And I thought Google tools was the answer to all problems

http://climateprogress.org/2009/11/25/competitive-enterprise-institute-to-sue-realclimate-blogger-over-moderation-policy/

“Competitive Enterprise Institute to sue RealClimate blogger over moderation policy”

And the tale the source tells is even worse. It isn’t just clear that criminal activity exists, it is without a doubt. No hack programmer that is worth his salt can ignore this outrageous attempt to code their way into the biggest global scam in history. Check out the source, it’s on many sites, but this one describes it quite nicely:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/11/crus_source_code_climategate_r.html

That, my friends, is a smoking gun… and is more than enough evidence to put the whole lot of the culprits in any one of a number of nation prisons for quite some time.

Now onto the next logical step. Who in the current administration, house of representatives, senate and other federal institutions had a hand in this. Their email needs to be peeled open as well. We need to see the publicly paid for servants email to determine if they were in on this collusion. Any organization that has anything to do with global warming, climate change or environmental studies needs to open up their servers and materials for full evaluation so an audit can be conducted to find out who is responsible for this horrific crime against humanity. Trillions of dollars have been spent, lifetimes of opportunities have been forgone, and continuous harassment of the general population has been all a part of this farce and the individuals responsible need to be held in account for it.

Contact everyone you know and let them know that we need to get our public servants to start serving the public.

Delete File…Yes/No….Yes
Delete File…Yes/No….Yes
Delete File…Yes/No….Yes

The EPA submitted testimony to the Supreme Court that was based upon the modeling and projections supplied by the IPCC and NASA, etc that was based upon data supplied by the GISS and the CRU. Now the CRU is saying what amounts to ‘their dog ate their homework’ – that they intentionally destroyed, (for whatever lame reason they claim), the raw data that they used to generate their adjusted data supplied to those AGW hoaxers. The existence of that raw data, the very foundation of all of their claims, was submitted as FACT and now we find out that it cannot be verified to have ever existed in the first place. That’s called a LIE in my book and telling one to the Supreme Court ought to earn the hoaxers some serious jail time for telling it. Yes teacher, you HAVE to also believe me when I tell you that my dog ate my homework – that, yes of course, it existed for the dog to eat.

While it’s certainly easy and convenient for them to ~say~ that they destroyed the raw data, it will NOT be so easy convincing the Supreme Court that it should have been assumed to exist for entry as supporting evidence when there is now as much proof that it even existed as there is empirical evidence that human CO2 affects earth’s temperature in any measurable way.

Chief Justice Roberts? What say you now, RU smarter than a 5th grade school teacher? Okay, there is still a chance that a valid BC for Obama may actually exist but, the existence of the raw data used by the CRU to convince you to allow the EPA to declare CO2 a pollutant does NOT exist because they just admitted that it was ‘destroyed’.

Although it’s not very scientific I put “Climategate” into Google insights.
If you can’t be bothered… large interest in the US… and that’s it.

If you go to a deeper level, it primarily seems to be California. WUWT?

http://www.google.com/insights/search/#q=climategate

That would be completely wrong. Einstein spent the last years of his life trying to merge General Relativity and electromagnetism into a “Unified Field Theory” that did not need to rely upon quantum physics.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_field_theory

Earlier in the thread some clown concluded that ALL environmentalism was a commie plot, or the equivalent.

These emails, as damning as they are, are simply more evidence that the argument has become very political ON BOTH SIDES.

Finally, shouldn’t we conclude that the whole field of hazardous waste management and/or air quality is a scam. Let’s just permit the free market (and after extensive tort-reform) dispose of its by-products and exhausts any where and any way it sees fit and we just take the resulting cancers and birth defects as a necessary price of our freedom, eh?