Bye Bye, Miss American Pie?
Drove my Chevy to the levee, but the levee was dry.
The famous refrain from Don McLean’s hit song, adjusted for context, has an ominous ring to it as America drives its Chevy, or its Volt, toward the levee of its future. There are fewer than two years to go before the United States will decide whether it intends to survive or to call it quits — a stark choice, and no doubt a simplistic way of putting it — but it’s no reductive exaggeration. To see how the process of degeneration works, we need only look across the Atlantic. America’s European parent is clearly in the throes of slow but inexorable disintegration. Fiscal recklessness owing to socialist economics and out-of-control entitlement and welfare spending, rampant multiculturalism leading to a rapidly expanding and hostile Islamic demographic, the politically correct war against truth allied with growing censorship and prosecution of free expression, virulent anti-Semitism, the transnational weakening of cultural solidarity, and a precipitously declining birth rate combine in an unholy amalgam to guarantee a desolate posterity. Beneath its cultivated facade, Europe looks increasingly moon-cratered.
Those of us who have observed the European denouement and retain some sense of history’s centrifuge know that Europe is finished. Perhaps not today or tomorrow, but certainly the day after tomorrow. The question is how much of the European DNA persists in America’s sociogenetic system. “Are we,” asks Steve Balch, chair of the National Association of Scholars, “along with Europe, drifting toward an acceptance of Tocqueville’s soft despotism?” — that is, according to the French philosopher, toward “servitude of the regular, quiet, gentle kind” which ultimately “stupefies a people.” And the answer is profoundly alarming.
For despite the exceptionalism of its founding and historical career, America remains Europe’s child. The unpalatable fact is that the United States currently suffers from many of the same infirmities that bedevil the European polity. The family resemblance is undeniable. There is probably no need to expect what Glenn Beck has somewhat extravagantly called a “Reichstag moment,” but every reason to fear the weakening of constitutional authority, budgetary implosion, and the eclipse of the sovereign individual and empowered citizen on which the greatness and uniqueness of the United States is predicated.
America’s descent from its founding principles did not begin with the administration of Barack Obama. The virus of dissolution may always have been inherent, but a modern starting point may plausibly be located in the unworldly idealism of Woodrow Wilson, who tried to make the world “safe for democracy,” an agenda which tends to make the world unsafe for everyone. In particular, Article 10 of his “Fourteen Points” for peace obligated member nations to intervene in the affairs of other countries in order to defend their independence, the forerunner of today’s invasive and double-edged R2P legislation. (See Libya.) For there is often no reliable way of distinguishing the oppressor from the oppressed. (See Egypt.) And political calculation may well target the truly endangered. (See Israel.) “The downside of allowing human rights to guide foreign policy,” remarks Daniel Flynn, “is that often human rights paradoxically suffer.” Wilson’s legacy is still with us today.
This strain of quixotic intrusiveness, both foreign and domestic, continued through a succession of presidents and their defining policies: FDR’s New Deal, which many scholars now believe actually prolonged the Great Depression by nearly a decade; Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society, which created a culture of crippling dependency on government programs and the emergence of an “entitlement mentality”; Jimmy Carter’s thoroughgoing ineptitude in the arena of foreign affairs, which gave us the Islamic Republic of Iran and a world on the brink of nuclear proliferation; and George W. Bush’s pixilated project of exporting democratic institutions to societies in the Muslim world where such institutions can find no historical and cultural purchase, producing a fractured Iraq, a corrupt and fragile Afghanistan, and a terrorist state in Gaza, to name only the most prominent instances of social and political delirium.
The installation of Barack Obama in the White House can be regarded as the end point of this malign declension. This is a president who has not only repeated the errors of his predecessors but seems intent on compounding them. We might assume there is no way out of the impasse and that America is irretrievably lost. But the ascendance of Obama might also be considered as the watershed event in which America either succumbs to the forces of dispersal and becomes one more failed state — or experiences a redemptive moment of national self-recognition and acts to restore itself as a viable and flourishing constitutional republic.
This is precisely what the approaching election is all about. It is not an election like any other, simply to determine which party occupies the seat of power for the next four years. It is an election in which the fate of the nation will be resolved for all the years to come. Roger Simon argues that a second administration for Obama would lead not to socialism or to a political and economic cataclysm, but to “stultifying stagnation.” We would all just fall asleep, as did Vice-President Joe Biden during the president’s April 12 budgetary address. Simon presents a best-case scenario that relies on the presumed effectiveness of a “Republican House and, most likely, a Republican Senate,” a rather debatable proposition. Obama may well be the most cloying, insipid, and insurmountably tedious president in living memory, but going to sleep is not an option.
In fact, the stakes could not be higher. This assessment is not an example of mere hyperbole to be scoffed at and dismissed as wilful scare-mongering. The United States is demonstrably teetering on the edge of the historical abyss. Will it go the way of Europe, a “demotic culture in decadence,” to cite Jacques Barzun’s magisterial work From Dawn to Decadence, a culture which suffers from both “paralysis” and “incompetence”? Have we become the casualties of our institutions and public agencies which are now “disintegrating, working against their best intentions, and unable to change”?
Or is a belated prologue still possible, a “renascent culture” and “resurrected enthusiasm,” as Barzun hopes? Will the American electorate seize the chance to repudiate the practice of autocratic decision-making — Tocqueville’s “administrative despotism,” the flagrant illegality of much of the Department of Justice’s present race-based conduct, the outrage of permeable borders resulting in festering violence and illegal immigration, the tendency to cede political autonomy to international bodies like the United Nations and the International Court of Justice in the Hague, the ongoing effort to circumvent Congress, the catering to an Islamic fifth column and its attempt to insinuate Sharia law into the life of the nation, a military establishment that condemns the burning of a single Koran but approves the mass incineration of Bibles, the pie-in-the-sky economics that ensures the massive accumulation of unpayable debt and the gradual impoverishment of the middle class under the sign of income redistribution? Will the American public reject the president’s stated, and currently enacted, promise to “fundamentally transform” the country into what is nothing less than a moribund caricature of its former self? For in the final analysis, this is a president, as Michael Ledeen writes, “who sees America as the root cause of mischief, and perhaps even evil, in the world, and is more concerned about punishing his own people than fighting our enemies.” Nevertheless, the opportunity for genuine ‘hope and change” is there.
The defeat of Barack Obama, who plainly does not have the best interests of his country at heart and oversees a degrading “state of the nation,” will not miraculously usher in a bright new dawn. The left-leaning Democratic Party, the supercilious coastal elites, the insatiable public sector unions, the vapid but insidious punditariat, and the venal, anti-republican media juggernaut will remain forces to be reckoned with. “The annoying thing about discredited gospels,” grumbles novelist John Gardner, “is that they continue, though dead as doornails, to exert their effect.” It will be a long night’s journey into day. But the early glimmer of a kind of zodiacal light signaled by Obama’s failure to win re-election may presage a new beginning. In a very real sense, it does not matter who fills the presidential vacancy, provided it is not a Democrat. Or, for that matter, a temporizing RINO. But there is a palpable desire for change in the air and there are a sufficient number of excellent Republican candidates to mine the silver lining of an otherwise cloudy future.
Failing this providential turn of events, it really will be Bye Bye Miss American Pie, leaving, in Don McLean’s words, “a generation lost in space, with no time left to start again.”






It is not far from the truth to say that the US is now its own worst enemy. Obama represents the worst of the self destructive in the US. This is the new America. Obama is the tip of a bigger issue which no civilization can survive: we have crossed the line with now more than fifty percent of public that think they can vote themselves entitlements from a shrinking number of the productive. I support the Tea Party movement but know that the US is in a process of cultural and monetary self annihilation that will be very painful for all of us through the next ten years. My advice is to implement your personal ark to survive the next decade.
Factoid: 51 percent no longer pay income taxes. We’ve reached the point where the takers outnumber the producers. There are two issues for the elections of 2012:
A. Will the takers be motivated to go vote?
B. How many producers will side with the takers.
If you look at the numbers, you’ll find that adding the takers plus the Marxists that work (example, MSM, government, etc.) and the Left should win by 70-30.
To predict the outcome, the only issue you need track is the senior issue. If the GOP can counter the lies of the Dems, then there’s a chance. Otherwise the Dems will always have at least 41 votes in the Senate.
The only real hope for the Republic is a States Constitutional Convention along with subsequent Amendments to put the Federals back in their bottle. If not, then check out how a State may exit the Union or decide, plan and be prepared to exit the US. Or both.
While I agree with the sentiments in general, I disagree with the call for another Constitutional convention. The problem with this nation is not that we don’t have the right clauses and amendments in the existing Constitution, it is that we the people are either willfully and negiligently ignorant of, or in denial concerning, what the Constitution actually says. Changing the Constitution will not change that.
Were we to actually follow the Constitution as written, ~ 90% of the Fed gov’t would disappear, business would boom, workers would be able to write their own ticket because of the dire need for them, wealth would spread. Freedom would ring.
But we are a wicked people, a lazy and depraved sovereign who has hired inept and corrupt ministers who supply us sufficiently with bread and circuses while we ignore the rot and the cries of the oppressed. This does not end well.
Oh, and as to how a ‘State may exit the Union’, that does vary from nation to nation, of course. In Canada they do ‘French Creek’. In the United States we do Antietam.
Of course, having said that, it would be interesting to see what would happen if, say, Texas (currently contributing the largest raw number of military recruits of all the states by almost twice the #2 which is Florida [http://www.statemaster.com/graph/mil_tot_mil_rec_arm_nav_air_for-recruits-army-navy-air-force]), with perhaps the deep South, Kentucky (please, oh please) and a few others, were to vote to leave the Union: would the coasts have the gumption to replay Gettysburg?
Not to burst your bubble, but the US is not over. We are still the world’s one hyperpower. Despite unbelievable challenges of war, a huge economic setback in 2008, our nation is mighty and growing in strength. We do have a terrible President but he may not win in 2012 if the economy does not improve and he had bin Laden killed.
You think the Senate will be all democrats after 2012? I don’t.
People need to calm down and have faith that in the intelligent design of our system of government.
We will be back. we will rise and we will keep rising. That is why pessimistic whining is wrong. Get your but back to work, make money and donate to the right candidates. It is what I am doing. If 100,000 americans gave $10000 each to republicans of all stripes in 2012, we win. Get it? Oh and there are over 10 million millionaires in the US.
I need to get to work.
Good article but you repeat the common misconception that LBJ’s Great Society created the modern welfare state. The Great Society may have been a failure but it was not the origin of today’s entitlement based government. Richard Nixon, who was an eastern establishment Republican in the mold of Nelson Rockafeller, created the modern welfare state.
tdiinva: So whose administration came first? That of LBJ or RN?
Johnson lasted from late 1963 until early 1969.
Nixon’s lasted from 1969 until summer 1974=AFTER the grand-child of the Welfare State=ROOSEVELT passed away in 1944!!!
Looking at the result of the ’08 election, no one can be blamed for opining that the collective American decision that made Barack Obama president means the end of America as we know it. Election results do sometimes say quite important things about an electorate at a particular moment in time and Obama’s election definitely said something important and a little scary about the state of the American electorate that year. Many people were justifiably angry at Bush and distrustful of McCain and turned somewhat ignorantly and indifferently to Barack Obama as a default. That he was an unknown was perhaps his greatest selling point. This is not to excuse the awfulness of the decision, just put it in some context.
But one must also look at the bright side of that decision for clues about the outcome of next year’s election. Back in ‘08 enough Americans felt that it was time to elect a black man as president. Perhaps most importantly, enough Americans wanted to believe that what Obama said was actually said from the heart and was true. We are a trusting lot and the idea that a candidate for the office of president could lie as egregiously as he did far exceeded our capacity for skepticism of politicians in general. That Obama went way beyond the parameters of the usual campaign fibs told by candidates is now conventional wisdom. But keep in mind that in ’08 many people believed that Bush had lied to them about his intentions to control spending and control the border; many of these people later added Iraq to this equation. After what Obama has already done to undo his presidency the question now becomes what can he do to save it? The Campaigner-in-Chief has pretty much cemented his reputation as a flop.
I would already have thrown up my hands (and throw in the towel), too, if last year’s election result had gone the other way, but it went the right way. And, unless the collective judgment of the American electorate is as degraded as the author fears, there will be a repeat of the same next year. It’s only logical.
My wife’s company shut down early 2009, she did not go back to work because we understood the nature of the threat from this elected government, and how it will do and go through to any means to tax achievers with its belief in wealth redistribution. Punishment of the producers is a mad obsession to control every facet of people’s personal freedom, the economy, and how they think, work, drive, and eat. All under the lie that we need to save the earth, therefore, we need to submit every facet or our lives to do as these people tell us to do. Where in the Constitution does it say “SUBMIT to the ruler king government?”
Just like I did in Vietnam with a Strategic recon team when in the center of the enemy of overwhelming numbers, “Lay Dog” and live to fight another day. As soon as the Marxist administration is gone we will muster our assets to invest, work, and spend. Our family is not alone in its thinking and actions, many family’s are not spending or investing because of fear or punishment from the government as well as helping the economy to rebound. It is the velocity of money that will create the wealth need to rebound the country. Special note here; the country is not the government. Having come from a family that lived through the Great Depression, and WWII, we can live on almost nothing until this scourge of the Obama Administration is gone. Obama called me and my family the enemy on a radio station during the 2010 elections. What does that say about a President and government that call its people the enemy? Surly they must think the country belongs to them, and that the people are lowly slaves to submit to the master government.
The greed and conspicuous consumption of this government is unparallel. The very arrogance of a government that says or implies that we cannot give a tax cut as well as we need more money from those who hire and work harder is untenable. All the time touting the greed of corporations, companies, investors, and ordinary citizens, as if to say how you dare not give government more so we can rule over you slaves better.
Trust that we will survive this blight on our country as we will not give our freedom to any dispot lier. What kind of a government calls the citizens “The enemy?”
“Will it go the way of Europe, a “demotic culture in decadence,” ?
American revolutionary and liberty loving DNA still exists — however the stock is a shrinking share of the electorate due to:
> Aging and declining number of citizens who’ve been taught and embrace founding principles
> Growing number of younger voters who are oblivious to what is at stake
> Uncontrolled immigration of all types with no assimilation to American culture and dependency on government from day one of arriving
The Tea Party was a flicker of this DNA ignited — but a what is necessary is a massive awakening from our comfortable torpor to comprehend the threat to liberty we are experiencing.
With each passing year the ability of that number of voters that could awake with a “resurrected enthusiasm” is less and less able to democratically overcome the sheer numbers of voters who prefer government dependence and the siren song of socialist s**t.
Sure. Right.
The Demagogic Party owns all the Union money, all the Bolshevik street soldiers, all so-called “minorities”, all the gummint employees, all the media including Hollywood and the BBC, $787 Billion in “stimulus” money to use as walking around ward heeler dough everywhere, a Chicago machine crooked DOJ, and all the guns in the world . . .
. . . and you think the split CountryClubRepublicans—Libertarians—Constituionalists—Moderates—Independents etc. will join together to “fight”.
Yeah. Right. Go team. Dream on.
Yep. Obama’s gonna win again, America is screwed.
I disagree Sam,if the election was held today Barako wouldn’t be elected . Those without work will not vote for this Muslim in Chief. Only the ignorant and those dependent upon their Nanny State will vote for Barako.
As Ronaldus Magnus once stated – I paraphrase – There is no where else to go or run to. This is Freedom’s last stand -Referring to America.
We must not allow this decline to mediocrity to continue. I trust that there are enogh freedom loving americans left that we will make the course correction that is needed. Palin/West 2012.
I have friends in Spain who answer the question “how can the cafes and stores of Spain be bustling with activity when unemployment is 20%? (30%+ among the young)…A: There is a huge underground economy that has emerged. I suspect that economy operates on more free-market principals than the “official” one. Maybe that should be our approach… let the establishment have it’s fun/pretend utopian socialist paradise, while we go off and build a real economy…and country…in a parallel universe.
Sorry, I don’t believe you. Every presidential election since 1960 has been billed as a make or break election. The chattering classes have cried WOLF too often.
The elections might make a difference if there were any reason to believe that that elected officials would do what they said they would do or what they did the previous term. But they don’t.
They are mostly liars except for the ones who are so ignorant that they don’t know that what they are proposing is stupid. Over and over again we have seen politicians promise one thing and then do the opposite.
“Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.”
The purpose of the incredible amount spent on elections in this country is to provide an economic boost to the media industry.
I see this not as a political movement in the beginning so much as a social one and beginning much later.
Political correctness is the most popular and dangerous ideology in America today and is not even seen as such and yet one could argue it is the main platform of the Democratic Party.
It’s bare seeds started in the 50s with Ginsberg and the “Beat Generation” and coalesced in the mid-60s and it’s been all downhill since. Political Correctness happened by accident but is now fully formed with tenets and a code of ethnics and an organic, unconscious desire apart from individuals who group together almost by instinct to deconstruct America and paint over Mount Rushmore.
These are hippies with swastikas.
I don’t really agree with a lot of the article but the title is brilliant in conduction with the Obama presidency and those who elected him.
The classic Don McClean balad has many parallels. Obama is a late boomer, like McClean and myself. He knows the references which capture a slice of the American experience transitioning to the early 70s.
One interesting parallel is the reference to the Rolling Stones at Altamont
As the flames climbed high into the night
To light the sacrificial light
I saw Satan laughing with delight
The day the music died
Obama listed his top 10 songs last election. One of them was ‘gimme shelter’ the classic Stones tune (my personal favorite) which was the title of the documentary about what happened there. Satan in the song refers to Jaggar and the whole Sympathy for the Devil thing.
Another is this. James May brought up hippies and I was thinking about Obamas “Sputnik moment” reference to the space program which captured all of our imaginations, hopes, and dreams.
And there we were all in one place
A generation Lost in Space
With no time left to start again
Double reference here. So many hippies got lost in drug era and vague ill formed ideas that they were lost. Yet not all who left the one place (woodstock in a metaphorical sense) Were lost. We are the seniors now. So is Obama. He wants to return to that hazy place, but another generation created Apollo. There is no starting again.
Music never dies. Music is in our DNA. One thing I liked about Bill Clinton is that he was an amateur musician. Buddy Holly may have died that day aboard the American Pie (the plane where he, Ritchie Valens, and the Big Bopper perished February 3, 1959) but the rest of the song talks about after, Stones, Beatles (quartet in the park), Janis Joplin (I met a girl who sang the blues).
Anyway it was fun to remember that song and think about what it might mean today.
Spindok
“Cause the players tried to take the field
The marching band refused to yield
Do you recall what was revealed
The day the music died?”
David, for nearly 100 years, America has been “it’s own grandpa” to Western Europe.
At once, our stuttering elite have fawned and curtsied toward the French haute couture, haute cuisine, haute corruption of America’s image…a menu of dismissive attitude, slander and envy…and at the same time, time and again racing to save them from annihilation at the hands of a raging anti-Semite, financial implosion, military ruin, social collapse.
They hate us for having to ask, we hate ourselves because we don’t measure up to their standards of elitism.
We beg to be liked, they treat us like beggars. We save their ass from annihilation, then kiss it, mewling for forgiveness and acceptance.
We bring their enemies to their knees, then fall to ours in abject humiliation at our own power, wishing that the cursed gift would vanish and we could be humbled before our betters. That wish is upon us. We have rubbed the genie’s bottle raw, so that two years ago he emerged and granted us our very first wish. We are weak and humbled beyond our wildest imaginings.
We circumnavigated the globe awash in apologies and deep bows. We have genuflected to our enemies and slapped the faces of our friends. We self-flagellate non-stop and we curse our history in a chorus of hostile harmony.
We are led by people who pretend for a living. An army of Abagnalian artisans, pretending to have answers to questions nobody was asking. Until now.
The flying monkey media writing their daily diet of “Yes, we Con” missives against the interests of the people and for the interests of the moral proletariat.
Ahhh, David…will we go the way of Western Europe, you ask? We we be lead to slaughter like the PIIGS before us? Let me cast these pearls before them…we not only will follow them into the abyss, we will seize the banner and lead the charge.
You see, David, as we head toward 2012…the players have tried to take the field, those marching bands in Wisconsin and the Middle East have refused to yield, …..my dear David, do you now see what has been revealed…this day…the music…died?