Get PJ Media on your Apple

Rubin Reports

As Benghazi Scandal Builds, Libya Falls Apart

May 13th, 2013 - 12:27 pm

Here are some of the current developments in Libya, where a recent article in the Egyptian newspaper al-Ahram explains that “militias at the command of various ideological camps and rival interest groups” increasingly dominate the country’s politics:

– “Since last week, the ministries of foreign affairs, justice and the interior in Libya have been under siege by armed militias demanding [passage of a] law that would ban all associates of the former regime from positions in government.”

– There was a recent terrorist attack on the French embassy in Tripoli.

– “As though the situation were not fraught enough, more than 100 policemen stormed the Ministry of Interior headquarters … where they began an open-ended sit-in to press previously voiced demands for adequate protection for the police in the course of the performance of their duties, health insurance, better job and pay conditions, and the restoration of the prestige and full rights of policemen.”

– “The following day … other militia bands stormed the Ministry of Finance located in downtown Tripoli and began to assault the guards. These quickly withdrew in order to avoid a confrontation with their attackers.”

– “A band of armed men attacked a Ministry of Justice police vehicle that was transporting prisoners and three escort vehicles.” One prisoner was killed and several others were severely injured during the attack.

–On May 13 a car bomb exploded near Benghazi’s main hospital killing at least 13 people.

– Prime Minister Ali Zeidan warned: “If the violence and security breakdown continue, the international community may be compelled to intervene.”

– Despite Zeidan’s threats, the militias are not scared.

– The Birka police station in downtown Benghazi was struck by a massive explosion that destroyed the building.

– In southern Libya, Chadian forces advanced 100 kilometers into Libyan territory without even encountering the Libyan armed forces. As al-Ahram remarks: “The incursion further throws into relief Libya’s weak security at a time when neither the army nor the militias are capable of controlling the country’s far-flung borders. … Yet, it appears that the militias nevertheless have the upper hand. They are better armed than the government forces and they are also said to possess sophisticated eavesdropping equipment which they use to spy on government officials.”

– As a result of the violence, the German embassy has suspended operations. British Petroleum has evacuated non-essential personnel.

What does this mean: that NATO will return to shore up the regime it put into power? The UN resolution permitting intervention in Libya is still operative. But one additional element of the Benghazi cover-up is that it allowed the U.S. government to ignore the serious state of Libyan security.

Remember: the Libyan operation was another of President Obama’s supposed successes that must be made to seem triumphant during the 2012 election.

<- Prev  Page 2 of 2   View as Single Page

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (6)
All Comments   (6)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
Libya is pals with the Muslim Brotherhood/Al Qaeda. Obama has had the same MO regarding outing the MB/AQ all along. If you DON't NAME AN ENEMY? The Underpants bomber, Boston Bombers and anything and everything in between has been deep-sixed and scurried through the "civilian trial" route for the very reason that it can be kept quiet and associations to the MB/AQ cannot be made. The Muslim Brotherhood has intimidated our own government into submission to their agenda; both at home and abroad. One salient fact remains: the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Qaeda are still around and they are ONE entity supporting each other in every aspect of their subversive and destructive work. Obama really DOES have some 'splainin' to do; he knows it and he's scared to death of doing it.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Diana West: "There is more at work here than a foundationally flawed strategy. In its drive to win Islamic hearts and minds, COIN doctrine has become an engine of Islamization inside the U.S. military. To win a Muslim population's "trust," U.S. troops are taught deference to Islam -- to revere the Quran; not to spit [or pee] toward Mecca (thousands of miles away); and to condone such un- or anti-Western practices as religious supremacism, misogyny, polygamy, pederasty and cruelty to dogs. Our military has even permitted Islamic law to trump the First Amendment to
further COIN goals, as when ISAF commander Petraeus publicly condemned an American citizen for exercising his lawful right to freedom of speech to burn a Quran.

This explains why the reports that CIA director David Petraeus went before the House Intelligence Committee in September and blamed a YouTube Muhammad video for the deadly attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, sounded so familiar. Whatever his motivation, it was all too easy for Petraeus to make free speech the scapegoat for Islamic violence. But so it goes in COIN-world, where jihad and Shariah (Islamic law) are off the table and the First Amendment is always to blame. If there is a lesson here, it is simple: A leader who will betray the First Amendment will betray anything."
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
"if [!] Obama had said it was a terrorist attack back in September of 2012"

You know it's gonna be a quality* article when the first sentence starts building the foundation for the piece on a false premise. There's no "if" here! The administration called the attack an "act of terror" from day 1, and an attack by Ansar-al-Sharia (not just the vaguer "extremists" used previously) by 3 days after the Susan Rice appearances.

I know that won't get reported in Agenda Media, but it's pretty trivial to confirm for those willing to get outside the bubble.

* conspiracy-mongering
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
"The administration called the attack an "act of terror" from day 1"

Simply not true. This has been proven false by video after video of Obama afterwards saying, "I dunno." He mentioned act of terror, but he did not label the attack as such. He has a real problem in communication, because he uses a lot of passive voice. His whole communication style is to vote "Present". IOW, he purposely avoided explicitly stating what it was.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Ladies and Gentlemen - the greatest scandal of our time. An existential crisis about the interpretation of "passive voice" and whether "act of terror" is the same as "terrorist attack". An "unprecedented" coverup that lasted a maximum of three days in which "indications" of Ansar-al-Shariah's involvement were reported as "indications" of extemist involvement. A shocking dereliction of talking point duty that, contra Einstein, cost the lives of 4 Americans 5 days after the fact.

It's like Watergate times Watergate... to the Watergate.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Frankly, nothing will be done. The current regime will continue the cover up & the republicans will eventually just forget about it. No one will EVER be held accountable. It is sad to say, but lying, covering up & transferring blame is at the very core values of this regime. And, w/ the help of the blind MSM, they will win in the end. Just wait & see...
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
View All