Comments on: Accuse First, Ask Questions Never: Mainstreaming Anti-Semitism

By: NEX-C3

NEX-C3 — Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:20:53 +0000

magnifico presentare, molto informativo. Mi chiedo perché gli esperti opposto di questo settore non ce ne accorgiamo. Si deve continuare la sua scrittura. Sono sicuro, hai basare un enorme lettori ‘già!

By: Gidi 17

Gidi 17 — Sun, 16 May 2010 10:07:16 +0000

#26 Berlin
Try googling again. You may find this:
“Speaking to Dutch newspaper De Telegraaf Saturday [8th August 2009], Desiree Rover said the virus is a conspiracy of pharmaceutical companies, intent on increasing their profits through the sale of swine flu tablet Tamiflu and decreasing the population by spreading the sometimes deadly strain. “Rover, 61, a ‘natural healer’ with no medical training, proposed the conspiracy can be traced to the Khazar Jews, a group who are believed to have converted 1,200 years ago. “De Telegraaf quoted Rover as saying descendants of the group are now “praying to another god; Lucifer, Satan or however you want to call him” and “are called Rockefeller, Rothschild, Brzezinski and Kissinger”.

By: Rosebud

Rosebud — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:47:42 +0000

Hey,

Doesn’t the Swedish press demand confirmation and checking of its sources? Responsible free speech is the banner of a free press in a free country.

Well, perhaps Sweden is not as free as it claims.

By: Mike

Mike — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:08:48 +0000

Nothing has changed in Obama since last summer.

He is still the same Black Nationalist, Marxist Muslim that he was back then.

The problem is that almost everyone who listened to him last summer, never heard anything other than what was on the teleprompters.

By: Brian

Brian — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 03:45:37 +0000

Europe= lost cause it seems.With the burden of fighting in Afghanistan on canada,australia,the US ,the Danes,and the british,europe it seems has already chosen to side with Islamists.Hmmm is that the sound of jack boots in Europe once again?Time will tell.Theres a difference between criticism (which Leftists cant handle) and outright hatred which Leftists seem to love.Sweden blood libel has been noted and filed to throw in their face in the future.

By: Good

Good — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:11:54 +0000

There is no question in my mind that the article in the Swedish paper is a blood libel as there is no way to harvest and use the organs of a dead person.
I am worried however to reed many of the posts here which in some cases try in a roundabout way to justify anti-Semitism. To all of you here is something that may sound weird: The Jews are just people and like the rest of humanity, there are smart Jews, stupid Jews, good and bad Jews, there are leftist and rightist Jews and so forth. There is no reason good enough to bash the Jews as people just as there is no good reason to do it to Americans, Swedes etc.
The only thing Jews have in common is their religion and the fact that somehow they survived for thousands of years despite being constantly persecuted.
So all of you “historians” with “facts” from the past that Jews did that or the other; stop doing it, unless you are an anti-Semite, of course.

By: Ruvy

Ruvy — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:56:47 +0000

I read this article and have more or less followed this tempest in a teacup with the goyisher press accusing Jews of atrocities.

This is not new. It is in the fine tradition of accusing Jews of killing Christian children to mix their blood in matzót, and it is no surprise that this comes from Jew-haters in Sweden.

If you stick your hand in a manure pile, what do you expect will be on it when you pull it out?

Bottom line: I’ll remember to boycott products from Sweden and treat Swedes as the Jew-hating trash they are. Let them prove to me that they are not haters of my people. The burden of proof is now on their shoulders.

By: Dave Surls

Dave Surls — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 04:52:36 +0000

“In 1929 the newspaper came under the control of the Kreuger family, when a majority of the shares was bought by Swedish Match, at that time the heart of Ivar Kreuger’s corporate empire. Aftonbladet was labelled “neutral”. In 1932 it backed Per Albin Hansson’s new Social Democratic government. Just a few years later it realigned with the Liberal Party and turned to advocate liberal politics. Heavily influenced by pro-German staff members, the newspaper supported Germany during World War II…”

Pro-Nazi rag in WWII, eh? Old habits die hard, I reckon.

By: kcs

kcs — Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:48:46 +0000

Karl,

Your analogies should embarrass you.

Swedes haven’t been vilified, persecuted, tortured, and murdered for centuries. Jews have.

Sweden isn’t habitually accused in the western press of the most horrific crimes, which inevitably prove untrue. Israel is.

By: Thomas

Thomas — Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:15:44 +0000

@40. Anonymous:

Regardless of the Russian pogroms and the revenge atrocities by the Jews during the Red Terror, the Bolshevik Jewish Antisemitism started much earlier and keeps on feeding itself until this day by the words of your Prophet, Karl Marx.

Karl Marx in the “On The Jewish Question shot the first salvo and no Polish, Russian or other, local Antisemitic outburst can explain the Leftist hatred against the Jews by the Jews in the West: the moniker “SELF-LOATHING” is borne out of this hate fest which is synonymous with your Leftist Democratic Party.

All Western Marxist oriented Societies – including Latin American ones – are virulently Antisemitic: no accident that the Swedish Soc.Dems put forth the “Israel snatches body parts theories”, the Brits organizing boycotts, and Chomsky along with other Jews leading the charge.

This thread about the present Antisemitism by the Bolshevik Democratic Party, distant and obscure historical events have minimal influence on what is going on today in our societies.

Words of wisdom for you: most Jews – you described them in your previous post #25 “‘Well y’see, Brucie, Jews are an intelligent people.” - who rabidly associated themselves with the Marxist totalitarianism eventually paid a heavy price after the collapse of the Bolshevik Proletarian Paradise.

It always happened before an will happen again in the future.