Comments on: Climategate: Have They No Shame?

By: Vitis01

Vitis01 — Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:50:11 +0000

Scientists – vindicated.

Deniers – Looking for other straws to grasp at…

By: Knotacommie

Knotacommie — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:04:45 +0000

These same commie scum had no problem when the Florida NEA senior couple was ILLEGALLY taping cell phone calls between Newt Gingrinch and John Boehner in 1995. Seems ethics is only a concern when the right “violates” them. Oh , by the way, the London Daily Mail is reporting today the BBC had these emails 6 weeks ago and did nothing with them. If the BBC had them, what are the odds other news outlets had them? No wonder they were hacked and put on the net. Apparently that was the ONLY way this story would get out. Once again, with the communist left and there syncophats, ideology trumps everything.

By: Chris the Engineer

Chris the Engineer — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 21:01:09 +0000

This is the second comments section in two days where I’ve seen commentor Mark York acting like the religious police questioning everyone elses background and right to criticize scientific material. Give it a rest!

By: Chris the Engineer

Chris the Engineer — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 20:11:35 +0000

You religious zealots keep pointing to the same old “peer reviewed – heh heh heh yeh, I believe it” links that are part of this humongous conspiracy of lies / deceit and expecting the rest of us simpletons to keep believing the garbage. We all know Hanson at NASA is a quack now we have definitive proof that Mann (at PSU) and this CRU group (and even folks in New Zealand) were doing the same crap (and rigged the peer review process which means all the links you point to are tainted and therefore useless). Funny thing about losing all credibility huh? Notice how much more shrill the religious zealots have become in the past several years as they predicted continued global warming and the globe actually cooled (some record cool summers and earlier winters in most parts of the world this past year). Al Gore says we have to act now!!! Remember when they produced the hokey Hollywood movie The Day After Tomorrow (right around the previous election – made the vice president in the movie look like Cheney). Remember how Hurrican Katrina was caused by Global Warming. Remember how they predicted a much more severe Hurricane season the next year (after Katrina) and yet it was one of the most benign ones on record. These are the same clowns who predicted the coming Ice Age in the 1970s (look at the covers on Time and Newsweek back then). Also, the Population Bomb – by Paul Erlich where we’d run out of food and everyone would starve (in the ice age) before 2000. This time, however, the science is “settled” and a global “consensus” exists. Yeah right!

By: John Q. Public

John Q. Public — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 19:15:15 +0000

Climategate

Let’s see:

a) subverting the peer review process
b) stacking the UN IPCC
c) obstruction of the Freedom on Information Act
d) breach of university and state ethics codes

… and we haven’t even talked about the data yet.

Climate Science – the new Ponzi scheme!

p.s. – Is this what Science is all about? Meet the new boss (science), same as the old boss (religion). When are they issuing funny hats to scientists?

By: Rashputin

Rashputin — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:56:29 +0000

Why would they have any shame? They’ve gotten away with thirty years of revisionist history, how could they imagine that they wouldn’t get away with the global warming fantasy? Just look at who won the last presidential election and you can clearly see that the folks who are pushing the global warming agenda think they can get the public to believe almost anything. How else could someone with so sparse a record and a corps of attorneys that work constantly to keep everything that might be recorded somewhere from coming out ever be elected president?

Shame? These folks and their supporters threw that away along with morality and honesty a long, long time ago. Once colleges and institutions can get away with falsifying history, there’s no limit on what they’ll want to falsify and believe they can get away with falsifying.

Regards

By: your mama

your mama — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:40:36 +0000

the gig is up,they won’t be able to hide the truth much longer.hopefully they’ll become the laughing stock they truly are and will lose all the respect they never had.

By: Mark York

Mark York — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:51:18 +0000

“Ebell graduated from Colorado College with a B.A. and obtained an M.Sc. from the London School of Economics. He did some graduate work at the University of California at San Diego and at Peterhouse College, Cambridge University.[1]

It’s funny Myron. I don’t detect anything scientific in your background. You’re quote provider as near as I can tell. That’s the problem with sceptics: Their agenda is blatantly obvious to anyone with a clue. That shouldn’t be a problem around here where the synapses are all turned off.

By: chuck in st paul

chuck in st paul — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:29:27 +0000

“The ‘global warming deniers’ are cherry-picking a few unfortunately worded emails…”

There’s a guy on another thread here that actually parroted that. Between Briffa et al and this set of data, computer code, and emails, the whole house of cards must come down.

As for the Idaho-ho-ho guy, give it up kid. Daily Kos is not a truth forum so stop parroting their baloney here. Thanks for playing. Better luck next time.

By: Poha

Poha — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:49:03 +0000

Al Gore claims again, recently, that the the UK Court vindicated his claims made in the Inconvenient Truth (truth is actually the opposite), to wild antic fixed-grin applause from the lecture hall full of ‘scientists,’ who paid for entry to the lecture … and hope for entre’ to the gravytrain?
http://planetgore.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YTY2MzgyZmZiZTY4MzMwZDViN2RlYzQyMWI2MTdmNjA=
Nope: no shame. Brazen it out. “Too Big to Fail?”