<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apocalypse Not: Report of Defense Department Disaster Plan Overblown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/blog/apocalypse-not-report-of-defense-department-disaster-plan-overblown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/apocalypse-not-report-of-defense-department-disaster-plan-overblown/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 02:44:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David S</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/apocalypse-not-report-of-defense-department-disaster-plan-overblown/#comment-188820</link>
		<dc:creator>David S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=43703#comment-188820</guid>
		<description>@13

Chuck Pelto,

Thank you for the kind comments on Oregon&#039;s disaster preparedness.  Oregon is quite progressive in many ways.  One of the few sales tax free economies left in the USA, 100% public ocean beaches, and a strong native pride.

You might also note that Oregon&#039;s police forces refused to be federalized by the JTTF program.

OREGON. WE LOVE DREAMERS. ™

Peace.

DS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@13</p>
<p>Chuck Pelto,</p>
<p>Thank you for the kind comments on Oregon&#8217;s disaster preparedness.  Oregon is quite progressive in many ways.  One of the few sales tax free economies left in the USA, 100% public ocean beaches, and a strong native pride.</p>
<p>You might also note that Oregon&#8217;s police forces refused to be federalized by the JTTF program.</p>
<p>OREGON. WE LOVE DREAMERS. ™</p>
<p>Peace.</p>
<p>DS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Pelto</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/apocalypse-not-report-of-defense-department-disaster-plan-overblown/#comment-187529</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Pelto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=43703#comment-187529</guid>
		<description>TO: &#039;Curious&#039;
RE: Since &#039;When&#039;?

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;Since when did “resisting U.S. influence” become tantamount to war?&lt;/i&gt; -- Curioius&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Probably around the date of 9/11: when a bunch of people “resisting U.S. influence” flew several airliners into various places killing about 3000 people.

Don&#039;t you &#039;think&#039;?

Regards,

Chuck(le)
[The Truth will out.....and Islamists are not going to like it.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TO: &#8216;Curious&#8217;<br />
RE: Since &#8216;When&#8217;?</p>
<blockquote><p><i>Since when did “resisting U.S. influence” become tantamount to war?</i> &#8212; Curioius</p></blockquote>
<p>Probably around the date of 9/11: when a bunch of people “resisting U.S. influence” flew several airliners into various places killing about 3000 people.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t you &#8216;think&#8217;?</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Chuck(le)<br />
[The Truth will out.....and Islamists are not going to like it.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curious</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/apocalypse-not-report-of-defense-department-disaster-plan-overblown/#comment-186279</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 03:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=43703#comment-186279</guid>
		<description>Since when did &quot;resisting U.S. influence&quot; become tantamount to war?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since when did &#8220;resisting U.S. influence&#8221; become tantamount to war?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Pelto</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/apocalypse-not-report-of-defense-department-disaster-plan-overblown/#comment-184940</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Pelto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=43703#comment-184940</guid>
		<description>TO: Charlie (Colorado)
RE: ERRATA!

Item #5 should read &quot;....Fall of LAST YEAR....&quot;

Regards,

Chuck(le)
[There&#039;s too much blood in my caffeine system.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TO: Charlie (Colorado)<br />
RE: ERRATA!</p>
<p>Item #5 should read &#8220;&#8230;.Fall of LAST YEAR&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Chuck(le)<br />
[There's too much blood in my caffeine system.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Pelto</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/apocalypse-not-report-of-defense-department-disaster-plan-overblown/#comment-184909</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Pelto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=43703#comment-184909</guid>
		<description>TO: Charlie (Colorado)
RE: What?

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;What in the world caused you to direct that comment to me?&lt;/i&gt; -- Charlie (Colorado)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Probably from the following:

[1] Commenting on the Freier monograph in another venue.
[2] Having read it not being particularly impressed with it as being anything &#039;new&#039;.
[3] However, noticing a dark undercurrent within its text.
[4] Your mentioning the monograph.
[5] Thinking of the report, from earlier this year, that someone idiot was thinking we should have 20,000 US Military personnel prepared to deal with massive civil disorder in 2011, just in time for the next election.

It&#039;s called &#039;connecting the dots&#039;.

Hope that helps....

Regards,

Chuck(le)
P.S. Thanks for the link, Daddy. It&#039;s pretty obvious that these people are rather &#039;ignorant&#039;.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TO: Charlie (Colorado)<br />
RE: What?</p>
<blockquote><p><i>What in the world caused you to direct that comment to me?</i> &#8212; Charlie (Colorado)</p></blockquote>
<p>Probably from the following:</p>
<p>[1] Commenting on the Freier monograph in another venue.<br />
[2] Having read it not being particularly impressed with it as being anything &#8216;new&#8217;.<br />
[3] However, noticing a dark undercurrent within its text.<br />
[4] Your mentioning the monograph.<br />
[5] Thinking of the report, from earlier this year, that someone idiot was thinking we should have 20,000 US Military personnel prepared to deal with massive civil disorder in 2011, just in time for the next election.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s called &#8216;connecting the dots&#8217;.</p>
<p>Hope that helps&#8230;.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Chuck(le)<br />
P.S. Thanks for the link, Daddy. It&#8217;s pretty obvious that these people are rather &#8216;ignorant&#8217;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. C.</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/apocalypse-not-report-of-defense-department-disaster-plan-overblown/#comment-184752</link>
		<dc:creator>A. C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 02:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=43703#comment-184752</guid>
		<description>We aren&#039;t the only ones that think about being attacked in multidimensional warfare ala your third bullet.  The Chinese, among others, do too.  Check out this translation from the Chinese:

http://www.terrorism.com/documents/TRC-Analysis/unrestricted.pdf

Having been published and translated into english, I doubt that it is the _actual_ Chinese battle plan.  I have _no_ doubt that it reflects thinking by some military leaders in China, and may well have influenced the contingency planning that the Chinese conduct.  We would be fools to ignore such thinking, which is what I fear that our top political leaders are doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We aren&#8217;t the only ones that think about being attacked in multidimensional warfare ala your third bullet.  The Chinese, among others, do too.  Check out this translation from the Chinese:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.terrorism.com/documents/TRC-Analysis/unrestricted.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.terrorism.com/documents/TRC-Analysis/unrestricted.pdf</a></p>
<p>Having been published and translated into english, I doubt that it is the _actual_ Chinese battle plan.  I have _no_ doubt that it reflects thinking by some military leaders in China, and may well have influenced the contingency planning that the Chinese conduct.  We would be fools to ignore such thinking, which is what I fear that our top political leaders are doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daddy</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/apocalypse-not-report-of-defense-department-disaster-plan-overblown/#comment-184581</link>
		<dc:creator>Daddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=43703#comment-184581</guid>
		<description>Since so many people in this country are unfamiliar with Military Service it is worthwhile to take the time to read the Oath&#039;s of Enlistment and Oath&#039;s of Office. www.history.army.mil/faq/oaths.htm
The Enlistment Oath has a requirement to obey the orders of The President of The United States. The Oath of Office, the Oath taken by Officers, does not. Both Oath&#039;s require supporting and defending The Constitution of The United States against all enemies foreign and domestic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since so many people in this country are unfamiliar with Military Service it is worthwhile to take the time to read the Oath&#8217;s of Enlistment and Oath&#8217;s of Office. <a href="http://www.history.army.mil/faq/oaths.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.history.army.mil/faq/oaths.htm</a><br />
The Enlistment Oath has a requirement to obey the orders of The President of The United States. The Oath of Office, the Oath taken by Officers, does not. Both Oath&#8217;s require supporting and defending The Constitution of The United States against all enemies foreign and domestic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie (Colorado)</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/apocalypse-not-report-of-defense-department-disaster-plan-overblown/#comment-184360</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie (Colorado)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=43703#comment-184360</guid>
		<description>Oh, Gary, I sympathize; I must have corrected that typo 15 times in my copy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, Gary, I sympathize; I must have corrected that typo 15 times in my copy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie (Colorado)</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/apocalypse-not-report-of-defense-department-disaster-plan-overblown/#comment-184358</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie (Colorado)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=43703#comment-184358</guid>
		<description>Chuck: what &lt;i&gt;are&lt;/i&gt; you talking about?  What in the world caused you to direct that comment to me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck: what <i>are</i> you talking about?  What in the world caused you to direct that comment to me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bad</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/apocalypse-not-report-of-defense-department-disaster-plan-overblown/#comment-184221</link>
		<dc:creator>bad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=43703#comment-184221</guid>
		<description>What happens if a previously collapsed country shuts off the pipeline to a bunch of other countries in the middle of some really cold global warming?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happens if a previously collapsed country shuts off the pipeline to a bunch of other countries in the middle of some really cold global warming?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

