<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Common Sense Gun Laws&#8217;: Obama&#8217;s Attack on the Second Amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/blog/common-sense-gun-laws-obamas-attack-on-the-second-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/common-sense-gun-laws-obamas-attack-on-the-second-amendment/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:46:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobblehead personalized</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/common-sense-gun-laws-obamas-attack-on-the-second-amendment/#comment-1750034</link>
		<dc:creator>bobblehead personalized</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=50384#comment-1750034</guid>
		<description>I think that is among the such a lot significant info for me. And i&#039;m glad studying your article. However should commentary on some common issues, The web site style is wonderful, the articles is truly excellent : D. Just right task, cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that is among the such a lot significant info for me. And i&#8217;m glad studying your article. However should commentary on some common issues, The web site style is wonderful, the articles is truly excellent : D. Just right task, cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kladionica</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/common-sense-gun-laws-obamas-attack-on-the-second-amendment/#comment-1321896</link>
		<dc:creator>kladionica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 01:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=50384#comment-1321896</guid>
		<description>Hi, i feel that i saw you visited my blog so i came to ?go back the prefer?.I&#039;m trying to to find things to improve my site!I guess its adequate to use some of your concepts!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, i feel that i saw you visited my blog so i came to ?go back the prefer?.I&#8217;m trying to to find things to improve my site!I guess its adequate to use some of your concepts!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedneckHillbilly</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/common-sense-gun-laws-obamas-attack-on-the-second-amendment/#comment-244987</link>
		<dc:creator>RedneckHillbilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 20:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=50384#comment-244987</guid>
		<description>Im your stereotypcial redneck kinda guy, I own 13 guns and my dad had me shooting at the age of 4. I believe there should be common scence used in using/buying/selling firearms and regulation and limitations are not a bad thing but only to a point. I agree that an extensive background check should be reqired to own and carry a firearm, but limiting and or completly eliminating the purchase of guns/ammo to our law abiding common man is just wrong. The use of firearms in a crime is extreamly uncommon and the death rate of accidental deaths due to guns in the US in 2008 was only 1,134 people. Now compare that with accidental vehical related deaths at 43,649 people or lets see how many people die from tobacco use and second hand smoke,on average 443,000 people die due to tobacco usage. Complications due to Optional medical procedures AKA plastic surgery 2,929 people, choking 3,206 people, drowning 3,488 people, accidental poisoning 9,510 people, and falling 14,986 people. Now yes there is another 32,564 deaths due to firearms murder/suicide but if someone want someone dead or want to die themselves then they wont have any trouble finding another way. Well what im trying to get at is that Obamas desire to limit/ban firearms will not make jack squat worth of a differnce in our public safty. if someone wants you dead they dont need a gun to kill you, and if you want to save the lives of our common person you would be better off trying to start a prohibiton on tobacco( But the US government makes way to much money on tobacco and alchohal taxes to ban them), or instead of investing our tax money in trying to ban guns put the money towards youth health and education, make the kids have a 2 hour gym class at school because im sure that in the long run it will greatly reduce the ammount of deaths due to heart disease, which is the number one killer in the United States today at 451,326 deaths last year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im your stereotypcial redneck kinda guy, I own 13 guns and my dad had me shooting at the age of 4. I believe there should be common scence used in using/buying/selling firearms and regulation and limitations are not a bad thing but only to a point. I agree that an extensive background check should be reqired to own and carry a firearm, but limiting and or completly eliminating the purchase of guns/ammo to our law abiding common man is just wrong. The use of firearms in a crime is extreamly uncommon and the death rate of accidental deaths due to guns in the US in 2008 was only 1,134 people. Now compare that with accidental vehical related deaths at 43,649 people or lets see how many people die from tobacco use and second hand smoke,on average 443,000 people die due to tobacco usage. Complications due to Optional medical procedures AKA plastic surgery 2,929 people, choking 3,206 people, drowning 3,488 people, accidental poisoning 9,510 people, and falling 14,986 people. Now yes there is another 32,564 deaths due to firearms murder/suicide but if someone want someone dead or want to die themselves then they wont have any trouble finding another way. Well what im trying to get at is that Obamas desire to limit/ban firearms will not make jack squat worth of a differnce in our public safty. if someone wants you dead they dont need a gun to kill you, and if you want to save the lives of our common person you would be better off trying to start a prohibiton on tobacco( But the US government makes way to much money on tobacco and alchohal taxes to ban them), or instead of investing our tax money in trying to ban guns put the money towards youth health and education, make the kids have a 2 hour gym class at school because im sure that in the long run it will greatly reduce the ammount of deaths due to heart disease, which is the number one killer in the United States today at 451,326 deaths last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/common-sense-gun-laws-obamas-attack-on-the-second-amendment/#comment-231555</link>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 01:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=50384#comment-231555</guid>
		<description>this blog sure went down hill this week</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this blog sure went down hill this week</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/common-sense-gun-laws-obamas-attack-on-the-second-amendment/#comment-231554</link>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 01:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=50384#comment-231554</guid>
		<description>this blog sure went down hill this week do us a favor and shut it down and go grow a brain  and buy  guns and  some bullets</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this blog sure went down hill this week do us a favor and shut it down and go grow a brain  and buy  guns and  some bullets</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goy</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/common-sense-gun-laws-obamas-attack-on-the-second-amendment/#comment-231430</link>
		<dc:creator>goy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=50384#comment-231430</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://reason.com/blog/show/132562.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Apropos&lt;i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; the real cost of the War On (Some) Drugs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://reason.com/blog/show/132562.html" rel="nofollow"><i>Apropos</i><i></i></a> the real cost of the War On (Some) Drugs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bilgeman</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/common-sense-gun-laws-obamas-attack-on-the-second-amendment/#comment-230745</link>
		<dc:creator>Bilgeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=50384#comment-230745</guid>
		<description>#169 oomo/ooyo/ooever:

 Do us a favor, snookums, don&#039;t be so long-winded, m&#039;kay?

 Your hobby is causing you some REALLY bad breath, see?

 I AM gratified to know that I could toss out a gratuitous insult WEEKS ago, and here you are, still carrying it around and obsessing on it here on a dead thread like a major psychic wound.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#169 oomo/ooyo/ooever:</p>
<p> Do us a favor, snookums, don&#8217;t be so long-winded, m&#8217;kay?</p>
<p> Your hobby is causing you some REALLY bad breath, see?</p>
<p> I AM gratified to know that I could toss out a gratuitous insult WEEKS ago, and here you are, still carrying it around and obsessing on it here on a dead thread like a major psychic wound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goy</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/common-sense-gun-laws-obamas-attack-on-the-second-amendment/#comment-230082</link>
		<dc:creator>goy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 04:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=50384#comment-230082</guid>
		<description>Jim,

People needlessly (?) under the influence of alcohol abuse cause a lot of problems for the rest of us. Alcohol isn&#039;t illegal.

Let me first emphasize that I&#039;ve not said the solution to rampant &#039;legal&#039; drug abuse by the medical community - which results in some 100,000 deaths and 2M hospitalizations annually - and that&#039;s for the &#039;properly&#039; prescribed medications - is to change our behavior toward drugs like marijuana, hash and coke. I agree with you: the two realms are, in fact, orthogonal.

What&#039;s hypocritical is to accept the damage inflicted by the former - simply because it is economically beneficial to a powerful pharmaceutical and medical professional lobby - while pretending that damage inflicted by the latter, typically far less in magnitude if it weren&#039;t for the arbitrary illegality, is somehow socially unacceptable.

All of our social experience with illegal drugs - the cost of law enforcement (including the dangers to which LEOs are exposed), the behaviors of those who buy, use and sell them and the criminals &lt;i&gt;created by&lt;/i&gt; the arbitrary designation of those substances as &#039;illegal&#039; - is bound up in the fact that they have been &lt;i&gt;declared&lt;/i&gt; illegal. It&#039;s a bit of a chicken-and-egg thing. This experience needs to be considered separately from these drugs&#039; inherent, physiologically destructive effects, if such effects exist.

Marijuana and hashish are no more inherently &#039;destructive&#039; of a drug than alcohol - considerably less so, in fact. Cocaine, while it does possess inherently destructive qualities akin to alcohol (i.e., when abused in the same manner), isn&#039;t &lt;i&gt;inherently&lt;/i&gt; destructive. What&#039;s destructive is how it&#039;s used - or abused - which is a personal choice, no different from the choice involved in alcohol or other legal substance abuse. What&#039;s most destructive in cases of drug addiction - as opposed to alcohol addiction - is the &lt;i&gt;economic&lt;/i&gt; effect caused by the cost of the drugs themselves (arbitrarily inflated because their illegal nature constricts supply), and the social effect inherent in using them because they&#039;re illegal (i.e., using them can make you a criminal if you&#039;re caught buying, using or selling them).

Ever seen the destruction of a life caused by addiction to aerosol inhalants? It&#039;s potentially as bad as addiction to heroin. Should we make aerosols illegal simply because they can be abused? If so, that same rationale can be use to justify repealing the Second Amendment, since firearms can be - and often are - abused. If not, why should cocaine or marijuana be treated differently? In short, it doesn&#039;t make any rational sense to make a substance illegal because of the way SOME people use or abuse it. It&#039;s just a socially accepted &#039;standard&#039; that has become conventional wisdom with no inherent validity.

We have NO recent experience with so-called &#039;recreational&#039; drugs as legal substances, therefore it is impossible to judge their deleterious effects in the context of contemporary society, were they to be legalized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim,</p>
<p>People needlessly (?) under the influence of alcohol abuse cause a lot of problems for the rest of us. Alcohol isn&#8217;t illegal.</p>
<p>Let me first emphasize that I&#8217;ve not said the solution to rampant &#8216;legal&#8217; drug abuse by the medical community &#8211; which results in some 100,000 deaths and 2M hospitalizations annually &#8211; and that&#8217;s for the &#8216;properly&#8217; prescribed medications &#8211; is to change our behavior toward drugs like marijuana, hash and coke. I agree with you: the two realms are, in fact, orthogonal.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s hypocritical is to accept the damage inflicted by the former &#8211; simply because it is economically beneficial to a powerful pharmaceutical and medical professional lobby &#8211; while pretending that damage inflicted by the latter, typically far less in magnitude if it weren&#8217;t for the arbitrary illegality, is somehow socially unacceptable.</p>
<p>All of our social experience with illegal drugs &#8211; the cost of law enforcement (including the dangers to which LEOs are exposed), the behaviors of those who buy, use and sell them and the criminals <i>created by</i> the arbitrary designation of those substances as &#8216;illegal&#8217; &#8211; is bound up in the fact that they have been <i>declared</i> illegal. It&#8217;s a bit of a chicken-and-egg thing. This experience needs to be considered separately from these drugs&#8217; inherent, physiologically destructive effects, if such effects exist.</p>
<p>Marijuana and hashish are no more inherently &#8216;destructive&#8217; of a drug than alcohol &#8211; considerably less so, in fact. Cocaine, while it does possess inherently destructive qualities akin to alcohol (i.e., when abused in the same manner), isn&#8217;t <i>inherently</i> destructive. What&#8217;s destructive is how it&#8217;s used &#8211; or abused &#8211; which is a personal choice, no different from the choice involved in alcohol or other legal substance abuse. What&#8217;s most destructive in cases of drug addiction &#8211; as opposed to alcohol addiction &#8211; is the <i>economic</i> effect caused by the cost of the drugs themselves (arbitrarily inflated because their illegal nature constricts supply), and the social effect inherent in using them because they&#8217;re illegal (i.e., using them can make you a criminal if you&#8217;re caught buying, using or selling them).</p>
<p>Ever seen the destruction of a life caused by addiction to aerosol inhalants? It&#8217;s potentially as bad as addiction to heroin. Should we make aerosols illegal simply because they can be abused? If so, that same rationale can be use to justify repealing the Second Amendment, since firearms can be &#8211; and often are &#8211; abused. If not, why should cocaine or marijuana be treated differently? In short, it doesn&#8217;t make any rational sense to make a substance illegal because of the way SOME people use or abuse it. It&#8217;s just a socially accepted &#8216;standard&#8217; that has become conventional wisdom with no inherent validity.</p>
<p>We have NO recent experience with so-called &#8216;recreational&#8217; drugs as legal substances, therefore it is impossible to judge their deleterious effects in the context of contemporary society, were they to be legalized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: one of my own</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/common-sense-gun-laws-obamas-attack-on-the-second-amendment/#comment-230039</link>
		<dc:creator>one of my own</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 02:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=50384#comment-230039</guid>
		<description>167. Bilgeman: . . . Decided to take the bull by the horn have you? I guess your feigned casual indifference wasn&#039;t enough to overcome the rage that wells up inside you when I remind you of your glory hole fascination. 

People of this dear board, please know that I&#039;m sure Bilgepump is a fabulous individual, a great American and patriot wheel-barrowing around with him an intellect that strains the talents of Pythagoras himself. 

Ah, perhaps that&#039;s it! The Greek connection. I hear that culture was rife with Bilgepumpian behavior. Are you sure your name isn&#039;t really Bilgepumpakokis? No matter. I look forward to you providing more insights into your very curious and glorious obsession. We now know there is spitting and buckets and men named Peter involved. Pray, do continue Bilgepump - share your experience with this odd custom - enlighten us further.

You&#039;re like a combination of Cliff Clavin and Ted Haggart. Fascinating, really. you might be able to earn a few extra bucks volunteering your proclivities for study by 1st-year residents in psychiatry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>167. Bilgeman: . . . Decided to take the bull by the horn have you? I guess your feigned casual indifference wasn&#8217;t enough to overcome the rage that wells up inside you when I remind you of your glory hole fascination. </p>
<p>People of this dear board, please know that I&#8217;m sure Bilgepump is a fabulous individual, a great American and patriot wheel-barrowing around with him an intellect that strains the talents of Pythagoras himself. </p>
<p>Ah, perhaps that&#8217;s it! The Greek connection. I hear that culture was rife with Bilgepumpian behavior. Are you sure your name isn&#8217;t really Bilgepumpakokis? No matter. I look forward to you providing more insights into your very curious and glorious obsession. We now know there is spitting and buckets and men named Peter involved. Pray, do continue Bilgepump &#8211; share your experience with this odd custom &#8211; enlighten us further.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re like a combination of Cliff Clavin and Ted Haggart. Fascinating, really. you might be able to earn a few extra bucks volunteering your proclivities for study by 1st-year residents in psychiatry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Baker</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/common-sense-gun-laws-obamas-attack-on-the-second-amendment/#comment-229874</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=50384#comment-229874</guid>
		<description>Goy,
  While I agree with you about the harmfulness of allowing doctors to prescribe drugs that are very harmful to people, based on presumed social abnormalities, I doubt that the solution should be to give up the fight against illegal street drugs.  Why not seek to eliminate both atrocities?  One does not need to be declared a hypocrite because he pushes for solutions to only one of these problems.  They are not related problems.  The only similarity these problems have is that people needleesly under the influence of drugs, do cause lots of problems for the rest of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goy,<br />
  While I agree with you about the harmfulness of allowing doctors to prescribe drugs that are very harmful to people, based on presumed social abnormalities, I doubt that the solution should be to give up the fight against illegal street drugs.  Why not seek to eliminate both atrocities?  One does not need to be declared a hypocrite because he pushes for solutions to only one of these problems.  They are not related problems.  The only similarity these problems have is that people needleesly under the influence of drugs, do cause lots of problems for the rest of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

