Call for Post-Election ‘Unity’ Fails the Giggle Test
In the days following the election, we’ve heard a lot about unity. This year, 53 percent of the voters cast their ballots for Barack Obama, and we’re being told that the country unified to elect him. In 2004, 51 percent of the nation voted to reelect Bush — but back then we were a country divided.
I hear that because Obama came out seven points ahead of John McCain that he won in a landslide. If you want to talk landslide, remember that Ronald Reagan won his first election against Jimmy Carter by nine points. He then went on to win his second term against Walter Mondale by 18 points. Now that’s a landslide.
Still, we did elect the candidate of hope and change — coming soon to a much larger government near you.
Speaking of unity: over the past eight years, many on the left made it known that they had no use for unity. For example, “embarrassed” by George Bush, noted political commentator Julia Roberts said, “He’s not my president.” Unflattering comparisons of Bush to chimpanzees and Hitler and claims of his inherent stupidity dotted the blogosphere. While the legacy media couldn’t quite get away with calling Bush the heir to the Third Reich, they did everything they could to discredit the president and his policies, even if it meant printing leaks of sensitive programs designed to keep Americans safe in the wake of 9/11.
Now that The One has emerged victorious, the need for unity is suddenly imperative. During his acceptance speech, Obama said that even if he didn’t win your vote, “I will be your president.” Former Carter hack and MSNBC “journalist” Chris Matthews wants to “do everything I can to make this thing work, this new presidency work. … Yeah, it’s my job. My job is to help this country.” I thought his job was to impartially report the news of the day with a minimum amount of drooling, but what do I know? And, perhaps even more important, celebrities who built their fabulous careers and made their fabulous fortunes in America can join Michelle Obama in finally being proud of their country.
Another example of this sudden need for peace, love, and reconciliation is the website From 52 to 48 with Love. Perhaps they chose the site name before the final vote tally was in. Created by the same type of “feelings first” folks who brought you Sorry Everybody, a site that apologized to the world for the 2004 reelection of George Bush, it’s populated with photos of people holding handmade signs with saccharine sentiments like, “Dear 48, I PROMISE: to listen to you, to fight for you, to respect you always. Love, 52.” It’s an interesting reaction, considering signs like this one that appeared on Sorry Everybody in 2004: “I am so sorry. Next time we’ll get the b****** for real O.K.”
Wow. Liberals went from being sore losers to gracious winners. All except the woman who emailed a friend of mine who ran a pro-McCain site: “Obama won, b****.” Guess she didn’t get the touchy-feely memo.
On the other hand:
http://tinyurl.com/6dubz5
The problem with that, David, is that while we all hope for a better world, some of us have grown past the point in our lives when we believe in “social justice.” What the hell is “social justice” anyway? In my experience, it means “making you do what I think is right, just because I think it is right”. And that is inherently anti-American. Sure it’s nice to dream that you are Emperor of the World and can remake the world according to your own image. And then you turn 16 or 18 or 20 years old and figure out that being in control of the world is only an illusion and you are never actually in control all along, and you move on with your life.
This “unity” nonsense is self-defeating for the surviving Republicans in Washington. DC. They will get nothing in return for allegedly being so “understanding and non-partisan.” It is time these doormats fight back and cease behaving like a bunch of girlie men. The first thing they should do is call for a U.S. Justice Department investigation into the credit card fraud committed by the Obama campaign. A congressional ethics investigation of Barney Frank is long overdue. The remaining Republicans must also immediately marginalize John McCain. He must be treated cooly and prevented from becoming an ally of the newly elected Democratic president. Make no mistake about it—the Arizona U.S. senator is likely to betray conservatives in the very near future. The wimpy McCain faction simply has to be eliminated from the GOP. This is especially true of Steve Schmidt and the other top people who ran his disastrous campaign. They should be advised to join the Democratic Party.
Social justice is what gets us through hard times. Because as long as we believe we are being fairly treated, we can put up with hard times. But if we believe we are being shafted, we don’t care about the haves because we don’t believe the haves care about anything but themselves.
And social justice is not a difficult concept – it means stopping some of the outrageous inequalities between the haves and the have nots. And it cannot be imposed and it cannot be left to people’s good nature. It is achieved by the rule of law.
David’s right. We also need to rally the Jindahl, Palin, Cantor wing along with Limbaugh, Hannity, Levin, et al, and get ready to go to war. The Dems have two years ahead for a more or less free ride. That will be a total of four in Congress and two in the White House by 2010. We must start now in organizing internet campaigns/people/strategies to counter the Dems. NOW, folks, with the organizing and working on strategy. Wait until mid-February to howl.
“Former Clinton hack and MSNBC “journalist” Chris Matthews”
Chris Matthews was never a Clinton Hack. He was a Carter hack and a Tip O’Neal hack and before that he was a hack on the staffs of Senators Frank Moss and Edmund Muskie but he was never a Clinton hack. In fact, when Clinton was in office Matthews had some rather unkind things to say about the man.
the liberals now calling for “unity” are advised to direct their attention to the sprig of mistletoe attached to my shirttail. i will not soon forget or forgive eight years of insults and outright lies aimed at george bush, and i surely do not believe in or trust their “messiah”.
Wacky Hermit: you asked what is social justice? According to Obama and lazy f%%king liberals, it means me getting up at 5:45, working my ass off 10 hrs a day, then “sharing” my hard earned livlihood with lazy bastards that sleep till noon, then get high all day. They are “less fortunate” than me you see!!!!!!!!!!!!!!It’s only FAIR to ” Spread the wealth around”, as long as you don’t have it sheltered like the Elites. Only the little people should “SHARE” Read ORWELL’S ANIMAL FARM, it explains in perfect detail how in Communism, ALL ANIMALS ARE EQUAL, BUT SOME ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS!!COMRADE. RISE UP PEOPLE AND ELIMINATE THE PARASITIC SCUM KNOWN AS LIBERALS.
‘Obama said that even if he didn’t win your vote, “I will be your president.”’
Knowing BO as I do, I take that as a threat.
…
Quote from article:
‘Now that The One has emerged victorious, the need for unity is suddenly imperative. During his acceptance speech, Obama said that even if he didn’t win your vote, “I will be your president.”’
Excellent article by the way and yeah we are getting this “can’t we all get along” from the left all over the place now but MoveOn and the DailyKos have shown us how to “get along”. We need to give Obama all the respect they showed Bush.
By the way, I hope all you rich liberals out there are going to pay a bunch of taxes because Joe Biden said it’s your patriotic duty to do so and I am waiting for my share of the free stuff Obama promised me.
We had eight years of pure sh*t, now brace yourselves.
I couldn’t agree more, “gunner”. The liberals didn’t win the White House by promoting a spirit of unity and bi-partisanship. They won the White House by spreading lies, innuendos, and hate about anyone and everyone that didn’t fit into their ideological cesspool. If anyone believes that B.O., Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid can be pried from Washington within some left-conceived spirit of “togetherness” is setting themselves up for more disappointment.
McCain, always the nice guy, finished where nice guys usually finish in politics. It’s time to ignore the phony pleas for unity and fight back. And fight back hard.
I was at the Food Lion behind a young couple who paid for their food with a government issued credit card (new version of food stamps). Then they proceeded to load two cases of beer on the counter which they paid for in cash.
Using our money to buy bread and their money for beer.
Is that what liberals mean by unifying?
I paid tens of thousands in taxes, but didn’t get a “rebate” (vote buying) check.
Is that what liberals mean by unifying?
Robbing one to pay another will never be unifying, no matter what flowery rhetoric is used.
http://www.saraforamerica.com
‘social justice … cannot be imposed … It is achieved by the rule of law.’
Hmmm, sorta thought that ‘rule of law’ was somehow an imposition of society’s views upon an individual.
‘social justice… means stopping some of the outrageous inequalities between the haves and the have nots.’
Please enlighten us:how would your proposed law read? Who are the parties to the court action?
No Thanks,
Bill
head over to the atlanta censorslist, oops, craigslist political board, and see how well unity is going post election.
seriously.
they got a taste of how powerful blatantly denying people their rights can be.
basically the attitude coming across is “don’t you dare say even ONE LETTER out of place or you’ll find yourself facing legal charges as threatening people’s lives”.
huh?
working towards unity, my fat fanny.
p.s. while you’re over there, please feel free to tell the dem party diehard who is so beyond obviously testing the waters to see if i’m over there that they can kiss same said fat fanny. that it’s very constructively busy elsewhere where those with access behind the scenes do not abuse their powers to deny participating members their (reasonable) rights.
vivo:
We had eight years of pure sh*t, now brace yourselves.
As someone with an academic background in history, I have to say that this is a pretty ignorant comment. To sum up the past eight years as “sh*t” is clearly the sign of a mind that doesn’t know what “sh*t” is, historically-speaking. Since I happen to share the same historical moment with you, I hope you never have to learn it first hand, because that’s bound to have some collateral damage on me, even though I already know it.
They say ‘unity’ while at the same time they are shamelessly corrupting the electoral process in the Minnesota Senate race.
Democrats have revealed their true character over the past 8 years, destroying any reasonable basis for trust and goodwill in the process. They say ‘unity’, but what they mean is ‘surrender your liberty to the state, because we politicians know how to run your lives better than you do’.
Their cup runneth over with dishonesty.
What libs mean by unity is meeting their authority with our submission.
This is good news for the USA if we are now all equal we can do away with the rules from the E.E.O.C and since blacks feel they have finally been able to accomplish something they never thought would happen this is great news. If all is equal we cannot forget about calling whites racist and we can stop hearing about how blacks are held back because they are black. Now we are all truly equal . We are all Americans so we can stop hyphenating American and just be American and all will be judged on their character not by their race. I am so happy I will no longer have to hear how blacks are not treated fairly in society. In fact the the white vote for Obama was about 55/45 but the balck vote for Obama was about 95/5 so who is more racist? Just wondering
I will give Obama the same chance they gave Bush. Not that I agree with a lot of Bush…. but Obama is not for me or our country!
Elvis
Obama bought the white house. The liberals will never accept those of us that do not believe as they do, so why should we accept any of their ilk. Where is the congressional hearing on Fannie and Freddie? Call Pelosi and demand an investigation just like Enron. I say lets build toward 2010 and getting as many of the dems out of our government offices. These tards don’t realize they work for us. You may be the American President Mr. Obama, but there is nothing that says I have to bow down to you and if I think you are off base about anything, I will use my words to tell the world what I think of you.
I believe in honest dissent – It is the basis of democracy. But please get your facts right.
Anyone who watched any Obama speech heard that, for him and his supporters, “unity” actually meant “victory.” The gist of every speech was “We all know Bush is a failure and a crook and a war criminal. Elect me – I’m going to enact every liberal slogan we’ve developed and fed to the media (and you) since the election crisis of 2000. I will take from the rich, and I will give you a ton of stuff. Plus, I’m black, and I went to Harvard. Aren’t I sweet? Let’s take the country away from these people – we’ll call it unity. Everyone loves unity.”
Of course, Bush won the immediately preceding elections. Republicans lost the 2006 elections largely over immigration (remember immigration?) and because many conservatives stayed home – just like this time, according to the numbers I’ve heard on NPR. “Unity” is just another slogan, which is apparently the defining form of liberal thought.
Dave, you’re wrong. Social justice is more difficult than you think. It gets defined differently by different people.
I am neither a libertarian nor an evangelical Christian, but I can see clearly enough what they think social justice is. For the libertarian, social justice means not having the government steal your money. And for the evangelical Christian, it means, at the very least, that the media won’t bash them while coddling Muslims.
Why should we prefer your definition of social justice?
Even as a leftist, I don’t agree with you. As someone who is unemployed, I’d prefer to have power and opportunities given to me than money.
MIKE YOU SAID IT. WE’RE HEADING FOR SOCIALISM AND ITS SO BLATANT. HOW STUPID AND IGNORANT ARE YOU LIBERALS???? ITS OK THOUGH THIS “TYPICAL WHITE PERSON” IS GONNA GET HIS GUNS READY AND A WHOLE LOT MORE ARE TOO!!!! YOU LIBS DESERVE WHAT YOU GET FOR VOTING IN A SOCIALIST EGOTISTICAL MORON LIKE OBAMA
There seems to be a bit of confusion about social justice and liberalism.
The basis of social justice is “all are equal in the eyes of the law.” Obviously Sidi Obama hasn’t much time for social justice when he can say that he wants to change to constitution to make sure courts “favour the weak against the strong” rather than taking an objective view of the evidence.
Below that there are laws to prevent the rich doing just what the hell they like,for example carelessly disposing of industrial effluent in a way that pollutes water sources many people depend on. Such practices were common in Britain and the U.S. up to the first half of the twentieth century and are still everyday occurrences in the developing world.
Then there are employment laws, health and safety regulations etc.
Very often the bureaucracies that grow around the enforcement of such regulations take the regulations too far but that does not mean the principles are wrong.
Be careful – if you don’t heed the call for unity you get labeled as suffering from ODS -even on conservative blogs
Liberal Unity = Do What Liberals Want and Be Quiet
Count me out! We shouldn’t just fall over and let them get away with destroying the country. They need to be held accountable. We need to fight back. If we don’t, the country goes completely down the tubes.
The first order of business needs to be the media. We need to organize and get moderates and conservatives to stop watching liberal media and buying liberal publications. In other words, we need to start voting with our dollars and eyeballs.
Here’s my thinking:
1. Use the Fairness Doctrine as the launching pad for a national, concerted effort to make the public aware of liberal media. The Obama administration wants to pass law in order to shut up opposing viewpoints. We should use moment to help jumpstart boycotting of liberal media stations like MSNBC and newspapers like The New York Times. We should also focus on getting liberal reporter names out in the open like Chris Matthews. Expose them all! The liberal media wants to be in the closet and we need to shine a big light on their devious news reporting.
2. Promote alternative media. Encourage people to watch more fair and balanced news programs (like Fox), buy newspapers with a more balanced or conservative viewpoint, and go to websites that are balanced or more conservative. There should be a list.
3. Buy/Invest in media. We need conservatives to form venture capital groups and get together to buy more media organizations. After we boycott, some of the media will start folding. This will create an opportunity to buy them if people with money are ready.
The media in the U.S. is a big problem. We can put whatever candidates and issues we want in front of the public, but we are continually digging ourselves out of a hole if we also have to fight the liberal media in order to get our message across.
Dissent will not be permitted. However, I hope the time will come and very soon, that the media will be forced to begin asking the questions they failed to ask.
Like, why would a 47 year old man not want his medical records released? What’s wrong with confirming one’s sound health? The answer is easy; he is not in good health. What could be wrong? My view is one of two things. He is either HIV positive or has a substance abuse problem (or both). If it is the latter, the pressures of his new job should increase the use and be more obvious even to his worshipers.
Pam, “the entire Europe, indeed the entire world is dotted by the tombs of those who thought that can deal with lefties” – this is how Henry Kissinger once described a situation (in France) which is not far away for the left’s call for unity in America.
And this will be the situation here if the the left’s ascension is not dealt with the greatest distrust – exactly like the Jacobins in France and other left movements in the world, the American left, since it will economically fail, will need to unveil and punish the conspirers who are behind the miserable situation of the country.
“Timeo Danaos et dona ferentes,” Laookon’s wise advise went unheeded, and the Trojans faced the known, terrible consequences. In the current American situation all what we need is to replace “Danaos” with “Left” and we are the unsuspecting Trojans rejoicing the good will present from Greeks – politically enabling a crew like Soetero, Emmanuel and Podesta is a suicidal act.
With the cultish adoration of Obama and the sycophantic media, America has become a true third world country without any democratic sophistication based on electoral maturity.The world therefore looks down upon it.America does not inspire the democratic aspirations of other peoples anymore.
RE TexEd/ #30:
[...] Dissent will not be permitted. However, I hope the time will come and very soon, that the media will be forced to begin asking the questions they failed to ask. Like, why would a 47 year old man not want his medical records released? What’s wrong with confirming one’s sound health? The answer is easy; he is not in good health. What could be wrong? [...]
TexEd, not only that: bellow is an excerpt from Camille Paglia/Salon piece “Obama’s Surfs… Why I Still Like Palin”, piece which nicely addresses concerns like yours:
“[...] In the closing weeks of the election, however, I became increasingly disturbed by the mainstream media’s avoidance of forthright dealing with several controversies that had been dogging Obama — even as every flimsy rumor about Sarah Palin was being trumpeted as if it were engraved in stone on Mount Sinai. For example, I had thought for many months that the flap over Obama’s birth certificate was a tempest in a teapot. But simple questions about the certificate were never resolved to my satisfaction. Thanks to their own blathering, fanatical overkill, of course, the right-wing challenges to the birth certificate never gained traction.
But Obama could have ended the entire matter months ago by publicly requesting Hawaii to issue a fresh, long-form, stamped certificate and inviting a few high-profile reporters in to examine the document and photograph it. (The campaign did make the “short-form” certificate available to Factcheck.org, a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania.) And why has Obama not made his university records or thesis work widely available? The passivity of the press toward Bush administration propaganda about weapons of mass destruction led the nation into the costly blunder of the Iraq war. We don’t need another presidency that finds it all too easy to rely on evasion or stonewalling. I deeply admire Obama, but as a voter I don’t like feeling gamed or played.
Another issue that I initially dismissed was the flap over William Ayers, the Chicago-based former member of the violent Weather Underground. Conservative radio host Sean Hannity began the drumbeat about Ayers’ association with Obama a year ago — a theme that most of the mainstream media refused to investigate or even report until this summer. [...]
Etc, etc. – worth to read the entire piece.
USMC – Your talk about getting your guns ready is meanlingless
Obama and his trash talking minions have still not made his own party whole, much less the Country.As for Schumer and his “Fairness” doctrine,I might give it some thought when he includes network television in the package.Seeing Charlie Gibson,Katie Couric,Campbell Brown,Rick Sanchez and the two gasbags on MSNBC looking for other work, might almost make it worth while.
Sara – There is a book you shoudl read “Amazing Grace” It is about the South Bronx in the early 1990s. Please read that and then talk about social jutice
N.U.M.A.
A lot of this unity crap will get old quick if Obama stubs his toe early on.
Trust me, this is what happened with the feckless Carter — and he was voted in because the American public wanted an end to Watergate and to distance themselves from Gerald Ford, Nixon’s “accomplice”. Arguably (and I never thought I’d be writing this) but Carter was probably better able to deal with the office of POTUS than Obama is. Carter had, at least, some executive experience as Governor of Georgia.
When energy and the economy went into the toilet, Carter’s response was cardigans, thermostat adjustment (“inflate your tires; get a tune-up”) and the “malaise” speech. The public began to realize that the fish was beginning to rot even without the MSM firmly in control and no alternative source of opinion and analysis available on the interent.
..AND all of this was also before the U.S. Embassy in Tehran weas overrun.
Right now, we see a president-elect who is insecure, surrounded by wolves, and about to face his first test: baling out the automaker; one that will alienate either the U.S. taxpayer or big labor, who he is in the tank for.
Pop some popcorn, pull up a chair, turn on the TV, it’s gonna be a fun time watching the butt-smooching MSM try to levitate this piece of crap for anothet 1,500 days.
The mobbed-up Marxist murtadd Muslim Arab-African will soon discover that while Presidents and even “presidents,” like him, come — and as-quickly, go — congressscum believe only in themselves and in their own continued re-election. And will, immediately the shinola he cannot tell himself apart from starts to rub off the annointed one — about January 25, next year, for the most part quickly distance themselves from him and leave him looking like what he is:
The least qualified and/or able political hack to EVER pretend to America’s presidency.
Why, after this evil b*****d gets cracking, even Jimmah Cartah’ll have something to look down at.
PALIN/JINDAL/2012
Brian Richard Allen
Los Angeles – CalifUBAMAcated 90028
INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PRESIDENT-ELECT
Team Obama needs all the help it can get. Here is a start:
http://greensrealworld.blogspot.com/2008/11/instructions-for-president-elect.html
To a liberal, bipartisanship means you have completely eliminated the opposition and you get your way every time. It’s very easy for them to be gracious in victory when they have pretty much completely vanquished the opposition. Unfortunately, we’ve all seen how they act when in the minority, and it’s not pretty. We all know the real liberal under the smiling facade.
I hope we’re all prepared for the next four years. Bring plenty of Vaseline.
For once, an PJM article worthy of conservative journalism.
As Obama supporters speak of unity, they are actively working to steal a senatorial election to assure a bullet proof majority. And they have the unmitigated gall to speak of unity? That’s a bad joke, right?
This last week, the MSM, the liberal wing of the Dimocratic party, and the appointment of Rahm Emanuel remind me of the gang sitting in the witness chair, with a grin on their face and murder weapon in hand, and asking the victim’s family to forgive them of their poor judgment.
My message to the winning party. Remove the log from your own eye before beginning your sermon.
And my sound advice to those ‘moderates’ who pulled the lever for President Obama while absorbing the vacuum of hope and change, but possibly still felt a little uncomfortable while doing so…
“fool me once, shame on you.”
Sara: Don’t bother with Mr. Hurley’s reference to “Amazing Grace”.Its written by yet another “activist” named Jonathan Kozol and manages to analyze the poverty of the South Bronx without once using phrases such as ” responsibility” or “self-reliance”.Your anecdote about the check out line was illustrative and its point was well made
Its good to see that liberals like Robert Hurley believe in “honest dissent”.Of course, it will be those such as himself who we can rely on to define it for us.The problem, as we see in both the media and the educational establishment where liberals congregate in leadership positions is that they worship diversity of appearance but do their best to suppress diversity of thought
My thoughts exactly. Whatever happened to the “Right-wing conspiracy” that Hillary used to blabber on about? Perhaps it actually was just an element of the more evident liberal conspiracy after all. I didn’t vote for Obama either. Folks will use that to call me a hater or a racist. Folks will also register their disgust with me to the world in blogs and message threads– but that’s what passive-aggressive, non-confrontational opportunists do to appease their minds which, had they any pertinent content, wouldn’t be so focused on telling people off.
The truth is, this is the first presidential election in the USA in which kids who have grown up on the internet were old enough to vote. Now, I’m not so fond of the internet, and I find that it’s critics can be as damnable as Obama’s. It’s a totally different mindset complete with skewed expectations and “mad at you because you’re mad at me” mentality. Of course, I was a hater back in the 90s when I saw the dot-com crash coming, I was a hater for saying that the Constitution does not guarantee you the right to commit crimes and be a nameless, faceless thorn in the sides of others. Now I’m a hater for saying that all of these elements were not without their contribution to determine our next president.
What’s next, will I be a hater for believing in the Bible? Will I be a hater for preferring one type of music over another? Or toothpaste?
It’s not a matter of what’s right and wrong, but rather, a matter of who decides what’s right or wrong. Opinions are not the final court of appeal, reality is. Opinions mean nothing, my own included. The true judge of character is how we act, what we do, and I say again: America doesn’t need change, Americans need to change.
“Robert Hurley castigating USMC” [Your talk about getting your guns ready is meanlingless].
Excellent. Bahgdad Bob has taken up residence.
There’s a lot of things I might do or say to an individual if they were to place a gun between my eyes:
(1) I didn’t do it.
(2) I didn’t mean it.
(3) I am very, very sorry.
(4) Please, please don’t kill me.
(5) Blubbering
(6) Faint and play dead.
(7) I regret I have but one life to leave my country.
(8) Fer the children?
(9) Yes, GodFather
(10) I VOTED FOR GEORGE BUSH!
But one of them won’t be “getting your gun ready is meaningless.”
Since Obama’s election there is bound to be more use of the word “hater” by liberal moon bats,I thought a working definition would be in order:
Hater: an individual who, not themselves belonging to a group having an historical grievance, officially sanctioned by (a) the Democratic Party (b) The New YorkTimes/Washington Post (c) MSNBC ,by word,gesture,deed or vote, opposes or obstructs the political agenda of such a group as expressed by the Democratic Party and/or Barack Obama
Dissent will be the purest form of patriotism for a little while longer, and then it will be squelched. People may be glad that “Obama ain’t Bush,” but people spoke freely – and spoke their hate freely – under Bush. Obama won’t have that sort of tolerance for the first amendment.
Tex:
I am sure we are all shaking in our boots. You must be one bad dude. I bet you even scare all the women around you too
Hello RickS,
“The liberals (…) They won the White House by spreading lies, innuendos, and hate about anyone and everyone”
Hope you find a Mirror in your stocking this Xmas!
peace
Westlake
Diana – I guess when you were called to be your brother’s keeper, you decided to limit the brothers to those you liked and had your advantges. Or am I wrong?
Hi Joan,
“Since Obama’s election there is bound to be more use of the word “hater” by liberal moon bats”
What word would you use to describe the type of people who write such comments as?…
“RISE UP PEOPLE AND ELIMINATE THE PARASITIC SCUM KNOWN AS LIBERALS.”
“THIS “TYPICAL WHITE PERSON” IS GONNA GET HIS GUNS READY”
“The mobbed-up Marxist murtadd Muslim Arab-African…”
“get ready to go to war.”
westlake
Tex:
I am sure we are all shaking in our boots. You must be one bad dude. I bet you even scare all the women around you too.
Oh, not me Baghdad “Bob” Hurley. I’m just a civilian lamb at peace with a wife ruling the roost. I was just giggling, hoping to be somewhere in proximity when an Obama rube announces to a battle-hardened marine, “Your talk about getting your guns ready is meaningless.” I’ll bet Abdul over in Iraq wasn’t thinking that once upon a time.
But then I always did wonder if Abdul didn’t have more sense than most Obama supporters.
USING A STATE WORKER TO HARASS JOE THE PLUMBER-SOME ‘UNITY”. USING THE SON OF A PARTY HACK FROM TENNESSEE TO HACK INTO SARAH PALINS PRIVATE EMAIL ACCOUNTS(ILLEGALLY, BY THE WAY) SOME “UNITY”. SENDING 30 LAWYERS TO SPREAD DIRT ON SARAH PALIN-SOME “UNITY”. APPOINTING AS A CHIEF OF STAFF A MAN WHO ONCE THREW A STEAK KNIFE INTO A TABLE AT THE MERE MENTION OF NEWT GINGRICH”SOME UNITY”. THIS NUTJOB IS A SAUL ALINSKY HACK,ALINSKY WASNT ABOUT UNITY ,HE WAS ABOUT DESTRUCTION. OBAMINATION ISNT ALL THAT BRIGHT,JUST WELL SPOKEN. WELL STALIN MAO HITLER AND CASTRO WERE ALSO WELL SPOKEN AND WE KNOW WHO THEY WERE. DONT FORGET-THRUOUT HISTORY,COMMUNISTS HAVE NEVER GIVEN UP POWER WILLINGLY. AND I CERTAINLY DONT SEE OBAMA,NASTY PELOSI, OR DIRTY HARRY GIVING UP THERER POWER EASILY.
Great post! Had to link you today.
(Of course, this probably won’t go over well at the Ministry of Love)
Wow, you really outdid yourself this time, Pam. Backing up a point (what was the point again? oh year, something about unity) by talking about 2 or 3 websites nobody’s ever heard of and pointing to some spam email you received. Throw in a OMG COMMIES!!! or two and you have one hell of a convincing argument. Good work.
“Another example of this sudden need for peace, love, and reconciliation is the website From 52 to 48 with Love. Perhaps they chose the site name before the final vote tally was in.”
Maybe they’re just all supporters of (California) Prop 8.
The real problem with Obama and his rubes is not that dissent will be going out of style. No, what I see the real with Obama and Rahm is what little we know is rehashed abysmal failure. For instance…
WINDFALL PROFITS TAX! Yea, that’s the ticket!Then you while you pay exhorbitant gas bill, you can schedule your appointment to fill up for rationed gas too.
If I could use a metaphor for Obama and his apparent new ideas for hope and change:
You keep running over a string a dozen times with their vacuum cleaner, then reach down, pick it up, examine it, then put it down to give the vacuum one more chance.
Reading this article reminded me of the famous “tolerance” of the Caliphate. For the world at the time, they were unusually tolerant of the cultures and habits of the powerless minorities within their realm. But they were only tolerant from a position of power, they were and are appallingly intolerant when they are not the rulers.
Same with liberals, apparently.
MethodtoMadness:
My bad: I forgot to include Nancy Pelosi’s promise that if the Dems gained an even bigger majority, Congress would be more “bipartisan.”
http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/politics&id=6473426
You have heard of Nancy Pelosi, I presume?
The limits to the hypocrisy of liberals will never be reached unless they cease to exist.
TWO YEARS OF A PROPAGANDA MACHINE AT WORK THE DEMOCRATIC CRISIS SPOKEN DAILY COVERED BY THE THE GREAT NETWORKS…NO WONDER WE NOW HAVE A CRISIS…AND THE LORD OF ALL IS THE ONLY PERSON TO LIFT US UP FROM OUR TROUBLES…BOY DID THE PUBLIC BUY IN…WHY WAS THERE NO COVERAGE ON THE TAPE IN HOUSTON SHOWING THE CHEVEZ CONNECTION WITH OBAMAS CAMPAIGN PHOTOS OF CHAVEZ ON THE WALLS OF THE HEADQUARTERS AND HIS FLAG..WHY WAS THE TAPE HIDDEN ON THE PLOS BANQUET WITH MR OBAMA IN ATTENDANCE….WHY WAS THE TAPES OF THE ACORN CONVENTION IN JUNE WITH MR EDWARDS AS A SPEAKER FIRING THE ACORN ATTENDIES UP TO RALLY FOR OBAMA..NO CONNECTION TO OBAMA THERE…RIGHT! ..NOW ITS ADMITTED BY THE CAMPAIGN THAT $832,000 WAS GIVEN TO ACORN UNDER ANOTHER COMMITTEE….HOW IS IT THAT NOTHING WAS REPORTED ABOUT THE SENATOR THAT RECEIVED @100000 THRU HIS APARTMENT COMPLEX IN THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC AND WAS GIVEN TO THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY..PELOSIS GROUP IS NOW GIVING IT BACK…DONT NEED AN INVESTIGATION HERE ON FINANCING RIGHT! OR HOW ABOUT THE $1OOOOO GIVEN BY CHAVEZ AND CITGO TO THE SPANISH GROUP IN CHICAGO FOR THEIR CELEBRATION OF THEIR HEROS FOR ONE DAY…HOW ABOUT THE GROUPS FORMING IN AMERICA SOME 60 TO 80 SUBVERSIVE ORGANIZATIONS THAT IS SPOKEN ABOUT BY CHAVEZS COMPETITION TRYING TO OUST HIM…NO ONE QUESTIONS THE AMOUNT OF MONEY SPENT BY OBAMAS CAMPAIGN OR WHERE IT CAME FROM..OR PERHAPS WHO BENEFITED THE MOST…THE BIG 3 MEDIA BOYS….IT TAKES MONEY TO RUN A PROPAGANDA MACHINE DOES IT NOT…. JUST SOME THINGS TO THINK ABOUT BEFORE STARTING A RUN AGAINST THIS REGIME ..LEARN WHO THE PLAYERS ARE BEFORE ORGANIZING AGAINST THEM…Z
http://www.blogtext.org/naturalborncitizen/
Leo Donofrio’s new lawsuit in the Supreme Court challenges the Secretary of the State of New Jersey, saying that she did not fully vet all of the candidates on the ballot. Could this case finally get the attention of the MSM?
gas is $2.09 a gallon at my local gas station in Cleveland. please STFU about gas prices. is there some kind of meme lag?
one thing i think is possible, although i don’t know how likely. to wit: obama may be a little awed by the grace of the office he is about to enter. he may want and try to govern from the center, or center-center-left. (biden has never seemed to me to be particularly ideological, fwiw.) the problem is he is the Howling Left’s guy; the non-Howling, merely Left-sympathetic, default lefties may not be Howling Left, but whether they know it or not they take direction from the Howling Left’s spokespeople.
when Obama screws up, the media will run interference, the cultural-left upper middle class will side with obama, but – the Wailing Leninist Babytalk Freakshow? Hm.
Nah forget it. They’ll be in lockstep, won’t they, since, being Whores, they understanding nothing but cynicism and charisma.
Every President-Elect calls for “unity” after the election is over. That’s what they do. Bush did it in 2000, but the big difference is that we have a President-Elect in which I personally can beleive means it. Democrats have always had a bigger-tent Party and accepted a more diverse type of constituent. The Republicans have come to only want white anglo-saxon pro-life Christians in thier party. Republicans do not want gays, or agnostics, and they certainly have not reached out to minorities. Obama won the election because he reached out to non-traditional non-Democratic voters…. many of whom were self-indentified Christians.
At the Republican convention in New York they stood outside with signs that said: “We hate you!’
They stood outside McCain-Palin rallies in T-shirts that said “Sarah Palin is a whore”. Larry Flint made a pornographic movie about Govenor Plain and they all laughed.
Pay them back in their own coin. Copy their attacks, word for word. Do the exact same things they did to us, then when MSM squawks, point out the we are only doing waht they did, and NO, we aren’t any better than they are. Being more honorable gets us no where.
The true voice of America has already spoken about the Obama presidency..
Since last Tuesday, the stock market is down 1,800 pts, because investors know that Obama\Pelosi are going to be a nightmare for the American economy. The markets were holding on until it became clear that the marxist was going to be elected then it has crashed.
By the time that Obama is sworn in the market will be in the 6,500 range and if Obama doesn’t show anymore economic intelligence in his 100 days than he has shown to this point, by the end of 2009 the market will be around 5,000. Leftist have difficulty understanding that the market is not a reference to the past or even current economy, but a prediction of the future.
I cannot believe what I am reading! I am a democrat, and a hardworking married, mother of three. My husband also is a hardworking democrat. We are most-certainly middle class, but do not have a problem contributing to programs to help out people less fortunate than us. We are able to have compassion for others who find themselves in less than desirable circumstances, and feel as though it is our duty as Americans to do so! Where is the empathy for others? What gives you the right to judge others whom you don’t even know? How can you presume that you know anything at all about the “young couple” buying beer with cash and food with food stamps? How do you know what their situation is??? Maybe she is a single mother- her husband left her alone to raise their children. He contintuously works “under the table” to avoid having to pay child support, and she finds herself struggling to make ends meet and needs our help to feed her children. The gentleman she was with may be just a friend or acquaintence- someone who happened to go to the store with her. Or- she finally met someone who treats her nice, but isn’t at the stage in a relationship where he would be supporting her and her children! Maybe he wanted beer for the night- who are you to judge someone elses situation??? YOU JUST DON’T KNOW!!!
You think we will have a chance to take back Congress in 2010 and the White House in 2012? I would not be surprised if within Obama’s first 100 days, the civil security force is launched and dissent is crushed under their jackboots. The Fairness Doctrine will return, Orwell’s prophecy will come true, elections will be suspended and there will be a new President for life coronated King of the World. If not overtly, then covertly. Unity, hah. They have no need for unity. They will continue to crush opposition in any way they can.
I’m very unifying these days. Every Obamanian I find I have been telling them I’m still waiting for something to change, like the oceans receding. To comments of well it can’t get worse, I say it can, which irritates them…just go visit another country in Europe. I mention that we don’t know anything about Obama since the media choose not to vet him, which also irritates them. I’m so glad racism is behind us and preferences are not necessary now, which also irritates people who enjoy being a victimized and grievance-based minority. I also mention I’m still waiting for my mortgage to be paid off and my free gas card.
Well, hmmmm, maybe I’m not unifying, just irritating since the shoe is on the left foot now and its my turn to twist the stick.
The One may be the President, but he is not my President. I’m simply now a loyal member of the miscreant opposition.
Hypocrisy breeds confusion and this blog represents the American hypocrisy to a fault. Lick your wounds and man up; America is not going asunder in the next four years whatever you may think or believe.
JACKH,
Want to know the best way to deal with them?
Turn your back on them and walk away.
If you have a 401k or IRA cash it out, take the tax hit this year before the Obamacrats can confiscate it. Pay off your debts and if you have any left over put it somewhere where they can not get their grubby mitts on it.
If you do not own a firearm get one before they get banned and learn how to use it. Stock up on ammo.
Cancel your newspaper, magazine and cable/sat TV subscriptions. Let them get their money from the “52′s”. Over the past 4 years many have already done this and it has put much of the MSM on it’s deathbed. Time to pull the plug on them.
Refrain from spending one more penny then you have to. Keep money in cash or in a place where the government can’t get it’s mitts on it. If you can put off major purchases for the next four years do so. If you need a vehicle buy a used one or if you have to buy a new one buy one that is not made by union labor. When you do have to buy something bear in mind who owns the company that made the product, who made it and where it came from. For example you want to buy some Ice Cream. There are may brands to choose from, one that I personally will never purchase again is Ben & Jerry’s-the owners spend millions to support radical leftist causes and provide legal defense to cop killers. They can do that on the “52′s” dime, not mine. If I need to buy a light bulb or a stove the one brand that will never cross my doorstep again is GE. They are the parent company of NBC/Universal.
Once the above is done just ignore the moonbats and Obamacrats, just turn your back and walk away from them. Don’t make a big deal out of it-just walk away.
You see, in the end they need us much more then we need them.
Enough of this socialist b.s. already. Why is it socialist to want to make the country better by using the tax system we have had in place for decades? That’s why we have social security, public education, welfare, unemployment compensation, public roads, law enforcement, a military; to make the country a decent and safe place to live in. So now (hopefully short term) we have to pay a little more in taxes to make up for the shortfall caused by greedy fat cats (liberal and conservative, to be fair) fleecing the nation for everything they can and leaving us in the current economic mess. If you don’t like it, move. Good-bye. I didn’t vote for Bush in 2004 because I was sick of the war. I didn’t want my taxes paying for it. But he won, and I did my duty. If you’re going to have to pay more in taxes, it means you’re making more than most people, so quit whining and count your blessings. I know a lot of people who would love to be able to be in that tax bracket.
I’m one liberal who is totally ready to fight you conservatives to the political death. The one thing I don’t like about Obama is that he’s so inclusive and forgiving. I don’t believe you deserve ANYTHING after the past 8 years of driving our country into the dirt. The criminal and his cronies should be imprisoned and all of you should be marginalized until you find your way back as REAL Republicans in the vein of Lincoln, TR, and even Reagan. You have failed. Let that sink in. It’s not such a big deal. Just dust yourselves off, go into the darkness for a few years and re-emerge as something REAL and challenge us and LEAD us for the first time in a generation. Won’t that feel good? I’m sure you can do it. But coming at us as Bush-defenders and nation-builders and cut-taxes-but-spend-ers is just going to get you more hellfire. Figure something else out.
Pam — Yes, I’ve heard of her. I’ve even met her once. I’m not sure how her saying that a dem majority will be more bipartisan than the recent 6 years of rep majority means that she’s shunning unity in some way. Of course, it’s pretty hard to tell from this article, loosely based around the idea of “unity”, whether you think unity is bad, or you think that it’s not actually what dems want, or whether you think it is what dems want but send too many angry spam emails to acheive. Maybe because the hated liberals (or, you know, 76% of the country now) think that Bush has done a terrible terrible job of running the country, that that points to us disliking unity in general? Maybe your link supports one of the scattered points you may or may not be trying to make, but hell if I can tell which one.
Mike:
Your “they certainly have not reached out to minorities” regarding the Republicans is poppycock.
The Bush administration has had a more diverse cabinet than there has ever been. Yep, even more than ol’ Wily. Perhaps youre not aware but Secretary of State/Former NSA Ms. Condoleezza Rice is burning up the frequent flyer mileage with her dicussions to worldwide leaders, well, everywhere.
Appointing a ‘minority’ shouldn’t be solely for being a ‘minority.’ It should be based on a fair, balanced and intelligent method of resolving issues. Not judged because of the accidental pigment of one’s skin. Ludicrous.
Lastly, California enjoys a ‘diverse type of constituents’ you speak of. California is ridiculously in debt. Crime is rampant in even the most posh citiest Santa Brbara). California is 47th inthe country in public education. 6 years ago it was in the mid 20′s. Calforonia’s public education system is officially this year more than 50% hispanic. I bet you can guess where most of these school age children’s parents hail from, most being illegal.. Ahhh, diversity..
kfarley,
Your hypotheticals, which was quite detailed, in justifying your giving money to those less fortunates is fine. It’s YOUR BUSINESS. When a Government forces our arm to give our hard earned money to tens of millions of ‘less fortunates’, something’s wrong. For everybody’s plight is different. Bad circumstances, laziness, tragedy, drug habit, etc., For the masses to be ‘rewarded’ for all of the aforementioned is truly ignorant (or as mentioned, a socialist dynamic).
Ben Franklin said that anyone who cares about the poor should help them feel uncomfortable in their poverty. He’s absolutely right. Franklin said the countries which treat their poor best have the most poor.
Why do you think there’s so many people on welfare, food stamps, Section 8 housing, uses the emergency room for their children’s pharmacy, etc.,? The Governemnt allows and encourages it. Now, Obama will provide health care for the small start up fee of $95 billion dollars his first year, and increasing $110 billion each year. Look it up..
TexEd:
Dissent will not be permitted. However, I hope the time will come and very soon, that the media will be forced to begin asking the questions they failed to ask.
Like, why would a 47 year old man not want his medical records released? What’s wrong with confirming one’s sound health? The answer is easy; he is not in good health. What could be wrong? My view is one of two things. He is either HIV positive
————–
You are a total nutcase. His medical records were released so do a fact check moron, because you can’t just make stuff up. Maybe you have HIV and wish that he shared your plight.
LogicalUS:
The true voice of America has already spoken about the Obama presidency..
Since last Tuesday, the stock market is down 1,800 pts, because investors know that Obama\Pelosi are going to be a nightmare for the American economy. The markets were holding on until it became clear that the marxist was going to be elected then it has crashed.
By the time that Obama is sworn in the market will be in the 6,500 range and if Obama doesn’t show anymore economic intelligence in his 100 days than he has shown to this point, by the end of 2009 the market will be around 5,000.
—————————————–
That is economic stupidity 101. The market is only 100 points below its low prior to the election, which was 8,400. Understand that many hedge funds are shoring up positions for next year, and many buyers are on the sideline reserving judgment, leading to mass sell offs. The market will come no where near 6,500, and I think having Warren Buffet as an advisor shows a lot more intelligence than Bush/McCain. Face it, the economic conditions are exactly a product of the sitting President and his Bush Doctrine policies moreso than an incoming President, get it?
Every word you wrote is very true and keep it going.
I’m one liberal who is totally ready to fight you conservatives to the political death.
Why does it need to be political? But will the MSM cover your back the first shot fired?
This is so fantastically hilarious! I stumbled on this site from a news item link and I think it’s great! Just think, if we could somehow attract every right wing, bible thumping conservative to this site and keep them here 24/7 year-round, what an absolutely wonderful world it would be. Even all the nicknames are hilarious! But wouldn’t it just be easier if you’d all use Bubba1, Bubba2, Bubba3, etc.?
Apparently all of you got the memo about “a little education goes a long way” – too bad you didn’t understand it and dropped out after 5th grade.
Palin in 2012! (all Democrats will support that!)
We are gonna be just as respectful and unified as they were with us in the last eight years…I wonder if he can handle it as gracefully as President Bush has….
How can we possibly dissent when we are the ones who have to work and have no time to march and dissent. Someone has to pay for entitlements.
That is economic stupidity 101. The market is only 100 points below its low prior to the election, which was 8,400. Understand that many hedge funds are shoring up positions for next year, and many buyers are on the sideline reserving judgment, leading to mass sell offs. The market will come no where near 6,500, and I think having Warren Buffet as an advisor shows a lot more intelligence than Bush/McCain. Face it, the economic conditions are exactly a product of the sitting President and his Bush Doctrine policies moreso than an incoming President, get it?
——-
Really? When did the President take control of the economic purse strings?
When I got my MBA years ago, they always taught us it the legislative branch that controlled the purse strings? I thought that was Economics 101? Now let’s see? What’s been the legislative majority since Nov. 2006 again?
OHHHH…why why why it’s the Dimocrats! Outstanding performance Herr Reid and Fraulein Pelosi!
I loved it when all of the leftists dared us
not to question their patriotism (even as i watched liberals flying to iran) to comment about how much better it is over there …
Oh brother where was to GAG goracle when all of that CO2 was realeased into the atmosphere..
I mean a couple 747′s a bunch of actors full of hot air going to meet the wackjob full of more hot air
but i digress anyway…
Now that the GAG messiah is about to be crowned
they are now DEMANDING ALL DISCENT STOP.
Not their traitorous behaviour no
Our audacity to Gag cough choke Question
either the one or the evil witch pelozi his power broker.
http://prepareforwar.blogspot.com
I mean it these people are friggin insane..
and now i belive dangerous to our country.
Not obama no all the usefull idiots around the ONE…
I also know that the so called
CALL to unity is really
the democrats in congress trying to hide for cover like the cockraoches they are..
they dont want for the americans to see the truth about the communist err democratic party..
How they always planned to surrender america to our enemies
or how they always wanted to usurp the constitution to deny us our god given rights.
So they are now screaming for all of us to unite
READ Stop criticising the liberals and help to cover up the planned surrender of the USA to our enemies or worse to bankrupt all of us..
Although i think both parties already did that.
http://prepareforwar.blogspot.com
Why would Democrats make any concessions to Republicans? Republicans don’t deserve it they already screwed up the situation. And like a good son the American people took away the driver’s license from the shaky hand of the senile republican party. Come to think of it you are exactly like senior citizens unable to make decisions for yourselves much less others any more. You lost and by a lot no matter what this author suggests it was a blowout. Keep deluding yourselves conservatives because that kind of attitude will surely prevent you from realizing the realigning you will need to do to even smell power again. Keep calling dems socialists and the like as if they will share and help your issues now. You people need to be on your best behavior because you aren’t the majority anymore and where this country’s demographic is trending an army of Sarah Palins won’t win you a school board seat in a couple years. Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha back to the old folks home with you. I don’t think we will be sharing you have nothing to offer us.
With Sen. Obama taking the reins of the most powerful job in the U.S., in many instances the world, shouldn’t the NAACP be dissolved now? This is the beginning of a color blind society, right? Hey, I tried..
Whatnow?
I don’t think we will be sharing you have nothing to offer us.
I thought Republicans had all the money? Isn’t that why you voted Obama in, to take the money we earned?
I just wish I got the right to kick whoever gets the extra taxes I pay right in their f-in face for my trouble.
I thought that there’s at least be a silver lining of the obots going away, and playing with themselves for a change. I erred.
Shortly after the coronation in January will be my last day at my current job. I just reviewed my TurboTax filing for 2007 and saw that I had paid OVER $80K in federal and state income tax for that year alone. 2008 will be even worse! I now don’t think I will be accepting the new job that pays me 20% more. In fact, I now plan on filing for unemployment compensation and food stamps to take some long deserved time off. They are even talking of extending unemployment compensation to help with “these bad financial times”.
When I told some of my current coworkers (mostly Obamaphiles) today of my plan, they uniformly said: “But you always said that we shouldn’t be rewarding that kind of behavior.” To which I replied: “Although I didn’t vote in favor of it, the majority of this country disagrees with me, and I am anything but stupid. I can hold my hand out with the best of them.” The gaping mouths and silence was absolutely DEAFENING!!!
The welfare/food stamp/medicaid creds may even help if I plan to run for public office some day, HA HA HA.
Got game anyone?
Who is John Galt?
Wow! You guys are all yo-yo’s. That’s the only comment any of you deserve.
As one of the 48%, I have to ask the 52ers a question. Why would you even want to friends with a knuckle-dragging, Christofascist Godbag, racist, sexist, bigot, nativist meat-eating homophobe Nazi like me? What would the World think?
Michele Obama is OUR — again the United States of America — First Lady. Barack, Michele, Malia and Sasha Obama is (sic) the First Family.
Yes they is…uh, are.
Now, if you yellers and screamers and ranters and ravers could only learn to speak English…
Funny, I just got an email at the university where I teach about “Unity Week,” with all kinds of “multicultural events.” This is Doublespeak for “Conform,” “Give in.” I say get your guns! Thanks for the link to the teacher. Does anyone know if this government employee/teacher has been fired?
I don’t think we will be sharing you have nothing to offer us.
Well whatnow the entire premise of your candidate’s campaign was to give you have nots all the crap and income the haves have gained to themselves….
And since according to The One™…you had nothing to share in the first place…who would possibly expect you had anything to offer now ?
David Thomson, you wrote: “The first thing they should do is call for a U.S. Justice Department investigation into the credit card fraud committed by the Obama campaign. A congressional ethics investigation of Barney Frank is long overdue. The remaining Republicans must also immediately marginalize John McCain.”
No, no, no….The Republicans should NOT do any of these things. Talk about small ball. What if the Justice Department doesn’t find any credit card fraud? How does an ethics investigation of Barney Frank help the American people? And then they must immediately marginalize the guy they nominated to represent them a week ago?
I think the Republicans would be better served, and by extension the rest of the country, if they laughed small minds like yours out of the ranks.
Buffett bought billions of Goldman Sachs at 120 and it is now in the 60′s and he is an economic advisor? Agree Dow is on the way to 6000 or less. Had McCain won I think we could have risen to the 10000 area. Hopefully I am wrong and Dow stays above 8000 and Obama governs more from the center like Bill Clinton did. I still believe we are a center right country and going too far left brings back GOP in 2012. Jindal will fix what Bushes and Clintons have destroyed. I hope Obama can get us through this so we do not have Great Depression the sequel.
Whatnow? <~~ prime example number uno. unbelievable. so filled with hate, so sadly obsessed with hate, so detrimentally preoccupied with spewing hate, they cannot see the light to recognize the very irony in posting what they did where they did. and it’s like this across the entire internet. so sad. so very, very sad. um.
..” dissent is suddenly going out of style.”
Yea? So what? What is there to to dissent from? We own the White House. We own the Congress. We own the Media. We own academia. We will soon own the Supreme Court. We are healed from racism. Social and economic justice will soon arrive. The world is behind us and wolrd peace will soon prevail. High vibrational luminosity and karmic harmony is filling the earth.
And you are against this?
I think a link to this site went out in an email to a bunch of Obama voters wanting to be “meanines”!! Hey kids, go back to your Facebook and MySpace, I think someone posted something mean about you on your page…sick’em and take your friends with you.
Obama Cannot Be President
by Dr. Robert Coambs
Dr. Coambs studies human reasoning and logic.
Obama is Disqualified by the Known Unknowns
(1) At the time of the November 4 election, Obama’ eligibility was unknown to the majority of the American electorate. That is, the vast majority of the American electorate did not know whether Obama was eligible to become the President of the United States (POTUS).
Furthermore Obama’s eligibility remains unknown, even to Americans who are very interested in this question, and have inquired deeply into it. When asked in court to produce evidence of his eligibility, Obama has declined to do so, even in the face of the considerable time, expense and trouble that is needed to avoid providing this evidence. Thus, the US citizenry did not know on November 4 if Obama was eligible, and they still do not know.
(2) Among the US citizenry are the following:
The current POTUS
The current VPOTUS & President of the Senate
The US Supreme Court
The US Congress
The Senior Staff of the Pentagon
The Senior Staff of the Federal Elections Commission
The Members of the Electoral College
To best of my knowledge, none of these individuals have officially and publicly declared Obama to be eligible to be POTUS. They have not produced or provided sufficient evidence to prove this eligibility.
(3) The news media, television, radio, and the Internet transmit huge amounts of information each day. However, to the best of my knowledge the eligibility of Obama to be POTUS is not known by the general public (See Note 1).
(4) Until and if that dissemination occurs, there is a method of formal logic that can be applied to this situation. It is called the Categorical Syllogism, and was described by Aristotle (Prior Analytics, 24b18-20). Ordinarily, a categorical syllogism is simply called a syllogism, as I shall do here. We begin with the major premise, which is from the US constitution, Article II, Section 1, which states:
“No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”
(5) From this we can construct the following syllogism:
Major Premise: To be POTUS, the candidate’s eligibility must be publicly known.
Minor Premise: Obama’s eligibility is not publicly known.
Conclusion: Therefore Obama is not POTUS.
(6) How Categorical Syllogisms work
When we learn logic in school the categorical syllogism is often taught like this. It begins with a Major Premise, like this:
All humans are mortal.
Then one introduces a second, or Minor Premise, like this:
Socrates is human.
Then we combine the major and minor premises to get this Conclusion:
Therefore, Socrates is mortal.
This method of deductive logic is more than 2000 years old and is taught in almost every introductory logic course in the world. According to these rules of deductive logic, as described by Aristotle (Prior Analytics, 24b18-20) if both premises are true, then the conclusion is true.
Logic is a branch of mathematics, and these rules are like those of arithmetic, where 2+2=4. The result is not negotiable. It is not subject to debate. These rules are universal, they apply everywhere in the known universe. At any time or place one can imagine, 2+2 will equal 4.
Just like arithmetic, the rules of deductive logic are not time-dependent and can be articulated at any time and place in the Universe. If we were to stand on the surface of Mars, then 2+2 would equal 4, and the syllogism above would also be true. If we were traveling at nearly the speed of light, these rules would be true. If all humans disappeared from existence, and only one computer remained, then it could calculate that 2+2=4, and it would be correct. If the computer disappeared, and there were no sentient beings left, and no computational devices, then still, 2+2=4. The syllogism would also be true. These rules are not the inventions of man, they are the rules of nature, and of the Universe.
The simple rules of arithmetic and deductive logic transcend space, time, matter, and energy. There is no point in trying to refute a categorical syllogism in which both premises are true. The conclusion must be true.
The conclusion of this syllogism is self-evident, because it merely requires the combination of two correct premises to produce a correct conclusion.
As I write this, both premises are true, and therefore, Obama is not POTUS. Right now, this is not a constitutional issue because Obama only the president-elect. The syllogism is written in the present tense, so as time moves forward, the status of the syllogism also moves forward. As time reaches January 20, 2009, if the premises remain true, then the conclusion will remain true: Obama is not POTUS. At that point the syllogism has significant constitutional impact, because Obama will sit as if he is POTUS, but he will not be POTUS.
Obama has ample time to act. If at any time Obama becomes publicly known to be eligible, then this syllogism would be invalid. That is, Obama might be POTUS, because he would be eligible. The conclusion of the syllogism would be invalid, because the minor premise would be invalid. The minor premise states “Obama’s eligibility is not publicly known”. If his eligibility becomes known, then the conclusion is invalid, and Obama might be eligible. But until his eligibility is publicly known, Obama is not POTUS, either before or after January 20.
If Obama took office without his eligibility being publicly known, then he is not POTUS. If Obama pretended to be POTUS, and other humans believed that he was POTUS, he would still not be POTUS. Even if 300 million Americans agreed to let Obama sit as if he were POTUS, and run the executive branch of the USA as if he were POTUS, he would not be POTUS.
The syllogism is compelling, omnipresent, and transcendent in time. So long as the premises remain true, the conclusion is true, and it’s form and meaning cannot be changed by human intervention.
If Obama sat as President, and left office 8 years later, he never was POTUS. If historians look back from 1,000 years hence, logic will dictate that he was not POTUS. For those 8 years, the USA did not have a POTUS. No element or feature of the past can be changed to make him POTUS. It is not possible to change the past. Obama never was POTUS.
None of the laws passed in the 8 years that Obama sat in the White House would be valid, because they must be signed into law by POTUS, and there would be no POTUS. Executive orders, Supreme court appointments, and declarations of war would not be valid. Nothing.
If the military took any action under the command of Obama, they would be in double jeopardy. Because they have sworn to uphold the Constitution, it would be forbidden by law for them to obey Obama, since according to the Constitution, he is not POTUS. POTUS is their commander in chief, not Obama. If they obeyed Obama on any matter, they might be held accountable for war crimes, since they acted without authority from POTUS. Because of the way military law works, there is no middle ground. The military can only obey the POTUS and uphold the Constitution, from the highest general to the greenest private.
There are two implications of this reasoning which are debatable, and go beyond the strict implications of the syllogism. They are (a) Because the military is charged to uphold the Constitution, by force if necessary, they may or may not be empowered (or required) to remove Obama from office, and (b) It may be correct and patriotic to refuse to follow any orders given by Obama. This may apply to all American citizens.
If the US Constitution was changed before Jan 20 to make Obama eligible, then everything would change. Then the syllogism would no longer be valid, because the major premise would be invalid. Obama might be eligible to be POTUS. But this would only apply if the Constitution was changed before January 20, 2009. If an effort is made to change the Constitution after Januray 20, it will not succeed under law, because there is no POTUS. Because Obama is not POTUS, he could not sign the Constitutional change into law.
Obama could step aside in favor of the Vice President. The Vice President would become POTUS, and he could sign the law if he chose to. However, the new POTUS would not be required to sign the constitutional change into law. It would be up to his discretion. Furthermore, once Obama has stepped aside from acting as POTUS, there is no constitutional mechanism by which Obama would be empowered to re-assume the position of POTUS.
This syllogism is true, prima facie and does not have to be proven in any court. The rules of deductive logic cannot be changed by any court or legislative assembly . These are rules of nature and the Universe, not of man, and no court or legislature can change them. No human can make a law that 2+2 equals 5, or make a law to change the structure of the syllogism. Humans cannot legislate that oxygen shall be nitrogen, or declare that protons are illegal, or that the planets do not orbit the sun.
Although the arguments articulated here could readily be used in a court of law, the syllogism is true whether or not it is considered by a court, or any human authority. These arguments can be made before various courts and authorities, but logic does not require this. Lawyers are certainly entitled to use these arguments in court to convince a judge that Obama is not POTUS. However, no matter what opinion the judges offer, Obama is not POTUS.
Therefore, So long as the premises remain true, Obama is not POTUS. If the premises remain true forever, then Obama will not ever be POTUS. Humans have no jurisdiction over the rules of logic. Logic is governed by the rules of nature, not of humanity.
SUMMARY
Major Premise:
To be POTUS, the candidate’s eligibility must be publicly known.
Minor Premise:
Obama’s eligibility is not publicly known.
This syllogism responds only to rules of deductive logic and cannot be overturned by any human action. If the premises are taken to be true, then the conclusion must be true. There is no law or statute that requires the rules of logic to be proven in a court of law for them to be enforceable. The laws of logic are compelled by nature, and cannot be challenged by any law of man.
Therefore, the conclusion of this syllogism cannot be questioned by humans of any authority. No human is empowered to alter, rewrite, or adjudicate the laws of the universe.
Conclusion:
Therefore, Obama is not POTUS.
___________________________________________
Note 1. The unknown status of Obama’s eligibility is typified in a current court case in New Jersey.
It is the case of lawyer Leo Donofrio versus New Jersey Secretary of State, Nina Mitchell Wells. In it, Donofrio claims that it is the duty of Wells, as Secretary of State for the State of New Jersey, to independently verify the constitutional qualifications of the presidential candidates before placing them on the ballot in that state.
Specifically, Donofrio notes in the brief accompanying the Application for Emergency Stay filed with the U.S. Supreme Court, Wells was required by N.J.S.A. 19:13-22 to make a statement in which she certifies and signs off on the names of the candidates on the ballots. The statute, in relevant part with emphasis added:
“The Secretary of State, not later than eighty-six days before any election whereat any candidates nominated in any direct petition or primary certificate of nomination or State convention certificate filed with him are to be voted for, shall make and certify, under his hand and seal of office, and forward to the clerks of the several counties of the State a statement of all such candidates for whom the voters within such county may be by law entitled to vote at such election.”
In other words, Leo Donofrio suggests that the New Jersey Secretary of State appeared unaware of the eligibility of Obama to serve as POTUS. If she was aware of Obama’s eligibility to be POTUS, she did not communicate this to the electorate.
____________________________________________________
To reply to Dr. Coambs, please leave a comment on the following thread:
http://ginacobb.typepad.com/gina_cobb/2008/11/sitrep-obama-citizenship-nov-11-08—-a-key-known-unknown-sinks-obama.html
I have to honestly state that reading the boards here at PJM is becoming an exercise in great patience, because the Obamabots and socialists are posting more and more taunts and missives that really don’t enlighten anyone or contribute to the discussion.
When I’ve visited the DailyKos, HuffPost, MoveOn, and the DU I rarely see conservative or Republican posts over there and the the ones you do see do not even approach the volume of missives the Left leaves over here. Plus I have a couple of acquaintances who have tried to constructively engage over there, and they were banned, shouted down, and their posts removed.
If I were a neutral observer (which I’m not)I would say that what the Left calls a “call for Unity” is really “STFU and get with the program.”
The evidence of their double standards is their behavior for the past eight years and what they propose to do going forward with respect to opposition viewpoints. They plan to find ways to shut them down.
Anyone who trusts these people is daft.
You libs make me laugh. You’re going to do SO MUCH! Well, how come we didn’t see it in the last two years in Congress, where you were in complete control? How come the Reid/Pelosi Demo-led Congress has the lowest approval ratings in American history?
You people had the perfect storm this year and still could only manage a four point win against a poor candidate with one-seventh the cash Obama had. I’m looking forward to seeing you people, with your Messiah, screw up so royally that historians will be writing for centuries about your clueless fecklessness. It’s coming, sure as water will wet us and fire will burn, because you’re the same loud-talking, dishonest, low-achieving, work-avoiding, jealous-of-your-betters scum you’ve always been.
As for unity, you’ll get just as much respect and decent treatment for The One as you gave George W. Bush. What goes around comes around. Oh, you want to suppress dissent? Bring it on. You think Al-Q made Iraq hard to govern? Try force against the better-armed half of the population when both the military and the police hate and despise you. Rather than enforce laws against us, they might just turn their guns on you. It doesn’t take a lot of imagination to see Bama having an “Allende moment” in his future.
Enjoy your moment in the sun now. It won’t last long.
“on November 10, 2008, the relentless members of the anti-American political cult World Can’t Wait uncorked a fresh new protest in downtown Berkeley, this time calling on Obama to withdraw all troops from Afghanistan.” –
They can pizz and moan…so it must be ok!
mac,
I hope your perspicuity is really a pessismistic look into the future. If not, we’re in for some rough times.
I think it’s up to Obama. If he tries to stuff his left wing ideas down America’s throat, he’ll polarize America like never before.
Meaning the nomination of far left judges, refusal to drill off shore or build nuclear power plants, the passage of the “Fairness Doctrine”, the weakening of our military, the waving the white flag in Iraq, free healthcare for illegal aliens, then blanket citizenship for them, government controlled healthcare, and in years 2,3 and 4, higher, much higher taxes and fees for all sorts of things. And, I almost forgot, the end of the 1997 homeowners’ exemption. If you don’t know what that is, and you voted for Obama, shame on you.
From my point of view, not mac’s above, there are two tipoffs that Obama is going to try to solidify the Democratic Party so that Socialism finds just the right climate in the United States to breed and prosper.
Here we go folks. But this is what Harry Reid, Nancy Palosi and Barack Obama have in common. This is their master plan. This is why those two Black Panther types showed up in front of the voting booth in Philadelphia. In the script writing world it’s called foreshadowing.
Hugh Hewitt, Michelle Malkin, Shawn Hannity, Michael Savage, Rush Limbaugh, to lesser or greater extents are aware of what I’m about to tell you.
Jesse Jackson isn’t. Bill Mahar isn’t. Jon Stewart isn’t.
The two tipoffs that Barack, Harry and Nancy are planning to change America forever.
One:
A combination of covert and overt action to increase their voter base. Stealing votes with Acorn type organizations is just the tip of the iceberg. Because you can’t steal enough votes to win most elections.
They have to create more voters. Declaring amnesty to illegal aliens is the way. Making our south borders more and more porous is the logical extension of that. These people will be poor. They’ll need welfare. They’ll vote Democratic. And they can be relocated in any state where Democrats have electoral vote issues.
Second.
An obvious move to the left will create mindsets like that of mac, above, and guys like Joe the Plumber. Lots of women will see the light. On PMJ, I hear some of the conservative to traditional middle of the roaders write some very angry stuff about Democrats and their Socialist agenda.
Guess what? Palosi, Reid and Obama don’t care.
That’s because they plan to radically limit second amendment rights. I don’t care what Barack said during the campaign. The brown eyed handsome mad was lying through his pearly whites. A weakened military won’t save us. It’s too much a part in our tradition for the military to do anything but obey their commander in chief. Police won’t stand a chance either. Barack’s Civilian Security Force will see to that. So anybody who considers armed revolt against the country having gone Socialist probably won’t stand a chance.
A final aside. By keeping us dependent on foreign oil, the Democrats will look like heroes when they strike deals with Russia and South American Socialist countries for cheap oil. Cold Americans might have been able to stick it out in Valley Forge. But today, they’ll pretty much sell their souls to keep warm.
That, my friends, is what Chaney and Bush fear the most. But if they said it, if any politician said it, they’d be laughed off the stage. Remember, we no longer have an objective press to dig for the truth. The New York Times isn’t afraid of going out of business because they’ve been promised to be “taken care of.”
How does Rachel Peepers, a college coed know all this?
Friends, Rachel Peepers is a cat. A beautiful gray feral cat, who falls asleep next to me by my keyboard every night as I try to connect with people who want to be free. As long as they have a thinking and a metabolizing.
TO: All
RE: Has Anyone Seen RealityChiq?
Although she didn’t call me a b****, her communications to me on PJM had the same sort of ‘touchy-feely’ warmth you get from someone throwing hot bleach in your face.
These people are not going to love ANYONE except for The One. And anyone who challenges their grasp of reality is going to get the same sort of ‘love’ as described in the article.
The REAL war began in 2000. And it has not abated just because they’ve gained the Oval Office. Indeed, I suspect that the ‘fun’ has just intensified. Judging by the behavior of the people of Hope and Change.
Regards,
Chuck(le)
[Statistically speaking, fifty percent all change is not necessarily for the better.]
17. venividivici:
What a bunch of BS.
vivo,
I have to agree with venividivici. If you consider the past eight years ‘pure sh*t’, you really are clueless about what sh*t really is. The ‘sh*t’ you speak of is only in your head.
Hilarious how this site is named “pajamas.”
“Straightjacket” is more apropos for the wingnut posters.
TO: Pam Meister, et al.
RE: An Observation
A ‘sore loser’ can NEVER become a ‘gracious winner’.
Only a ‘gracious loser’ can be ‘gracious winner’. It’s all in their moral background….which these Progressives have nothing that any rational human being would recognize as ‘good’.
Regards,
Chuck(le)
[The Truth will out....]
I see there is another Mike posting here. I am not he. That Mike seems to be a Obama fan, I most surely am not. See how I end my posts.
By the way, I hope all you rich liberals out there are going to pay a bunch of taxes because Joe Biden said it’s your patriotic duty to do so and I am waiting for my share of the free stuff Obama promised me.
Quote from schnargley, post #102:
“Yea? So what? What is there to to dissent from? We own the White House. We own the Congress. We own the Media. We own academia. We will soon own the Supreme Court. We are healed from racism. Social and economic justice will soon arrive. The world is behind us and wolrd peace will soon prevail. High vibrational luminosity and karmic harmony is filling the earth.”
Well schnargley my friend here is what else you now own. You you now own the consequences of this Socialist Workers Paradise that you are creating.You own the unemployment rate, the tax rates, the Dow/Nasdaq Averages, the GNP, future SAT scores, the price of oil, the crime rate, and the inflation rate.You own every body-bag that comes home to America. You own the Iraqi war and the consequences of a cowardly retreat. You also own Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, North Korea, Russia, Hamas, Hezbollah, Osama bin Laden, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Hugo Chaves, and Kim Jong-il. Those of us that did not drink the Kool-Aid, will be watching every move your Democratic dictatorship makes… and we WILL hold you accountable.
By the way, I hope all you rich liberals out there are going to pay a bunch of taxes because Joe Biden said it’s your patriotic duty to do so and I am waiting for my share of the free stuff Obama promised me.
The day after the election a former co-worker emailed me and asked how I was doing. I informed her that I was very worried about the future of our nation.
Her response, “Ohhhhh girlie…I am wearing BLUE today…I am a happy camper!!!! GO Dems! hehehehehehehehe.”
Yesterday she sent me an email regarding the removal of pastors on TV. Wanting me to sign a petition, number 2493. This was to stop a petition to the FCC supposedly started by athiest to remove religious broadcasting from American airways.
I informed her that it was a hoax but “The fears are probably based on the Fairness Doctrine being reinstated.” That “Pelosi supports the Fairness Doctrine, she wants it reinstated. Obama has not said if he would veto it or let it go. But he has always voted along with other Democrats. Since they control the House, Senate and President, it will more than likely be reinstated. We are about to lose our first of many freedoms.”
Her response, “Ok ENOUGH…your making me feel like an idiot….ok, ok, I know I’m an idiot but……I get it!
:):):)”
There appears to be an antidote to the Kool-Aid they drank: Truth and reality!!!
Mike,
The people getting free stuff are called the Bank of England. But you are too dense to ever understand why we laugh at you for giving them your wealth through the private corporation the IRS, so they can loan it back to you, meanwhile destroying your wealth through inflation.
Instead their media plays up gays and dark people, and makes you dislike them. And you swallow their lies, just as the indentured servants arriving in the New World believed they were different than the black slaves working alongside.
Libby
There surely will be a fight and it will be about marxism and socialism and death will be real.
So many overgeneralizations and soothsayers coming from both sides; I’m disappointed reason seems to have left us all. When will we realize guns are not needed nor is conformity to the ruling majority. Yes, Obama is now President to us all and his actions, as well as the Democratic Congress, will have effects, but they will effect us less than is being made out on these comments –> IE your life will go on and you will live, so be happy for that!
How can you presume that you know anything at all about the “young couple” buying beer with cash and food with food stamps? How do you know what their situation is???
Doesn’t matter what their situation is. If they’ve got money for beer, they’ve got money for peanut butter and children’s shoes–they’re just putting their own selfish pleasure above their children’s lives. Why should I be forced to pay for other people’s misplaced priorities?
Democrats,
F*** you.
Love, Me
I don’t pretend to know what Obama’s presidency will really be like. Not as bad as predicted, I hope.
However, I’m beginning to agree that no matter what he does we should give Obama exactly the same degree of respect the support that the Left gave Bush – which is to say, none.
Remember: Dissent is the highest form of patriotism. I hope those words taste good when we throw them back in your teeth…
Snarugly or whatever, the wrold doesn’t love the US. I know I’ve already posted this, but France will not love the US, unless the US unilaterally pays the French from the evilly gained profits from the US free market, as there is no longer enough cashflow generated to support the French socialist system. Two days after Obama was elected, union members protesting the closing of a US owned, French based company complained that Obama was supposed to save their jobs, because the company paid the dividends to their stockholders, and claimed a profit…. I only hope that Obama will moderate so the real US can come back in 2012.
TO: Bugs
RE: Don’t Count On It
Indeed. I suspect that saying things that the cultists of The One don’t care for will get something a tad more substantial thrown back in YOUR teeth for you efforts.
Regards,
Chuck(le)
[Sore losers, make for sore winners. -- CBPetlo]
TO: All
RE: [OT] Speaking of ‘Change’
As I commented in my item #109 (above), all change is not necessarily ‘good’.
I’ve seen reports that terrorist attacks in Baghdad have increase by 100% since early November. In September and October the number of attacks were 22 and 28. So far, in November there have been 20. And we’re not even half-way through the month.
Three guesses as to why. First two don’t count….
Regards,
Chuck(le)
P.S. To all the so-called ‘liberals’ and ‘progressives’ who voted for The One….
….this blood is on YOUR hands.
P.P.S. It looks like my plans for a t-shirt and/or bumper sticker with an image of Iraq dripping blood and the verbiage, “Don’t Blame ME!” is coming to pass….
P.P.P.S. All you people who live in a major metropolitan area had better hope that my plans for a similar t-shirt/bumper sticker with the image of a nuke over a city skyline doesn’t prove out as accurately.
Either that or move to the country, soon.
Preferably somewhere up-wind from the prevailing winds of the projected target area.
kochevnik:
“Mike,
The people getting free stuff are called the Bank of England. But you are too dense to ever understand why we laugh at you for giving them your wealth through the private corporation the IRS, so they can loan it back to you, meanwhile destroying your wealth through inflation.”
Kochevnik, the Bank of England it is now. Ah sure now that I am enlightened I can sleep easy.
But I really don’t have to worry now do I since Obama has promised me no taxes and some of the wealth that will be shared out.
By the way, I hope all you rich liberals out there are going to pay a bunch of taxes because Joe Biden said it’s your patriotic duty to do so and I am waiting for my share of the free stuff Obama promised me.
If I were a neutral observer (which I’m not)I would say that what the Left calls a “call for Unity” is really “STFU and get with the program.”
It seems to be the case.
The level & intensity of…nah nah nah nah nahing…and immature gloating of some of the Obamatrons make you think they’ve barely passed the 3rd grade.
I guess since The One™ got a majority (I won’t say, exactly, “won”) that the O’trons may be trying to keep that excited obsessive-compulsive feeling alive.
’cause now it’s back to boring old politics again, some Washington DC BS, a government that has grown way too unwieldy and huge already and will only be satisfied when it has the power to command and redistribute all of your personal income, how dare you imagine that it is yours ?
Taxation without representation is tyranny ! We’ll have a little tea party in Boston Harbor…
Tantaafl, please do not be so derogatory as to compare democrats with third-graders. Third-graders usually have learned that acting that way gets you in trouble or a punch in the nose.
Dan, where is your gas station in Cleveland? Gas around here costs more than milk.
No.
Michelle Obama will never be the First Lady.
She may well be the First Woman. Becoming a resident of the White House does not have the power to make her a lady. In order to be “First Lady” she has to be a lady FIRST. And that political hack is no lady.
Chuck, you act like the war started on election day…
“The blood is on your hands?” For voting Obama???? Please…draw the line that connects a single terrorist attack in Iraq with a vote for Obama.
And yes, you can use crayons.
Therese,
I agree, Refuse to support the corrupt Media,
Boycott the Media, But in a Focused way that will be more effective. Instead of all of us choosing who to boycott as Individuals Might we Target a Specific News Source. This is a technique that the Left has use to good effect when Striking certain Industries. Force one to Fold then move on to another. Kind of like putting Funds into battleground States or Key Races.
Mike,
The taxes you pay are interest only payments to the Bank of England. If you refused to use debt notes, and instead used colonial scrpt, greenbacks or silver certificates you would not need to pay taxes, and the economy would boom. Instead, your economy is collapsing because the banksters are refusing new loans and instead demanding ownership of your economy. At the present rate you will have nothing left but giving your children to them as slaves, like 200 years ago. At what point will you stop being a patsy? Nature is made out of dialectics. Every hear about quantum mechanics? Are you so attached to the left/right paradigm that you will let everything in your life go? The two sides are inseparable so you are playing a fool’s game besides.
>But I really don’t have to worry now do I since Obama
>has promised me no taxes and some of the wealth that
>will be shared out.
>By the way, I hope all you rich liberals out there
>are going to pay a bunch of taxes because Joe Biden
>said it’s your patriotic duty to do so and I am
>waiting for my share of the free stuff Obama promised >me.
Dave,
“I agree, refuse to support the corrupt Media, Boycott the Media”
If you pay taxes, you support the banksters who bought all your media companies long ago. They are buying up more and more of your economy.
RADICAL POLITICIANS WILL DESTROY OBAMA
The far left in Congress is on track to ruin the Obama administration:
http://greensrealworld.blogspot.com/2008/11/radical-politicians-will-destroy-obama.html
111. RE:
In my head??? Are you blind, deaf or in another planet? Overreaction to 9/11, a stupid “war”, lack of intelligence in other countries, biggest deficit, no leadership, the list is so long and embarrassing. People are waking up from the bad politicians and misguided policies. Yes, eight years of pure crap.
Unity will be achieved when we are all equally suffering under the proposed policies of Obama.
Alien Amnesty,skyrocketing energy costs,stifling taxes, diminished world standing,high unemployment and runaway inflation, and government deciding for us.
Unity with the angry left…dream on; and judging by Obamas appointments so far, very far off if at all.
http://thenma.org/blogs//index.php/libertyforusa/2008/11/09/america-the-div-id-ed
NOT TO MENTION THE BILLIONS THE OBAMACOMMIE RECEIVED FROM MARXISTS,HAMAS,HEZBOLLAH,IM A DUM JIHAD OF IRAN IN ILLEGAL CAMPAIGN DONATIONS. YOU KNOW,JOHN MCSHAME LOST THIS ELECTION WHEN HE BOUGHT INTO SOROS “MCSHAME-SLIMEGOLD CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM” A SHAM IF THERE EVER WAS ONE. OBAMAS “UNITY”-OH LET ME SEE-THE “CIVILIAN DEFENSE FORCE”-AKA THE WAFFEN SS. THE NATION OF ISLAM-THE “LEADERS” OF THE NEW STORM TROOPERS. NASTY THE BOLSHEVIK PGLOSI-SOME UNIFYER. HARRY THE RED REED-THE GUY WHO SAID “IRAQ IS LOST,THUS UNDERMINING OUR MILITARY. SOME UNIFYER. DICKHEAD DUMBASS DURBIN TURBAN-HE WHO CALLED OUR HOLDING FACILITY AT GITMO TO HITLER ,POLPOT,STALINS GULAGS ET AL. SOME UNIFYER. RAHM EMANUEL-SOME “UNIFYER”. “REV” JEREMIAH WRIGHT-SOME UNIFYER. “REV” OTIS MOSS-SOME UNIFYER. “FATHER” MICHAEL PFLEGLER-SOME UNIFYER. BILL AYERS AND BERNADETTE DOHRN-REAL UNIFIERS. YES THEY ARE ALL “UNIFYERS”. THEY ARE UNIFIED IN THERE HATRED OF FREEDOM AND LOVE OF COMMUNISM.
WARREN BUFFETT AS AN “ECONOMIC ADVISER”? A CRONY CAPITALIST. A REAL CAPITALIST DOESNT USE THE TAX CODE TO FORCE COMPETITORS TO SELL BUSINESSES TO HIM AS BUFFETT DOES. A REAL CAPITALIST DOES AS THE LIKES OF CARNEGIE OR HARVEY FIRESTONE DID, REINVESTED THERE CAPITAL INTO PRODUCING MORE GOODS TO BENEFIT THERE FELLOW MAN. BUFFETT DOES NOTHING OF THE SORT. BUFFETT IS A GAMER OF CAPITALISM ,AS IS SOROS. NIETHER ONE OF THESE LOSERS DOES ANYTHING TO BENEFIT THERE FELLOW MAN. RATHER, LIKE ALL COMMIES,THEY ONLY SEEK TO ENRICH THEMSELVES AT THE EXPENSE OF THERE FELLOW MAN. SOROS HASNT PRODUCED ONE PRODUCT THAT BENEFITS MANKIND. NIETHER HAS BUFFETT,ALL HIS COMPANIES(BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY,GEICO INSURANCE ETC) ARE SERVICE ORIENTED.
68. kfarley:
In response, we’re not all cold-hearted selfish ‘wingers. We just don’t believe the government is the best or only way to help these people you describe. Charity and volunteerism is a much more efficient way of helping people. You could give to programs that administer help to those less fortunate for a lot less money lost to overhead – food banks for example.
Basically, we don’t want the government to take extra earnings away to do a job better done outside of government. We’ll do it ourselves, thank you very much.