ACORN Leaders Attempting Stealth Consolidation
Over the last 18 months, ACORN chief organizer Bertha Lewis, executive director Steve Kest, and his brother Jon Kest have secretly sought to consolidate ACORN resources and power in its New York branch. We have learned that New York ACORN has shut down its operation in Brooklyn and handed its lease over to New York Communities for Change, a new nonprofit organization formed by community activists and former staff and leaders of — wait for it — New York ACORN.
New York was home to one of ACORN’s strongest branches. Interestingly, New York ACORN leaders have raided the coffers of ACORN chapters across the country, like Louisiana, and then re-incorporated under a new name. ACORN, or what’s left of it, should consider suing New York Communities for Change for full accounting and forensic audit.
The exposure of the $1 million Rathke embezzlement nearly 18 months ago should have been a wake-up call. It was ACORN’s last real chance to right the ship and save itself. Instead, ACORN’s management decided to expel the board members who exhibited courage and integrity when they tried to exercise their fiduciary duties and root out ACORN corruption. They failed to realize that it was impossible for ACORN to continue to operate the way it has in the past. ACORN’s business model is forty years old — change was painful but inevitable.
The election of President Barack Obama — though celebrated within the association — was actually the worst thing that could have happened to ACORN. The meteoric ascent of the first community organizer to reach the presidency means a level of scrutiny was thrust upon ACORN that it had never experienced before.
The secret of ACORN’s success was that it was always underestimated. Corporate executives would see a group of little old ladies in bright red hats, holding signs, chanting aloud in front of their buildings and laugh. Never realizing they were caught in the sights of a $100 million multi-national conglomeration — with state, congressional and national political reach. That is — until it was too late.
The understated genius of the ACORN is that there is no national front figure, no organizational figurehead. Unlike the Rainbow/Push Coalition with Rev. Jesse Jackson, Sr., or the National Action Network with Rev. Al Sharpton, the face of ACORN is ordinary little old ladies from any community USA.
Whether or not you agree or disagree with their tactics, most corporate executives know what is happening to them when Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson show up. But a handful of non-descript little old ladies? They never bat an eyebrow — their hubris does them in.
The second factor is new technology. Forty years ago, no one could untangle the complex web of interlocked corporations that Wade Rathke created in ACORN. No one had the time, knowledge, inclination, or resources to travel across 50 states and check all the secretary of state filings in order to figure out if ACORN had affiliates there or not. Today, you can do it all in one afternoon with Google.
Also, we live in an age of 500 channel telephony. Forty years ago there were three broadcast outlets. So even if you thought you had an ACORN story you probably couldn’t get it aired. Today, we have a media environment that has to fill 500 channels with news and entertainment 24 hours a day. Individual activists armed with a video camera or a cell phone can capture images, post them on the web, and have a very good chance that they could cross over into cable or broadcast television, with devastating impact.
Times have changed — ACORN leadership didn’t. Therein lies the rub. Devastated by a loss of funding and damage to its brand, has the long-rumored dissolution of ACORN finally begun?






Obvioulsy the writer wants us to now write his story for him. Has the dissolution of ACORN begun? You have got to be kidding me. These scum bags are wired into the money in DC. Since our legislators are dumb as Dog….., all they need to go is just change their name. Wow!
Not a chance. Like General Reinhard Gehlen’s German Army intelligence service in May of 1945, they’ll just change the names of their “local” branches and keep on doing business as usual. (When Gehlen switched from working for You Know Who to working for the U.S., most of his agents in the field didn’t even miss a paycheck.)
ACORN’s branches will all relabel themselves, with the usual trendy-sounding names including “people’s”, “justice”, “community”, etc., but they will still be the interlocking group of strong-arm artists they are now. Just don’t expect the MSM to admit it. Or the DNC, either.
clear ether
eon
Like most criminal enterprises, Acorn will not just go away. It will change it’s name, evolve in so many way as to be unrecognizable. It has so much money and political influence, that it will be difficult to follow where goes. The one place it will not go is away. As long as there is a Democrat party, Acorn will exist in one form or another.
What’s in a name?
Well “A rose is a rose” it’s been said
So when Breitbart did their facade shred
Their leadership knew
It was suave qui peut
As the tainted name Acorn they fled
….uuuu..’o^o’..nn!n….algie
Illegitimi nOn carborundum
This cancer will morph and change but still it will keep eating away at free elections.
As a former, and PROUD, ACORN employee. I call a bunch of BS on this article. AND all the comments. The misinformation about our org is hilarious and ridiculous. At this point its just comedy fodder.
The key to assuring the final, complete destruction of ACORN is to attack it. Attack it relentlessly. Tie every spin-off back to the mothership and attack them both. They really cannot fight back, because they cannot sue… they cannot go into court. That is their Achilles heel… discovery. They live in fear of outside accountants and outside lawyers. A full and open accounting of ACORN would expose the organization for what it is, a money laundering network, and lead to long jail sentences for its many leaders.
Kudos to Beck for bringing ACORN dealings to the forefront.
.no one else hammered away at it as he did.. Otherwise I do not believe we would have known what they are all about.
It is a criminal enterprise.
One that our dear leader has endorsed for many years…makes one wonder what he’s been up to dealing with such people and backing them.
3 & 5 have it right. ACORN has many names and affiliates. I’m certain Swindle-Us funding is already flowing to the same thugs for the same criminal and redistributive purposes….it just flows through a different channel to a different banner.
An organization that engages in election fraud that benefits the democrats? There will always be funding for such a thing.
Yes, tupre, I’ll bet you were PROUD to represent an organization that “fixes” elections and conspires to use taxpayer funds to franchise pimps and hookers. I’m certain those criminal activities are just the tip of the iceberg, but that’s a lot to be PROUD of, for sure.
11…right on!!!
Wonder why tupre is a FORMER Acorn staffer? Did he/she/it snag a higher-paid job a the taxpayer’s trough in DC? I’ll believe the White House believes in the recession when it stops hiring all the laid-off journalists and ex-community activists it’s currently providing sinecures for. But on the other hand, it’s probably those same newly-hired incompetents who are responsible for Obama’s abysmal performance and diving ratings, so maybe it’s a good thing that idjuts like tupre are “working” for him.
I believe there may be another ACORN office morphing into something different in Oakland. There’s a community housing group there which is currently trying to transform itself into something different and the thought crossed my mind to wonder if what they’re really trying to do is to hide ACORN funding and/or affiliation.
What the news here? All Communist and Socialist groups have been doing the same since the late 40′s. Dissolving and popping up by the tens and hundreds under different guises. The best analogy is when the light was shown on Dracula, he transformed into a thousand rats that scurried into the shadows to fight another day. There was a blogger that I used to read that uncovered all these associations and disassociations, finding the connections through organizations and members. I wish I could remember his name. It had to be quite alot of work, like political “whack a’mole” at “ludicrious speed.”
It strikes me that the Tea Party could be the ideal counter to ACORN, since it too is a group without a hierarchical leadership, working at a grassroots level in all 50 states and plugged into social media, and is also underestimated.
From: tupre:
“As a former, and PROUD, ACORN employee.
I call a bunch of BS on this article.
AND all the comments. The misinformation
about our org is hilarious and ridiculous.
At this point its just comedy fodder.”
To: Tupre
You say you are proud of ACORN
A boast the majority scorn
A public disgrace
For actions quite base
And their break up very few mourn
….uuuu..’o^o’..nn!n….algie
Illegitimi nOn carborundum