Get PJ Media on your Apple

Admin Wants to Lift Ban on Airline, Nuke Training in U.S. for Libyans

DHS reasoning for requesting change of the Reagan-era rule didn't mention Benghazi attack or risk posed by associated terror groups.

by
Bridget Johnson

Bio

April 11, 2014 - 6:15 pm
Page 1 of 2  Next ->   View as Single Page

WASHINGTON — Republicans are protesting the Obama administration’s plan to lift a 1983 ban on nuclear and aviation training for Libyan nationals in the U.S., noting that the Department of Homeland Security’s reasoning didn’t mention the Benghazi attack or the responsible terrorist affiliates at work in the country.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), Immigration and Border Security Subcommittee Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), and National Security Subcommittee Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) sent a letter in November to DHS about the proposed change, with a March follow-up to Secretary Jeh Johnson after they found out the administration had moved forward with the rule change without responding to lawmakers’ initial concerns.

“The U.S. relationship with Libya is anything but normal, as evidenced by the September 11th assault on the U.S. compound in Benghazi, Libya and horrific murder of our ambassador to that country over year ago. Not only did four Americans die on that date, but, as we previously documented, numerous other terror threats have continued from Libya in recent months,” they wrote in the March letter. “…While this rule is in the final stages of review prior to publication, the Administration continues to ignore Congressional inquiries.”

“In light of the continued national security threat to America, we find the planned policy reversal to be dangerous and irresponsible,” the chairmen continued. “The decision to lift the ban on allowing nationals of such a terror-plagued country to come to the U.S. to engage in flight-related training is particularly disturbing in light of the role such training played in the preparations for the September 11, 2001 terror attacks. Further, lifting the ban on Libyan nationals to come to the U.S. to study nuclear science and related fields is incomprehensible in light of the peril the U.S. and its allies in the Near East face from the potential acquisition of nuclear weapons technology by terrorists or hostile nations in the region.”

The State Department formally requested in 2010 that DHS lift the ban, arguing that relaxing the Reagan-era regulation was needed to allow aviation and nuclear-related “bilateral security cooperation” with the Libyan government. Dictator Moammar Gadhafi wasn’t ousted until 2011.

The Defense Department joined the State Department’s entreaty in 2012, and the Energy Department sent it own letter to DHS asking that the policy be rescinded.

Libya is currently the only country expressly blocked from seeking studies or training in aviation maintenance or flight operations in the U.S. DHS began the process to repeal the regulation under then-Secretary Janet Napolitano in February 2013.

The administration argues the regulation isn’t needed because visa applicants would be screened like all other nationals against watch lists and databases.

At an under-the-radar hearing last week before a House Judiciary subcommittee, Goodlatte said the  February 2013 memo signed by Napolitano “fails to mention the attack in Benghazi.”

“The long-standing prohibition on Libyans was put in place to protect the homeland against serious threats from terrorists from a particularly unstable and dangerous country. The Obama administration argues that it is no longer needed,” the chairman said.

“…Four 9/11 hijacker pilots obtained their expertise in aviation primarily at U.S. flight schools. Do we want to risk Libyan terrorists learning how to fly airplanes in the U.S.? Given the desire of radical regimes and terrorists to obtain or build nuclear weapons or dirty bombs, do we want to possibly train Libyan terrorists in nuclear engineering? If the prohibition is lifted, not only can Libyans supposedly vetted by the administration receive this training, but any Libyan can seek to do so.”

Goodlatte stressed it “does not appear that national security has been adequately considered” in the effort to end the ban.
“It is uncertain whether our immigration system has sufficient integrity to ferret out applicants’ long-term motivations for receiving an education in sensitive topics from the United States,” he said.

Assistant Director of International Affairs and Chief Diplomatic Officer Alan Bersin, who wrote the February DHS memo, said the draft regulation is still under review at the Office of Management and Budget.

“In formulating my policy recommendation to then-Secretary Napolitano, I primarily evaluated the visa and border security measures currently in place,” Bersin testified, adding that since the policy’s implementation decades ago “the U.S. Government has constructed a visa vetting process that leverages state-of-the-art technology, extensive information sharing, highly-skilled and trained officers, and thorough interagency cooperation.”

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (6)
All Comments   (6)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
You are really Hillary Clinton, right? :The crime has already been committed. Why would we want to investigate it?" Only a sociopath would think like that. Is your hobby pulling the wings off butterflies while smoking heroin?
22 weeks ago
22 weeks ago Link To Comment
The traitor-in-chief, who attended all those flag burning events, has always had but one goal; destroy America! He acts against America at each and every turn. Can we find a legal and moral way to take him out of the loop?
22 weeks ago
22 weeks ago Link To Comment
Can there be any doubt that this President is doing everything he can, to precipitate a disastrous attack on the American homeland.
23 weeks ago
23 weeks ago Link To Comment
Ah, seriously, what could go wrong here? This administration is asinine.
23 weeks ago
23 weeks ago Link To Comment
Is this a joke?

Please, somebody: tell me that this is a joke.

23 weeks ago
23 weeks ago Link To Comment
the Department of Homeland Security’s reasoning didn’t mention the Benghazi attack or the responsible terrorist affiliates at work in the country.
What difference, at this point, does it make? (c)
23 weeks ago
23 weeks ago Link To Comment
View All