Get PJ Media on your Apple

Congress Aims to Rein in Patent Trolls

"Everyone from independent inventors, to start-ups, to mid and large sized businesses face this constant threat."

by
Rodrigo Sermeño

Bio

November 14, 2013 - 11:07 pm
Page 1 of 2  Next ->   View as Single Page

WASHINGTON – Lawmakers are planning to step up their effort to crack down on patent trolls – entities that generally buy patents with the sole purpose of bringing lawsuits against companies and extracting a payout.

Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), chairman of the House Committee on the Judiciary, introduced a bill recently to stop abusive patent litigation. Speaking at the American Enterprise Institute, Goodlatte noted that Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and the White House also agree something needs to be done to prevent abusive patent litigation.

The practice, called “patent trolling,” has grown in recent years, Goodlatte explained. An entity will use a patent not to build or improve an invention, but to threaten businesses with infringement lawsuits to extort a settlement as an alternative to expensive litigation.

The legislation is co-sponsored by Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), Rep. Howard Coble (R-N.C.), and Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.).

“Everyone from independent inventors, to start-ups, to mid and large sized businesses face this constant threat,” Goodlatte said. “The tens of billions of dollars spent on settlements and litigation expenses associated with abusive patent suits represent truly wasted capital – wasted capital that could have been used to create new jobs, fund R&D, and create new innovations and technologies.”

While commending Goodlatte’s introduction of the bill, Leahy announced he is working on similar patent legislation in the Senate with Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah).

“Chairman Goodlatte and I are committed to working in a bicameral and bipartisan way to counter patent trolling,” Leahy said.

“The Innovation Act takes meaningful steps to address the abusive practices that have damaged our patent system and resulted in significant economic harm to our nation,” Goodlatte said.

The bill would target the parts of the legal system most abused by patent trolls: the cost for parties of defending against a suit, and the liability and transparency of the party alleging infringement.

First, the bill requires the loser in a patent case to pay attorney’s fees and costs, making it more economical for a defendant threatened with a frivolous patent suit to fight in court and win. In the U.S., each party pays its own courtroom costs. This discourages anyone from suing another person unless he or she has a reasonable level of confidence in his or her case, or that the defendant will pay a settlement to avoid the suit altogether. Even if the defendant wins the legal battle, this party can still owe hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees.

Second, the Innovation Act would delay discovery until after the court concludes the “claim-construction” phase of the trial. Discovery is the process in which each party can obtain evidence from the opposing party when it is relevant to the case. The party accused of infringement is usually the one that receives the bulk of discovery requests, which can involve thousands – if not millions – of documents being held by a defendant company. The discovery process is a huge cost driver in litigation and by delaying it, the bill would prevent patent holders from running up defendants’ costs.

The bill also requires the plaintiff to specifically identify which parts of a patent have been violated. The party alleging infringement would have to reveal the parties that actually benefit from the litigation to the U.S. Patent Trademark Office, the court, and the opposing party. Patent trolls often hide their ownership structure to hide the scope of their operations and shield their parent companies from bad publicity. This portion of the bill would put an end to that.

Over half of patent litigation is now from patent trolls. The number of patent lawsuits has increased six-fold since the 1980s and the number of lawsuits per patent has tripled since the same period.

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (5)
All Comments   (5)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
my classmate's aunt makes $62/hr on the computer. She has been unemployed for 10 months but last month her pay was $21044 just working on the computer for a few hours. go to this site....... http://www.Bay95.com
43 weeks ago
43 weeks ago Link To Comment
OldBear - your comments is a socialist attempt to seize ideas and property. If people can't profit off original ideas then there's little motivation to conduct research, test, develop, refine, produce, and promote.

As one who has written patents and challenged patents, I'm glad to see a pro-business bill that reins in the plaintiff lawyers looking to blackmail companies. This is one of the very few times Obama's support makes sense.
43 weeks ago
43 weeks ago Link To Comment
Remember, patents are not a 'natural right' like property. They are an arifical government creation.

The deal was to 'promote the Progress of Science and useful arts' there is a time limited grant of exclusivity in exchange for full disclosure of the details of the invention's implementation. This disclosure was to contain sufficient detail to allow other practitioners to either duplicate the invention or ideally enhance it.
Patents also did not block alternate implementations that accomplished the same task or function.
Software and business process patents seem to lay claim to all possible methods to accomplish their task - and expanding the boundary of the task to the edge the known universe.

Over years of discussion over at Groklaw, no one has ever presented evidence that any software [or business process] patent has even contained information useful to to [or comprehensible by] anyone other than patent lawyers. When software patents were presented as examples by parties defending their use, once the scant content was extracted they were often trivial and obvious applications with prior art - sometimes available for decades before the filing date of the patent.
Sadly, Groklaw is no longer active for new postings, but the site is available as a reference.
43 weeks ago
43 weeks ago Link To Comment
Mr. Sermeno,

Thank you for the informative and interesting piece.

Having 3 patents of my own and completing only recently R&D for 2 of those patents this again was an enlightening read.

Though my difficult experiences have been not with the USPTO inasmuch though then- Virginia 'representation' who've ONLY caused patent trolling to exponentially increase.

My then-representation VA Senator Mark Warner greatly contributed 2010 patent legislation which HURT though sold said legislation as 'helping' individuals not companies/ businesses.

It was and continues to be a bald faced lie.

Suffice to say Senator Warner AND his middle finger-like legislation is STILL in VA.

Though Warner being 1 of the most wealthy Senators nationwide it's EASY to see why he caters to his donors/ friends than those constituents, patent holders he claims to 'represent' as well.
(show less)
43 weeks ago
43 weeks ago Link To Comment
The best way to solve this would be to eliminate / invalidate all patents on business method and software.

Perhaps the patent office should return to the nineteenth century practice of requiring a model implementation [and no, neither a program listing or business plan would qualify as implementation]
43 weeks ago
43 weeks ago Link To Comment
View All