The biggest scandal of our times is a non-story to U.S media. Why are the London papers covering the Climategate collapse, but not ours?
As new fraud is revealed almost daily, the full story of how the AGW scam came to pass is taking shape.
The scientific fraud started with the money and the (leftist) politics, and that's where the investigation needs to go now.
Senator James Inhofe calls for Dr. Rajendra Pachauri, and the EPA, to respond to the "crisis of confidence" in the IPCC's CO2 findings.
A 1935 poem, written by Charlie's maternal grandfather during the era of the Forgotten Man, still strongly resonates today.
The investigations prompted by Climategate have just started, but scientists involved are already feeling the heat.
MacMillan fights with Amazon to protect the physical book market from e-readers. Bet on Amazon.
A false claim by the IPCC shows up in several grant applications for companies with IPCC members on their boards.
Two major errors based on poor science. Not a good week for the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (See also Roger L. Simon: "Climategate: The Scandal that Keeps on Giving")
A review of Climategate: The CRUtape Letters, the first book on the game-changing data leak. (Also see Roger L. Simon's PJTV interview with the book's author:"Climategate Heats Up As Liberal Author Jumps Ship")
Is criticism of U.S. relief efforts justified? Mostly, no.
Brit Hume did nothing wrong when commenting about Tiger Woods, but he doesn't know the faith.
It appears that most of the Copenhagen participants saw the money they spent as an investment. Here's how they get paid.
With the revelation about the cherrypicked Russian stations (plus six other freshly, independently discovered problems), the real story of how we got here just took a shape.
The "trick" used to "hide the decline," which alarmists have claimed was taken out of context, is actually worse when the context is included.
When you are in one, it is best to stop digging.
A one-stop source for information about the biggest scientific scandal in a century.
The decorated scientist — oft-mentioned in the CRU emails — wants to see the current blatant conflicts of interest removed from climate science. (Also read Bill Whittle: "Ike's Response to Climategate")
The IPCC has been claiming Himalayan glaciers could be gone by 2035. The research paper they used concluded 2350.
The "Read Me" file of a harried programmer who couldn't replicate the scientists' warming results.
The scientific method only works when fellow researchers can implicitly trust the results offered by their colleagues.
Just one of the scandals is the willingness to manipulate data to make a political case.
BBC confirms that a hack did indeed occur. Is this smoking-gun evidence of global warming data being fabricated? (Also read Richard Fernandez: "The CRU Hack")
The latest sourced information on the 9/12 crowd points to a lower bound of at least half a million.