In a PJM exclusive, we report on new research that confirms the telomere hypothesis of cell aging, a discovery that may lead to better adult stem cell therapies and even to direct treatment of the effects of aging.
Senator Barrasso: Why Won’t Congressional Democrats Permit Science Oversight Hearings? (PJM Exclusive)
Senator John Barrasso M.D., in an exclusive interview with PJ Media, discusses science oversight — or the lack of it — in the Democratic Congress.
New emails from James Hansen and Reto Ruedy (download PDF here) show that NASA's temperature data was doubted within NASA itself, and was not independent of CRU's embattled data, as has been claimed.
BREAKING: Released Emails Show Wind Lobby, Soros Group Helped with White House PR (PJM Exclusive — Read the Emails Here)
GreenJobsGate? The Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Energy coordinated with "green" lobbyists when trying to fend off a damning report.
Following the release of the Inhofe Report, Boxer claimed she was only quoting "American scientists," and Jackson reversed herself on the use of the IPCC as the "gold standard."
Inhofe intends to ask for a probe of the embattled climate scientists for possible criminal acts. And he thinks Gore should be recalled to explain his prior congressional testimony. (Click here for the just-released Senate Environment and Public Works report behind Inhofe's announcement.)
The biggest scandal of our times is a non-story to U.S media. Why are the London papers covering the Climategate collapse, but not ours?
As new fraud is revealed almost daily, the full story of how the AGW scam came to pass is taking shape.
The scientific fraud started with the money and the (leftist) politics, and that's where the investigation needs to go now.
Senator James Inhofe calls for Dr. Rajendra Pachauri, and the EPA, to respond to the "crisis of confidence" in the IPCC's CO2 findings.
A 1935 poem, written by Charlie's maternal grandfather during the era of the Forgotten Man, still strongly resonates today.
The investigations prompted by Climategate have just started, but scientists involved are already feeling the heat.
MacMillan fights with Amazon to protect the physical book market from e-readers. Bet on Amazon.
A false claim by the IPCC shows up in several grant applications for companies with IPCC members on their boards.
Two major errors based on poor science. Not a good week for the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (See also Roger L. Simon: "Climategate: The Scandal that Keeps on Giving")
A review of Climategate: The CRUtape Letters, the first book on the game-changing data leak. (Also see Roger L. Simon's PJTV interview with the book's author:"Climategate Heats Up As Liberal Author Jumps Ship")
Is criticism of U.S. relief efforts justified? Mostly, no.
Brit Hume did nothing wrong when commenting about Tiger Woods, but he doesn't know the faith.
It appears that most of the Copenhagen participants saw the money they spent as an investment. Here's how they get paid.
With the revelation about the cherrypicked Russian stations (plus six other freshly, independently discovered problems), the real story of how we got here just took a shape.
The "trick" used to "hide the decline," which alarmists have claimed was taken out of context, is actually worse when the context is included.
When you are in one, it is best to stop digging.
A one-stop source for information about the biggest scientific scandal in a century.
The decorated scientist — oft-mentioned in the CRU emails — wants to see the current blatant conflicts of interest removed from climate science. (Also read Bill Whittle: "Ike's Response to Climategate")
The IPCC has been claiming Himalayan glaciers could be gone by 2035. The research paper they used concluded 2350.