Get PJ Media on your Apple

Already Fearing Sequestration, Contractors Could Feel Impact from Leaks

Snowden's leaks to the media follow another contractor in Hawaii, for the Defense Department, who leaked secrets to China.

Bridget Johnson


June 10, 2013 - 7:34 pm
Page 1 of 2  Next ->   View as Single Page

The NSA leaker wanted to impact how the federal government conducts surveillance on U.S. citizens, but Edward Snowden may make the government rethink how it does business with the mammoth network of defense and national security contractors.

With the federal government lacking resources from foreign language experts to tech specialists and having to procure equipment ranging from surveillance systems to tanks, the network of federal contractors has longed feared taking a financial hit from sequestration. The top 100 defense contractors pulled in $414.3 billion in revenue in 2011.

Now the contractors could face an administration wary of leaks.

Contractors hiring for clearance jobs — confidential, secret or top secret — recruit employees at comfortable salaries who have already attained clearance; Snowden previously worked for the CIA in IT security. Snowden, like more than 483,000 other contractors, had top secret clearance and made $200,000 per year on an NSA contract with Booz Allen Hamilton. Another 582,000 contractors have confidential or secret clearance, according to a 2012 report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

Half of the more than 18,000 Booz Allen employees with security clearances have top-secret ones. DNI James Clapper is a former Booz Allen executive.

Booz Allen’s website went down for maintenance for a short time over the weekend after the news broke that an employee of the McLean, Va.-based firm had come out as the source of the leaks.

“Booz Allen can confirm that Edward Snowden, 29, has been an employee of our firm for less than 3 months, assigned to a team in Hawaii. News reports that this individual has claimed to have leaked classified information are shocking, and if accurate, this action represents a grave violation of the code of conduct and core values of our firm,” the company said in a Sunday statement. “We will work closely with our clients and authorities in their investigation of this matter.”

And when trading opened Monday, the company’s stock fell the most in four months, recovering a bit before closing the day on the New York Stock Exchange.

It’s not the only high-profile hit that contractors have taken this year.

Benjamin Pierce Bishop, working at U.S. Pacific Command for small defense contractor Referentia Systems Incorporated, was arrested in March and accused of espionage.

Bishop, 59, a former Army officer, met his 27-year-old girlfriend, a Chinese national who was in the country on a student visa, at an international military defense conference. The Chinese woman “may have been at the conference in order to target individuals such as Bishop who work with and have access to U.S. classified information,” an FBI agent wrote in the affidavit, and the pair were intimate since June 2011. He allegedly began passing information to her the following year.

Bishop had a top-secret security clearance and did not, as required, report his relationship with a foreigner.

The secrets he fed to his lover during this time included information on U.S. nuclear weapons, war plans, communications with U.S. allies and early-warning radar missile detection deployment.

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (6)
All Comments   (6)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
This is what happens when you switch your intelligence gathering from Humint to Sigint. Did Sigint help stop what happened in Boston? The Russians, from what I have read, wanted to give info they had gathered on Tsarnaev, but the US did not take it. The US is too captivated in using technology to gathered intellience, while other countries still use the time tested method of Humint. The story on Benjamin Pierce Bishop, the Russian spy Chapman and others still show that Humint is still the best method to use on your enemies. I just would like to know how much the US has abandoned such methods. If it has substantailly, then we are in truly a pickle. I suspect we will be seeing more stories like Snowden in the future.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
The lunacy of the TSA with their nude scanners was softening us up to ALL be treated like criminals. Guilty until proven innocent is worlds away from innocent until proven guilty! Our government is surveilling law abiding citizens with the cynical purpose of getting dirt on them in order to control them.

There seems to be a point of collapse of such a huge government apparatus on the horizon. The government is so big, it can't be run efficiently and the individuals in the government can't be adequately controlled. At the same time, any huge government takes on a life of its own and craves control, power, and to become ever bigger. It must collapse eventually of its own weight and sprawl.

Whether Snowden is a patriot or a traiter turns on whether the 4th amendment is worth our allegiance.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Well said and Amen!

In recent years (at least the last 30) the alphabet soup of gubmint agencies has had no clue who they are supposed to be working for.

You can't preserve freedom by tearing it apart piece by piece..
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
PRISM -- and the Enemies of This State []

This is exactly what has happened.

What we are left with is a rigid set of official lies and government propaganda.

1) "Profiling" is worse than terrorism

2) Terrorism is generic, unpredictable

3) Islamic movements such as MB are evolving toward Jeffersonian democracy; give them time and money

4) "Islamophobia" must be eradicated -- like the plague.

Adhering to this ideology, "naturally" Uncle Sam must see every American as a suspect. "Naturally," 100 million Verizon customers "must" have their phone records "mined," or "stockpiled" or whatever verb best describes this meta-government, mass computerized intrusion that is so very, very ripe for politicized targeting and widespread abuse. "Naturally," the now-infamous PRISM program permits, as Jed Babbin writes at the American Spectator, "the FBI or NSA to have its own equipment on-site at [various Internet companies] and that equipment is apparently enabled to penetrate and access the “SIGADs” in question without any further interaction with the Internet company." "Naturally," there must be still more and deeper state supervision of Americans to fend off the enemies of this ideological state, whoever they might be. The undifferentiated paranoia this reflects is distinctly Soviet.

The post-9/11 hyperstate, then, isn't acting to pre-empt jihad terrorism or vectors of sharia aimed at our Constitution; it is acting to implement its own perverse ideology -- an ideology influenced if not entirely fostered by an Islamic decepetion operation. Pure and unscathed even by what the Michael Haydens of the intel world likely consider the odd attack, this ideology becomes more important to our leaders than anything else. Such leaders include Michael Hayden, FBI Director Mueller, JCC Gen. Dempsey, not to mention Presidents Bush and Obama.

Their ideology -- that Islam has nothing to do with this latest historical cycle of jihad we are living through -- has become more important to them than public safety, facts, liberty itself.

Is it really such a leap to see how opponents of the ideology become enemies of this state?
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
I think things in the US Government are even more rotten and corrupted than my worst nightmares.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Just goes to show what has happened to our national secuirty appartus post Cols War. Most of the professional corps of non politicized patriots aged out and were replaced with the new younger generations of polticized minds. The greatest decimation of our appartus occured during the 90s and the extreme polticization has occured since 2000. Add to that, the government never staffing for Middle East disciplines but rather relying upon Israel and other external government sourcing in spite of being 'actively' involved in the Middle east Post WWII and to some degree before.

Foreign affairs and national security policies need an expedited overhaul bringing most all the staffing and policy making back inside the government and under direct government control. There was no finer national security apparatus and patriot staffing then the U.S during post WWII and the Cold War era. We need to clean house and somehow find those who are not politicized activists but rather, politically neutral American patriots. If not, then all indications are that Americas national security and destiny is in the hands of political activist zelots who will gladly sell America to the highest bidder monetarily or for 15 minutes of fame through the press and other activist organizations.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
View All