<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barack Alone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/blog/barack-alone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/barack-alone/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:12:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: redball6</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/barack-alone/#comment-422763</link>
		<dc:creator>redball6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 02:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=69205#comment-422763</guid>
		<description>Why would any reasonably thinking person ever again elect a Democrat to a national office based upon their almost total lack of common sense and the almost complete lack responsible thinking? It appears as the people sitting in the chambers of government and walking the halls are almost totally devoid of insight. 

They are bereft of rational thinking about their place in the national social upheaval and revolution taking place before their eyes. This revolution is national, not 
dictated by zip code. 

Many if not most of &quot;US&quot; have come to see the government not as servant of the public but as a &quot;SERPENT&quot;  which has snaked its way into our lives to constrict our freedoms and remove opportunities for &quot;US&quot; to succeed. And yes it is ultimately &quot;WE&quot; or &quot;US&quot; who are responsible for this. 

Blaming the media is not an answer. &quot;WE&quot; at our local precinct level must be involved. It is we the citizens who must VET the individual who seeks our vote. We can&#039;t rely on the press, or either an any party(s) ringing endorsement of a given candidate

As I said in a previous post &quot;The Democrat Party sits astride a great fault line in American politics. It is not listening to the country, it is however listening to its special interests. This will likely be their undoing on 11, 3, 2010. The GOP and libertarians are working their trap lines. However the GOP had better do its homework, zip code by zip code if it wants to insure victory in  2010. 

We must not rely  on the  &quot;O&quot; mans action or lack there of, to help to insure victory. The message trumps the &quot;O&quot; mans personality and his message has been and continues to be rejected. &quot;O&quot; is in the process of crippling himself. But  &quot;O&quot; posses the capability to turn swiftly and attack from an oblique angle. 

The GOP and libertarians this time must carefully craft the  message. Otherwise 2012 could bring for more years in the socialist wilderness and once again ring in Chicago style.  I like Chicago Style, but for me its limited to hot dogs.

 Check &quot;6&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would any reasonably thinking person ever again elect a Democrat to a national office based upon their almost total lack of common sense and the almost complete lack responsible thinking? It appears as the people sitting in the chambers of government and walking the halls are almost totally devoid of insight. </p>
<p>They are bereft of rational thinking about their place in the national social upheaval and revolution taking place before their eyes. This revolution is national, not<br />
dictated by zip code. </p>
<p>Many if not most of &#8220;US&#8221; have come to see the government not as servant of the public but as a &#8220;SERPENT&#8221;  which has snaked its way into our lives to constrict our freedoms and remove opportunities for &#8220;US&#8221; to succeed. And yes it is ultimately &#8220;WE&#8221; or &#8220;US&#8221; who are responsible for this. </p>
<p>Blaming the media is not an answer. &#8220;WE&#8221; at our local precinct level must be involved. It is we the citizens who must VET the individual who seeks our vote. We can&#8217;t rely on the press, or either an any party(s) ringing endorsement of a given candidate</p>
<p>As I said in a previous post &#8220;The Democrat Party sits astride a great fault line in American politics. It is not listening to the country, it is however listening to its special interests. This will likely be their undoing on 11, 3, 2010. The GOP and libertarians are working their trap lines. However the GOP had better do its homework, zip code by zip code if it wants to insure victory in  2010. </p>
<p>We must not rely  on the  &#8220;O&#8221; mans action or lack there of, to help to insure victory. The message trumps the &#8220;O&#8221; mans personality and his message has been and continues to be rejected. &#8220;O&#8221; is in the process of crippling himself. But  &#8220;O&#8221; posses the capability to turn swiftly and attack from an oblique angle. </p>
<p>The GOP and libertarians this time must carefully craft the  message. Otherwise 2012 could bring for more years in the socialist wilderness and once again ring in Chicago style.  I like Chicago Style, but for me its limited to hot dogs.</p>
<p> Check &#8220;6&#8243;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Malone</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/barack-alone/#comment-421685</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Malone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=69205#comment-421685</guid>
		<description>#5 vivo - Here&#039;s where you demonstrate that you really don&#039;t understand Conservatives.  For the Left, it&#039;s all politics all the time.  They are the revolutionaries.  Conservatives represent the traditional.  If Conservatives ran the committee, you would see reasonable selections being made, not political ones.  In fact, you probably wouldn&#039;t see the choices, as they wouldn&#039;t make much splash for the media.

  My choice would go to Columbia&#039;s leader, when he snookered the cartels into giving up the hostages.  He simply made a statement for freedom for the hostages and for their own country.  No more corruption.  No more extortion.  It was a signal of Columbia&#039;s blooming freedom.  Good for him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#5 vivo &#8211; Here&#8217;s where you demonstrate that you really don&#8217;t understand Conservatives.  For the Left, it&#8217;s all politics all the time.  They are the revolutionaries.  Conservatives represent the traditional.  If Conservatives ran the committee, you would see reasonable selections being made, not political ones.  In fact, you probably wouldn&#8217;t see the choices, as they wouldn&#8217;t make much splash for the media.</p>
<p>  My choice would go to Columbia&#8217;s leader, when he snookered the cartels into giving up the hostages.  He simply made a statement for freedom for the hostages and for their own country.  No more corruption.  No more extortion.  It was a signal of Columbia&#8217;s blooming freedom.  Good for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ddc</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/barack-alone/#comment-420475</link>
		<dc:creator>ddc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 05:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=69205#comment-420475</guid>
		<description>wow! this is one of the most insightful and, in my opinion, accurate portrait of the international &quot;axis of peace&quot; (fools)  political scene leading up to Obama. 

Obama is a little too late at the table to matter to those who will step up to Iran on the international front. with Iran (sarcastically no doubt) calling him &quot;brave&quot; after dissing our eastern european allies in the name of &quot;dialog&quot; and with Chavez questioning his Nobel prize, he truly IS alone and due to his naivete...dangerous. 

Obama&#039;s Legacy: Worst President, replacing Carter, in US history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow! this is one of the most insightful and, in my opinion, accurate portrait of the international &#8220;axis of peace&#8221; (fools)  political scene leading up to Obama. </p>
<p>Obama is a little too late at the table to matter to those who will step up to Iran on the international front. with Iran (sarcastically no doubt) calling him &#8220;brave&#8221; after dissing our eastern european allies in the name of &#8220;dialog&#8221; and with Chavez questioning his Nobel prize, he truly IS alone and due to his naivete&#8230;dangerous. </p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s Legacy: Worst President, replacing Carter, in US history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hod Coburn</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/barack-alone/#comment-420317</link>
		<dc:creator>Hod Coburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=69205#comment-420317</guid>
		<description>The Nobel Peace Prize
What a joke.  This is not Teddy Roosevelt brokering a peace between Russia and Japan, this is Obama delivering speaches via teleprompter on the television.
If anyone didn&#039;t realize what a joke Al Gore&#039;s Peace prize was for making a propaganda video a few years ago they should surely realize what a farce the Nobel awards have become to date.
     For crying out loud, why didn&#039;t tax cheat Geithner get the award for economics?
     The Nobel prize is nothing but professional wrestling with a suit on.  What a joke!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Nobel Peace Prize<br />
What a joke.  This is not Teddy Roosevelt brokering a peace between Russia and Japan, this is Obama delivering speaches via teleprompter on the television.<br />
If anyone didn&#8217;t realize what a joke Al Gore&#8217;s Peace prize was for making a propaganda video a few years ago they should surely realize what a farce the Nobel awards have become to date.<br />
     For crying out loud, why didn&#8217;t tax cheat Geithner get the award for economics?<br />
     The Nobel prize is nothing but professional wrestling with a suit on.  What a joke!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Professor Guvinoff</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/barack-alone/#comment-420201</link>
		<dc:creator>Professor Guvinoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=69205#comment-420201</guid>
		<description>George Bush disturbed the falsely comfortable standards and practices in which you were supposed to accomodate the Arabs by the word instead of opposing their islamic proclivities by the sword.

Obama is an after-effect of the thusly toppled applecart, still brandishing the word and burying the sword, in a futile attempt to share attitudes which the Europeans have already abandoned in the meantime.

The nominal leader amuses himself by following the nominal followers, and they give him the lollipop!  We are getting drunk with the dividends of poetic justice while the mullahs are sending money and hardware to their surrogates, and preparing to launch missiles of the ballistic variety.

Indulging in reaction in a situation asking for action is a delinquency of the presidential duties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Bush disturbed the falsely comfortable standards and practices in which you were supposed to accomodate the Arabs by the word instead of opposing their islamic proclivities by the sword.</p>
<p>Obama is an after-effect of the thusly toppled applecart, still brandishing the word and burying the sword, in a futile attempt to share attitudes which the Europeans have already abandoned in the meantime.</p>
<p>The nominal leader amuses himself by following the nominal followers, and they give him the lollipop!  We are getting drunk with the dividends of poetic justice while the mullahs are sending money and hardware to their surrogates, and preparing to launch missiles of the ballistic variety.</p>
<p>Indulging in reaction in a situation asking for action is a delinquency of the presidential duties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: misanthropicus</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/barack-alone/#comment-420096</link>
		<dc:creator>misanthropicus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=69205#comment-420096</guid>
		<description>RE #7/5 vivo: 

More great news for you, vivo, I just learnt that NAMBLA and Kevin Jennings have made the cut for future years&#039; Nobel Prize -</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE #7/5 vivo: </p>
<p>More great news for you, vivo, I just learnt that NAMBLA and Kevin Jennings have made the cut for future years&#8217; Nobel Prize -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: misanthropicus</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/barack-alone/#comment-420085</link>
		<dc:creator>misanthropicus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=69205#comment-420085</guid>
		<description>RE #5/vivo: [..] 5. vivo: [...] OK, let’s make a Nobel Prize committee with 5 red-blooded conservatives. [...]

Wrong, mon pauvre Vivo - no conservative would go for such an unseemly and base job like a Nobel Prize committee member.
And as far as future Nobel recipients, relax, Limbo, O’Reilly, Hannity, Beck are nowhere on the Nobel list - the next years&#039; prizes will go to Mumia Jabal, then to Polansky, Bill Ayres, Rangel and other figures from liberals&#039; pantheon -
You ARE the happy man, vivo -</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE #5/vivo: [..] 5. vivo: [...] OK, let’s make a Nobel Prize committee with 5 red-blooded conservatives. [...]</p>
<p>Wrong, mon pauvre Vivo &#8211; no conservative would go for such an unseemly and base job like a Nobel Prize committee member.<br />
And as far as future Nobel recipients, relax, Limbo, O’Reilly, Hannity, Beck are nowhere on the Nobel list &#8211; the next years&#8217; prizes will go to Mumia Jabal, then to Polansky, Bill Ayres, Rangel and other figures from liberals&#8217; pantheon -<br />
You ARE the happy man, vivo -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: misanthropicus</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/barack-alone/#comment-420082</link>
		<dc:creator>misanthropicus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=69205#comment-420082</guid>
		<description>It is too early to come with a definitive description of the Iraq as a success or a failure - while the mixture of news coming from there is often exasperating, in the long term it might well happen that Bush&#039;s decision will be praised.
As far as the European opposition at that date (I remember the troika Villepin, Ivanov and Schroeder marching on a UN hall, there to huff &amp; puff &amp; shake things), that came from various, and even mutually antagonistic causes, a rather opportunistic affair which was described in exagerated terms by the always available &quot;usual idiots&quot; of media, there and in America -

With no authentic necessity of opposing America in Iraq, after some fiery rhetoric and gesticulation, things have quietly returned to the prior configuration - everyone wants to do business in Washington, and the irony here is that in this configuration Obama is a man of the past, but of an &quot;un-defining&quot; past (gosh, Obama&#039;s &quot;defining&quot; and &quot;distraction&quot; are contagious), world politics present &amp; future being largely carried on the lines drawn by Bush and Cheney. 

Heh! Transformational presidencies sure have a malicious life of their own - Obama&#039;s compulsion for public grandstanding amputated by the next election (if not by his ilegitimacy problem that simply doesn&#039;t go away), we&#039;ll probably see him near Schroeder in the Gazprom board of directors or something similar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is too early to come with a definitive description of the Iraq as a success or a failure &#8211; while the mixture of news coming from there is often exasperating, in the long term it might well happen that Bush&#8217;s decision will be praised.<br />
As far as the European opposition at that date (I remember the troika Villepin, Ivanov and Schroeder marching on a UN hall, there to huff &amp; puff &amp; shake things), that came from various, and even mutually antagonistic causes, a rather opportunistic affair which was described in exagerated terms by the always available &#8220;usual idiots&#8221; of media, there and in America -</p>
<p>With no authentic necessity of opposing America in Iraq, after some fiery rhetoric and gesticulation, things have quietly returned to the prior configuration &#8211; everyone wants to do business in Washington, and the irony here is that in this configuration Obama is a man of the past, but of an &#8220;un-defining&#8221; past (gosh, Obama&#8217;s &#8220;defining&#8221; and &#8220;distraction&#8221; are contagious), world politics present &amp; future being largely carried on the lines drawn by Bush and Cheney. </p>
<p>Heh! Transformational presidencies sure have a malicious life of their own &#8211; Obama&#8217;s compulsion for public grandstanding amputated by the next election (if not by his ilegitimacy problem that simply doesn&#8217;t go away), we&#8217;ll probably see him near Schroeder in the Gazprom board of directors or something similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vivo</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/barack-alone/#comment-420050</link>
		<dc:creator>vivo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=69205#comment-420050</guid>
		<description>4. Bohemond:

&quot;Of course, John, the Nobel Hatebush Prize was awarded by a committee of five Norwegians, four of whom are off on the Socialist International/Green kook Left.&quot;

OK, let&#039;s make a Nobel Prize committee with 5 red-blooded conservatives.  Future recipients?  Peacemakers Limbo, O&#039;Reilly, Hannity, Beck and future GOP prez candidates.  Happy now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4. Bohemond:</p>
<p>&#8220;Of course, John, the Nobel Hatebush Prize was awarded by a committee of five Norwegians, four of whom are off on the Socialist International/Green kook Left.&#8221;</p>
<p>OK, let&#8217;s make a Nobel Prize committee with 5 red-blooded conservatives.  Future recipients?  Peacemakers Limbo, O&#8217;Reilly, Hannity, Beck and future GOP prez candidates.  Happy now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bohemond</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/barack-alone/#comment-420016</link>
		<dc:creator>Bohemond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=69205#comment-420016</guid>
		<description>Of course, John, the Nobel Hatebush Prize was awarded by a committee of five Norwegians, four of whom are off on the Socialist International/Green kook Left. Not much resemblance or connection even to the old Eurobosses, except Zapatero and perhaps German ex-FM Fischer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, John, the Nobel Hatebush Prize was awarded by a committee of five Norwegians, four of whom are off on the Socialist International/Green kook Left. Not much resemblance or connection even to the old Eurobosses, except Zapatero and perhaps German ex-FM Fischer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

