News
Directly To
Your Inbox
Follow PJ Media

Abolish the Nobel Peace Prize

It has outworn its usefulness — if it ever had any.

by
Roger L Simon

Bio

December 10, 2009 - 11:20 am

Read the entire story here.

Roger L. Simon is an Academy Award-nominated screenwriter, novelist and blogger, and the CEO of PJ Media. His book, Blacklisting Myself: Memoir of a Hollywood Apostate in the Age of Terror, was released in February 2009.

PJ Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that PJ Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. Please note that comments are reviewed by the editorial staff and may not be posted immediately. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pjmedia.com.

1 Comments, 1 Threads

  1. 1. Sharron Pitcher

    There will be more peace throughout the world if the Nobel Peace Prize is abolished. We have Americans with their President running around the world demanding one country’s leader after the other stand down from their “leader of the country” status. Americans would stop causing wars if the Peace Prize was abolished. We wouldn’t have to see dominant women like Mrs Bill Clinton, Samatha Powers et al on our TV screens day in and day out. We wouldnt have to look at Obama’s smug face hoping he will win another Prize. We may be able to keep Australia’s politicians from running around the world trying to pretend that they are capable of creating peace in another country when they are taxing their own people to death. The likes of Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard would have to stay at home and face their own country’s problems. The bottom line is, if the Peace Prize was abolished, the very same people who are running around the world voicing their condemnation of other world leaders, would not bother about the people involved in international conflict. We would not have to hear about how your Obama thinks he is the king of the world, we would not have to hear Mrs Bill Clinton’s demands to other countries. The Nobel Peace Prize has to be abolished to sustain world peace.

Leave a Reply

Click here to subscribe to the Daily Digest, to stay up to date with the latest at PJ Media. (You will be sent an email asking you to verify your email address. If you have previously subscribed, no verification email will be sent.)