Bias? More Doubts Raised About The Politico’s Thompson Article
Fire Chief Dan McKenzie cast more doubts on The Politico’s chief political correspondent Roger Simon’s version of events at McKenzie’s Waverly, Iowa fire station in Simon’s article “Fred Thompson: Lazy as charged.” Questions had been raised about Simon’s article based on a video of Thompson’s appearance, which seemed to show the candidate behaving in a radically different manner from the one described by The Politico correspondent. In interviews with PJ Media, Chief McKenzie similarly refuted Simon’s characterization of Thompson as “lazy” or “sour” at the event and the editor of the Waverly Democrat refused to confirm the accuracy of comments attributed to her in Simon’s article.
McKenzie was unaware of the Simon article until Friday afternoon. The Iowa fire chief was read the following paragraphs and asked for comment.
…Thompson rode four blocks to the local fire station. Local fire stations always have captive audiences (unless there is a fire).
Inside, Thompson shook a few hands – there were only about 15 people there – and then Chief Dan McKenzie handed Thompson the chief’s fire hat so Thompson could put it on.
Thompson looked at it with a sour expression on his face.
“I’ve got a silly hat rule,” Thompson said.
In point of fact, the “silly” hat was the one Chief McKenzie wore to fires and I am guessing none of the firefighters in attendance considered it particularly silly, but Thompson was not going to put it on. He just stood there holding it and staring at it.
To save the moment, Jeri Thompson took the hat from her husband’s hands and put it on her head.
“You look cute,” Thompson said to her. She did.
Unlike Simon’s characterization of a “sour” Thompson, McKenzie recalled that the firefighters were joking with the Thompsons during the visit, which corroborates the CBS News video that captured part of the event. He stated further than any attempt to portray the event as Simon described was the work of “someone who had their own agenda.”
Unprompted, McKenzie stated that he was well aware of the dangers of politicians wearing hats, and he and his fellow firefighters understood why Thompson declined to wear the helmet. He also stated that he understood that someone might want to make an issue of Thompson wearing his helmet, and that it seemed that when Thompson declined, “someone decided to make an issue out of it anyway.”
Chief McKenzie concluded that the Waverly firemen was very appreciative of Thompson’s visit, as they would be of any presidential candidate that took the time to stop by.
Prior to the campaign’s visit to the Waverly Fire Department, Thompson visited the Waverly Democrat, a semi-weekly newspaper, where Thompson conducted a brief interview with the newspaper’s staff, including editor Anelia Dimitrova and reporter Janelle Penny.
Simon attributed the following statements to Editor Dimitrova in his article:
Anelia Dimitrova, the executive regional editor, greeted us in warmly and invited us to have a seat, chat and use the bathroom. She offered Mark a high-speed Internet line so he could upload some video to his website and I sat down with her for a brief interview.
She said Thompson was the first candidate to come into the paper. The paper does not endorse candidates, and maybe that is why the others have skipped it. “He’s got a lot of catching up to do,” Dimitrova said. “I think it’s a sign he is behind. I don’t think he necessarily wants to run. Bluntly, I don’t know why he is running.”
Simon wrote on the next page of the article:
Later in the day, I sent an e-mail to Anelia Dimitrova, asking her about the private meeting she had with Thompson at the newspaper office.
She e-mailed me back that Thompson “was so vague that I would be hard-pressed to write a story. Simply put, there is no news peg other than he came to the newsroom with his model wife and a beehive of staffers. When I asked him specifically what he would do as prez for farmers in Bremer County, he resorted to glittering generalities.”
When reached for comment this afternoon, Dimitrova stated that she had a newspaper edition that she was trying to finish. She also made clear that she did “not want to get in the middle of this.”
When asked to confirm whether or not the words Simon attributed to her in the article were accurate, Dimitrova declined.
Bob Owens has been covering the Beauchamp Scandal for PJ Media and the Confederate Yankee.






Fred Thompson would be a GREAT President,not a fireman
The local editor is clearly a partisan given the disparaging characterizations of Thompson and his wife. I guess they don’t call it the Waverly Democrat for nothing.
But this really takes the cake:
“When I asked him specifically what he would do as prez for farmers in Bremer County, he resorted to glittering generalities.”
The entitlement that some of these people feel is breathtaking! Iowa is not looking good. These people are extortionists! It is not just the politicians fault. Good for Fred to not pander to their ethanol-subsidy addiction.
Fred Thompson always looks scary to commies and hippies. To the rest of us he’s just an awesome guy with a beautiful wife. He’s like a kind of “idiot meter.” You can sort out the idiots in any situation by how they react to Fred. Got pix of Jeri in the fireman’s hat?
So it’s okay for PJM to be on the giving side of “media bias” (i.e., the smear jobs and mischaracterizations of Ron Paul), but it’s a different story when your boy Fred is the target. Time to put on your big-boy underpants and quit crying.
The local editor does not seem so partisan in the full edition of the Waverly Democrat, where she prints the full transcript of the interview:
http://communitynewspapergroup.com/articles/2007/12/22/waverly_newspapers/news/news01.txt
I would love to see Fred Thompson as our next president. I think he would be excellent.
Indeed, franco 53, the small-mindedness of Iowans is the big story here. The world is blowing up and they are worried about farm subsidies.
I’m for Fred because he is the strongest/best candidate out there, regardless of how so many in the media try to diminish his candidacy. Some outlets try to ignore him, only giving him coverage when it paints him or his campaign in a bad light. (Fox) Of course, that’s why you hear almost nothing about him on Fox other than that he is lagging in some poll or other. They can’t find a controversy or legitimate negative to peg him with. So, others, like Simon, simply make them up. And the lemmings nod and say, “Yep, Fred’s great on the issues, but he’s lazy/lacks fire/doesn’t want it, can’t get noticed, etc…”
Thank you, Mr. Owens, for helping to point this out. Maybe it will help wake the lemmings up. Now my big question is WHY? Why are they all so determined to keep Fred from breaking through? I can only conclude that they do not want a true conservative in the White House. Voters, do your own research and not just at a candidate’s campaign website where they tell you what you want to hear, regardless of the truth or lack there of. Look at their records. Fred is the real deal, the only real deal with the exception of Duncan Hunter, barring his withdrawal and endorsement of any of the other candidates.
I have followed politics since the disaster of the Clinton years, so I glean as much as I can from the WSJ, some writers @ Townhall, etc. I actually have learned a lot from sites such as this.
Two statements that make me want to pull my hair: I will vote for Hillary because she is a woman.
From Obama; “I will TALK to our enemies.” Or some such nonsense.
Why wouldn’t he salute our FLAG? Have the picture.
FRED THOMPSON is the best person to lead this country. He is a true conservative and has been his entire life. All one has to do is check his record to see this.
During my time in the Army as an Intelligence Analyst, I served under both Presidents Carter and Reagan (as my commanders in chief). Without argument, President Reagan was the best commander-in-chief a military person could ever have served under. Fred Thompson possesses the same qualities and vision as President Reagan in that he is strong on national defense and sees a dire need to secure our borders and control immigration.
I can think of no better person to lead this country and fix the problems we have. He is the only candidate from either party who has specific and detailed plans on border security and immigration reform; revitalization of America’s armed forces; saving and protecting Social Security; and tax relief and economic growth. These are detailed on his Web site at http://www.fred08.com. I challenge you to find any other candidate who has laid out specific plans to fix anything.
Fred Thompson has published his first principles, some of which are mentioned above. In addition to those, he strongly believes in individual liberty, personal responsibility, limited government, federalism, traditional American values, the rule of law and is a strong proponent of the Second Amendment — all concepts established during the birth of our country and documented in our Constitution.
Again, try to find any candidate who has laid out their plans to “fix” this country. You will find they all speak in vague and abstract terms on their plans.
For those who have heard Fred Thompson speak, you will usually hear him say that the Fred Thompson you see today is the same Fred Thompson you saw yesterday and is the same Fred Thompson you will see tomorrow. He stands by his principles and values and doesn’t shift his positions based on polls or public opinion; in other words, he doesn’t say what the voters want to hear just to get elected, but remains steadfast on his views and convictions.
During his time in the Senate he focused on three areas: to lower taxes, strengthen national security and expose waste in the federal government. Fred Thompson has foreign policy experience, having served as member of the Senate Foreign Relations and Senate Intelligence committees.
As chairman of the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee, he opened the investigation in 1997 on the Chinese government’s attempt to influence American policies and elections, and this investigation identified connections with the Clinton administration (documented in the committee’s report).
As a member of the Finance Committee, he worked tirelessly to enact three major tax-cut bills. Fred Thompson remains steadfast and even though a person may not agree with all his views and he understands some may disagree with him, you can count on him to be consistent and unwavering.
Don’t be fooled by his laid back approach and what critics call his “laziness.” As a former assistant U.S. attorney, he earned a reputation as a tough prosecutor and he possesses the toughness this country needs in order to tackle today’s and tomorrow’s issues.
I ask that you take a hard look at what this country needs, then take a hard look at all the other candidates’ views, policies, their records and their track record on consistency. Fred Thompson possesses integrity, loyalty, commitment, energy and decisiveness, all traits of an effective leader, and will emerge as the best person to take this country boldly forward.
Isn’t Politico the same place that came up with the now-bogus story of Guiliani’s accounting of trip expenses for Judith Nathan? That seems to have pretty much destroyed his campaign.
Any Republican who thinks their candidate is safe from these people is deluding themselves…
If you want to see some unusual bias on the part of the media, go over and read Carl Cameron’s blogs at Foxnews. Literally every single one is pro-Huckabee and anti-Romney.
Hard to imagine why a reporter who asks such pitiful questions feels qualified to judge his fitness for campaigning, or even to judge his answers.
Roger Simon has apparently lost any inhibition of being caught in spinning against Fred Thompson…what’s this fable he wrote his third or fourth? Simon is usually much more cautious but, I guess the new surge in people of Iowa are learning about Fred which has Simon worried all over again…he should be worried.
Check out for yourself about Fred at his website or Fredipedia (single page stuffed with links all about Fred);
http://fredipedia-us.blogspot.com/
http://www.fred08.com
You can also see some surprising stuff on the other candidates here;
http://candidateresearch.blogspot.com
“When I asked him specifically what he would do as prez for farmers in Bremer County, he resorted to glittering generalities.” Reported to be the words of Ms. Dimitrova. May I answer for Mr. Thompson? No, I shouldn’t? I’ll do it anyway.
My dear Ms Dimitrova, I will do the best for them that is possible under our way of government. I will leave them alone to practice their honorable trade and do whatever I can do to see that the rest of those in government begin doing likewise.
Entitlement programs for individual special interest groups (e.g. “the farmers of Bremer County”) isn’t in the job description of President of the United States.
Any candidate that panders to whichever audience he/she is addressing at the moment (promising the sun, the moon and the stars)…should be avoided on general principles.
(which covers most of the candidates, near as I can tell)
The more I see and hear of Fred, the more I understand that he is probably the only candidate who genuinely understands and appreciates the job of President under the US Constitution and the limitations on the power of the federal government under the Constitution.
Selecting a President isn’t choosing a rock star or a king, despite the 2 year long (even longer) relentless hype to which we the people are depressingly subjected in these times.
Remember our first President, George Washington, came reluctantly to the job as service to his country.
Since nobody has bothered to point this out…Fred DIDN’T “resort to glittering generalities.” He replied that he would lower subsidies on American farmers and fund programs focused towards soil/land conservation. What more does she want from a GIGO question like that?
Fred is the first candidate that I ever felt strongly enough about to donate my hard-earned money. I know he’ll make a great president! There isn’t anyone else out there who has been as consistent on views and stances as he has been- from EITHER party. I am sitting here, late at night, finishing paperwork (taking a break for a few to read and post) so that I can have some free time to devote to doing something for his campaign. I already have his website plastered across the rear window of my car (and I LOVE my car and keep it immaculate, so that’s a biggie for me) in hopes that I can turn even one head his way.
To those who say he is lazy, he is not; he has one of the busiest schedules out there. To those who say he doesn’t really want it, well why would he take his Christmas holiday time away from celebrating with all of his family and friends to do this for us, the American people? I find him refreshing, honest, trustworthy, consistent, intelligent, and the one and only true conservative out there.
GO FRED!
Fred refused to raise his hand to man-made global warming’s stupid hysteria.
GO FRED!
I think Fred is running only because a bunch of us asked him to, several months ago.
He’s an intelligent, perceptive man. He knows what a huge task that being the President has to be, and he quite resonably would rather do anything else but take that on. But, like other patriots in other times, he is honoring the requests of his countrymen and the call to duty.
I’d rather have a reluctant Washington than an eager (fill in the blank with your pick as the worst serving president ever). (mine is Jimmy Carter)
Fred Thompson will be on Fox News Sunday…Dec. 30,2007.