Get PJ Media on your Apple

Are the Big Tent and Bipartisanship the GOP’s Problem?

Many conclude CPAC with a call to resist rebranding, with one Tea Party leader comparing the stakes to The Hunger Games.

by
Fallon Forbush and Rodrigo Sermeño

Bio

March 17, 2013 - 5:48 pm
Page 1 of 2  Next ->   View as Single Page

NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. — The 2013 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) began its last day Saturday with an overwhelming call for conservatives to stick to their principles.

There is “too much bipartisanship” where both sides of the aisle are mortgaging our future away, said Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA and emcee for Saturday morning’s lineup of speakers. Those speakers included the likes of co-founder of the Tea Party Patriots Jenny Beth Martin, Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa), Gov. Scott Walker (R-Wis.), former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.), Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.), and former GOP vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin.

(See videos of all CPAC speakers on the American Conservative Union’s YouTube channel.)

Where last year’s CPAC convened prior to the presidential election, this week’s speeches were delivered on the heels of the GOP’s loss in favor of a second term for President Obama. Speakers gave their passionate opinions of how the Republican Party can win the election in 2016.

The “mainstream media’s” idea of rebranding the Republican Party to better cater to minorities was out of the question for some.

Martin chided conservatives for the lack of support for Tea Party candidates, naming Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.).

“Is this the country you want?” she asked the crowd while comparing the country and Washington, D.C., to the world found in The Hunger Games novel and movie (a nation of Panem that is divided between 12 districts and ruled by a totalitarian Capitol).

“Our vision is distinctly different from today’s reality,” said Martin. She called on the crowd to refuse politicians lining their friends’ pockets on K Street and to “fight boldly on principle.”

“Patriots, stand with us to fight for freedom … life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness … like Tea Party Patriots do around this country every day … together we will have their back.”

Introduced as a person with the confidence to call out members of the Republican Party for being RINOs (“Republican in Name Only”), King carried on that message.

“There are some people who want to rebrand the Republican Party, but they will not succeed in rebranding us conservatives,” he said. Instead, he drew hard lines on “life and marriage and the rule of law.”

While some have asserted that Mitt Romney lost the election because of the party’s stance on social issues, like an immigration policy built on self-deportation, King said he wasn’t “buying it.”

However, an outspoken conservative force, Ann Coulter, spoke later in the evening and warned the crowd of falling for this “canard.”

“If Republicans don’t focus on what is really causing problems, they’re going to fall for the canard that the problem with the Republican Party is its conservative principles,” said Coulter. “Au contraire: Conservatism is about the only thing Republicans have going for them … conservatism is our winning feature.”

Coulter said a scapegoating of a “fake Republican establishment” is allowing the “real GOP establishment” to “plot and scheme undetected” on immigration policy.

“What public policy will harm average Americans, drive up unemployment, change America permanently in negative ways, and on the other hand, is supported by businessmen who will never vote for a Republican anyway?” she asked the crowd. Amnesty for “illegal aliens,” she responded.

Half of elected Republicans support it and as far as she could tell, most conservative talk radio and TV hosts support it, she said.

“You want the Republican establishment, that’s the Republican establishment. … If amnesty goes through, America becomes California and no Republican will ever win another national election,” she said.

Blaine Richardson, a retired Navy captain and candidate for Congress in Maine’s second district, agreed with King. Richardson, sporting a Tea Party Patriot T-shirt, said that he went to the movement’s first rally and has been a participant ever since.

Where King asked pro-reformers within the GOP to join conservatives in “restoring the pillars of American exceptionalism,” Richardson wants to answer that call and sees conservatives winning the votes as a vital part of maintaining the “very essence of human freedom” in America.

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (11)
All Comments   (11)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
Martin did not 'chide" conservatives like McCain and Graham. How anyone can consider those two conservatives is out of my realm of comprehension. When the words to describe and define politicians have real meaning, we as conservatives, will win on ideals and principles, two things McCain and Graham sorely lack!!!
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
We should remain faithful to conservative principles.

But being a conservative is NOT the same thing as being a reactionary.

Conservatives know when a ship has sailed. We shouldn't be trying to relitigate Marbury vs. Madison or call for the end of the Federal Reserve. That's just ridiculous. The 19th century is gone, and we're not going back to it.

Nor can we dream of the days before modern medical science. The contraceptive Pill was first marketed 50 years ago. It is not going away, and single women today expect to have an active social life. There are no more 20 year old virgins in America.

We should be looking to the future as reformers, and stop this nostalgia for the 19th century or for Calvin Coolidge. The type of conservatism that looks back nostalgically a hundred years has never sold to the American people. We're not Europeans. We're a revolutionary society that always looks to the future, not the past.

1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Don't know much about history;
Don't know much biology;
Don't know much about a science book;
Don't know much about the French I took.
But I do know 1 and 1 is 2 . . . . .

Take a break from looking forward with no frame of reference to check out what Santayana had to say about progress, history, and experience in "The Life of Reason"! Don't let the failure of our public education system doom you to a life of making past mistakes over and over again!
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Conservatism is not a pathetic longing to return to the 19th century, it's a respect for the past and an effort not to toss out ideas that still have relevance today. Some ideas are eternal.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
"We should be looking to the future as reformers, and stop this nostalgia for the 19th century or for Calvin Coolidge."

SCREW LEARNING FROM THE PAST!!@! YEAR ZERO OR BUST!!!!
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
This is the path of the Faux Conservatives of Europe. The Leftist-Lite Democrat-Lite, the we are better managers of the Massive Welfare State, the Me-Too Mini Me Party, the No Hills to Die On Party, the we will follow the Left in any Policy Goal Party just more cautiously Party.

Of course Social Conservatism should be dumped first, and not only dumped, but people who espouse them should be denigrated as European & Christian supremacists, theocrats, Old White Men, racists, sexists, misogynists, and xenophobes.

There you have it folks, the future of our party as envisioned by sinz. Once the Left gets something through legislatively on the Federal Level then, it's a done deal and we will just have to throw up our hands and work to conserve that Leftist fixture as the new normal.

I want no part of this.

I think Im moving to the Constitution Party and telling all Christians and So-Cons to do likewise.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Ideological purity may be something to be proud of but it's not always the best way to draw support for your party. Ours is a nation where most of the voters are moderate on the social issues. They are not attracted to pols who want to exert their control over people in the realm of the social issues. Most people agree that abortion should be safe & rare but stop short of wanting to repeal RvW. Many may still not be ready for gay marriage but most agree with the concept of the civil union & gays having legal parity with straight couples.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
The STUPIDITY of the American electorate is perfectly encapsulated in the Polls where EVERYTHING about the USURPERS Policies are opposed by a MAJORITY yet where the USURPER himself still has an approval rating above 50% . It is quite clear that even after 5 years in office the STUPID American electorate still do not accept that the 'constant campaigner' is in POWER. In Germany when NAZI atrocities were exposed the STUPID gullible Germans used to say 'If only the FÜHRER knew' and such is the naive gullibility of the American populace that similar thought processes apply to their perception of the USURPER.
Unfortunately a MAJORITY of Americans do not visit 'Conservative' websites and , where they can be bothered at all and that is an incredible minority, get all their news from the disgusting 'in the tank' Lame stream EneMedia which just reinforces the Left Wing brainwashing they get from Academia in Schools and Colleges.

1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
"Martin chided conservatives for the lack of support for Tea Party candidates, naming Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.)."

So this Martin thinks McCain and Graham are conservatives? I think that needs to be rephrased as those two are anything but conservatives.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
As Lindsey Graham stated in an interview last year in The State Newspaper, on why he wants to be re-elected as South Carolina's representative in the US Senate in 2014...

"I want to work with Democrats."
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
"I want to work with Democrats."

In that case he should become a Democrat.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
View All