Assad and WMD: ‘Don’t Doubt — He Will Use Everything’
A former Syrian general told PJM from an opposition base just outside the country today that forces fighting the regime of Bashar al-Assad critically need Western assistance before the dictator unleashes a catastrophic, last-stand attack on scores of civilians.
And if Washington or the European Union are concerned that weapons given to the Syrian resistance would fall into the wrong hands, the opposition leader has a solution: put them on loaner.
“If they decide to help us militarily by air or any way to help getting rid of this present regime, it’s very welcome,” the defected general, who wished to remain anonymous, said. “If it’s not going to happen this way, let them give us the weapons to get rid of the last bastion of the regime.”
That includes systems able to target the skies and even the playing field with one of Assad’s remaining strengths: an air force.
“I wish you guys can do something — give us everything that will empower us to get rid of this regime,” he continued. “Don’t be afraid that we’re going to keep those weapons and one day invade the neighbors. We’ll give you the last weapon after we take over the power.”
“We’re interested in rebuilding our country and getting rid of the evil in this country. …If the Americans or other parties are ready to help the Syrians help overturn the existing regime, I would beg you that they need to do it through the Syrian military.”
Numerous high-level defectors such as himself, the general said, “are ready to fight the final fight” to defeat “something above description — the crimes that are happening.”
“They’re like animals, like a beast on a rampage; there is no conscience there,” the general said of Assad’s loyalists. “…I am surprised that nothing has been done in the international community to save the people.”
The crimes against civilians include the torture and execution of children, sexual torture, and the torture and murder of hospital patients. Some of these grisly attacks have been documented by cell phone video and shared with the world via Syrian social networkers.
But the 40,000 death toll could climb sharply if Assad dips into his weapons of last resort as he struggles to hold on to the last gasp of his 12-year rule.
“I would say he’s definitely gone and the regime is falling day after day,” the general said, adding Assad can’t go “one meter” outside his palace. “He’s 75 percent gone.”
“The location of where he is is allowing him to resist a little bit. … He will do everything to the last man. He will use everything, including the chemical weapons. Don’t doubt about that — he will use everything.”
“I hope as God is my witness that the solution will come as a political solution,” the general continued. “I tell you why there will be a tragedy. I cannot imagine what will be used. He’s not going to leave alive.”
He added, “There’s no doubt in mind at any time he can use destructive weapons against the population.”
Washington said last week it fears Assad using his chemical weapons as rebels close in on Damascus and the president feels boxed in.
“We have sent an unmistakable message that this would cross a red line and those responsible would be held to account,” said Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
The general called the chemical weapons a “very, very, very important problem — we’re seeing them going toward Lebanon, which is an extremely dangerous situation that we should be very aware of. Very extremely dangerous.” Here, of course, they would fall into the hands of Assad ally Hezbollah.
Those fighting Assad hope that the solution, be it diplomatic or military, comes before a “catastrophic” slaughter by the flailing dictator, who still has the powerful intelligence sector on his side.
“If the opposition was granted a good discipline, were really backed by a good strategy and armaments, there wouldn’t be anything left by the government,” the general told PJM. “If we did have a good strategy from the beginning, I tell you there wouldn’t be any military fighting at this point.”
The Syrian revolution began in March 2011 with peaceful street protests against the reign of Assad, inspired by other Arab Spring movements calling for democratic government in the region. As Assad slaughtered civilians in response, disillusioned generals left their posts and rank-and-file soldiers crossed to the opposition, too. Longtime opposition groups — representing the country’s diversity from Christians to Islamists, Kurds to Assyrians — forged a political leadership in exile, leading from the Syrian National Council to the newly formed National Coalition for Syrian Revolutionary and Opposition Forces.
And while the State Department is designating one group of Syrian rebels as a terrorist group — the al-Nusra Front (deemed an extension of al-Qaeda in Iraq) — in an effort to isolate extremists who would take advantage of the political instability, the general takes umbrage at characterizations of this revolution as one of hardline militant Islamists.
“I would like to give you my word of honor and to all the American public that there is no presence of al-Qaeda in Syria,” he said. “Whether Muslim or Christian or Alawi, everything that you look at, it’s coming from the people — it’s the people, your regular people from the street, fighting.”
He stressed that in Syria, a conservative Muslim isn’t like one you’d find in Afghanistan or Pakistan — a Salafist, he said, is basically considered as one who prays more than your average Muslim.
He does point to the Iraq War and Assad sending jihadists over the border to conduct suicide bombings and other attacks. “If you want to search for any traces of al-Qaeda, look no further than the government of Syria,” the general said.
“They were fueling extremists of all types whether from the right or left,” he said. “Everything was controlled and used to back the power of the intelligence of Syria.” Assad consistently tries to brand the opposition as “terrorists.”
And those who have protected and armed the Assad regime won’t have a new friend in a democratic Syria.
“Yes to the United States, yes to Europe, and no to Russia — we don’t want to deal with anything or anyone coming from this part of the world,” the general asserted.
The general vows that a peaceful Syria, representing its myriad ethnic and religious groups, can even be a force for stability in other regional crises.
“We want peace,” he said. “Please don’t stick any kind of labels to us.”






I wish you guys can do something — give us everything that will empower us to get rid of this regime,” he continued. “Don’t be afraid that we’re going to keep those weapons and one day invade the neighbors. We’ll give you the last weapon after we take over the power.”
And how would we ensure that all the weapons were returned after the opposition obtains power? Are we really just supposed to take his word for it? Why do I have the feeling that similar promises were made or implied by the rebels in Libya only to be broken shortly thereafter?
As for Al Qaida being absent in Syria, I’ve seen several of those cell phone videos and every single one has only one intelligible phrase in it: “Allahu Akhbar”. Now, I’m not saying that phrase is only used by Al Qaida members but it does suggest the speakers are Muslim, not Alawi or Christian.
Syria is a charnel house and the violence being perpetrated is horrific but I’m tired of doing things that are supposed to help improve countries only to find them being used to empower those who would do even worse.
Where is the honest and reliable intelligence that would tell us who the rebels in Syria really are and what they stand for? Do we have any assets there to fill us in?
Is Obama listening to those assets? Or is he doing exactly what he needs to do to help the Islamists achieve domination over yet another predominantly Muslim country?
U.S. Attorney’s Office claims author’s of Blagojevich book “Golden” lying
http://illinoispaytoplay.com/2012/12/10/u-s-attorneys-office-claims-authors-of-blagojevich-book-golden-lying/
This blogger keeps track of things – as best as possible – through her own sources within Israel and the U.S, sources who are in a good position to more than hedge their bets. And it is due to this info that many commentaries shake out the way they do.
That being said, in regard to Syria (and living a hair’s breath from chemicals which may be unleashed) here are some gleanings – http://adinakutnicki.com/2012/12/07/world-war-3s-place-markers-set-up-through-barack-hussein-obamas-mid-east-fires-addendum-to-northeast-intelligence-network-posits-a-direct-nexus-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/
And the above is not smack talk.
the west is the one pushing Assad into a dangerous corner. I can not understand that there isn’t any western country saying “STEP BACK”
the west is making a horrific mess of the middle east. they are playing g-d with the lives of the innocent for their petty pleasures.
what comes after Assad will be a lot worse then what is there now.
I could care less if Assad is a dictator …his replacement will also be one.
Yet another invitation to a nation building party. Funny how some in the U.S. thinks it can reverse the long history of the Middle East. They take our money and laugh at us while trying to kill us. We’re foolish enough to think we have national friends in the Middle East when they have no true friendship or political bonds among themselves and the various Muslim sects. Then we’re even more foolish to think that Iran, Eygpt, Russia and China will sit on the sidelines should we ‘liberate’ Syria. They have money and we don’t! So who’s going to finance the nation building in Syria if we liberate them?
We never seem to learn!
This “former Syrian general” can fight his battles for Islam by himself. I hope they all lose.
If cancer cells killed other cancer cells, why is this bad for non-cancer cells?
Because the strong cancer survives, armed with the tools that we gave them..
“The general vows that a peaceful Syria, representing its myriad ethnic and religious groups, can even be a force for stability in other regional crises.”
Who could possibly be stupid enough to believe this lying muslim? They do lie a lot, you know.
Sounds like he’s working with TMB:
http://www.canadafreepress.com/
Benghazi explained: Interview with an Intelligence Insider (Part III)
(Link to Parts I & II in first paragraph).
It details whats going on with Syria and how it involves Benghazi. Brought to you by Barry Hussein and the NWO mob.
“They’re like animals, like a beast on a rampage; there is no conscience there,” the general said of Assad’s loyalists. “…I am surprised that nothing has been done in the international community to save the people.”
Like the “rebels” are any better in the least. Let me say something to this “general” in case by some remote chance he reads this. Fight your own battles and go F yourself.
I simply don’t believe this statement of the General’s…
” “Don’t be afraid that we’re going to keep those weapons and one day invade the neighbors. We’ll give you the last weapon after we take over the power.””
This is suspect also…..wouldn’t believe it for a moment…….
“The general vows that a peaceful Syria, representing its myriad ethnic and religious groups, can even be a force for stability in other regional crises.
“We want peace,” he said. “Please don’t stick any kind of labels to us.”
These “myriad ethnic and religious groups” have been slitting each others’ throats for generations upon generations.
“We want peace,” he said. “Please don’t stick any kind of labels to us.”
Of course the “peace” he’s talking about COULD well be the peace of Islam when the Caliphate is finally achieved; i.e. when the entire world is Muslim.
Any time we hear the word “peace” used; we need to clarify the definition.
Here is the American perspective:
(1) On 9/11/2001, America was attacked by Sunni Muslim terrorists, mostly from Saudi Arabia, with brains from Egypt and funding from Saudi Arabia. Sunni Muslim Palestinians danced in the street to celebrate.
(2) Syria’s Sunni Muslim opposition is already murdering, raping and expelling the Christian minority (who were in Syria long before Islam arrived).
(3) Asad’s regime is based on the Alawi population group. They drink beer and are relatively secular. No Alawis have committed jihad murder in the West.
(4) Asad’s regime is undoubtedly brutal. However, his regime does not harm the West and has been quite cooperative, even helping torture Muslim terrorists for the CIA.
(5) Asad is currently supported by Iran, whereas the Jihadis are supported by Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States – effectively, the situation is a Middle Eastern proxy war.
America’s best bet is to do nothing and let the Middle East fight its own wars. However, Obama will most likely indulge his student-era anti-Western sympathies to help yet another Jihadist group grab power under the guise of humanitarian intervention.
Humanitarian intervention is, of course, a thoroughly loving and decent Christian notion. We must understand that our help will once again earn us the undying HATRED of the Muslims we help save from Asad’s brutality.
I wholeheartedly agree with this.
Whenever “Arab Brothers” fight each other (like the Iran-Iraq war for example), I simply say that I hope “both sides will win.”
Although I would add that I wish that it would take a very, very, very long time for this to play out (Allah willing).
– FF
True to form, Obama has now endorsed Muslim terrorist groups as Syria’s next regime:
U.S. taxpayers will now pay to arm these America-hating savages to help them murder, rape and expel Syrian Christians, Druze and probably Kurds as well as other groups.
Of course, women will be put in their “proper place”. Warfare should provide an excellent environment to collect sex slaves (milk al-yamin) for fun and profit.
The anti-Western terrorist groups will also be given anti-aircraft weapons that will soon be used to bring down passenger planes in the U.S. and Europe.
So don’t go backpacking in the Syrian alpines, is what you’re saying…
There’s nerve gas up there!
We are not the sherrif of the world. We don’t need any more of our troops dying in wars for folks who are truly ungrateful. We don’t need any more ‘regime change’, nor any more ‘nation-building’, nor any more ‘genocide-fighting’ nor any other slogans you want to make up. Let the Syrians do whatever they want to do to each other and if their civil war spills over onto the U.S. – not some imaginary ‘humanitarian’ or other fake interest – then hammer them (both sides) into the rocks and walk away. If it doesn’t spill over, then let them kill each other all they want. Don’t help the government. Don’t help the rebels or whatever you think they are .. they’re certainly not freedom-lovers. They want to impose their own version of craziness on everyone in their country. Let them!! The entire Middle East – with the possible exception of Israel – isn’t worth the life of one American soldier, isn’t worth one box of rifle ammo, let alone anything more. And just in case you think otherwise, I served 24 years in the Army, including 3 years in Vietnam and three years in the most recent Iraq lunacy. I know what I’m talking about and most of you haven’t a clue about what the entire actual cost of what you’re espousing is or will be.
PRECISELY. Wars are sometimes necessary to protect real U.S. interests. Even JFK’s Vietnam war may have been necessary as part of a larger strategy to stand firm through the Cold War. (BTW thanks for your service, Ike.)
On the other hand, protecting foreign countries and their populations from their own bad choices is never a good choice for the U.S.
The narcissistic Woodrow Wilson pioneered the technique of involving the U.S. in far-away foreign war as a smokescreen to amass more power and suppress opposition at home.
Why the hate towards Wilson? He kept the US out of the slaughterhouse of WW1 as long as possible and and his fourteen points almost certainly would have prevented WW2.
One of the curiosities of Blogdom is the dislike of some very good Presidents.
BTW one of our worse Presidents was Andrew Jackson. So there!
That brings us neatly back to the current situation – real U.S. interests were not significantly threatened in World War I.
Hindsight suggests that Wilson always wanted a war. However, then as now, a president seeking to start a war must talk peace until all the ducks are in a row.
Oh, let’s see.
He wrote volumes prior to his presidency stating how the Constitution was outmoded, irrelevant and antiquated. He never wavered from his belief that the executive branch and govt. in general needed to have far more power than provided for in the Constitution.
Basically, he held the Constitution in contempt.
He was not shy about his anti-Semitic and racist view points.
WWI was a war that the USA had zero business getting involved in; it was simply a continuation of the many European wars that had been waged over the previous 500 years. The USA was not threatened in any way now was Germany or England a threat to the USA.
About 50,0000 US soldiers were killed in that war and yes, Wilson is responsible for every one of those deaths. He should have been hanged -literally – for that.
(By the way, it was a foregone conclusion, as a result of the Franco-Prussian War of 1870, that Germany and France would go to war again. The Prussians knew this at that time and they just needed an excuse to invade France; plans which had been drawn up many years before the onset of WWI.
The British, in their stupidity, aligned with France. They should also have stayed out of that conflict, for the Germans has no aims to invade the UK).
It was Wilson – an arrogant, elitist, “intellectual” who believed that HE and the USA existed to solve the world’s problems. Of course, even though the USA and the UK was on the “winning” side, the result was Hitler and Lenin/Stalin.
Some win, eh?
Wilson was the second US president that was a hardcore progressive (Teddy Roosevelt was the first). It was these two that set the USA on the path to ever larger govt, ever diminishing individual rights and the acceptance that the government has a right to confiscate the wages of the people.
And it was these two in particular that established the precedent that the USA should become the policeman of the world.
And now the USA is bankrupt because our govt. spends to much and never seems capable of saying NO to getting into another war.
The moment Wilson put his hand on the bible and swore to uphold the constitution, he lied.
JA, I thought that you made a very true & relevant comment.
You left out the last three: Franklin Roosevelt, Lynden Johnson and the last, but not least, Obama.
“Even JFK’s Vietnam war may have been necessary as part of a larger strategy to stand firm through the Cold War.”
May I invite you to study up on the history of Vietnam and Ho Chi Minh and how the U.S. come to intervene in a blunder of all political blunders.
As a side note, I have far more respect for the Vietnamese than I do for any American who was involved in the anti war and social reform movement of the time. I shall never forget my two times returning to the U.S. from Vietnam via San Francisco and on down the coast to Santa Barbara and Los Angeles watching the animals riot, take over campus buildings and staff and burn down a bank of America and otherwise destroy everything in view. The same morons who are in government today and most others proclaiming themselves as the mature intellectual elites. This nation may have a chance when ALL of those morons are pushing up daisies from six feet below.
Sorry to have vented on your posting but you opened the door. You’re one of the few postings I read when I see them.
Whether or not the war was a blunder, it did divert money from the broader Communist strategy of funding revolutions and anti-capitalist protests throughout the world. The cost of the war to the USSR, and later the cost of the Afghanistan war, was one of the reasons for bankrupting and dissolution of the Soviet Union. The Vietnam War was more than a bunch of armed peasants involved in ambushes against the US military. After Tet, the war was taken over by the North Vietnamese, funded primarily by the USSR, i.e., became really expensive.
I would be most interested in your supporting data re; “…it did divert money from the broader Communist strategy of funding revolutions and anti-capitalist protests throughout the world. The cost of the war to the USSR, and later the cost of the Afghanistan war, was one of the reasons for bankrupting and dissolution of the Soviet Union.”
You couldn’t be more wrong regarding USSR economic support or any support of North Vietnam’s 2nd war with the U.S.! Therefore, you are completely wrong to assume that Vietnam hand anything to do with bankrupting the former USSR.
The former USSR and China did in fact join in a geopolitical strategy post WWII and involved IndoChina/Vietnam though it did not involve the USSR with Vietnam wars #1 or #2.
If you’d like some topographic facts maybe this would give you some insight:
http://www.militaryhistoryonline.com/20thcentury/articles/chinesesupport.aspx
Ike, I hate to question anyone’s service but how did you serve 24 years in the army including three in Viet Nam which ended in 1975 (1972 for most Americans) and three years in Iraq which began in 2003? The numbers don’t add up.
My, my! Head back to your history books! You must be a youngin.
What are you going on about? Trangbang68′s chronology is exactly right as Iraq I didn’t last any three years.
trangbang68: Simple. First active duty from 1965 to 1979, served in RVN October,1965 – January, 1969. Took a break in service for about 18 years, then enlisted in the Army Reserve. Mobilized in December, 2003 for three years and served a total of 3 years active duty (give or take a few months; it’s the Reserves, eh?) and seven not on active duty. That gives me a total of a bit under 24 years service and three years in each war. In order to be eligible to ren-enlist in the Reserves at age 50, I had to be able to reach 20 years of service for retirement purposes – or more – by the time I reached 60 years of age. Active duty has different rules; Reserves rules were these. I didn’t have three years service in Iraq, but three years active duty during the period of 03 – 06. Hope that explains what you’re curious about and satisfies your “b-s” meter.
Okay, I apologize for my doubting you. I just have a low tolerance for fake veterans like the stooges John Kerry used in Winter Soldier or those outlined in “Stolen Valor” by Jug Burkett
No problem. I understand completely and is why I responded with a straight answer as soon as I read your post, sir.
Please, please, continue to kill each other. Don’t let us stop you. Use any weapons you might have. Kill prisoners, kill civilians, kill, kill, kill. You’ll be saving us the trouble.
Funny in a way. We know the future of Syria. A civil war with the winner being allied with the Moslem Brotherhood, followed by an eventual MB takeover with the support of the Erdogan government, the Qataris with the acceptance if not the overt support of Obama.
We should arm the Kurds, and keep the Turks, Persians, Saudi/Sunnis killing each other for as long as possible. The more Muslim on Muslim death the better.
Egypt has 200 F-16s.
Saudi Arabia has enough arms to conquer half the world.
Turkey wants to be a big boy.
Why is anybody looking at the USA?
It’s about who’s got the money and who can be talked into spending it. Like Libya. Get the US involved so that they pick up the tab.
I’m not a youngin whatever that is. Put your big boy math hat on.
Let’s say Ike joined the army in 1969 . He completed basic and then served 3 years in Viet Nam, leaving at the end of 1972 when Nixon’s Vietnamization of the war was completed and the only Americans still there were a few advisers and Marine guards and a few others. Twenty one years later Ike’s 24 years in the army would be over. If he entered the service in 1969, he would have an ETS date of 1993 which is ten years before the Iraq war began. Like I said the math doesn’t add up.
The war with Iraq started in 1990 after Iraq invaded Kuwait. US forces threw Iraq out of Kuwait in 1991, resulting in a cease fire. Iraq repeatedly violated the peace terms which required Iraq to disarm and verify the destruction of their chemical weapons. Hostilities were continuous up to the 2003 invasion.
In defense of trangbang, Ike did post that he was in the most recentIraq lunacy. That said, it is possible that Ike was in Viet Nam and maybe got out for a while and then returned and served in 2003 or so. We should tip our hat for his service and not question his integrity as he is above questioning.
Ike made his service a point of why he had antiwar credibility (I agree with his contention of avoiding foreign entanglements, I think the only dog we have in Syria’s fight is to arm and cheer on Israel to smack Syria down). He boasted of his service and then gave a dubious military record. I considered him getting out and returning but at the onset of the Iraq war he would have been mid 50′s so unless he had a critical MOS ,that’s unlikely also. There’s a fake Viet Nam vet standing holding a “Will Work for Food” at freeway ramps all over America so I lean toward skepticism towards claims.
We didn’t have troops in Iraq in ’91, remember? At least not officially and even the unofficial troops only stayed a couple months. I remember well. I was there.
So a defecting general warns of imminent threat of WMD in the hands of a crazy dictator and urges the US to intervene, which of course we will do, on humanitarian grounds.
I saw this movie nine, ten years ago, didn’t believe it then and definitely didn’t like the way it ended.
One man with a 338 Lapua sniper rifle could take care of Asshat anytime …. …
I reckon that his own generals are plotting to import a couple of those smoke poles and take care of it themselves.
Anyone notice that the U.N. made a huge with the fake palestinians recently, and they also roundly condemned Israel for building houses on a miniscule plot of land which belongs to them? The Useless Nations never said a word about Syria’s murder of 40,000 of their own people! That’s telling; and it’s all I need to know about that institution of evil. Boot the b’tards out of the U.S.A. and stop funding Assad’s little escapades …. …
If Assad falls it will end up only one way: another Middle Eastern state falls into the hands of the jihadi’s. The West is doing everything possible to enable the jihadi’s to come to power. Christians and secularists in Syria will immensely suffer at the hands of the allies of the West. Interventions on humanitarian grounds is nothing more than an excuse to empower the jihadi’s. How many times does this have to happen for you to get the message? Kosovo, Bosnia, Egypt, Libya, Chechnya (where it didn’t work), it’s always the same false flag operation. Accuse the target government of mass murder or using or having WMD’s, arm the jihadi’s, the jihadi’s come to power and institute Islamic terror, and the Western media doesn’t report it. People in the West have become idiots.
My.
What curious timing.
“I would say he’s definitely gone and the regime is falling day after day,” the general said, adding Assad can’t go “one meter” outside his palace. “He’s 75 percent gone.”
Well, if Assad is so close to falling, then they really don’t need our help, do they. Problem is, most of the people who want to overthrow Assad are just as bad, if not worse, than Assad himself. Many of them are al Qaeda fighters who would just assume kill us as Assad. Proof of this has already happened in Libya. We provided military support and weapons to the “rebels” in Libya, only to have al Qaeda militias take over in eastern Libya and they went on to kill our ambassador as well as three other Americans. Now all of eastern Libya is basically a base for al Qaeda militias. Could you imagine all of Syria being nothing but an al Qaeda base for radical Islamists? Not a very appealing prospect.
Let them all slaughter each other. They are nothing but a bunch of animals. Whoever is left standing after all of this will be in such a weak position that they won’t be able to threaten much of anybody. And whoever replaces Assad will hate Israel and the United States just as much as Assad did, so what’s the point of supporting anybody in that worthless country? This is not our fight and there is no need to get sucked into it. Even if they use chemical weapons, if they use it on their own people that is still none of our business. As long as they don’t use anything on Israel, there is no reason to get involved in Syria.
“A former Syrian general told PJM from an opposition base just outside the country today that forces fighting the regime of Bashar al-Assad critically need Western assistance before the dictator unleashes a catastrophic, last-stand attack on scores of civilians.”
Hilarious. In WW1, Germans were nailing cats to the doors of churches in Belgium; in Desert Storm, Iraqis were throwing babies out of hospital windows in Kuwait. And now a former servant of a Socialist tyrant claims that in some possible future the tyrant will use chemical weapons like the British, French, Germans, and Russians.
Has anyone checked this former toady’s record on prophecy?
I ain’t letting Obama use his behind leading on Syria again after his successes in Egypt and Libya based on the say-so of anonymous thugs who served the Vanity Fair-approved dictator of Damascus.
Since when did PJM become a propaganda mouthpiece for the Obama platform of “responsibility to protect?”
When Socialists and Islamicists fight, we can only hope each uses weapons of mass destruction on each other. (Couldn’t happen to a nicer bunch.) Oh, wait: they already have in Iran-Iraq war, in which he didn’t intervene. And we shouldn’t here.
“I would like to give you my word of honor and to all the American public that there is no presence of al-Qaeda in Syria,”
“word of honor”? Seriously? Pfft. Go away. A muslim’s word of honor along with a couple of dollars will get you a coffee at Starbucks.
I’d charge extra if I was working the counter. And use the counterfeit detector pen on any money.
Don’t be surprized if you wake up one day (soon)to find that Israel has already taken care of the problem.
“We have sent an unmistakable message that this would cross a red line and those responsible would be held to account,” said Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
In Hillaryspeak: “We will summon you to the International Court at The Hague and subject you to a very stern lecture.”
It’s their mess, why should we get involved? All we would be doing is giving aid to people who will turn on us once they have one.
It is a local problem, not ours, if we stay out, then they will be too busy to bother others.
The general said, “Whether Muslim or Christian or Alawi,” and thus betrays his flaccid attempt at taqiyya. The Alawis are moslums, just not his preferred variety. Islum is a filthy cult, populated with liars and thieves and savages. Let them kill each other and keep them away from civilization.
Wasn’t it Bush who was criticized for going into Iraq to get Hussein’s WMD, and none were found, even though we know that chemical weapons were used on the Kurds? How do we know that Assad really has any? If so, where did he get them?
Good question!
My own assumption is that, since there is no doubt Hussein DID have WMDs,having used them in his own country on dissident groups, he MUST have moved the weapons out of the country to his friends and allies, and to those who owed him big favors. Maybe some went to France,whose leaders got MILLIONS in the Oil for Food scandal,and sold weapons like the Exocet missile to Arab countries all the time. (That particular scandal happened on Clinton’s watch,as I recall.) While Saddam was getting the weapons moved out of the country, he was working HARD to PREVENT weapons inspectors from the UN to come in and see for themselves,so they could do nothing to prevent the shipments,or to prove that they had actually happened. By the time they did get in, he had had MONTHS to both move the weaponry and destroy or hide any evidence that they’d ever been there,though there WERE photos of high tech military jets being buried WHOLE. VERY much like a wealthy, powerful illegal arms dealer who uses the courts, bribes,intimidation and his highly paid lawyers to hold off an investigation until he can get all the weaponry off his property,and when the sheriff, Feds or state police finally DO arrive on the scene, they find nothing but a smirking perp.
How many times does Lucy have to pull the football away Charlie Brown quits?
Are these the same WMD that Sadaam didn’t have, yet were convoyed and airlifted out of Iraq during the 18 months that the Dhimmicrats drug there feet before Bush liberated Iraq?
True to form, Obama has now endorsed Muslim terrorist groups as Syria’s next regime:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/12/as-jihadist-element-among-syrian-opposition-grows-more-prominent-obama-recognizes-it-as-legitimate-r.html
U.S. taxpayers will now pay to arm these America-hating savages to help them murder, rape and expel Syrian Christians, Druze and probably Kurds as well as other groups.
Of course, women will be put in their “proper place”. Warfare should provide an excellent environment to collect sex slaves (milk al-yamin) for fun and profit.
The anti-Western terrorist groups will also be given anti-aircraft weapons that will soon be used to bring down passenger planes in the U.S. and Europe.
“I hope as God is my witness that the solution will come as a political solution,” the general continued. “I tell you why there will be a tragedy. I cannot imagine what will be used. He’s not going to leave alive.”
God is your witness! GOD does nothing to you! What do fools know of GOD? Here is a hint; GOD HATES YOU
Yes,”be held accountable”. In other words, get an official scolding from her or Obama,and NOTHING ELSE. I am so SICK of their ENABLING our enemies and the enemies of civilization itself,while going recklessly and without plan or orderliness to war all OVER the place without the consent of Congress as,if and when the want,having our finest young men KILLED for NOTHING.