Why I Haven’t Caught “Obama Fever”
Everybody’s gaga over Barack Obama. Or so it sometimes seems. People whose judgment I deeply respect are in ecstasy over the prospect of the junior senator from Illinois being elected President. Some of them have heard him speak live and have come away enchanted. For my part, I’ve seen him talk and debate and have read as much as I can find about his positions. The result? I’ve appreciated some stands he’s taken – and been extremely offended by others. I’ve noted some signs of what may actually be real principle and courage – as well as classic examples of political waffling, cynicism, and expediency. I can see that he’s smart, charming, and articulate – but, unlike some people, I don’t see him as some knight in shining armor who’s going to deliver us from government as usual.
In short, I can’t exactly say I’ve caught Obama fever.
I’m eager, however, to understand as best I can what all the excitement is about – really I am. So when a friend lent me his copy of Obama’s 1995 memoir Dreams from My Father, I gave up my dream of spending my week’s vacation on the Costa Blanca blissfully unplugged from current events and took the damn thing with me. To my surprise, it turned out not to be a bad beach book at all – it was well written, richly human (i.e., not the usual politician’s pap), and genuinely moving.
But it disturbed me, too.
As the title intimates, the figure in Obama’s carpet is his father, a Kenyan exchange student who met Barack’s white, Kansas-born mother at the University of Hawaii. After marrying her and fathering Barack, Dr. Obama – as he was universally known – returned to Kenya to take up a high-ranking government position. Thereafter, he showed little or no interest in Barack, whom he met only once, when the boy was ten. Though Barack’s mother had a brief second marriage that took her and the boy to Indonesia, she raised him mostly in the Aloha State – and, by his account, was unfailingly selfless and loving, as were her parents, “Gramps” and “Toot,” who helped bring him up.
Yet on whom does Barack’s memoir focus? On his father – whom Barack, against all evidence (which suggests that Dr. Obama was colossally selfish and narcissistic), seeks to portray as heroic, sympathetic, indeed near-mythic. Obama p√®re was a polygamist (and a lousy husband to all his wives), but Barack gives no indication that he finds this morally problematic; on the contrary, he seems determined to excuse his father’s many failings as consequences of imperialism, colonialism, and/or racism. One can, of course, well understand why a small boy – or even a young man – might idealize out of all proportion the father he never met. But Obama shows few signs in this book of recognizing that he’s doing this. Meanwhile, perversely, he treats his mother and grandparents, who by his own account raised him with extraordinary devotion, all but dismissively. At one point he even suggests that Gramps and Toot were really racists – and that all white people, in fact, are racists, and that black people have been so deformed by this racism that black individuals can hardly be held responsible for their own moral lapses.
Forget the content of our character; this is a work preoccupied with skin color. It’s drenched with the legacy of Malcolm X (whom Obama, at least in this book, openly idolizes). At times it’s as if there were no historical injustices in the world other than those visited upon blacks by whites. Obama routinely refers to other black men (but never white men) as “brothers”; he exhibits considerably more concern for the dignity of black men than for that of women or non-black men; and he’s acutely sensitive to perceived racial slights (yet even as he deplores the subordination of blacks in America, curiously enough, he appears to accept as his due his family’s lofty position in Kenya). While occasionally gesturing toward an ideal of colorblindness √† la Dr. King, in his heart of hearts he’s anything but colorblind, fervently endorsing black solidarity while repeatedly expressing distrust of, and even contempt for, whites. When, lamenting Kenya’s intertribal rivalries, he tells a relative that “We’re part of one tribe. The black tribe. The human tribe,” the last three words feel like an afterthought – as does his attempt, in the book’s closing pages, to move beyond strict racial line-drawing and to articulate broader sympathies. As if all this weren’t enough, it seems clear by book’s end that his heart’s home is not America but Kenya.
What does it say about the young Obama that he was well-nigh obsessed with his vain braggart of an absentee father but trivialized his mother’s accomplishments? What does it mean that he himself plainly can’t see that his father comes off in these pages as a world-class jerk and his mother as a woman of admirable self-discipline and quiet achievement? What does it mean that throughout his account of his work as a community organizer in Chicago, Obama himself is in sharp focus while the underprivileged folks he’s supposedly trying to help are hazy figures in the distant background? What does it mean that some of the characters in this book – whom one would otherwise assume to be important people in his life – are, as he admits in the introduction, composites? What does it mean that despite his fixation on his father and his Kenyan kin, their religion (Islam) is barely mentioned, and that in the most substantial reference to it, he gives a genial thumbs-up to his brother’s newfound religious fervor?
Though often sympathetic (what fatherless Bildungsroman protagonist isn’t?), the Obama of these pages can also be unbearably self-absorbed – yet, at the same time, astonishingly short on self-knowledge. What’s more, he’s a young man of fierce – if powerfully muted – emotions. Raised on glorious Hawaiian beaches by three wonderful people who were utterly devoted to him, he attended top schools and walked straight from graduation into a cool job in New York – all in all, a pretty lucky guy. Yet between this memoir’s lines, one senses a barely suppressed rage; his good fortune notwithstanding, one has the distinct feeling that Obama feels he – Dr. Obama’s son! – still hasn’t received his due. As for his social, racial, and political attitudes – well, yes, since 1995 he’s definitely changed his tune about a few things. But how much has he changed deep down inside?
Racism is the #1 blot on America’s escutcheon. As a kid in the South – and the North – during the 1960s I saw and heard things that impressed upon me for all time the utter ugliness and evil of it all. I know beyond a doubt that the spectacle of a black person for whom I had some modicum of respect (i.e., not Jesse or Rev. Al) taking the oath of office would move me to helpless tears. I can see, moreover, that Obama is in many ways a terrifically attractive candidate; I can understand why so many people whom I respect for their intelligence and sense of moral responsibility want him to be president. I’d love to be able to agree with them. In other words, I want to want him to be president. But largely because of what I read in Dreams from My Father, it’s hard for me – at least given what I’ve heard thus far – to climb on the bandwagon.
Bruce Bawer’s book While Europe Slept is now in paperback. His website is at www.brucebawer.com.






It’s amazing you can write all those words and make outrageous accusations and fail to include a single quote from the book to back it up.
I especially love when you say Obama suggests: “that all white people, in fact, are racists, and that black people have been so deformed by this racism that black individuals can hardly be held responsible for their own moral lapses.” How can you write that and not provide any evidence?
Mike:
Not including quotations makes perfect sense to me. How long do you want the article to be.
Have you read the book.
I have not read the book. However, I have read a number of favourable reviews.
I have noticed that Obama rarely talks about his mother and I cannot remember her being included in any campaign events. Is he ashamed of his heritage.
I’m from Illinois, where Obama won the Senate seat by default (the Republican party in this state is in shambles) and not merit. After the win, he went on world tours promoting his book and himself, and has done nothing of note for the state. Nothing. Ask any Illinoisian what Obama has done for the state and they’ll stutter.
I’m not saying he’s a bad guy, but electing him President would be like picking someone off the street and plopping him in the White House.
With Obama’s ultra thin resume, it’s a bit insane to think he’s qualified for the office of the presidency. Come ot think of it, the same can be said for any of the Democrat candidates. Is this really the best they can come up with? The job requires more than pandering. Much, much more.
It is truly frightening how un-serious the media and political process has become. And shame on the American people for not demanding better.
I have noticed that Obama rarely talks about his mother and I cannot remember her being included in any campaign events. Is he ashamed of his heritage. (davod)
Davod, his mother is dead.
“Racism is the #1 blot on America’s escutcheon.”
Yeah, and slavery was abolished here by a gang of honkies. Perpetual guilt for a state of mind that has been all but extinguished for decades is inappropriate, and adds nothing to Obama’s qualifications for office.
A wish to atone for something one’s grandfather might have thought – notice, please, that not even all grandfathers qualified as racists – may bring tears, but so do soap operas and fictional tragedies. Such tears would be as bad a reason for voting for an individual as a desire to smash capitalism and live in peace and love by any means necessary.
Why would Obama be a better executive than someone whose stage presence were less glib, but had actually made some executive decisions and been accountable for the results? I realize that this question applies to practically all the Democratic candidates, but it’s more pertinent than pretending that racism still rules in the US.
Does anyone really know anything about Obama? Is he a large onion with many layers but no core?
At least he has a nice facade, and Oprah likes him enough to go on the stump. Obama is becoming a celebrity in a “celebrity culture.” He reminds me of Bill Clinton. If only he could play the saxophone!
Women seem to be falling for Obama in droves. “Mike” above may be a nom de plume for “Michelle.”
“Narcissism” is a word that keeps coming up regarding Obama and many other candidates of both major parties. Could it be that the Senate fosters this trait? (That’s a trick question — of course it does: “the world’s most select club.”) How about a constitutional amendment to prevent any senator from being nominated for the presidency? Being a Senator, after all, hardly develops executive ability — it just helps build huge campaign chests. The result of such an amendment would be to make the upper chamber a deadend job — and perhaps stop attracting wannabe presidents to it. F
Regardless of Mr. Obama’s history or political views, I worry about the results of having an inexperienced president during a time of crisis/war. This applies to Mrs. Clinton and some of the Republicans too. They have not been tested to give an international perception that they are strong in regards to America’s security. I was 18 when President Kennedy was killed and I liked him, but I remember vividly that he faltered on the Bay of Pigs in Cuba by withdrawing the air support, backed off of confronting the USSR on the illegal Berlin Wall construction and was judged by Khrushchev in their face to face meeting to be weak which led to the Cuban Missile Crisis according to Mr. Khrushchev’s memoirs. And our present enemies have less of an understanding of our culture and politics than did Premier Khrushchev.
You’ve intrigued me enough to read the book. Not that he might get my vote, but I can’t help but wonder why so many people are falling for him, if there is any substance at all to that effect.
Obama’s father recalls to mind a Nigerian exchange grad-student in Economics at Stanford who was a homestay with my parents in the late 70′s – and later went to work at the Nigerian Oil Ministry and sent them a letter requesting a means to transfer a large sum of money he inherited if only they would send him some…they didn’t.
“this is a work preoccupied with skin color”
Today’s Leftism is a all about skin color and white guilt over past racial injustices. The normally dark skinned Muslim terrorists are supposedly victims of Western Imperialism. This mindset is embraced by most Democrats and even some Republicans like the followers of Ron Paul.
“but I can’t help but wonder why so many people are falling for him”
Many white people want to find any excuse to vote for Barack Obama to prove that they are not racists. It really is that simple. This man possesses a very slim resume. Normally, such an individual wouldn’t even dare make a serious attempt to become our national leader.
Please also note that rarely in American history does a U.S. senator make it to the White House. The last one was John F. Kennedy—and he barely beat Richard Nixon. The odds are decent that the Democrats have already doomed themselves in 2008.
I do not think that the phenomenon of the abandoned child idolizing the absent parent is a particularly rare one.
Winston Churchill springs to mind. Both parents treated him shabbily as a youth and he repaided them with love and enormous filial devotion.
Winston at least had the decency to revere as well the nanny who was the principal support and mainstay of his youth. But then he was a man of enormous magniminity — and a Torie.
Mark
I am sorry but Barack Obama reminds me of a quote from Han Solo.
“I’ve got a bad feeling about this.”
What he says he is and what he says he thinks are not the same as what he actually believes. Some of the stuff he has stated shows that he has no real concept of how the world works. He is either a Pollyannaish fool or someone who has an agenda. One that does not have the best interests of the country or it’s people at heart.
Couple that with who his most ardent supporters are and he has all the makings of being (if elected) our second Communist President and our first Maoist. I’m sorry, but I would not vote for him no matter how much “lipstick” they put on him
Barack Obama is the most popular non-entity in American political history. He’s a joke. The sooner he is gone, the better.
Can anyone tell me what Obama had done by 1995 that even justified writing a memoir? Was he in the Illnois state senate then? Narcissism, indeed!
And regarding narcissism, in reply to F, the upper chamber has been a dead-end job. The last president to come directly from the senate was JFK. And before him, Harding. If the historic trend continues and a senator does not become president, the Republicans will keep the White House.
I wonder if Obamarama knows of the continuous, multi-millenial involvement, as both sellers and buyers, of muslims in the African slave trade. It is not just a historic european/american problem. At least the British squashed much of the slave trade – see The River War for Churchill’s account of how that was part of the war against the Mahdi in Sudan. We all know what price the US paid to end slavery and how discrimination has been defeated over the last 60 years here. What have islamic leaders ever done to renounce their history and current slavery in so much of modern Dar al Islam? Nothing.
Obama is an empty suit.
You’re not a Republican?
I find Bawer’s article a matter of concern. It would help if Bawer supported his claims with a few quotes from Obama as Mike pointed out; however, I have read Bruce before and found him a responsible writer. If he says that Obama openly idolizes Malcolm X in the memoir, I’m inclined to believe Bawer. It’s not all that surprising really.
However, if Obama is as focused on the oppression of blacks, particularly black males, as Bawer says, that’s a big red flag. America is hardly perfect, but we’ve made huge strides in that area to the point it seems that further emphasis on blacks as victims worsens matters for all and for blacks.
Bruce,
You’re starting to sound like a conservative here..
Your description of Obama as obsessed with race and simmering with rage and demanding of ‘his due’ from everyone in general is a frightening description of immaturity.
Unfortunately, it’s the kind of personality that is drawn to politics, to the false nobility and the fawning and the worship aspects of it.
Give me a quiet humble man of any race, a man who knows that he doesn’t know enough, a man who hesitates to be served and springs forward to serve others, and he’s got my vote as well.. but that man is NOT Barack Obama. Let him run for president of Kenya. My nation needs better.
Neocon Don:
Bingo.
It’s also interesting how the Janjaweed seem to just zip right under the radar of the MSM. I guess butchery and rape perpetrated along racial divides is not newsworthy when the perpetrators are Arab, and the victims are black Africans.
Is Obama a Communist?
Is his association with the Nation of Islam casual? Could we ask Tony Rezko?
Ha – yeah, the great unspoken truth about the African slave trade is that THE AFRICANS were – and still are – the greatest facilitators of it. Please. I cannot wait til all these pissant-gullible baby boomers are d.e.a.d. All they’re good at is making money anyway. Thanks guys, now shut up.
I wonder how many of the commenters here have read “Dreams From My Father”. I did, and was blown away by its frankness, eloquence, and humanity. It was not written by a politician — it was written by a young man who had had an interesting life up to then (and who therefore had been approached by a publisher to write a memoir), and represents his attempts to make sense of himself.
A lot of the book is about his father, and his race. Bawer sees this as discouraging, that he is slighting his white relatives and obsessed with race. I’d say that it’s perfectly natural for a young person to be especially interested in the things that are missing in their lives, and for Obama that was his father and an easy racial identity. He has made clear, in the new introduction to “Dreams” and in speeches and interviews, his love for his mother and her parents, and his gratitude for everything they gave him. They gave him everything, but they could not tell him how to be a black man in America — that part he had to figure out himself.
Your description of Obama as obsessed with race and simmering with rage and demanding of ‘his due’ from everyone in general is a frightening description of immaturity.
It’s also entirely based in fantasy, as is nearly every conservative expression of character judgment and paranoia. Obama is far more qualified to be president by judgment and temperament than any Republican now alive. Certainly he’s more qualified than the bed-wetters, fascists, cowards, and dishonorable slime now running for the Republican nomination.
It’s worth noting that Obama, himself, has made statements of similar effect about his first book – both in his second book and in one-on-one interviews.
To paraphrase, he basically said, “I regret that I took my mother so much for granted in my earlier years. Se was an amazing person. If I had known when I wrote the first book that she would be gone only a few years later, the book would have been much different.”
I haven’t quite caught Obama fever either, but I think that this reading of Dreams of My Father is almost completely inaccurate. To wit:
o Obama presents all his father’s failings unflinchingly. His relatives tell him in detail of his father’s vanity, failure to adapt to his setbacks, failure to take care of his children, etc.
o The portrait of Obama’s mother is rounded. She gets ample credit for getting herself and him up at 4:30 (?) a.m. every morning for home schooling in Indonesia, for her adaptability, and for her unconditional love. The reader can make what s/he will of her attaching herself at very young ages to two men from foreign cultures with very different values who were problematic for her children.
o Obama presents his own adolescent resentment toward white people with ironic detachment.
o I thought that several of the people Obama worked with and encountered during his activist years in Chicago were quite vivid.
o Of course the Obama ‘character’ in the book is somewhat self-absorbed and immature. This is a coming-of-age autobiography, and a pretty unsparing though not self-hating one.
In my mind you clearly didn’t connect to the book but to say that Obama doesn’t recognize his mother’s sacrifices and accomplishments, to insinuate he doesn’t feel connected to the work he was doing in Chicago.
Frankly, I question how well you read the book. I question how you can question this man’s devotion to his family or his mother who he has always thanked and upheld as a tower of strength. And I disagree with your rather inflamatory comment that his heart’s home is in Kenya; his heart may have longed for his father but he’s always struck me in speech, thought, and action as a man who loves his country.
I don’t know what you were attempting to convey with your review of his memoir and how you were attempting to connect that to the lack of support you have for him; despite disingenously claiming to want to want to support him.
I just know that I found this trite, fairly offensive (or I should say rather gratingly offensive), and wondering at what in the world you were trying to obliquely say.
That the man is too self-centered to be President of the United States? That his work as a community organizer wasn’t about helping but about himself alone and not the good he was doing? That he wants to run for some sinsiter unknowable reason that has to do w/his father’s abandonment? What exactly is your point?
That he is blind to his father issues: what about Sen. Clinton apparently blind to her father’s coldness or her mother staying with him and marrying a similar man? What about President Clinton’s family issues? President Bush’s constant struggle and one-upmanship with his father, President Bush?
Do daddy issues disqualify you from becoming president? Because history’s rife with them sir, and a lot of people go on having a blind spot for the people who gave them life.
When you decide to base a post and your discussion on the man’s personal biography and take shots on his life story you should be clearer. All I’m left with here is a faint hearted (and I mean by that cowardly) attempt at slimming a popular man and a book a lot of bi-racial people do “get.”
Sometimes, it’s better to say nothing at all. Because all you do say is that you resent the man for still loving a shitty father.
A lot of us do.
This review is a gross mischaracterizaton of Dreams from My Father. Bruce Bawer’s main beef appears to be that Obama focuses too much on his absent black father and neglects his white mother and grandparents. That’s not a illegitimate criticism, though one I don’t agree with, but Bawer pushes this frame much too far. It’s true Obama idealizes his father in the beginning, when he’s a kid and doesn’t know anything about him. But of course that’s not how the book ends, and it’s a complete misreading to say that Obama brushes over or excuses his father’s past. And it’s simply outright false to say that Obama’s “heart is Kenya, not America.” This is plainly and explicitly contradicted in the book. Again, I encourage everyone to actually read Dreams from My Father for themselves and not accept this review as the definitive one.
Dave wrote, “Give me a quiet humble man of any race, a man who knows that he doesn’t know enough, a man who hesitates to be served and springs forward to serve others, and he’s got my vote as well”.
Sorry, Dave, that’s a fairy tale. Even Lincoln was described by his law partner Herndon as “the most ambitious man in the world”, and Lincoln was not merely the humble saint most people think him to be. But Lincoln WAS a great man, and his ambition doesn’t diminish that.
Uhhh…when are “you people” going to stop ascribing to MLK this neo-con “colorblind” stuff? Did you all ever take the time to really understand what he was all about? Recall those of your political ilk despised the man as a dangerous race-mixing radical, a sort of Gandhi on steroids, back in the day. You should rent the cartoon “Boondocks” for the Emmy-nominated episode where Dr. King comes out of his secret coma and schools black people (including rappers) AND white people like you and the President for misusing or being utterly ignorant of what he was trying to do, and why he got shot. In the end, he gets fed up and moves to Canada under an assumed name. Thanks, Bruce. As for Barack, he’s a gracious enough man to forgive you. Something you’re likely not used to. Perhaps that kind of graciousness will be contagious…
It doesn’t even seem like we read the same book. For instance, I only recall one mention of Malcolm X in the book, where Obama talks about Malcolm once writing that he wished he could erase his white blood, which came from the rape of slaves. Obviously, Obama has a different lineage and had the experience of being raised and nurtured by whites, so he couldn’t come to that conclusion, as he writes. Often in the book, especially while chronicling his childhood and teenage years, he writes about his point of view at any given time, then about arriving at different conclusions later. He doesn’t necessarily announce to the reader, hey, I thought this and then I thought this when I had other experiences or information. He simply traces his own evolution, which includes changing points of view on race that you somehow don’t find as credible as his teenage anger. It’s very easy for a white person, who has never had to deal with racism or question his identity the way many biracial people do, to dismiss a black person as “obsessed” or “acutely sensitive” to racial issues. To then extrapolate from this that he’s just a stereotypical Angry Black Man with a chip on his shoulder is truly vile.
Bruce, you badly miss the point of this book. It’s hard to imagine anyone could read it and come away with the conclusions you did, so I have to wonder if this whole review isn’t just a cynical grab for controversy-driven traffic to this website. Just about every paragraph leaves me with the same question: “Did this guy read the same book I did???”
Clearly, Bruce did not carefully read Dreams from My Father. Otherwise, he would have realized that the book was reflection of the journey Barack took while growing up as a biracial kid in Hawaii, Indonesia, and later on, as an adult in LA (Occidental College), New York City (Columbia and after), and Chicago. It may come as a shock, but many biracial kids (and African American kids for that matter, particularly those who have grown up in an all-white environment) have a tough time reconciling the fact they are viewed strictly by their “race” by the larger society. Thus many take a personal journey to find where they best fit in that larger society.
And if Bruce carefully read the book, he would have further realized that by the end of it Barack understood that his Dad was not someone to be idolized as he imagined as a young boy. Barack’s opinion of his father evolved as he got older; from a young kid who really only knew his Dad through great stories as told him by numerous people in Hawaii, to a younger man who could see through the fa√ßade and clearly see his father’s many flaws. Take the book for what it is/was: a personal narrative of a person’s life story to that point. But based on the comments posted, I doubt many of the commentators have the intellectual-wherewithal to figure it out.
Davod, his mother is dead. Insensitive.
Bruce, read RealDeal’s comment.
I think Obama’s focus on his father is understandable. Anyone who has grown up with an absent parent naturally tends to obsess about them. Obama clearly loves his mother, but growing up mythologized his father. Seems pretty typical psych 101.
This review reminds me of people who say things like “Shakespeare thought that life was a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.” Who are such people? People who haven’t read Lear… or only read it as an assignment. Which kind of sounds like the attitude that Bruce read with here. I’m glad you provided the context Bruce, because otherwise I would now think much less of you as both a reader and writer than I do. You didn’t want to read it, and in my opinion, you essentially didn’t read it.
Obama rather unflinchingly narrates his own coming to grips with his confused racial identity. It’s a story Bruce is not interested in, and the details of which obviously repell him. That’s natural, because racial identity in the U.S. is a kind of repellant topic, not one that people want to deal with or acknowledge unless forced to, a kind of Un-American topic.
But people who are designated as “black” have to deal with it. And I think Obama gives a great and honest account of this encounter, one that contains all the inherant confusions that it represents. Bruce is taking a “journey” story and treating it like an opinion essay, and pulling themes out of context in an unforgivable way.
Take it from someone who read the book AND does not have Obama as a first choice candidate: This is a truly worthless review, and an unfair extension of criticism to the candidate. But that’s what you get when the reviewer is simply uninterested or perhaps slightly antagonistic to the subject at hand.
As an aside, I dearly love all the wingers who come on to say “yeah, that’s just what I thought that book would be about, and it proves blacks are the real racists, and anyone who votes obama is just a guilt-ridden fool who just wants to elect black people.” What can you expect though when you have Bruce basically saying that the only reason at all that he wants to vote Obama is race-driven.
Whew. It stinks here today.
So, don’t climb on the bandwagon.
His first book, Audacity, starts with an anecdote of living in a poor section of Manhattan and resisting the rich white people who bring their dogs to his neighborhood to defecate. The only problem is that he did not live in Harlem but on the border in a white neighborhood, rich white people don’t walk their dogs to poor people’s neighborhoods, and this metaphor of fighting for poor or minority people is baloney. But maybe his perception of white people as the enemy because they shit on minority people is what he really believes.
The fact that he names the book, “Dreams From My Father” points to the truth of Bawer’s thesis- that not only is he is obsessed with skin color, but he made a lively career out of race-baiting. The fact that he attends a racist church, that purports to elevate the black man further confirms it – the man has issues, and I{m not talking about National Geographics.
Obama’s efforts to connect to the Republican Party, specifically Bush, and Dick Cheney, of the Halliburton Company, dates back to the Presidents Grandfather, Prescott Bush, and indeed Cheney was once an executive officer of Halliburton.
The American military pounds Iraq with Artillary, bombs, and the like, destroying large sections of cities, and infra-structures, then Halliburton comes in to rebuild. Halliburton and Halliburton associated companies have raked in ten’s of billions.
Obama is just like the BIG HALIBURTAN. Haliburton has contracted to build detention centers in the U.S. similiar to the one in Quantanammo Bay, Cuba. Halliburton does nothing to earn the Two Dollars for each meal an American Serviceman in Iraq eats.
http://www.halliburtonwatch.org/
Halliburton was scheduled to take control of the Dubai Ports in The United Arab Emiirate. The deal was canceled when Bush was unable to affect the transfer of the American Ports.
Now we see what some might suspect as similiar financial escapading from the Democrats.
Two years ago, Iraq’s Ministry of Electricity gave a $50 million contract to a start-up security company – Companion- owned by now-indicted businessman (TONY REZKO) Tony Rezko and a onetime Chicago cop, Daniel T. Frawley, to train Iraqi power-plant guards in the United States. An Iraqi leadership change left the deal in limbo. Now the company, Companion Security, is working to revive its contract.
Involved along with Antoin “Tony” Rezco, long time friend and neighbor of Democratic Presidential hopeful Barack Obama, and former cop Daniel T. Frawley, is Aiham Alsammarae. Alsammarae was accused of financial corruption by Iraqi authorities and jailed in Iraq last year before escaping and returning here.
LIKE FATHER LIKE SON –
Recently, Obama’s campaign staff have been vetted by the IRS to disclose his connection to the criminal money generating underworld. Besides, his connections to the REZCO MAFIA types, his up-coming Tax Fraud charges — Obama needs to disclose why he is a MUSLIM “PATWANG-FWEEE” and disclose Obama’s MUSLIM Farrakhan mob connection to Chicago’s Trinity United Church of Christ. Its minister, and Obama’s spiritual adviser, is the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. In 1982, the church launched Trumpet Newsmagazine; Wright’s daughters serve as publisher and executive editor. Every year, the magazine makes awards in various categories. Last year, it gave the Dr. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. Trumpeter Award to a man it said “truly epitomized greatness.” That man is Louis Farrakhan. Farrakhan and Chicago’s Trinity United Church are trumpeting Barack Obama AKA Barack Hussein Obama as the second coming of the messiah. Obama should stop suppoting our intervention in IRAQ. It’s time to introduce this false, fake Xerox – X box Obama and invite the self-indicting thief plagiarizing pipsqueke “GLORK” Xerox – X box to meet the Buffalo “GAZOWNT-GAZIKKA” Police Department Buffalo Creek. He is MAD!!! –
OBAM YOU’RE NO JFK —
“GLORK” Obama looks like Alfred E. Newman: “Tales Calculated To Drive You.” He is a MUSLIM “Glork” He’s MAD!!! Alfred E. Neuman is the fictional mascot of Mad. The face had drifted through American pictography for decades before being claimed by Mad editor Harvey Kurtzman after he spotted it on the bulletin board in the office of Ballantine Books editor Bernard Shir-Cliff, later a contributor to various magazines created by Kurtzman.
Obama needs to disclose why he is a MUSLIM “PATWANG-FWEEE” and stop suppoting our intervention in IRAQ. It’s time to introduce this false, fake “GLORK” Xerox – X box Obama and invite the self-indicting thief plagiarizing pipsqueke Xerox – X box to meet the Buffalo “GAZOWNT-GAZIKKA” Police Department Buffalo Creek.
Michelle Obama should be ashamed.
“GLORK” Michelle Obama should be ashamed of her separatist-racist connection to Farrakhan and Chicago’s Trinity United Church trumpeting Barack Obama AKA Barack Hussein Obama as the second coming of the messiah. Beneath that Darth-Vader-Mace-Windu-Jedi-Me ssiah Helmet Hairdo of Michelle Obama lurks a Wildabeast. If Michelle Obama new what her husband — the Hope-A-Dope, Fonster Monster — Barack Obama AKA Barack Hussein Obama did in Harlem, she would wash her wide-open, Hus-suey loving MUSILM mouth out, with twenty-four (24) mule-team double-cross X-boX-BorraX. The Lexis-Nexis-Albatross-Abacus-Complex of Barack and Michelle’s relationship with MUSLIM “PATWANG-FWEEE” Rev. Wright, Louis Farrakhan, and black demagoguery of Obama’s Stump Lines Echo Malcolm X; is about as much of a Hoax as Oxfam volunteers believe in HIV– AIDS Witch Doctors in Africa they feed.
“God damn America” – Jeremiah Wright and Barack Obama –
“God bless America” – Pope Benedict XVI and Hillary Clinton –
If Barack Obama had married Shaniqua instead of Michelle, his Jackenapes Collegial Elitism Attraction, black rage, and “GLORK” black demagoguery of Obama’s Stump Lines Echo Malcolm X; would be taken a lot more seriously. Expectations are that Obama will manage his explosive MUSLIM JIHADI — FATIMA EXTREMISM obsession bitter. He is a MUSLIM “Glork” It’s time to introduce this false, fake “GLORK” Xerox – X box Obama and invite the self-indicting thief plagiarizing pipsqueke Xerox – X box to meet the Buffalo “GAZOWNT-GAZIKKA” Police Department Buffalo Creek. He’s MAD!!!
http://www.halliburtonwatch.org/
THE SPEECH –
The Apologia has arrived and once again the self-indicting, separatist-racist Barack Obama AKA Barack Hussein Obama, promises to heal the wounds of the world. The speech is the rude awakening of mass messianism of his campaign. Apologetically, Obama the MUSLIM double-cross X-boX-BorraX has an astonishingly empty two-prawn echelon explanation of his misjudgment.
In the first prawn: with regard to his connection to separatist-racist Rev. Wright; Obama summons voodoo and juju to express slavery as beginning and ending with the Rev. Wright.
In the second prawn: Obama’s speech takes credit for Ashley’s dream. A dream of unity Martin Luther King, Jr. borrowed from Ashley for his historic “I Have A Dream” speech. In Obama’s speech, the connective bond Ashley, the elderly black man and Obama’s grandmother share; represents Obama’s self-indicting rise to the Harvard Yard. For Obama, the grand flag of language is the semi-fore of words, bestowed upon our nation by the messiah-alumni from Harvard. Obama’s Swoon-Song Apologia to the nation represents a failed hymn — a hymn that fails to heal the nation, repair the world, or make this time different than all the rest. Obama’s speech is a brilliant failure.
http://www.halliburtonwatch.org/
MUSLIM LIES –
The ILLIGITIAMTE MUSLIM MESSIA has blundered yet again!!! The self-indicting, separatist-racist Barack Obama AKA Barack Hussein Obama, lied about the politics of his campaign. The danger involved with this self-aggrandizing, -a-hoop, Hope-A-Dope, Fonster Monster — Barack Obama AKA Barack Hussein Obama is that — “Like Father Like Son” Obama is constantly wanting to impress America with “…his incapacity for sound judgment.” In 2005, Sen. Obama voted for the Dick Cheney energy bill, which Cheney wrote in secret with the oil industry. Hillary Clinton opposed Cheney’s energy bill, has a plan to eliminate oil industry tax breaks, and would require oil companies to contribute to a $50 billion strategic energy fund to jump-start research and investment in clean energy technologies. On top of the horrible crime Obama executed in Harlem, the fact is, we have to hear it from Karl Rove about Obama’s latest Campaign Crisis.
“GLORK” Top Ten Obama Lies:
1. Obam said his parents met at the Selma march — Reality: He was born 4 years before that.
2. Obam said he was a constitutional law professor — Reality: . . . Obama Made This False Claim In His 2004 Senate Race. “Several direct-mail pieces issued for Obama’s primary [Senate] campaign said he was a law professor at the University of Chicago. He is not. He is a senior lecturer (now on leave) at the school..
3. Obam said he spoke fluent Indonesian as a child — Reality: . . . Obama has claimed on numerous occasions to have become fluent in Indonesian in six months. Yet another Phi Beta Krakatau lie from Obama. Those who knew him disputed that during recent interviews. Israel la Pareira Darmawan, Obama’s 1st-grade teacher, said she attempted to help him learn the Indonesian language by going over pronunciation and vowel sounds. Truth-be-told: Obama’s Indonesian teachers say Kaku-Pooh.
4. Obam said he was involved in community asbestos and housing project for the poor — Reality: Didn’t happen. This was the basis for Barack and Michelle’s claim, that he was a community activist on the South and East Side of Chicago. Usher United Arab Emirates (UAE) A+ lie both he and his twenty-four (24) mule-team, Hus-suey loving wife Michelle Obama have been claiming in the campaign — Reality: The Chicago Newspaper’s Obelus — Kiss-A-Cuss:…NO-MAMA.
5. Obam said in his book that he received his racial awakening at age nine reading a Life/Ebony Magazine story about a black man who was scarred trying to dye his skin white — Reality: Didn’t happen. Both Magazines (Life and Ebony), and the Rev. Wright and Farrakhan MUSLIM Trumpet Newsmagazine say, just didn’t happen.
6. Obam’s Campaign Didn’t Have The “Technical Capacity” To Produce The “1984” Ad:
Obama: “But it’s not something that we had anything to do with or were aware of and that frankly, given what it looks like, we don’t have the technical capacity to create something like that.” (CNN’s “Larry King Live,” 3/24/07) — Reality:…The Creator Admitted All It Took Was A “Sunday Afternoon” On His Mac. Phillip de Vellis: “I made the ad on a Sunday afternoon in my apartment using my personal equipment (a Mac and some software), uploaded it to YouTube, and sent links around to blogs.”
7. Obam’s Campaign Claimed His High School Friend Tried To Extort Money From Them:
“According To The Obama Campaign, [Obama’s Punahou Classmate Keith] Kakugawa Explicitly Raised The Possibility That He Could Make Up False Stories About Obama, Implying He Would Do So If The Campaign Did Not Give Him Money.” (Maurice Possley, Kirsten Scharnberg and Ray Gibson, — Reality: “…An Old Friend’s Troublesome Return,” Chicago Tribune, 3/25/07).
8. Obam voted to bring low-cost foreign labor into New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina — Reality:…This was a slap in the face against the African-Americans who were displaced in that city. Obama also voted to place Michael Chertoff, the man responsible for the Katrina catastrophe, in charge of Homeland Security. Obama voted for Senate-Bills that gave Blackwater the funding they needed to shoot the folks of New Orleans who were only trying to save their own lives. The towel head voted to allow Michael Chertoff to waive all applicable laws, including murder, torture, kidnaping, and he suppoted water-boarding.
9. Obam voted more than five times for USA-PATRIOT ACT renewal — Reality:…This is a Senate-Bill patently offensive to most Americans. City after city has passed resolutions condemning USA-PATRIOT ACT. Passively or reflexively, Obama chose to side with tyranny over freedom and Bush over the folks on this issue. The Real ID Act, which would allow Michael Chertoff to declare martial law and imprison Americans, was supported by ex-patriot Obama, as noted above.
10. Obam is not a MAD MAN. Sen. Obama has not exaggerated his inextricably troublesome involvement with long-simmering sub-text of the October Surprise: “X-Files” — The 1980 election scandal exposed….the extraneous venomous anger-driven association between Obama and aging [VX] Vietnam-era Weather Underground Radical Extremist William Ayers. Sen. Obama Is not involved along with Antoin “Tony” Rezco, long time friend and neighbor, now-indicted businessman (TONY REZKO); or Tony Rezko and a onetime Chicago cop, Daniel T. Frawley. Sen. Obama is not involved with, nor has Sen. Obama exhibited any nuclear security, bribery, money payoffs, or cronyism in the state of Illinois; or criminal activities related to the BIG HALIBURTAN and V.P. Cheney’s Halliburton bribery case; or any political misjudgment in his escalating Campaign Crisis. “GLORK” Sen. Obama Is not involved with any Hoax or Oxfam volunteers and HIV– AIDS Witch Doctors in Africa they feed. Sen. Obama is not associated with Exiled “God damn America” SOULJAH JIHAD — Rev. Jeremiah Wright, MUSLIM EXTREMIST (MalcomX KillA) — Louis Farrakhan, and black demagoguery of Obama’s Apologia – Mea Culpa; or Stump Lines Echo Malcolm X; Sen. Obama is not a separatist-racist. Michelle Obama AKA Wildabeast is not a separatist-racist. Sen. Obama is not a self-indicting thief plagiarizing pipsqueke Xerox – X box. “GLORK” Obama executed no crime in Harlem. Obama is Not America’s Poison — Reality:…He’s Radio-Active.
http://www.halliburtonwatch.org/
SOULJAH JIHAD — OBAMA CAMPAIGN CRISIS
The Republicans’ disengagement (media bias), if not disillusionment, with the economic campaign issues is borne out by the fact that many more Republicans are able to explain, extinguish, and excoriate the name Barrack Obama with the term (JIHAD), than can name Bush/Dick Cheney and McCain — as the Big Oil — BIG HALLIBURTAN politicians expanding GOP IRAQ WAR ideology, and Republican White House Party Elders’ GI Bill of Rights for the 21st century IRAQ WAR ECONOMY. Even among Republicans, Clinton is much more visible than GOP presumptive candidate John McCain towards affecting positively the important economic issues facing America’s middle class economy.
When asked who they would vote for in the general election for president of the United States, the natural pendulum swing in America is 79% of Republicans named Hillary Clinton as their choice. Reasons for Obama’s Campaign Crisis “GLORK” Campaign Crisis include:
“Obama has more holes in him than Swiss-Cheese.” (CNN’s “Politics.com,” 4/01/08)
Obama’s presidential campaign has received $2,812,336 from firms that employ registered federal lobbyists. [fec.gov]
Obama has taken $405,747 from the Pharmaceutical industry. [opensecrets.org]
Obama has received $1,185,937 from the Commercial Banking industry. [opensecrets.org]
Obama has received over six million dollars from the Securities & Investment industry. [opensecrets.org]
Obama has taken $608,822 from the Insurance industry. [opensecrets.org]
Obam has taken $168,584 from the Mortgage Banking industry. [opensecrets.org]
“GLORK” SOULJAH JIHAD — CAMPAIGN CRISIS
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3369102968312745410&q=Fitna&total=1413&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=5
WASHINGTON — Obama’s support among Democrats nationally has softened.
“GLORK” Sen. Barack Obama’s support among Democrats nationally has softened over the last month, particularly among men and upper-income voters, as voters have taken a slightly less positive view of him than they did after his burst of victories in February, according to the latest New York Times/CBS News poll.
The survey suggests that Mr. Obama, Democrat of Illinois, may have been at something of a peak in February, propelled by a string of primary and caucus victories over Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York, and that perceptions of him are dramatically trending downward.
Mr. Obama’s favorability rating among Democratic primary voters has dropped seventeen percentage points, to 42 percent, since the last Times/CBS News survey, in late February. While that figure is steadily declining, this dramatic decline came in a month during which he endured withering attacks from Mrs. Clinton, and responded to reports that his exiled former pastor had made politically inflammatory statements from his church’s pulpit in Chicago, and swirling questions about what Barack Obama did in Harlem.
The events of the last month appear to have fundamentally altered the race for the party’s nomination and provided Mrs. Clinton’s campaign extensive evidence of a collapse in Mr. Obama’s standing or an overwhelming preference voiced for Mrs. Clinton by Democratic and Republican voters in polls: — perplexing developments in Obama’s ongoing Campaign Crisis, that could be used to persuade uncommitted super-delegates to sign on with Hillary Clinton.
Twenty-six percent of the general electorate voters who heard of the Apologia speech that Mr. Obama the self-indicting, separatist-racist Barack Obama AKA Barack Hussein Obama gave to try to deal with the controversy over Obama’s separatist-racist connection to Farrakhan and Chicago’s Trinity United Church trumpeting Barack Obama AKA Barack Hussein Obama as the second coming of the messiah, said it made them dislike him. And 74 percent of Democrats and Republicans said Mr. Obama’s Campaign Crisis “GLORK” Campaign Crisis “God damn America” – Jeremiah Wright and Barack Obama. “God bless America” – Pope Benedict XVI and Hillary Clinton….stems from the fact that he shows continued misjudgment for even the most challenging problems. Next, the overall opinion of people in the news this year; Mr. Obama lacks the decisive capability to lead, willingness to listen, conviction and courage. Mr. Obama uses false charges and exaggerated claims to play politics with national security. Mr. Obama lied about the politics of his campaign, and knew about Rev. Wright’s MUSLIM Farrakhan – JIHADI — FATIMA EXTREMIST mob connection to Chicago’s Trinity United Church of Christ.
http://www.halliburtonwatch.org/
Fact Check: Sen. Obama on Lobbyists –
“When it comes to lobbyists, Senator Obama’s words might sound nice but voters need to make sure they read the fine print. Despite trying to give the impression that he has no relationship with lobbyists or special interests, the reality is that Senator Obama takes money from people who hire lobbyists, partners of lobbyists, spouses of lobbyists, former lobbyists and state lobbyists.” –Statement from Clinton Deputy Communications Director, Phil Singer
Sen. Obama Has Ties to Lobbyists in His Presidential Bid
Public Citizen: 10 of Sen. Obama’s bundlers have been federal lobbyists. The Public Citizen report listed the following ten bundlers for Sen. Obama who have registered as federal lobbyists: Frank Clark, Commonwealth Edison; Scott Harris, Harris Wiltshire and Grannis; Allan J. Katz, Akerman Senterfitt; Robert S. Litt, Arnold & Porter; Thomas J. Perrelli, Jenner and Block; Thomas A. Reed, Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLP; Paul N. Roth, Schulte Roth & Zabel; Miriam Sapiro, Summit Strategies; Alan Solomont, Solomont Bailis Ventures; and Tom E. Wheeler, Core Capital Partners. [Public Citizen, 1/29/08]
Sen. Obama takes money from employees of firms that lobby and has lobbyists as advisers. “But those who lobby for a living say it’s not that simple, and even Obama’s stance shows some flexibility. He won’t take money from federal lobbyists but accepts money from employees of firms and corporations that lobby, and he uses lobbyists and other government relations professionals as advisers… Obama has also used major fundraisers who are registered lobbyists on the state level. And he uses registered federal lobbyists such as Broderick Johnson, who lobbies for AT&T and Shell Oil, among others, as a campaign adviser. Because Johnson isn’t giving money to Obama, his name won’t show up in Federal Election Commission records.” [Chicago Tribune, 2/10/08]
Bloomberg: Five of [Obama’s] ten biggest sources of funds are groups of employees at law firms that lobby in Washington. “While Obama doesn’t accept money from registered federal lobbyists, five of his 10 biggest sources of funds are groups of employees at law firms that lobby in Washington…Among Obama’s top donors were employees of the Chicago-based law firm of Sidley Austin LLP, who gave $105,750 in the first quarter. The firm was paid $4.5 million last year” for lobbying the federal government. [Bloomberg, 6/7/07]
Obama’s presidential campaign has received $2,812,336 from firms that employ registered federal lobbyists. [fec.gov]
Obama has taken $405,747 from the Pharmaceutical industry. [opensecrets.org]
Obama has received $1,185,937 from the Commercial Banking industry. [opensecrets.org]
Obama has received over six million dollars from the Securities & Investment industry. [opensecrets.org]
Obama has taken $608,822 from the Insurance industry. [opensecrets.org]
Obama has taken $168,584 from the Mortgage Banking industry. [opensecrets.org]
Prior to His Presidential Campaign, Sen. Obama took Money from Lobbyists and PACs
1996-2004: $296,000 of the $461,000 Sen. Obama raised as a state senator came from PACs, corporate contributions or unions. “But behind Obama’s campaign rhetoric about taking on special interests lies a more complicated truth. A Globe review of Obama’s campaign finance records shows that he collected hundreds of thousands of dollars from lobbyists and PACs as a state legislator in Illinois, a US senator, and a presidential aspirant. In Obama’s eight years in the Illinois Senate, from 1996 to 2004, almost two-thirds of the money he raised for his campaigns — $296,000 of $461,000 — came from PACs, corporate contributions, or unions, according to Illinois Board of Elections records. He tapped financial services firms, real estate developers, healthcare providers, oil companies, and many other corporate interests, the records show.” [Boston Globe, 8/9/07]
In his 2004 U.S. Senate race, Sen. Obama raised $128,000 from lobbyists and $1.3 million from PACs. “Obama’s US Senate campaign committee, starting with his successful run in 2004, has collected $128,000 from lobbyists and $1.3 million from PACs, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonprofit organization that tracks money in politics. His $1.3 million from PACs represents 8 percent of what he has raised overall.” [Boston Globe, 8/9/07]
http://www.halliburtonwatch.org/
bupalos:
“This review reminds me of people who say things like “Shakespeare thought that life was a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.” Who are such people? People who haven’t read Lear… or only read it as an assignment. Which kind of sounds like the attitude that Bruce read with here. I’m glad you provided the context Bruce, because otherwise I would now think much less of you as both a reader and writer than I do. You didn’t want to read it, and in my opinion, you essentially didn’t read it.”
For my part, I wonder how well you read Shakespeare. Not well enough, it seems, to know that the lines you quoted were from MacBeth.
I believe you have been hoisted, sir, upon your own petard.
Thank you so much for this article my friend. I am an African American woman from the south and I have not been for Obama since he started. My friends and I feel that he is too young and inexperienced. What is he going to CHANGE???? Everything is about change. I know one thing he needs to change. He needs to stop hanging around his “evil crowd”. Hate monger Rev. Jeremiah Wright, terrorist Bill Ayers, and crooks like Tony Rezko.
I am like you, I have not caught the “Obama Fever” and I don’t think I will ever get it. I am a Democrat but I am not voting for a Democrat because they are black, white, male or female. I am voting for them because they are the right person for the job and Obama, being the nominee at this time, is not the right person for president.
Obama supporters, do not take this comment personal. He is a nice man but he knew this was not the time for him to run. He should have waited till 2012. He only won small states and Hillary won the major states that a president needed to win.
Thank you for such wonderful insight. The more we hear about this man the more we should fear. Reading your latest book, I can honestly say – Obama is not the person to lead America. I thoroughly am enjoying your book “While Europe Slept.” Keep up the good work. Dee Abadie