Get PJ Media on your Apple

Can the DoD Trust Brazil with American National Security?

Should an important Air Force contract be awarded to a Brazilian company, despite our trade and foreign policy differences with that country?

Jaime Daremblum and Seth Cropsey


May 31, 2011 - 12:00 am
<- Prev  Page 2 of 2   View as Single Page

Embraer enjoys an arm’s length relationship to the Brazilian government. There is a clause written in the company’s bylaws that gives the government authority at any time, for any reason, veto power over the production and supply of maintenance and replacement parts for military aircraft. This Golden Share provides the Brazilian government with veto power over key policies that would affect Embraer’s defense business.

There is good reason to think carefully about possible expansion of the U.S.-Brazil defense trade relationship. Brazil’s medium and long-term foreign policy orientation is uncertain. The trajectory of recent Brazilian foreign policy suggests that a strong, cohesive, and stable alliance with the United States is unlikely. Moreover, the future relationship between the Brazilian government and its private sector is unclear, unfair, and troubling.

When officials at the Department of Defense decide whether to award an important Air Force contract to a Brazilian firm, they should consider the far reaching U.S. national security implications. They should carefully scrutinize a decision that could strengthen Brazil’s defense industry while weakening U.S. aircraft manufacturers and the economy as a whole.

<- Prev  Page 2 of 2   View as Single Page
Seth Cropsey is a Senior Fellow at Hudson Institute. Previously, he served as Deputy Undersecretary of the Navy during both the Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations. Ambassador Jaime Daremblum is a Senior Fellow with Hudson Institute and directs the Center for Latin American Studies. He previously served as Costa Rican Ambassador to the United States.
Click here to view the 26 legacy comments

Comments are closed.