» 2012 » February

Klavan On The Culture

Monthly Archives: February 2012

Sling Baby Jonah Over the Top

February 6th, 2012 - 10:19 pm
YouTube Preview Image

I have no doubt it was readers of this blog whose Chicago-Democrat-style multiple voting helped send the “Sling Baby” Doritios ad to the Super Bowl. You’ll recall the folks who worked on the Sling Baby ad included two Folks — namely Justin Folk, who did some of the SFX and his son Jonah folk, who played the role of the baby magnificently. Hard to believe the kid’s thirty, I know.

Though he doesn’t like to admit it for fear of arrest, Justin was also the brilliant and prize-winning visuals fellow who did the backgrounds of my Klavan on the Culture videos at PJTV.

Anyway, I think there’s still time to drop in at the USA Today Ad Meter site and give the ad five stars. If Sling Baby ends up the most popular Super Bowl ad, the team gets a cash prize a portion of which will help keep Baby Jonah in the chips until his father can think of something else to do.

You did it once; please do it again. Go to the site and give five stars to Doritos’ “Sling Baby.”

Like Your Freedom? Thank a Church.

February 5th, 2012 - 5:50 am

The Obama administration is insisting that church-affiliated employers pay for birth control in their health care plans. This especially violates the Catholic Church’s doctrine prohibiting the use of contraception. As such, it’s an act of tyranny — an insidious attempt to bring down one of the load-bearing walls of liberty.

The idea that churches stand to a great degree apart from the power of the state has its beginning — in my reading of history — in an incident that involved Pontius Pilate before he entered the Gospel stories. Appointed the Roman governor of Judaea in 26 AD, Pilate set up (according to the account of the historian Josephus) a set of Roman standards in the city of Jerusalem. The Romans were famously tolerant about the religions of the people they conquered. They didn’t care if you worshipped your gods — as long as you also worshipped their gods. To ask this was to ask no more than loyalty to Rome, whose gods and government were as one.

This was good conqueror policy and worked well — except in Judaea. The Jews had only one God and he was a jealous one. They felt the Roman display constituted idolatry and a violation of God’s law. They protested to Pilate. Pilate enticed the rabble rousers into the great stadium at Caesarea, then surrounded them with soldiers, swords drawn: Either accept the Roman symbols in the Holy City or die. The Jews, as one, flung themselves on the ground and extended their necks: better to die than to break God’s law.

Pontius Pilate, meet the Jews. With his emperor furious at the mess he’d made, Pilate was forced to back down and remove the symbols.

About 45 years later, the Jews tried to secure their religious freedom through violent revolt. The Romans crushed them, sacked Jerusalem, and destroyed the Jewish temple. But God’s irony never sleeps. By destroying its Jewish centers, the Roman conquest of Palestine accelerated the spread of a Jewish cult throughout the Roman world — a cult that would eventually transform Rome into its instrument.

According to theologians like N.T. Wright, the founder of this cult, Jesus of Nazareth, had been trying to warn zealous Jews off the disastrous path that led to the revolt. He preached a more patient and pacific but nonetheless unyielding religiosity, pointing to a way that involved neither religious surrender nor political violence: Give Caesar what belongs to Caesar; give God what belongs to God. It may have been the best political advice anyone ever gave anyone, and was wholly in keeping with the actions of the men who bared their necks at the stadium in Caesarea.

Throughout the so-called Dark and Middle ages, as Christianity helped shape Rome’s savage conquerors into the nations of Europe, church and state battled over how to actualize Jesus’s doctrine. In clash after clash, crisis after crisis, kings and popes vied over which was the ultimate arbiter of what power where. Did these clashes involve perfect people versus evil people? Pristine institutions versus corrupt ones? Don’t be ridiculous. They involved only men, sinful, self-interested, and violent. But out of their clashes, there evolved an idea that was better than the mere mortals who shaped it.

Pages: 1 2 | Comments bullet bullet

It seems there are a lot of people around trying to count the Tea Party out. The media has hyped the thugs from the various Occupy movements as if they represented a mainstream uprising instead of an outlying collection of rag-tag nobodies. The same media has tried to portray the widespread grassroots Tea Party as rife with a bigotry and anger that are nowhere evident. And even the Republican establishment seems to wish the conscience of the party would just go away. But the truth is: they’re not going anywhere. Take a look at this: