen allowed in – falls flat, as far as I can see. Plainly enough, Mohyeldeen is a norwegian citizen. He arrived at the age of three. End of story (unfortunately).
As for Westergaard, there doesn’t seem to be any real evidence that he was forcibly deported, a la Geert Wilders. Until Westergaard comes out and says clearly what happened, I don’t think it’s available inference.
The question in my mind is, why are “hate speech” laws never turned on people like Mohyeldeen Mohammad?
Hate speech laws aren’t applied to jihadist muslims, La Raza, name-your-group, because they represent minorities, and as such, are incapable of hate-speech. Their speech needs to be protected because it’s not hate, it’s reactionary dialogue against the structural racism inherent in western societies.
Also, their speech needs more protection than yours as they have fewer outlets and are marginalized, again, by the structural racism inherent in western societies. These groups technically cannot be classified as racist or other negative connotation because they simply are not in power, so, they need extra protections and deserve exceptions. It’s not hate, it’s anger, and we, as the connected majority, need to listen and figure out how to help re-enfranchise them.
And yes, I just threw up a little in my mouth typing that. However, that is nearly verbatim the explanation I was given by an intelligent, thoughtful progressive who had unfortunately received a good liberal arts education at a US university. This is the general mindset of the western progressive. It was even used as a defense when I asked about a latino I know that called all black americans “Lazy n….rs”. The latino couldn’t be a racist (boy, was he ever), since he wasn’t in the majority of power. He was just “upset and reactionary.” Again, this explains so much about what’s wrong with american progressives at least.
They can’t seem to admit that it’s possible for anyone, of any color, religion, sexuality, etc, etc, etc, to be an a-hole. We’re not going to be able to effectively deal with any problems, particularly jihadists, until we can, as a culture, admit that sometimes a racist bastard is a racist bastard, regardless of his actual skin color.
It may not be hate speech, however it is treasonous speech.
antisemitic *shxits – too bad more weren’t shot
Some Scandinavian countries like Denmark, Norway, and Sweden are going to collapse under the burdens of multiculturalism and socialism. But there are other countries in the region, such as Finland, Czech Republic, Poland, etc. that experienced first-hand the misery of totalitarian socialism.
From the Czech Observer:
“”The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting an inexperienced man like him with the Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama Presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their President. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America . Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their President.”
So obviously someone in that region gets it.
Here’s what I found about baha’i in America..
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~jrcole/bahai/1999/jssr/bhjssr.htm
Here I wish to examine social control mechanisms in the American Baha’i community. These include mandatory prepublication censorship of everything Baha’is publish about their religion, administrative expulsion, blackballing, shunning and threats of shunning. What are the ideological bases of these control mechanisms? How is power attained and managed in a lay community without a clergy? I wish to stress here that this article is not concerned with the essence or scriptures or theology of the religion, but with the actualities of its day-to-day technologies of control. Many of my remarks cannot be generalized to other national communities, and concern mainly the U.S.
Anyone familiar with the public relations literature produced by the movement will be surprised at the description of control mechanisms given above, since Baha’is are often grouped in the media with Unitarian-Universalists. Why should the Baha’i authorities wish to project an image more liberal than the reality? First, the movement’s scriptures are liberal in their orientation, and as a result even administratively conservative Baha’i leaders support the U.N. and race unity, and pay lip service to the rule of law. But when it comes to the internal governance of the religion, the same leaders wield these control mechanisms to enforce on prominent believers what might be thought of as “party discipline” in the Marxist sense. Second, Baha’i leaders are aware that if the U.S. press understood how their administration actually operates, journalists might be far less favorable to them than is now the case. Third, the Baha’i leadership and intellectual class includes some powerful liberals, and some of the contradictions between self-presentation and policy derive from conflicts among the leadership. Fourth, since the 1960s this non-Christian Iranian religion has not attracted many white evangelicals or working-class Catholics, whereas more pluralist college-educated persons have been much more open to it. Thus, an open insistence on a fundamentalist orthodoxy and a clear condemnation of human rights principles might deprive the religion of an important recruiting ground. Although antiliberals have captured the key posts, they shape the community’s ideology subtly, by controlling media and silencing liberals who begin to become prominent. Because of these techniques of dissimulation, power can remain in the hands of conservatives, while liberals can continue to be recruited at the local level, and often remain unaware of how marginalized they really are.
==========
More…
http://bahairants.com/appeal-court-decision-us-nsa-loses-again-509.html
Considered in light of these First Amendment limitations on the court’s authority, certain aspects of the 1966 injunction are troubling. The decree declares that “there is only one Baha’i Faith,” that Shoghi Effendi was its last Guardian and none has come since, and the National Spiritual Assembly was its representative and “highest authority” in the United States and was “entitled to exclusive use of the marks and symbols of the Faith,” including the exclusive use of the word “Bahá’í.” Declarations of this sort push the boundaries of the court’s authority under Kedroff and Presbyterian Church. In church property disputes (trademark suits obviously qualify), the First Amendment limits the sphere in which civil courts may operate. When a district judge takes sides in a religious schism, purports to decide matters of spiritual succession, and excludes dissenters from using the name, symbols, and marks of the faith (as distinct from the name and marks of a church), the First Amendment line appears to have been crossed.
=========
Personally, I think the 1966 decision was a legal set up so the baha’i could set a precedent.. it’s quite obvious that the 1966 district Judge was in on the decision as well..
I am so glad my Norwegian ancestors showed they had brains 170 years ago.
Cultures evolve and change. In this case the culture is taking a nosedive from proud Vikings to dhimmi lemmings.
my long posts have not been released by the moderator.
I use their own words.. their own history..
Cynic,
baha’i are barred from proselytizing in Israel (baha’i are literally messianic muslims).. they have peace, but only because of the protection Israel provides, though the baha’i doctrine calls for the end of the nation state, they enjoy the hospitality of the only nation that would allow their existence in the area..
I can see how some people would confuse the two ideas due to geographic location and the baha’i claim to encompass all faiths..
but one is based on real history, the other based on mohammad’s lies..
the baha’i have a virus, reverence for mohammad as just another prophet.. that means they cannot separate islam from their universalism..
the trojan horse for islam is well meaning dupes who are bringing about Armageddon by trying to use islam as a necessary component for ‘world peace’
This story may need an update. A Norwegian in his thirties has just been arrested for plotting to murder Westergaard with automatic weapons and explosives. Westergaards’ departure on Norwegian police advice looks different in this light.
Read the Japanese comic “Vinland Saga” to just how far Scandinavia has fallen.
QQ
Westergaard is a hero who really should be better known in America. All those overgrown adolescents who drew Hitler mustaches on pictures of Bush don’t have a quarter of Westergaard’s courage.
terrorism workS- and now we see the frutis of their terror campaignin all our societies- no terror acts are needed to conquer us- just the threat of these acts by the growing populations of those who preach violence are enough to shut down your speech, censor your books, arrest dissenters, make your women live in fear of rape, make your govt give in to any demand no matter how extreme or ridiculous-
the wages of sin is DEATH
and to ignore the reality that ISLAM means you should capitulate and live subdued is a SIN, a suicidal decision, a death sentence for your children and theirs.
And a slew of Breviks are watching and being incubated in oppostion to this madness-
And we are sending these MF europeans money. WHY?
This is precisely because of what Breivik did. He accomplished exactly the opposite of what he claimed he wanted to do. Now Europe is on a suicide collision course with Islam.
And all the liberals who have been cheering on multiculturalism will end up with the short end of the pluralistic stick. It will mean little that they truly believed Islam was a religion of peace when liberal gays, jews, Christians, Hindus, polytheists, and so on are subscribed to either second class citizenship or one of the many various barbaric punishments prescribed in the Qur’an.
I have seen no evidence lately that Norwegians are not just pathetic losers. They provide an important service to the world with their oil. That’s pretty much it. They have nothing else to show.
Unfortunately this is quite a normal if ultimately dangerous behavior inherent in human nature, the flight from fright, the avoidance of danger. Norwegians are no different from any other group of humanity blessed with citizenship in Western society that will avoid violence rather than adopt a posture of defiance in the face of threats that experience shows are highly likely to result in violence, murder and mayhem. The Norwegians know that sending Westergaard back to Denmark will not put anyone in harms way whereas any action taken to repress or restrict the civil rights of Mohyeldeen Mohammad would have a high probability of creating a situation that could result in injury or death based on hard evidence from current world events.
The West, including the United States, indulges in a self delusional mind game that allows it to pat itself on the back in both instances; 1st as an effective act of homeland security, the avoidance of danger and protection of its citizenry from potential violence and 2nd as a demonstration of its noble commitment to the civil rights of a “religious” minority and atonement for “past sins” which no one can quite put their finger on. Rather they’ve got their fingers and toes stuck in pinholes in a leaking damn of political correctness hoping against hope that it won’t burst until someone, anyone but them, will be forced to deal with it.
The personal freedom the West enjoys is a seductive mistress that jealously guards those who are fortunate enough to enjoy it against aggressive impulses until the threat of its loss becomes tangible. At this juncture in history, when the threat of losing that freedom is becoming increasingly real, the West remains in denial. Hopefully the West will ultimately recognize reality and demonstrate its determination to confront the threat. As WWI and WWII did and very likely WWIII will prove, freedom is not free. WWIII will begin when the West clears the fog of political correctness, multiculturalism and moral relevance and recognizes the “newest” (some would argue that this threat has been in existence since the 7th century) threat to world peace, orthodox Islam. Until then it continues its political contortions and self delusions in the false hope that appeasement will make the underlying problem go away; maybe if we sacrifice Israel.
We’d all best wake from our collective stupor and soon or witness the end of Western civilization and the rise of a global Caliphate governed by Sharia law. The Muslims who are committing daily acts of violence, atrocities and suicide bombings around the world have no such love of freedom, life and fear of death. It is exactly the opposite and until that fact becomes obvious and the West stops treating Islam as “the religion of peace” and recognizes it as a political, theocratic, social order driven towards world dominance it will continue the bizarre behaviors as documented in this article and thousands of others, an accumulation of evidence that continues to be ignored and misinterpreted by Western intelligentsia consumed with self hatred and guilt.
the suicidal insanity of the norwegian government really makes sense at some low level of thinking. peaceful muslims probably would murder the cartoonist, therefore, to avoid violence, they sent the potential victim home. on the other hand, norwegians arent going to kill the peaceful murderous invading monster, so there is no reason to send him home, at some low level of reasoning. if the norwegians had any sense at all, they would send all the muslim invaders to a place they like. preferrably heaven
norwegians. pay attention. those peaceful muslims are there to replace you as the citizens of your country. they have genocided the original inhapitants of almost every country they have contaminated, and they will kill you. there are only 2 options: victory–which means exterminate or expel every muslim, or defeat—which means worshiping an evil god and venerating his loathsome prophet, or death. victory would be so easy now, but it gets more difficult every day you waste, and soon will be impossible. noone will liberate you from the ultimate evil of islam. you either free yourself, or your descendants, if you have any, will curse you for selling them into islamic slavery.
Mr. Bawer,
Your spirited defense of western civilization against Islamic jihad is inspiring and most welcome. I have read two of your books, “While Europe Selpt” and “Surrender,” and recommend them as widely as I can. Episodes like the latest incident you report in Norway are all-too-common in the new Europe, as you know.
It is hard to believe that this is the same Norway that resisted the Nazis and gave us the “Heroes of Telemark,” the brave Norwegian SOE agents crippled Hitler’s atomic bomb project with the raid at Norsk Hydro in Vermork.
Re: “It’s getting harder every day to believe that these people ever were Vikings.” Cyrus Borg, you have about summed it up. A recent news item reported that 100% of the cleared (solved) rape cases in Oslo this last year were comprised of Islamic males attacking Norwegian women.
Where are the men of Norway? Are they unwilling even to protect their own women? Is the ideal of multiculturalism so sacred to them that they are willing to sacrifice the society around them on the alter of political correctness?
It brings to mind C.S. Lewis, who spoke of,
“We make men without chests and expect of them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. We castrate and then bid the geldings to be fruitful.”
In a paragraph: Humans evolved to progress through knowledge, experiment and discovery. But something went wrong, and it makes little difference whether we blame Nature, or human nature, or god, or whichever other concept or entity we as individuals regard as the driver. First, it endowed us with the means to advance at an astonishing pace both technologically and socially, and this has resulted in the Western civilisation we enjoy, based on high and often unreachable principles. But we are not equipped to cope with the complexities of such rapid and phenomenal human growth, and so the balance is restored by reversion, as we become willing participants in our own downfall. It is part of a cycle that has repeated itself many times in the past, with each victim struck by complacency into believing it cannot happen. In this respect, Islam is merely the tool by which this will be achieved.
Epilogue: Future generations will scratch their heads in disbelief, that the most advanced civilisation in history so easily capitulated to a regressive, dysfunctional ideology created in the deluded mind of a narcissistic dust dweller.
the viking-muslim comparison is interesting. the vikings of old departed a meteorologically hostile area to plunder, rape, and kill the inhabitants of other countries. their victims tried to resist, but werent successful, and in some cases the vikings stayed long term in the invaded country, interbred with the locals, and their influence exists until this day. muslims are leaving meteoroligically hostile areas to plunder, rape, and kill the inhabitants other countries, and always stay to overcome the locals. the similarities end there. for some undiscernable reason, the idiots that are being invaded are welcoming the new barbarians, then do not resist, instead they actually pay them to breed themselves into majorities that have the power to genocide the original inhabitants of the lands they invade. if the witless victims of this modern barbarian invasion to not wake up and exterminate or expel the invaders, they will cease to exist as peoples, and will join the dodo, wooly mammoth, and great auk in extinction.