A victory for the Assad/Iran/Hizballah/Russia side in the Syrian civil war would represent a strategic disaster for the U.S. and the West in the region.
As the West weighs involvement, the Saudis replace foe Qatar as the rebels' primary backer.
The support is now clearly evident, and is responsible for Assad's recent gains.
Doing nothing will tell totalitarians that the word of America means nothing. Related: Obama: Yeah, My Syria Red Line is Still in Effect, But…
The emergence of a new. powerful Islamist force in Syria.
Take Ghassan Hitto, the U.S. supported rebel leader with ties to jihadists.
The Assad regime could now be considered just another competitor for power.
The results indicate that a large, sane, pragmatic center is the core presence in Israeli political life.
Many possible culprits.
National security is the key issue.
Bashar Assad's forces suffer strategic losses, and are facing a dearth of manpower.
The U.S.-supported move has some success, but questions remain going forward.
Syrian President Assad's "strategy of tension" in Lebanon.
Whoever prevails, Syria will face a totalitarian future.
In the manner of adolescents, they think that security and prosperity just sort of happen by themselves.
Still, Western media pretends the split never happened.
With an Iranian confrontation looming, he corners 94 of the Knesset's 120 seats.
The prime minister and his party hold a strong hand.
Israel prepares for arrival of march calling for its destruction.
The tactic is likely to fail, but the rebels are similarly too weak to overthrow him.
Military conflict with Israel is the last thing a troubled Hamas wants now.
If Bashar Assad does not survive in Syria, Hezbollah will be confronted by rising Sunni enemies.