A Political Wish List for the Holidays
Moving along through the political shopping aisles, I — along with the editors of several liberal national newspapers — would like to see Rep. Charlie Rangel booted out of the chair and off the Ways and Means Committee. It is beyond laughable to have a serial tax and ethics violator in charge of tax policy. Once again, this present might be in the offing, as Speaker Nancy Pelosi discovers — thanks to the demise of William Jefferson, of frozen cash fame — that voters don’t like lawbreakers after all.
Then I’d like an informative confirmation hearing on Eric Holder. I’d like to hear how a Justice Department official thought it was appropriate to steer a fugitive’s attorney around his colleagues in the department in pursuit of a pardon. I’d like to understand how Democrats who lambasted Alberto Gonzales for capitulating to the political whims of the Bush administration find comfort in the appointment of an attorney general who couldn’t wait to say “yes” to the Clintons on the Marc Rich and FALN terrorist pardons.
Up next, I — in the company of a diverse array of liberals and conservatives — would like to see Chris Matthews off the air. He’s running for the Senate or for chief cheerleader for President-elect Barack Obama. And he shouldn’t therefore be appearing with the patina of journalistic respectability. His continued presence is only further damaging the NBC “brand” and is a continual reminder that once-respected media institutions have no shame. (Sen. Arlen Specter is no doubt rooting for a face-off against Matthews, the only time in Specter’s career in which he would be the darling of the Right.)
After all that I’d like commissioner of the Washington, D.C., schools Michele Rhee to succeed in instituting meaningful school reforms, if need be by marching over the carcasses of the teachers’ union officials who oppose her efforts to weed out bad teachers. Along the way it would be delightful to see her testify in Congress on the desirability of any measure — vouchers, magnet schools, or decertification of teachers’ unions — needed to pull inner-city youth out of the prison of awful schools.
And finally I’d like a nice knock-down-drag-out fight on the Employee (Not) Free Choice Act. Let Democrats explain why secret ballots are good for their elections but not for unions’. Let them justify why mandatory arbitration — whereby government officials would set terms and conditions of employment if the parties couldn’t reach agreement — is a good thing for the economy, in a depression no less. And let them reveal that the “new politics” is merely exchanging the other guys’ special interest groups for your own.
So I have my list — and hope that at least some of them will be delivered this holiday season. If instead I wind up with oversized Keynesianism, overstuffed national health care, and a mish-mash of garish government programs, I will be in the “returns” line with many of my fellow citizens.
I have a simple wish for Christmas and the New Year: may the vast majority of Americans learn about creative destruction. Each and every economic improvement indirectly, if not directly, destroys existing jobs. The auto companies created in the early 20th century improved the lives of the masses—while destroying the livelihood of countless individuals employed in the horse and buggy industry. It is shocking that few well educated people are even familiar with this core economic truth. Such ignorance has resulted in a lot of avoidably stupid legislation and delayed progress. My wish might seem relatively modest, but it is extremely important.
Next, I’d like a ban on “whither conservatism?” — and also “more or less God?” — columns. At some point pundits really need to get out of the way and let political leaders (ah, the people who run races and govern) find their own way. It matters not at all whether Kathleen Parker wants less religiosity. It matters much more whether Bobby Jindal can balance budgets and create a political following. Pundits really don’t pick the 2012 frontrunners; the voters do — in three years.
No, unfortunately, politics does not work on Jennifer Rubin’s expectations of a lieisure process where debate about if Republicans are a National Party or the Party of Southern Christian Evangelicals can wait 3 years.
You build strength and organization in the off-years. 2009 is all prepatory to whether or not Republicans can regain organizational strength outside the South and a few Mormon states and not lose complete control of Gov’t in 2010 by losing the Senate. Or the slide continues.
***************
First, I will disclose, I have a vested interest in US auto companies survival.
I would also like to know the salary of the UAW union leaders. More important, how much has the UAW given to legislators for their PACS, instead
of monetary concesstions to their employers.
What is the added cost for mandates imposed by government agencies? Ex: EPA,etc.
Why have Sanators Shelby and McConnell fought against a loan for US owned companies? How many foreigned owned auto companies are in their states?
Do these foreign owned auto companies contribute to their PAC? How much?
If the US owned auto companies close, what will be the cost unemployment
benefits, healthcare (medicaide), mortgage foreclosures and loss of tax dollars to federal and state governments. When calculating these figures
include, all suppliers and vendors.
Jennifer,
That’s a fine list. So, keep asking. If our major news organizations had only asked the questions and transmitted the answers, they would be looking at bankruptcy, now.
“If the US owned auto companies close, what will be the cost unemployment”
You can also ask this question: If the US owned auto companies stay open via tax payer assistance, what will be the unemployment cost? You cannot save jobs no longer relevant without damaging the overall economy. Any money our elected officials might give to the automakers will simply be taken out of the pockets of other taxpayers. There will be less money to invest wisely and help reinvigorate a sluggish economy.
David Thomson, one of my points I was trying to convey is the cost to the US
taxpayers with or without a loan to these companies. I am no economist but I do pay taxes. The employees from these companies plus part suppliers and
vendors will be collecting taxpayer funds when they have no job. Estimated
at 3 million people. Iknow! Iknow! I am not to good at explaining, please be
kind.
I do challege you on your remark about the US auto companies being relevant.
They are US owned companies that employ US citizens. They also operate globally and making profits in other countries. They make quality autos for
industry and personal use. These auto companies are definately relevant to
their employees and the states where they operate. These companies and employees pay taxes.
I too have a holiday wish list, in keeping with the spirit of the times:
1) I would like the “patina of journalistic respectability” to be sandblasted, scrubbed with a wire brush, scraped, retrofitted, repaired, and returned to its original lustre.
2)I would like my presents delivered this holiday season by Kris Kringle not Chris Tingle. One of them is a cherub-cheeked, assessor of who is naughty and who is nice, and pretends to bring gifts to the children who follow his rules. The other is known in some quarters as Santa Claus.
3)I would like for academia to hold an intellectual debate on campus on the subjects of indoctrination, denial of free speech, authoritarianism, and suppression of ideas are the topics. I would also like to see the debate invite an “against” team to participate for the first time in 40 years.
4) I would like to see Hollywood produce 7 blockbuster films, none of which portray American business, republicans, non-leftists, people of faith or the military…as evil incarnate. Roger Simon writes the scripts, and none of the actors winds up in rehab, divorced and with a book signing on how the rest of us should lead our lives.
5)I would like my information stream back. You know, the one where facts are facts, pictures are pictures, and documents are originals. And they are given to us without distortion, parsed, forgery, or deception.
6)I would like to see patriotism replace the “blame chic”, self-loathing that has become so de rigeur. And without smug and pedantic rules about the “right” kind, which seems to want to eliminate our flag and our anthem, important symbols of our unity.
7)And I would like to see us take the election of our highest officials a bit more seriously. Vetting and nomination of candidates bringing us the best and the brightest, who seek to serve not themselves at the banquet table of cronyism and graft, but us, for the greater good.
And for Minnesota to take part in that process of nomination of individuals for higher elected office in government, not an insomniac’s infomercial. Enough with Jesse “The Body” Ventura and Al “Nothing but an Ass” Franken. Let the humiliation of your elected official from your state be a surprise, not a given, like the rest of us.
(one last wish, an “edit” button on comments, so that when I am constantly interrupted or in a hurry, I can read, then edit my comments.
I too have a holiday wish list, in keeping with the spirit of the times:
1) I would like the “patina of journalistic respectability” to be sandblasted, scrubbed with a wire brush, scraped, retrofitted, repaired, and returned to its original lustre.
2)I would like my presents delivered this holiday season by Kris Kringle not Chris Tingle. One of them is a cherub-cheeked, an assessor of who is naughty and who is nice, and who pretends to bring gifts to the adoring and simple children who follow his rules. The other is known in some quarters as Santa Claus.
3)I would like for academia to hold an intellectual debate on campus on the subjects of indoctrination, denial of free speech, authoritarianism, and suppression of ideas. I would also like to see the debate invite an “against” team to participate for the first time in 40 years.
4) I would like to see Hollywood produce 7 blockbuster films, none of which portray American business, republicans, non-leftists, people of faith or the military…as evil incarnate. Roger Simon writes the scripts, and none of the actors winds up in rehab, divorced and with a book signing on how the rest of us should lead our lives.
5)I would like my information stream back. You know, the one where facts are facts, pictures are pictures, and documents are originals. And they are given to us without distortion, parsed words, forgeries or deception.
6)I would like to see patriotism replace the “blame chic”, self-loathing that has become so de rigeur. And without smug and pedantic rules about the “right” kind, which seems to want to eliminate our flag and our anthem, important symbols of our unity.
7)And I would like to see us take the election of our highest officials a bit more seriously. Vetting and nomination of candidates bringing us the best and the brightest, who seek to serve not themselves at the banquet table of cronyism and graft, but us, for the greater good.
And for Minnesota to take part in that process of nomination of individuals for higher elected office in government, not as an insomniac’s infomercial. Enough with Jesse “The Body” Ventura and Al “Nothing but an Ass” Franken candidates. Let the humiliation of your elected official from your state be not a given, but come as a surprise, like the rest of us.
The cars and trucks still have to get built, whether it is the UAW/GM or the Japanese. Jobs will be there, just relocated to more competitive plants. If the UAW/GM can’t build the same quality car for the same cost, how do they compete? Currently, it costs UAW/GM about $2000 more to pay for labor on the building of one car. ( Average wages for UAW/GM workers is about $150,000/year. Average wages for Toyota plants in the USA is about $100,000/year. $50,000/year times 200,000 UAW/GM workers is $10 billion/year. ) Time for UAW/GM to get real. I think an auto worker can make it on $100,000. If UAW/GM decide to become competitive, very few jobs would be lost. Competitively speaking, this labor union has destroyed GM, and with full co-operation from GM. When a company no longer cares what it’s labor costs are, it will be like what they said after they cut the tail off the proverbial monkey.
G-Ma….I think you can rest assured that if the big 3 bailout doesn’t go through now, it surely will after Obama’s anointing in January. I am vehemently against it though. The automakers should have to reorganize which they will NEVER do if bailed out now and again next year and over and over and over. Bad decisions were made at the top, the company was bent over by the union bosses and unfortunately for you apparently the unsuspecting workers were at their mercy. I feel bad for you and others who will lose their jobs in all of this turmoil truly but there are so many others out in this great country of ours without HUGE retirement packages and HUGE healthcare packages that will also lose their jobs with no hope of a bailout. Sometimes it is truly a bitter pill but I don’t think you should worry. The unions have dear leader Obama’s you-know-whats in a vice and he’ll come through for them and you. It’s the rest of us tax-payers that will then need to be bailed out. Will Obama do the same for us then? Will you feel for us too G-Ma?
“The employees from these companies plus part suppliers and
vendors will be collecting taxpayer funds when they have no job.”
I agree completely with the above comments of Jim Baker. Somebody is still going to build and sell cars. Some people may indeed lose their jobs—but others will be hired. The net loss may be next to zilch, and there could even be an increase in hiring. These three companies should go bankrupt so that these matters can be sorted out. A bailout only delays the inevitable and makes the ultimate resolution that much more difficult.
I once lived next door to a large apartment complex that went bankrupt. The buyers paid about ten cents on the dollar for the remaining assets. They turned the property into a thriving community! This, by the way, is often the result of bankruptcy. The process must be endured. It simply cannot be avoided.
My Christmas wish list? “Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness” for ALL Americans.
My daughter has more to say at http://www.gingiedmonds.com
Thinking Person thanks for your remarks. I did not vote for Obama. Actually,
we probably agree more than we disagree. I have never worked for an auto
company but retired from a large health insurance company. The huge healthcare packages you mention do not exist. The huge retirement packages
don’t exist except possibily at the executive level. Retirement is supplemented by paying into a 401k. Which is now in the tank.
David Thompson-if only the the economy could be solved as easily as turning around an apartment complex.
I listened to the hearing today on Freddie and Frannie. The economist are
projecting 8 million more mortgage foreclosures. Those who have a car may be
living in it.
I do think I prefer someone “work” for their govenment money, instead of
staying home and having it mailed to them.
This is a good wish list, as are the additions to it. My wish is for good health for everyone, as I am battling several chronic illnesses that will eventually kill me – maybe I should wish to be healed – don’t know about that one, it sounds selfish.
The only other thing I would wish for, is for politicians to be required to resign their position in government – i.e. senators, congressmen and women, governors – prior to running for another office. This last presidential race lasted almost two years. I think it’s rediculous to be paid for a job that you’re not performing. I don’t care whether it’s a Republican or a Democrat, you want to run for a certain office, take a chance, but don’t expect to be paid for running for office.
I wish for Jesus to pop out of those clouds and scare those evil people to death.
Everyone -
Regarding “Card-Check” – and I say this as a former Union Committeeman, Pray Tell – why do we see the institution of Secret Ballot Union Representational Elections as a reform IN MEXICO – and an Impediment in the USA?
-S-
Headset is according to their drive (transducer) and the type of it to wear to the classification of the way.
Moving coil type
Moving coil in-ear headphones are the most common, the most common headphones, it’s drive unit is basically a small moving coil speakers, the permanent magnetic field in the voice coil of driving and connected to the diaphragm of the vibration. Moving coil headphones for high efficiency, mostly on the headset for the output driver and reliable and durable.
Magnetic type such as
The driver of the magnetic headphones, similar to narrow the plane of the speaker, and it will be embedded in the plane of the voice coil frivolous diaphragm, like printed circuit board the same average distribution of the driving force. Magnets in the diaphragm of the focus on one or both (push-pull), diaphragm in the formation of the magnetic field vibration. Magnets diaphragm no headphones and electrostatic headset diaphragm that light, but there are also big vibration area and similar sound quality, it as moving coil headphones for high efficiency, and it is not easy to drive.
Electrostatic type
Electrostatic headphones have light and thin film vibration, the high voltage dc polarization, polarization the electricity required by ac conversion, also has a battery power supply. Diaphragm hanging on by two fixed metal plate (stator) to form the electrostatic field, when the audio signal to load the stator, electrostatic field changes, the driver diaphragm vibration. Single stator is also can drive the diaphragm, but double the stator the push-pull form less distortion. Electrostatic headset must use special amplifier will audio signals are converted to hundreds of v voltage signal and use transformer connected to the power amplifier output terminal of the electrostatic headset can also drive. Electrostatic headset expensive, not easy to drive, the reach of level is also not moving coil in-ear headphones, but its response speed and could put all sorts of tiny details of heavy, very low distortion.
In a body
In a body headphones also called fixed electrostatic headphones, it’s diaphragm is itself or by the diaphragm of the polarization of the launch of the polarization material static electric field polarization, does not need special equipment with polarization voltage. In a body of static headset most of the headset features, but in very experience gradually to polarization, need to change, its life about 5 to 10 years.
Wireless headset and cordless headset
They consist of two parts, signal emitter and with receiving signal and amplification device headset (usually moving coil type). Transmitters and signal source is linked together, also can be in the former stage before the transmitter access or headphone amplifiers to improve quality and adjust the tone.
Wireless headset generally refers to the infrared transmission signal headset system, cordless headset is refers to using radio waves of transmitting signals headset system. The working frequency of infrared headset from several KHz to a few MHz, effective distance about 10 meters, headphones to the visible range; Radio headset working frequency VHF 130 MHz to 200 MHz, UHF 450 MHz to 900 MHz, most cordless headphones work in UHF, but transmission range of 100 meters, can around obstructions. Two vice or more wireless/cordless headset deputy may be disturbed each other, so choose when they had better choose to have DuoGe work of the frequency of varieties, for cordless headphones, working in UHF than in the interference on VHF may be small. The two kinds of background noise headphones are, more high-grade models have adopted the technology reduces the noise. Also note that the wireless/cordless headset battery life, generally should not be less than 8 hours.
Headset is according to their drive (transducer) and the type of it to wear to the classification of the way.
Moving coil type
Moving coil in-ear headphones are the most common, the most common headphones, it’s drive unit is basically a small moving coil speakers, the permanent magnetic field in the voice coil of driving and connected to the diaphragm of the vibration. Moving coil headphones for high efficiency, mostly on the headset for the output driver and reliable and durable.
Magnetic type such as
The driver of the magnetic headphones, similar to narrow the plane of the speaker, and it will be embedded in the plane of the voice coil frivolous diaphragm, like printed circuit board the same average distribution of the driving force. Magnets in the diaphragm of the focus on one or both (push-pull), diaphragm in the formation of the magnetic field vibration. Magnets diaphragm no headphones and electrostatic headset diaphragm that light, but there are also big vibration area and similar sound quality, it as moving coil headphones for high efficiency, and it is not easy to drive.
Electrostatic type
Electrostatic headphones have light and thin film vibration, the high voltage dc polarization, polarization the electricity required by ac conversion, also has a battery power supply. Diaphragm hanging on by two fixed metal plate (stator) to form the electrostatic field, when the audio signal to load the stator, electrostatic field changes, the driver diaphragm vibration. Single stator is also can drive the diaphragm, but double the stator the push-pull form less distortion. Electrostatic headset must use special amplifier will audio signals are converted to hundreds of v voltage signal and use transformer connected to the power amplifier output terminal of the electrostatic headset can also drive. Electrostatic headset expensive, not easy to drive, the reach of level is also not moving coil in-ear headphones, but its response speed and could put all sorts of tiny details of heavy, very low distortion.
In a body
In a body headphones also called fixed electrostatic headphones, it’s diaphragm is itself or by the diaphragm of the polarization of the launch of the polarization material static electric field polarization, does not need special equipment with polarization voltage. In a body of static headset most of the headset features, but in very experience gradually to polarization, need to change, its life about 5 to 10 years.
Wireless headset and cordless headset
They consist of two parts, signal emitter and with receiving signal and amplification device headset (usually moving coil type). Transmitters and signal source is linked together, also can be in the former stage before the transmitter access or headphone amplifiers to improve quality and adjust the tone.
Wireless headset generally refers to the infrared transmission signal headset system, cordless headset is refers to using radio waves of transmitting signals headset system. The working frequency of infrared headset from several KHz to a few MHz, effective distance about 10 meters, headphones to the visible range; Radio headset working frequency VHF 130 MHz to 200 MHz, UHF 450 MHz to 900 MHz, most cordless headphones work in UHF, but transmission range of 100 meters, can around obstructions. Two vice or more wireless/cordless headset deputy may be disturbed each other, so choose when they had better choose to have DuoGe work of the frequency of varieties, for cordless headphones, working in UHF than in the interference on VHF may be small. The two kinds of background noise headphones are, more high-grade models have adopted the technology reduces the noise. Also note that the wireless/cordless headset battery life, generally should not be less than 8 hours.