<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are You More Likely to Be Shot Because You Own a Gun?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/blog/are-you-more-likely-to-be-shot-because-you-own-a-gun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/are-you-more-likely-to-be-shot-because-you-own-a-gun/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 06:11:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/are-you-more-likely-to-be-shot-because-you-own-a-gun/#comment-423650</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 02:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=69059#comment-423650</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s is my OK CORRAL study that supports the good work of Penn State Med (I sent the USG a invoice for $100M and sent an entry to Stockholm for the 2010 Nobel Prize Contest.)

OK Corral A) 10 Earps arrive unarmed. 100 armed Clantons shoot one Earp 600 times, then beat 8 of them to death with a bungstarter, and finally tar &amp; feather the last one at the family picnic. RESULT: 90% fatalities/10% 3rd degree burns (one died gunshot)

OK Corral B) 10 Earps arrive armed. 100 armed Clantons die in the gunfight versus 2 Earps dead by gunshot. RESULT: being armed makes it twice as likely to be shot

“The OK Corral (Study B) helps resolve the long-standing debate about whether guns are protective or perilous,” notes study author Richard, Aerospace Engineer. &quot;The results are clearly unequivocal&quot; he added.

PS: or maybe they lined up 10 Earps and drilled them all with one teflon coated bullet in Study A.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s is my OK CORRAL study that supports the good work of Penn State Med (I sent the USG a invoice for $100M and sent an entry to Stockholm for the 2010 Nobel Prize Contest.)</p>
<p>OK Corral A) 10 Earps arrive unarmed. 100 armed Clantons shoot one Earp 600 times, then beat 8 of them to death with a bungstarter, and finally tar &amp; feather the last one at the family picnic. RESULT: 90% fatalities/10% 3rd degree burns (one died gunshot)</p>
<p>OK Corral B) 10 Earps arrive armed. 100 armed Clantons die in the gunfight versus 2 Earps dead by gunshot. RESULT: being armed makes it twice as likely to be shot</p>
<p>“The OK Corral (Study B) helps resolve the long-standing debate about whether guns are protective or perilous,” notes study author Richard, Aerospace Engineer. &#8220;The results are clearly unequivocal&#8221; he added.</p>
<p>PS: or maybe they lined up 10 Earps and drilled them all with one teflon coated bullet in Study A.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inrptrn</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/are-you-more-likely-to-be-shot-because-you-own-a-gun/#comment-421917</link>
		<dc:creator>Inrptrn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 03:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=69059#comment-421917</guid>
		<description>36. Now and Then:
&quot;A kitchen knife is designed for cooking.&quot;

Kitchen knives don&#039;t &#039;cook&#039; anything dumbass, they cut things.
Vast numbers of people have been killed or maimed by knives and other similar cutting instruments.

If guns are blamed for killing can I blame misspelled words on my pencil?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>36. Now and Then:<br />
&#8220;A kitchen knife is designed for cooking.&#8221;</p>
<p>Kitchen knives don&#8217;t &#8216;cook&#8217; anything dumbass, they cut things.<br />
Vast numbers of people have been killed or maimed by knives and other similar cutting instruments.</p>
<p>If guns are blamed for killing can I blame misspelled words on my pencil?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deguello</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/are-you-more-likely-to-be-shot-because-you-own-a-gun/#comment-421504</link>
		<dc:creator>deguello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=69059#comment-421504</guid>
		<description>VIVO: Tell us  how  you going to &quot;defuse the situation VIVO dear. Are you going to sing Cumbaya with your assailants, and hope they share their drugs with you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VIVO: Tell us  how  you going to &#8220;defuse the situation VIVO dear. Are you going to sing Cumbaya with your assailants, and hope they share their drugs with you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deguello</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/are-you-more-likely-to-be-shot-because-you-own-a-gun/#comment-421501</link>
		<dc:creator>deguello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=69059#comment-421501</guid>
		<description>Actually,Mr. Cramer:You are more likely to be shot by a liberal in control of state sanctioned-gun wielding thugs.Just ask a WACO survivor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually,Mr. Cramer:You are more likely to be shot by a liberal in control of state sanctioned-gun wielding thugs.Just ask a WACO survivor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vivo</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/are-you-more-likely-to-be-shot-because-you-own-a-gun/#comment-421407</link>
		<dc:creator>vivo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=69059#comment-421407</guid>
		<description>81. anton:

&quot;@80. vivo: “If you see me carrying a gun, be sure that I will use it. This is 100% reliable data . . .”

. . . I carry all of the time, in 25 years as a police officer in Metro Detroit I have seen lots of people killed because they were unable to defend themselves,&quot;

A cop! That explains a lot.  You are right that if one is not trained, the gun is useless.

The point I&#039;m making is that if I carry a gun is because I&#039;m going to use it.  I wouldn&#039;t carry a gun for &#039;just in case&#039; situations.  Maybe I&#039;m not explaining this scenario well.  I will use a gun against an identified aggressor.  But this hopefully will never happen because I would avoid or defuse dangerous situations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>81. anton:</p>
<p>&#8220;@80. vivo: “If you see me carrying a gun, be sure that I will use it. This is 100% reliable data . . .”</p>
<p>. . . I carry all of the time, in 25 years as a police officer in Metro Detroit I have seen lots of people killed because they were unable to defend themselves,&#8221;</p>
<p>A cop! That explains a lot.  You are right that if one is not trained, the gun is useless.</p>
<p>The point I&#8217;m making is that if I carry a gun is because I&#8217;m going to use it.  I wouldn&#8217;t carry a gun for &#8216;just in case&#8217; situations.  Maybe I&#8217;m not explaining this scenario well.  I will use a gun against an identified aggressor.  But this hopefully will never happen because I would avoid or defuse dangerous situations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Surls</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/are-you-more-likely-to-be-shot-because-you-own-a-gun/#comment-421355</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Surls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=69059#comment-421355</guid>
		<description>&quot;Yet another flawed study attempts to make the case for keeping citizens defenseless.&quot;

LOL.

They can have all the studies they want to, and it won&#039;t change the fact that the more gun control laws they pass...the higher the murder rates have gone.

True in both the USA and the UK.  Just compare homicide rates in 1900 (when there was basically no such thing as gun control) to homicide rates in 2000.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Yet another flawed study attempts to make the case for keeping citizens defenseless.&#8221;</p>
<p>LOL.</p>
<p>They can have all the studies they want to, and it won&#8217;t change the fact that the more gun control laws they pass&#8230;the higher the murder rates have gone.</p>
<p>True in both the USA and the UK.  Just compare homicide rates in 1900 (when there was basically no such thing as gun control) to homicide rates in 2000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clayton E. Cramer</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/are-you-more-likely-to-be-shot-because-you-own-a-gun/#comment-421285</link>
		<dc:creator>Clayton E. Cramer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 04:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=69059#comment-421285</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;I hope to be in your foxhole, bud!&lt;/I&gt;

I desperately hope that it doesn&#039;t get to that point.  The history of armed revolutions is really ugly.  The American Revolution is one of the few successes.  I worry that if push comes to shove, the sort that will be left standing when the bloodshed stops will be the most ruthless and savage.  Nations in internal revolt are often unable to defend their interests abroad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I hope to be in your foxhole, bud!</i></p>
<p>I desperately hope that it doesn&#8217;t get to that point.  The history of armed revolutions is really ugly.  The American Revolution is one of the few successes.  I worry that if push comes to shove, the sort that will be left standing when the bloodshed stops will be the most ruthless and savage.  Nations in internal revolt are often unable to defend their interests abroad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/are-you-more-likely-to-be-shot-because-you-own-a-gun/#comment-421209</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 01:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=69059#comment-421209</guid>
		<description>NICE TRY ANTI-GUNNERS !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NICE TRY ANTI-GUNNERS !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eowyn</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/are-you-more-likely-to-be-shot-because-you-own-a-gun/#comment-420972</link>
		<dc:creator>Eowyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=69059#comment-420972</guid>
		<description>93. Cybergeezer, count me in, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>93. Cybergeezer, count me in, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cybergeezer</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/are-you-more-likely-to-be-shot-because-you-own-a-gun/#comment-420937</link>
		<dc:creator>Cybergeezer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=69059#comment-420937</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;46. Jim Baker:
..........We may soon find that we finally have to use our firearms for the very reason that the Constitution describes. If that becomes necessary, God help us all.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I hope to be in your foxhole, bud!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>46. Jim Baker:<br />
&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.We may soon find that we finally have to use our firearms for the very reason that the Constitution describes. If that becomes necessary, God help us all.</p></blockquote>
<p>I hope to be in your foxhole, bud!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

